{"id":33011,"date":"2025-10-28T04:14:09","date_gmt":"2025-10-28T04:14:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/33011\/"},"modified":"2025-10-28T04:14:09","modified_gmt":"2025-10-28T04:14:09","slug":"arodbiedribas-un-darba-deveji-cinas-par-darba-likuma-110-pantu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/33011\/","title":{"rendered":"Arodbiedr\u012bbas un darba dev\u0113ji c\u012bn\u0101s par Darba likuma 110. pantu"},"content":{"rendered":"

Latvij\u0101 \u0161obr\u012bd notiek asas debates par Darba likuma 110. pantu, kas paredz, ka darba dev\u0113jam nepiecie\u0161ama arodbiedr\u012bbas piekri\u0161ana darbinieka atlai\u0161anai.<\/p>\n

Saeim\u0101 ir iesniegts priek\u0161likums \u0161o pantu sv\u012btrot no likuma, jo darba dev\u0113ji to uzskata par novecoju\u0161u birokr\u0101tisku \u0161\u0137\u0113rsli. Savuk\u0101rt arodbiedr\u012bbas saredz taj\u0101 b\u016btisku v\u0101j\u0101k\u0101s puses \u2013 darbinieku \u2013 aizsardz\u012bbas meh\u0101nismu.<\/p>\n

Latvijas Darba dev\u0113ju konfeder\u0101cija (LDDK) uzskata, ka Darba likuma 110. pants ir “padomju laiku mantojums” un trauc\u0113 ekonomikas att\u012bst\u012bbai, radot papildu birokr\u0101tiskos \u0161\u0137\u0113r\u0161\u013cus.<\/p>\n

Procesa novilcin\u0101\u0161ana: LDDK \u0123ener\u0101ldirektors Kaspars Gork\u0161s nor\u0101da, ka atlai\u0161anas process, \u012bpa\u0161i str\u012bd\u012bgos gad\u012bjumos, var novilcin\u0101ties tiesved\u012bb\u0101s pat gadiem, un visu \u0161o laiku darba dev\u0113jam j\u0101saglab\u0101 darbavieta un j\u0101sedz juridisko pakalpojumu izdevumi.<\/p>\n

Gork\u0161s uzsver, ka “ja ir darbinieks kur\u0161 varb\u016bt ir slinks un nepilda savus pien\u0101kumus, tad tas ir slogs ne tikai darba dev\u0113jam, bet tas papildus ar\u012b liek citiem darba \u0146\u0113m\u0113jiem str\u0101d\u0101t par vi\u0146u.” Darba dev\u0113ji uzskata, ka pat\u0113r\u0113 krietni liel\u0101kus resursus (gan laiku, gan finanses), lai pan\u0101ktu rezult\u0101tu, kas nav efekt\u012bv\u0101kais veids, k\u0101 veidot darba attiec\u012bbas.<\/p>\n

J\u0101\u0146em v\u0113r\u0101, ka jau tagad arodbiedr\u012bbas at\u013cauja nav nepiecie\u0161ama t\u0101d\u0101s situ\u0101cij\u0101s k\u0101 z\u0101dz\u012bba, iera\u0161an\u0101s darb\u0101 alkohola vai narkotiku reibum\u0101, vai kait\u0113juma nodar\u012b\u0161ana citiem darbiniekiem.<\/p>\n

Latvijas Br\u012bvo arodbiedr\u012bbu savien\u012bba (LBAS) stingri iest\u0101jas par panta saglab\u0101\u0161anu, redzot taj\u0101 juridisku aizsardz\u012bbu pret darba dev\u0113ju patva\u013cu.<\/p>\n

Arodbiedr\u012bbas atz\u012bst, ka aptuveni 50% gad\u012bjumu pretenzijas pret darbiniekiem ir pamatotas, un arodbiedr\u012bba dod piekri\u0161anu atlai\u0161anai. Tom\u0113r str\u012bdus situ\u0101cij\u0101s 110. pants aizsarg\u0101 darbinieku, kur\u0161 k\u0101 darba l\u012bguma v\u0101j\u0101k\u0101 puse nevar at\u013cauties ilgsto\u0161us un d\u0101rgus tiesved\u012bbas procesus.<\/p>\n

LBAS priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101js Egils Baldz\u0113ns nor\u0101da, ka, sv\u012btrojot pantu, viss smagums un pier\u0101d\u012b\u0161anas pien\u0101kums tiks p\u0101rlikts uz darbinieku: “Darbiniekam ir j\u0101pier\u0101da, ka darba dev\u0113js ir k\u013c\u016bd\u012bjies. \u0160obr\u012bd darba dev\u0113jam, kuram parasti ir jurists, ir daudz viegl\u0101k pier\u0101d\u012bt savu pretenziju pamatu. Jo vi\u0146\u0161 jau ir atlaidis. Ne jau darbinieks pal\u016bdza, lai vi\u0146u atlai\u017e.”<\/p>\n

K\u0101 potenci\u0101lais kompromisa risin\u0101jums tiek pied\u0101v\u0101ta darba tiesas izveide p\u0113c kaimi\u0146valstu \u2013 Lietuvas un Igaunijas \u2013 parauga. Str\u012bdus par atlai\u0161anas pamatot\u012bbu izskat\u012btu \u012bpa\u0161a komisija, kur\u0101 b\u016btu p\u0101rst\u0101vji no valsts, darba dev\u0113jiem un arodbiedr\u012bb\u0101m. \u0160\u0101da darba tiesa sp\u0113tu pie\u0146emt l\u0113mumu par atlai\u0161anas pamatot\u012bbu viena l\u012bdz divu m\u0113ne\u0161u laik\u0101. \u0160\u0101da k\u0101rt\u012bba ne tikai nodro\u0161in\u0101tu darbinieku aizsardz\u012bbu, bet ar\u012b samazin\u0101tu izdevumus darba dev\u0113jiem, darbiniekiem un valstij, k\u0101 ar\u012b b\u016btiski atslogotu visp\u0101r\u0113j\u0101s tiesas.<\/p>\n

Arodbiedr\u012bbu vad\u012bt\u0101ji \u0161os jaut\u0101jumus \u0161obr\u012bd apsprie\u017e ar vis\u0101m Saeimas frakcij\u0101m, pirms str\u012bd\u012bgais pants tiks izskat\u012bts Saeimas Soci\u0101lo un darba lietu komisij\u0101.<\/p>\n

\"Latvijas<\/p>\n

Latvijas Darba dev\u0113ju konfeder\u0101cijas \u0123ener\u0101ldirektors Kaspars Gork\u0161s. Foto: LETA<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Latvij\u0101 \u0161obr\u012bd notiek asas debates par Darba likuma 110. pantu, kas paredz, ka darba dev\u0113jam nepiecie\u0161ama arodbiedr\u012bbas piekri\u0161ana…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":33012,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[129,850,1304,23,28,29,32,33,22,30,31,35,39,38,36,37,34,40,20,26,27,1305,862,1306,863,24,25,21],"class_list":{"0":"post-33011","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-latvija","8":"tag-__typenameadvicekeyword","9":"tag-id734","10":"tag-id970","11":"tag-aktualitates","12":"tag-breaking-news","13":"tag-breakingnews","14":"tag-featured-news","15":"tag-featurednews","16":"tag-headlines","17":"tag-latest-news","18":"tag-latestnews","19":"tag-latvia","20":"tag-latvian","21":"tag-latviesu","22":"tag-latviesu-valoda","23":"tag-latviesuvaloda","24":"tag-latvija","25":"tag-lv","26":"tag-news","27":"tag-popularakas-zinas","28":"tag-popularakaszinas","29":"tag-slug360-zinas","30":"tag-slugwork","31":"tag-title360-zinas","32":"tag-titlework","33":"tag-top-stories","34":"tag-topstories","35":"tag-zinas"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@lv\/115449853616822529","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33011","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33011"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33011\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/33012"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33011"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33011"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33011"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}