{"id":31387,"date":"2025-10-26T09:46:07","date_gmt":"2025-10-26T09:46:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/31387\/"},"modified":"2025-10-26T09:46:07","modified_gmt":"2025-10-26T09:46:07","slug":"rigas-dome-un-pasvaldibas-policija-joprojam-nav-vienota-redzejuma-par-satiksmes-organizaciju-dala-pilsetas-stavvietu-raksts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/31387\/","title":{"rendered":"R\u012bgas dom\u0113 un pa\u0161vald\u012bbas policij\u0101 joproj\u0101m nav vienota redz\u0113juma par satiksmes organiz\u0101ciju da\u013c\u0101 pils\u0113tas st\u0101vvietu \/ Raksts"},"content":{"rendered":"

Vai brauktuves mal\u0101 speci\u0101li izveidot\u0101s kabati\u0146\u0101s dr\u012bkst novietot auto, ja ce\u013cmal\u0101 ir z\u012bme “Apst\u0101ties un st\u0101v\u0113t aizliegts”? Par to vienotas izpratnes joproj\u0101m nav R\u012bgas domes \u0100rtelpas un mobilit\u0101tes departament\u0101 un pa\u0161vald\u012bbas policij\u0101. Da\u013ca r\u012bdzinieku par transportl\u012bdzek\u013cu novieto\u0161anu \u0161\u0101d\u0101s viet\u0101s sa\u0146\u0113mu\u0161i sodus. Viet\u0101m tie atcelti, bet citviet \u2013 n\u0113. Pa\u0161vald\u012bb\u0101 sola skaidr\u012bbu ieviest dr\u012bzum\u0101.<\/p>\n

Malienas iel\u0101 viet\u0113jie iedz\u012bvot\u0101ji savas automa\u0161\u012bnas var\u0113ja novietot ar mier\u012bgu pr\u0101tu septi\u0146us gadus, bet vien\u0101 dien\u0101 atbrauca R\u012bgas pa\u0161vald\u012bbas policija un visiem piem\u0113roja sodu.<\/p>\n

“Te bija z\u012bme “St\u0101v\u0113t un apst\u0101ties aizliegts”, lai gan ir kabati\u0146as un balt\u0101s atdalo\u0161\u0101s l\u012bnijas, kas t\u0101 k\u0101 simboliz\u0113, ka dr\u012bkst novietot ma\u0161\u012bnas, bet tom\u0113r izr\u0101d\u0101s, ka nevar, jo atbrauca pa\u0161vald\u012bbas policija un uzlika 60 ma\u0161\u012bn\u0101m sodus,” st\u0101st\u012bja Linda Vran\u010d\u0101ne, kura ar\u012b sa\u0146\u0113musi sodu.<\/p>\n

K\u0101p\u0113c situ\u0101cija main\u012bj\u0101s?<\/p>\n

“Ir Apgabaltiesas, kas ir augst\u0101k\u0101 tiesa Administrat\u012bvo p\u0101rk\u0101pumu liet\u0101s, noteikusi, ka ar\u012b uz \u0161\u012bm kabati\u0146\u0101m attiecas \u0161ie ierobe\u017eojumi, ko nosaka 326. z\u012bme,” teica R\u012bgas pa\u0161vald\u012bbas policijas priek\u0161nieka vietnieks Edgars Rudz\u012btis.<\/p>\n

Pa\u0161vald\u012bba steidza z\u012bmi demont\u0113t, atz\u012bstot, ka pa\u0161vald\u012bbas policijas un \u0100rtelpas un mobilit\u0101tes departamenta viedoklis at\u0161\u0137iras.<\/p>\n

“Z\u012bm\u0113m viennoz\u012bm\u012bgi ir j\u0101tic, j\u0101skat\u0101s, j\u0101piev\u0113r\u0161 t\u0101m uzman\u012bba. \u0160eit bija tas gad\u012bjums, kad R\u012bgas pa\u0161vald\u012bbas policijai un \u0100rtelpas un mobilit\u0101tes departamentam at\u0161\u0137\u012br\u0101s viedoklis par Ce\u013cu satiksmes noteikumu trakt\u0113jumu. \u0145emot v\u0113r\u0101 \u0161o trakt\u0113juma at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bbu, tika pie\u0146emts l\u0113mums par \u0161o z\u012bmju demont\u0101\u017eu, un t\u0101d\u0113\u013c no 3. oktobra Malienas iel\u0101 vairs \u0161\u012b z\u012bme neatrodas,” nor\u0101d\u012bja R\u012bgas pa\u0161vald\u012bbas \u0100r\u0113j\u0101s komunik\u0101cijas noda\u013cas projektu koordinatore Ieva Gr\u012bsle.<\/p>\n

Malienas iel\u0101 piem\u0113rotos sodus pa\u0161vald\u012bbas policija atc\u0113la, ta\u010du autovad\u012bt\u0101jiem izteica aizr\u0101d\u012bjumu, jo likumu vi\u0146i tik un t\u0101 esot p\u0101rk\u0101pu\u0161i.<\/p>\n

“Policijas priek\u0161nieks k\u0101 augst\u0101ka amatpersona pie\u0146\u0113ma l\u0113mumus izteikt aizr\u0101d\u012bjumus, jo p\u0113c savas b\u016bt\u012bbas p\u0101rk\u0101pumi jau bija, bet \u0161aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 izteica aizr\u0101d\u012bjumus, atz\u012bstot \u0161os p\u0101rk\u0101pumus k\u0101 maznoz\u012bm\u012bgus, jo respekt\u012bvi te bija inform\u0101cijas aprites \u0101trums. Vienlaic\u012bgi no pils\u0113tas satiksmes organizatoriem bija sa\u0146emta inform\u0101cija, ka vi\u0146i ir pl\u0101noju\u0161i main\u012bt \u0161o satiksmes organiz\u0101ciju un paredz\u0113t, ka \u0161\u012bs kabati\u0146as ir paredz\u0113tas tom\u0113r automa\u0161\u012bnu novieto\u0161anai, un \u0161o situ\u0101ciju ar ce\u013ca z\u012bm\u0113m main\u012bt,” skaidroja policij\u0101.<\/p>\n

Nesen Latvijas Telev\u012bzijas raid\u012bjums “4. studija” veidoja si\u017eetu ar\u012b par Lauku ielu<\/a> R\u012bg\u0101, kur situ\u0101cija ir gau\u017e\u0101m l\u012bdz\u012bga\u00a0Malienas ielai.\u00a0Tur\u00a0transportl\u012bdzek\u013cu vad\u012bt\u0101ji sa\u0146\u0113ma sodu par to, ka novietoja savus sp\u0113kratus kabati\u0146\u0101s. Vai policija sodus atcels ar\u012b Lauku ielas iedz\u012bvot\u0101jiem?<\/p>\n

“Situ\u0101cijas vien\u0101das, l\u012bdz\u012bgas. Pils\u0113t\u0101 satiksmes organiz\u0101cija main\u0101s diezgan dinamiski, un taj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101, par Lauku ielu run\u0101jot, tad \u0161\u012b situ\u0101cija bija pirms diviem m\u0113ne\u0161iem aptuveni un uz l\u0113muma pie\u0146em\u0161anas br\u012bdi, un uz soda p\u0101rskat\u012b\u0161anu, kad jau iedz\u012bvot\u0101ji bija iesniegu\u0161i s\u016bdz\u012bbas pa\u0161vald\u012bbas policijai, nebija inform\u0101cijas par to, ka pils\u0113ta pl\u0101no \u0161eit main\u012bt satiksmes organiz\u0101ciju un paredz\u0113t \u0161\u012bs z\u012bmes demont\u0113t. \u0160\u0101das inform\u0101cijas m\u016bsu r\u012bc\u012bb\u0101 nebija, un t\u0101p\u0113c \u0161ie sodi ir atst\u0101ti sp\u0113k\u0101,” skaidroja Rudz\u012btis.<\/p>\n

T\u0101tad Lauku iel\u0101 piem\u0113rotos sodus, ko viet\u0113jie iedz\u012bvot\u0101ji apstr\u012bd\u0113ja, neatcels, jo pa\u0161vald\u012bbas policija nav zin\u0101jusi, ka pa\u0161vald\u012bba \u0161eit main\u012bs z\u012bmes, neskatoties uz to, ka \u0100rtelpas un mobilit\u0101tes departaments jau agr\u0101k ir paudis viedokli, ka Lauku iel\u0101 izveidot\u0101s kabati\u0146as ir rad\u012btas\u00a0speci\u0101li\u00a0automa\u0161\u012bnu novieto\u0161anai.<\/p>\n

“\u0100rtelpas un mobilit\u0101tes departaments \u0161aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 nev\u0113las, lai \u0161aj\u0101 situ\u0101cij\u0101 b\u016btu neskaidr\u012bbas pils\u0113tas iedz\u012bvot\u0101jiem, un t\u0101d\u0113\u013c m\u0113s demont\u0113j\u0101m \u0161o z\u012bmi, un \u0161o jaut\u0101jumu m\u0113s jau izskat\u0101m un diskut\u0113jam ar R\u012bgas pa\u0161vald\u012bbas policiju, lai konkr\u0113ti b\u016btu vienota poz\u012bcija \u0161\u0101d\u0101s iel\u0101s, k\u0101da ir Malienas iela un Lauku iela, un t\u0101d\u0113\u013c m\u0113s pagaid\u0101m \u0161\u012bs z\u012bmes demont\u0113j\u0101m,” sac\u012bja departament\u0101.<\/p>\n

“Manupr\u0101t, vajadz\u0113tu t\u0101, ka vi\u0146i vispirms sak\u0101rto savus likumus, ko nedr\u012bkst, ko dr\u012bkst, tad uzliek z\u012bmes un p\u0101rbauda, lai cilv\u0113kiem nav nevajadz\u012bgi p\u0101rpratumi, liekas klapatas visus tos sodus apstr\u012bd\u0113t,” pauda Malienas ielas iedz\u012bvot\u0101ja Vran\u010d\u0101ne.<\/p>\n

Pa\u0161vald\u012bbas policija uzskata, ka z\u012bme “Apst\u0101ties un st\u0101v\u0113t aizliegts” attiecas ar\u012b uz blakus eso\u0161aj\u0101m kabati\u0146\u0101m, savuk\u0101rt \u0100rtelpas un mobilit\u0101tes departaments t\u0101 nedom\u0101. Ar\u012b CSDD dr\u012bz n\u0101ks klaj\u0101 ar savu redz\u0113jumu, uz ko \u0161\u012b z\u012bme attiecas.<\/p>\n

“CSDD ir sa\u0146\u0113musi vair\u0101ku iedz\u012bvot\u0101ju s\u016bdz\u012bbas un neizpratni par to, k\u0101 tad b\u016btu \u012bsti autovad\u012bt\u0101jiem j\u0101r\u012bkojas attiec\u012bgaj\u0101 situ\u0101cij\u0101. M\u0113s \u0161os jaut\u0101jumus esam caurskat\u012bju\u0161i un pie\u0146\u0113mu\u0161i savu viedokli, ka Ce\u013cu satiksmes noteikumi ir rakst\u012bti sam\u0113r\u0101 skaidri un tos nevajadz\u0113tu da\u017e\u0101d\u0101m instit\u016bcij\u0101m tulkot da\u017e\u0101di, kas \u012bsti neatbilst Ce\u013cu satiksmes noteikumiem un attiec\u012bgaj\u0101 situ\u0101cij\u0101,” teica Ce\u013cu satiksmes dro\u0161\u012bbas direkcijas p\u0101rst\u0101vis M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 M\u0101lmeisters.<\/p>\n

T\u0101 k\u0101 R\u012bg\u0101 daudzviet ir uzst\u0101d\u012bta z\u012bme “Apst\u0101ties un st\u0101v\u0113t aizliegts”, lai gan blakus atrodas st\u0101v\u0113\u0161anas kabati\u0146as, rodas jaut\u0101jums \u2013 k\u0101 tad ir, vai \u0161\u0101d\u0101s viet\u0101s ir vai nav at\u013cauts novietot automa\u0161\u012bnas?<\/p>\n

“Ja ir uzst\u0101d\u012bta 326. z\u012bme, kas noz\u012bm\u0113 “Apst\u0101ties un st\u0101v\u0113t aizliegts”, tad apst\u0101ties ir aizliegts. Skatoties, kur\u0101 iel\u0101, kur\u0101 ielas posm\u0101 t\u0101 ir novietota, te es jums nevaru konkr\u0113ti atbild\u0113t, t\u0101p\u0113c\u00a0ka \u0161eit es jums atbild\u0113ju par konkr\u0113t\u0101m iel\u0101m, konkr\u0113t\u0101m adres\u0113m. Ja j\u016bs uzdosies konkr\u0113tu jaut\u0101jumu par konkr\u0113tu l\u012bdz\u012bgu gad\u012bjumu, es jums labpr\u0101t atbild\u0113\u0161u,” sac\u012bja departament\u0101.<\/p>\n

Pa\u0161vald\u012bb\u0101 sola, ka vienots skat\u012bjums par \u0161\u012bs z\u012bmes trakt\u0113jumu tiks pie\u0146emts tuv\u0101kaj\u0101 laik\u0101. Patlaban \u0100rtelpas un mobilit\u0101tes departaments turpina diskusijas ar pa\u0161vald\u012bbas policiju. Viennoz\u012bm\u012bgas atbildes, vai R\u012bg\u0101 “Apst\u0101ties un st\u0101v\u0113t aizliegts” z\u012bme attiecas uz kabati\u0146\u0101m vai ne, pagaid\u0101m nav.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Vai brauktuves mal\u0101 speci\u0101li izveidot\u0101s kabati\u0146\u0101s dr\u012bkst novietot auto, ja ce\u013cmal\u0101 ir z\u012bme “Apst\u0101ties un st\u0101v\u0113t aizliegts”? Par…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":31388,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[23,28,29,32,33,22,30,31,35,39,38,36,37,34,40,20,26,27,24,25,21],"class_list":{"0":"post-31387","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-latvija","8":"tag-aktualitates","9":"tag-breaking-news","10":"tag-breakingnews","11":"tag-featured-news","12":"tag-featurednews","13":"tag-headlines","14":"tag-latest-news","15":"tag-latestnews","16":"tag-latvia","17":"tag-latvian","18":"tag-latviesu","19":"tag-latviesu-valoda","20":"tag-latviesuvaloda","21":"tag-latvija","22":"tag-lv","23":"tag-news","24":"tag-popularakas-zinas","25":"tag-popularakaszinas","26":"tag-top-stories","27":"tag-topstories","28":"tag-zinas"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@lv\/115439834489395473","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31387","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31387"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31387\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/31388"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31387"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31387"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31387"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}