{"id":59226,"date":"2025-11-26T16:21:15","date_gmt":"2025-11-26T16:21:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/59226\/"},"modified":"2025-11-26T16:21:15","modified_gmt":"2025-11-26T16:21:15","slug":"latvija-iepazistas-ar-est-spriedumu-par-viendzimuma-paru-atzisanu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/59226\/","title":{"rendered":"Latvija iepaz\u012bstas ar EST spriedumu par viendzimuma p\u0101ru atz\u012b\u0161anu"},"content":{"rendered":"

Eiropas Savien\u012bbas<\/a> Tiesa (EST) pie\u0146\u0113musi spriedumu liet\u0101 pret Poliju, kas nosaka, ka ES dal\u012bbvalst\u012bm savsarp\u0113ji j\u0101atz\u012bst viendzimuma laul\u012bbas. Tieslietu ministrija<\/a> (TM), vaic\u0101ta, ko tas paredz Latvijai, nor\u0101da, ka Latvija v\u0113l iepaz\u012bstas ar pilno spriedumu. Vienlaikus tiesas spriedums neparedz, ka valstij j\u0101groza laul\u012bbas defin\u012bcija, uzsver ministrij\u0101.<\/p>\n

Jau v\u0113st\u012bts, ka EST spriedums paredz, ka pilso\u0146iem, kuri ir re\u0123istr\u0113ju\u0161i laul\u012bbu cit\u0101 ES valst\u012b un atgrie\u017eas m\u0101j\u0101s, ir ties\u012bbas b\u016bt atz\u012btiem k\u0101 laul\u0101tam p\u0101rim. \u0160\u012b laul\u012bba j\u0101atz\u012bst ar\u012b tad, ja m\u012btnes valst\u012b \u0161\u0101das ties\u012bbas nav pie\u0161\u0137irtas.<\/p>\n

Lasiet ar\u012b<\/p>\n

\"Dal\u012bbvalst\u012bm<\/a><\/p>\n

“Tieslietu ministrija \u0161obr\u012bd iepaz\u012bstas ar pilno EST spriedumu un t\u0101 piem\u0113ro\u0161anas iesp\u0113j\u0101m Latvijas pilso\u0146iem, kuri atgriezu\u0161ies no dz\u012bves cit\u0101 ES dal\u012bbvalst\u012b. J\u0101uzsver, ka tiesas spriedums neuzliek par pien\u0101kumu groz\u012bt laul\u012bbas defin\u012bciju. Satversme nosaka, ka laul\u012bba Latvij\u0101 tiek nosl\u0113gta tikai starp v\u012brieti un sievieti. Sniegsim pla\u0161\u0101ku koment\u0101ru p\u0113c Tieslietu ministrijas ekspertu atzinumu sa\u0146em\u0161anas,” port\u0101lam “Delfi” pau\u017e TM. <\/p>\n

“Delfi” jau zi\u0146oja, ka spriedums paredz, dal\u012bbvalst\u012bm ir pien\u0101kums atz\u012bt viendzimuma laul\u012bbu, kas likum\u012bgi nosl\u0113gta cit\u0101 ES valst\u012b, pat ja to iek\u0161\u0113jie ties\u012bbu akti neparedz.<\/p>\n

Ja \u0161\u0101das likum\u012bgi nosl\u0113gtas laul\u012bbas neaz\u012bst, tas ir “pretrun\u0101 ES ties\u012bb\u0101m, jo p\u0101rk\u0101pj p\u0101rvieto\u0161an\u0101s br\u012bv\u012bbu un ties\u012bbas uz priv\u0101t\u0101s un \u0123imenes dz\u012bves iev\u0113ro\u0161anu”, nor\u0101d\u012bju\u0161i tiesne\u0161i, un tas “var rad\u012bt sare\u017e\u0123\u012bjumus administrat\u012bvaj\u0101, profesion\u0101laj\u0101 un priv\u0101taj\u0101 dz\u012bv\u0113, piespie\u017eot laul\u0101tos dz\u012bvot k\u0101 nelaul\u0101tiem cilv\u0113kiem”.<\/p>\n

Lieta attiecas uz diviem Polijas<\/a> pilso\u0146iem, kuri 2018. gad\u0101 apprec\u0113j\u0101s Berl\u012bn\u0113 un p\u0113c tam atgriez\u0101s Polij\u0101, kur vi\u0146i piepras\u012bja, lai vi\u0146u v\u0101cu valod\u0101 izsniegtais laul\u012bbas apliec\u012bbas dokuments tiktu transkrib\u0113ts Polij\u0101. \u0160o piepras\u012bjumu noraid\u012bja, jo Polija<\/a> neatz\u012bst viendzimuma laul\u012bbas.<\/p>\n

\u0160obr\u012bd aptuveni vair\u0101k nek\u0101 puse no 27 ES dal\u012bbvalst\u012bm atz\u012bst viendzimuma laul\u012bbas. N\u012bderlande 2001. gad\u0101 bija pirm\u0101 valsts pasaul\u0113, kas \u0161o savien\u012bbu atzina, liecina “Euronews” apkopojums.<\/p>\n

Pilns spriedums pieejams \u0161eit<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Seko “Delfi” ar\u012b Instagram<\/a> un YouTube<\/a> profil\u0101 \u2013 pievienojies, lai uzzin\u0101tu svar\u012bg\u0101ko un interesant\u0101ko pirmais!<\/p>\n

Publik\u0101cijas saturs vai t\u0101s jebk\u0101da apjoma da\u013ca ir aizsarg\u0101ts autorties\u012bbu objekts Autorties\u012bbu likuma izpratn\u0113, un t\u0101 izmanto\u0161ana bez izdev\u0113ja at\u013caujas ir aizliegta. Vair\u0101k lasi \u0161eit<\/a>