L\u012bdz ar balsojumu Saeim\u0101 par izst\u0101\u0161anos no Stambulas konvencijas, rodas jaut\u0101jums ar\u012b par koal\u012bcijas stabilit\u0101ti. Lai ar\u012b partneri nor\u0101da, ka ir svar\u012bgi kop\u0101 pie\u0146emt n\u0101kam\u0101 gada valsts bud\u017eetu, viedok\u013ci par savtarp\u0113j\u0101m partneru attiec\u012bb\u0101m at\u0161\u0137iras.<\/p>\n
“Jaun\u0101s Vienot\u012bbas” frakcijas vad\u012bt\u0101js Edmunds Jur\u0113vics atzina, ka Saeimas 30. oktobra l\u0113mums savstarp\u0113jo uztic\u012bbu nav vairojis. Savuk\u0101rt Za\u013co un Zemnieku savien\u012bbas\u00a0(ZZS) frakcijas vad\u012bt\u0101js Harijs Rokpelnis, lai gan apstiprin\u0101ja jaut\u0101juma j\u016bt\u012bgumu, aicin\u0101ja\u00a0partnerus fokus\u0113ties uz n\u0101kam\u0101 gada bud\u017eetu un citiem valstiski svar\u012bgiem jaut\u0101jumiem. Tikm\u0113r “Progres\u012bvo” frakcijas vad\u012bt\u0101js Andris \u0160uvajevs nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka ZZS sp\u0113l\u0113jot interesantu sp\u0113li\u00a0\u2013 no vienas puses nododot partnerus b\u016btiskos jaut\u0101jumos, bet taj\u0101 pa\u0161\u0101 laik\u0101 publiski izliekoties, ka koal\u012bcij\u0101 viss ir k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101.<\/p>\n
\u012aSUM\u0100:<\/p>\n
Vai koal\u012bcij\u0101 viss k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101? P\u0113c l\u0113muma par Stambulas konvenciju partneru redz\u0113jums at\u0161\u0137iras<\/p>\n
Prezidenta iesp\u0113jas<\/p>\n
Lai likums, kas paredz izst\u0101\u0161anos no Stambulas konvencijas<\/a>, st\u0101tos sp\u0113k\u0101, tas j\u0101paraksta Valsts prezidentam. Vi\u0146am l\u0113mums j\u0101pie\u0146em 10 dienu laik\u0101. Piektdienas r\u012bt\u0101 Valsts prezidents Edgars Rink\u0113vi\u010ds pazi\u0146oja<\/a>, ka atbilsto\u0161i Satversmei izv\u0113rt\u0113s Saeimas pie\u0146emto likumu, \u0146emot v\u0113r\u0101 valstiskus un juridiskus, nevis ideolo\u0123iskus vai politiskus apsv\u0113rumus.<\/p>\n T\u0101 k\u0101 par likumprojekta steidzam\u012bbu nobalsoja maz\u0101k nek\u0101 2\/3 deput\u0101tu, prezidents var nodot likumu parlamentam otrreiz\u0113jai caurl\u016bko\u0161anai. Ja t\u0101 notiek, Saeima bez debat\u0113m nodod prezidenta motiv\u0113tos iebildumus atbild\u012bgajai komisijai un lemj par termi\u0146u, k\u0101d\u0101 iesniedzami priek\u0161likumi un likums izskat\u0101ms atk\u0101rtoti. Otrreiz\u0113j\u0101 caurl\u016bko\u0161ana notiek, iev\u0113rojot k\u0101rt\u012bbu, k\u0101d\u0101 likumprojektu izskata tre\u0161aj\u0101 las\u012bjum\u0101, un t\u0101s laik\u0101 parlaments izskata tikai prezidenta iebildumus un priek\u0161likumus. Ja Saeima likumu negroza, Valsts prezidents otrreiz ierunas nevar celt.<\/p>\n T\u0101pat Satversme paredz, ka Valsts prezidents uz diviem m\u0113ne\u0161iem var aptur\u0113t Saeim\u0101 pie\u0146emta likuma public\u0113\u0161anu. To dar\u012bt prezidentam var piepras\u012bt ar\u012b ne maz\u0101k k\u0101 viena tre\u0161\u0101 da\u013ca jeb vismaz 34 Saeimas deput\u0101ti. Apturot likuma public\u0113\u0161anu, Centr\u0101lajai v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu komisijai ir j\u0101uzs\u0101k parakstu v\u0101k\u0161ana, lai ierosin\u0101tu referendumu par likuma atcel\u0161anu. Parakstu v\u0101k\u0161ana ilgst 30 dienas, un, lai sar\u012bkotu tautas nobalso\u0161anu, j\u0101parakst\u0101s vismaz 1\/10 no p\u0113d\u0113j\u0101s Saeimas v\u0113l\u0113\u0161an\u0101s balssties\u012bgo pilso\u0146u skaita. \u0160aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 tie b\u016btu vair\u0101k nek\u0101 154 t\u016bksto\u0161i pilso\u0146u.<\/p>\n Vienlaikus past\u0101v iesp\u0113ja v\u0113rsties Satversmes ties\u0101. Sa\u0146emot \u0161\u0101du pieteikumu, Satversmes tiesas kol\u0113\u0123ijai j\u0101lemj, vai ierosin\u0101t lietu. J\u0101piebilst, ka \u0161is b\u016btu precedents, jo Satversmes tiesa l\u012bdz \u0161im nav izskat\u012bjusi nevienu lietu, kur\u0101 v\u0113rt\u0113tu likuma par k\u0101da starptautiska l\u012bguma denons\u0113\u0161anu atbilst\u012bbu Satversmei vai starptautiskam l\u012bgumam.<\/p>\n JV: Savstarp\u0113jo uztic\u012bbu \u0161is l\u0113mums nevairo<\/p>\n “Jaun\u0101s Vienot\u012bbas” Saeimas frakcijas vad\u012bt\u0101js Edmunds Jur\u0113vics pav\u0113st\u012bja, ka\u00a0frakcija ir ofici\u0101li v\u0113rsusies pie Valsts prezidenta ar l\u016bgumu nodot likumu par izst\u0101\u0161anos no konvencijas otrreiz\u0113jai caurl\u016bko\u0161anai Saeim\u0101. Vienlaikus frakcija gatavo ar\u012b pieteikumu Satversmes tiesai.<\/p>\n “Es dom\u0101ju, ka diem\u017e\u0113l \u0161is vakardienas balsojums kopum\u0101 ir \u013coti skumja zi\u0146a Latvijai par kop\u0113jo parlamenta t\u0101du populistisku nost\u0101ju \u013coti da\u017e\u0101dos jaut\u0101jumos.<\/p>\n Skaidrs, ka savstarp\u0113jo uztic\u012bbu koal\u012bcij\u0101<\/a> \u0161\u0101ds l\u0113mums neuzlabo, bet m\u016bsu priorit\u0101te tuv\u0101kaj\u0101s ned\u0113\u013c\u0101s ir nepie\u013caut \u0161\u012b l\u0113muma st\u0101\u0161anos sp\u0113k\u0101,” nor\u0101d\u012bja Jur\u0113vics.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n “Progres\u012bvie” cer, ka deput\u0101ti v\u0113l p\u0101rdom\u0101s<\/p>\n “Progres\u012bvo” Saeimas frakcijas vad\u012bt\u0101js Andris \u0160uvajevs uzsv\u0113ra, ka vispirms gaid\u012bs prezidenta l\u0113mumu attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz likuma atgrie\u0161anu Saeim\u0101, piebilstot, ka ir p\u0101rliec\u012bba, ka otrreiz\u0113j\u0101 caurl\u016bko\u0161ana var\u0113tu nostr\u0101d\u0101t un l\u0113mums var\u0113tu b\u016bt par palik\u0161anu konvencij\u0101.<\/p>\n “Ikvienam deput\u0101tam ir j\u0101str\u0101d\u0101 komand\u0101, j\u0101str\u0101d\u0101 sav\u0101 frakcij\u0101, un ir da\u017eos\u00a0b\u016btiskos l\u0113mumos svar\u012bgi iev\u0113rot frakcijas discipl\u012bnu, bet no priv\u0101t\u0101m sarun\u0101m man ir secin\u0101ms, ka ir \u013coti liels daudzums Saeimas deput\u0101tu, kas nav saj\u016bsm\u0101 par jaut\u0101juma virz\u012bbu. Vien\u012bgie, kas ir saj\u016bsm\u0101, ir \u0160lesera (“Latvija pirmaj\u0101 viet\u0101”)\u00a0deput\u0101ti. Un, t\u0101 k\u0101 \u0161is jaut\u0101jums turpin\u0101s, cerams, b\u016bs\u00a0dienas k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101 vismaz n\u0101kamo m\u0113nesi.<\/p>\n Es esmu cer\u012bgs uz to, ka gan deput\u0101ti no “Apvienot\u0101 saraksta”, gan ar\u012b Za\u013co un Zemnieku savien\u012bbas, gan ar\u012b varb\u016bt no Nacion\u0101l\u0101s apvien\u012bbas\u00a0tom\u0113r p\u0101rdom\u0101s savu nost\u0101ju un lems par Latvijas palik\u0161anu Eiropas v\u0113rt\u012bbu telp\u0101,” pauda \u0160uvajevs.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Neredz iemeslu main\u012bt domas<\/p>\n Par Latvijas izst\u0101\u0161anos no Stambulas konvencijas kop\u0101 ar opoz\u012bciju Saeim\u0101 nobalsoja ar\u012b koal\u012bcij\u0101 eso\u0161\u0101 Za\u013co un Zemnieku savien\u012bba. T\u0101s\u00a0frakcijas vad\u012bt\u0101js Harijs Rokpelnis nor\u0101d\u012bja \u2013 \u0161obr\u012bd partijai nav pamata main\u012bt ceturtdien pausto nost\u0101ju.<\/p>\n “Protams, m\u0113s respekt\u0113jam ikviena politisk\u0101 sp\u0113ka ties\u012bbas c\u012bn\u012bties par sav\u0101m idej\u0101m. Ja prezidents atgriez\u012bs likumprojektu Saeim\u0101 vienk\u0101r\u0161i atgrie\u0161anas p\u0113c, es neredzu iemeslu, lai m\u0113s main\u012btu savas domas.<\/p>\n Ja tiek sav\u0101kti paraksti vai tiek rosin\u0101ts nodot tautas nobalso\u0161anai \u2013 labi, sabiedr\u012bbai ir ties\u012bbas lemt par \u0161\u0101diem jaut\u0101jumiem,” teica Rokpelnis.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Likumprojekta iesniedz\u0113ja \u2013 partija “Latvija pirmaj\u0101 viet\u0101” (LPV) \u2013\u00a0viedokli par Stambulas konvenciju nemain\u012b\u0161ot, uzsv\u0113ra LPV Saeimas frakcijas vad\u012bt\u0101ja Linda Liepi\u0146a, piebilstot, ka konvencij\u0101 nekas nav main\u012bjies, lai t\u0101 b\u016btu j\u0101uztver cit\u0101di. Par likuma t\u0101l\u0101ko virz\u012bbu politi\u0137e gan nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka laiks r\u0101d\u012b\u0161ot,\u00a0ko lems prezidents. Vienlaikus vi\u0146a uzsv\u0113ra, ka nedr\u012bkst aizmirst apst\u0101k\u013cus, k\u0101dos Stambulas konvencija ratific\u0113ta.<\/p>\n “Ja parlamenta sast\u0101vs b\u016btu t\u0101ds, kur Stambulas konvencijas atbalst\u012bt\u0101jiem b\u016btu vair\u0101kums, un s\u0101kotn\u0113jais l\u0113muma pie\u0146em\u0161anas process b\u016btu rit\u0113jis norm\u0101li, nevis ar viltu, nekad m\u0113s neb\u016btu non\u0101ku\u0161i pie \u0161\u0101das situ\u0101cijas, un m\u0113s nec\u012bn\u012btos, lai konvenciju denons\u0113tu, jo t\u0101ds b\u016btu bijis parlamenta vair\u0101kuma viedoklis. Un pie \u0161\u012bs situ\u0101cijas ir vain\u012bgi gan “Jaun\u0101 Vienot\u012bba”, gan “Progres\u012bvie”, gan ZZS. Un diem\u017e\u0113l ar\u012b Latvijas prezidents, kur\u0161 ar\u012b tika iev\u0113l\u0113ts, pateicoties \u0161im politiskajam dar\u012bjumam,” v\u0113rt\u0113ja Liepi\u0146a.<\/p>\n Valsts prezidents, visticam\u0101k,\u00a0lems par likuma nodo\u0161anu otrreiz\u0113jai caurl\u016bko\u0161anai Saeim\u0101. Tom\u0113r tas neb\u016bs viegls l\u0113mums \u2013 uz prezidentu tiek izdar\u012bts spiediens gan no sabiedr\u012bbas, kas r\u012bkojusi protestus, gan ar\u012b politiskaj\u0101 vid\u0113.<\/p>\n Kulu\u0101ros izskan runas \u2013 ja Rink\u0113vi\u010ds likumu atdos Saeimai atk\u0101rtotai izskat\u012b\u0161anai, atsevi\u0161\u0137as partijas var\u0113tu pazi\u0146ot, ka n\u0101kotn\u0113 neatbalst\u012bs vi\u0146a kandidat\u016bru otrajam termi\u0146am Valsts prezidenta amat\u0101.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Te gan j\u0101piebilst, ka par n\u0101kamo prezidentu lems \u0161oruden iev\u0113l\u0113t\u0101 Saeima, nevis eso\u0161ais sasaukums.<\/p>\n KONTEKSTS:<\/p>\n Saeimas vair\u0101kums 30. oktobr\u012b p\u0113c 13 stundu darba\u00a0nol\u0113ma<\/a>, ka Latvijai j\u0101izst\u0101jas no\u00a0Eiropas Padomes Konvencijas par vardarb\u012bbas pret sieviet\u0113m un vardarb\u012bbas \u0123imen\u0113 nov\u0113r\u0161anu un apkaro\u0161anu jeb Stambulas konvencijas.\u00a0“Par” balsoja 56 deput\u0101ti, “pret” bija 32 deput\u0101ti, bet divi parlament\u0101rie\u0161i attur\u0113j\u0101s.\u00a0<\/p>\n Tagad \u0161is jaut\u0101jums non\u0101cis uz Valsts prezidenta Edgara Rink\u0113vi\u010da galda, kuram j\u0101izlemj, ko dar\u012bt t\u0101l\u0101k. Da\u013ca Saeimas deput\u0101tu jau gras\u0101s l\u016bgt prezidentu nodot likumu, kas paredz konvencijas denons\u0113\u0161anu,\u00a0otrreiz\u0113jai caurl\u016bko\u0161anai. “Jaun\u0101s Vienot\u012bbas” Saeimas frakcijas vad\u012bt\u0101js Edmunds Jur\u0113vics pav\u0113st\u012bjis, ka pie prezidenta gras\u0101s v\u0113rsties ar\u012b vair\u0101k nek\u0101 100 nevalstisko organiz\u0101ciju, aicinot \u0161o likumu neizsludin\u0101t.\u00a0<\/p>\n Savuk\u0101rt\u00a0par iesp\u0113ju\u00a0v\u0113rsties Satversmes ties\u0101<\/a>\u00a0jau izteiku\u0161ies<\/a>\u00a0“Progres\u012bvie” un “Jaun\u0101 Vienot\u012bba”.\u00a0Sa\u0146emot \u0161\u0101du pieteikumu, Satversmes tiesas kol\u0113\u0123ijai j\u0101lemj, vai ierosin\u0101t lietu.\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"L\u012bdz ar balsojumu Saeim\u0101 par izst\u0101\u0161anos no Stambulas konvencijas, rodas jaut\u0101jums ar\u012b par koal\u012bcijas stabilit\u0101ti. Lai ar\u012b partneri…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":36289,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[23,28,29,32,33,22,30,31,35,39,38,36,37,34,40,20,26,27,24,25,21],"class_list":{"0":"post-36288","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-aktualitates","8":"tag-aktualitates","9":"tag-breaking-news","10":"tag-breakingnews","11":"tag-featured-news","12":"tag-featurednews","13":"tag-headlines","14":"tag-latest-news","15":"tag-latestnews","16":"tag-latvia","17":"tag-latvian","18":"tag-latviesu","19":"tag-latviesu-valoda","20":"tag-latviesuvaloda","21":"tag-latvija","22":"tag-lv","23":"tag-news","24":"tag-popularakas-zinas","25":"tag-popularakaszinas","26":"tag-top-stories","27":"tag-topstories","28":"tag-zinas"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@lv\/115469506577088359","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36288","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36288"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36288\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/36289"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36288"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36288"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36288"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
\n
\n
\n