{"id":66429,"date":"2025-12-05T13:07:14","date_gmt":"2025-12-05T13:07:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/66429\/"},"modified":"2025-12-05T13:07:14","modified_gmt":"2025-12-05T13:07:14","slug":"darbibu-beigusaja-uznemuma-smartlynx-airlines-ir-uzsakta-parbaude-informe-vdi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/66429\/","title":{"rendered":"Darb\u012bbu beigu\u0161aj\u0101 uz\u0146\u0113mum\u0101 &#8220;SmartLynx Airlines&#8221; ir uzs\u0101kta p\u0101rbaude, inform\u0113 VDI"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Aviokomp\u0101nija &#8220;<a rel=\"noopener nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.delfi.lv\/temas\/54313548\/smartlynx-airlines\" tag-id=\"54313548\">SmartLynx Airlines<\/a>&#8221; ar 24. novembri p\u0101rtraukusi uz\u0146\u0113muma saimniecisko darb\u012bbu. Port\u0101ls &#8220;Delfi&#8221; sa\u0146\u0113mis anon\u012bmu uz\u0146\u0113muma darbinieka v\u0113stuli, kur\u0101 tiek paustas ba\u017eas par darbinieku ties\u012bbu aizsardz\u012bbu, izbeidzot darba attiec\u012bbas. Valsts darba inspekcij\u0101 inform\u0113, ka ir uzs\u0101kta p\u0101rbaude, k\u0101 ar\u012b skaidro darbinieku ties\u012bbas.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Darbiniekiem tiek pied\u0101v\u0101ts parakst\u012bt &#8220;pu\u0161u vieno\u0161anos&#8221;, kas form\u0101li sola izmaks\u0101t nostr\u0101d\u0101to algu un neizmantoto atva\u013cin\u0101jumu, ta\u010du dokument\u0101 ietvertas pretrun\u012bgas un potenci\u0101li nelikum\u012bgas klauzulas,&#8221; inform\u0113 v\u0113stules autors.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">&#8220;\u0160is dokuments ir piln\u012bgs absurds, jo:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">1.1. punkts nor\u0101da, ka vieno\u0161an\u0101s ir labpr\u0101t\u012bga;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">2.3. un 2.4. punkti piln\u012bb\u0101 noliedz 2.1. un 2.2. punktus, kas sola algu un kompens\u0101ciju;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">4.1. punkts nosaka, ka vieno\u0161an\u0101s saturs ir stingri konfidenci\u0101ls;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">4.2. punkts apgalvo, ka parakst\u012b\u0161ana atspogu\u013co darbinieka patieso gribu \u2013 bet k\u0101 t\u0101 var b\u016bt m\u016bsu griba, ja uz\u0146\u0113mums vienk\u0101r\u0161i bankrot\u0113 un mums pat neizmaks\u0101 kompens\u0101ciju?&#8221; vi\u0146\u0161 ieskic\u0113 dokumenta saturu.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>S\u0101kta p\u0101rbaude<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Zemgales Re\u0123ion\u0101l\u0101s Valsts darba inspekcijas (RVDI) Ogres sektora galven\u0101 valsts inspektore Ir\u0113na Jakov\u013ceva port\u0101lam &#8220;Delfi&#8221; sac\u012bja, ka l\u012bdz\u012bga satura iesniegums ir re\u0123istr\u0113ts ar\u012b Valsts darba inspekcij\u0101 (VDI) un nodots izskat\u012b\u0161anai Zemgales RVDI. L\u012bdz tam iesniegumi par \u0161o uz\u0146\u0113mumu inspekcij\u0101 nav sa\u0146emti.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\u0160obr\u012bd uz\u0146\u0113mum\u0101 &#8220;SmartLynx Airlines&#8221; esot uzs\u0101kta p\u0101rbaude.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Tom\u0113r inspekcijai neesot skaidrs, vai uz\u0146\u0113mums &#8220;SmartLynx Airlines&#8221; re\u0101li pl\u0101no izbeigt savu darb\u012bbu (likvid\u0113t uz\u0146\u0113mumu) vai tikai samazin\u0101t darbinieku skaitu. P\u0113c Uz\u0146\u0113mumu re\u0123istra datiem, uz\u0146\u0113mumam &#8220;SmartLynx Airlines&#8221; ir tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas process.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">&#8220;Darba attiec\u012bbu izbeig\u0161anu, pus\u0113m savstarp\u0113ji vienojoties (Darba likuma 114. pants), kad realit\u0101t\u0113 darba dev\u0113js samazina darbinieku skaitu vai uz\u0146\u0113mums tiek likvid\u0113ts, nevar\u0113tu nosaukt par labo praksi, jo darba dev\u0113js \u0161\u0101d\u0101 veid\u0101 m\u0113\u0123ina izvair\u012bties no darbiniekiem pien\u0101ko\u0161os atlai\u0161anas pabalstu izmaksas, no savu pien\u0101kumu izpildes iesp\u0113jam\u0101 kolekt\u012bv\u0101s atlai\u0161anas gad\u012bjum\u0101 (inform\u0113\u0161ana un konsult\u0113\u0161ana),&#8221; uzsver Jakov\u013ceva.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">&#8220;Konkr\u0113taj\u0101 savstarp\u0113j\u0101s vieno\u0161an\u0101s dokument\u0101, piem\u0113ram, neredzu, ka darba dev\u0113js paredz, ar\u012b izbeidzot darba attiec\u012bbas, pus\u0113m vienojoties, izmaks\u0101t atlai\u0161anas pabalstu, ko var\u0113tu paredz\u0113t (lai gan Darba likums to nenosaka) un kas var\u0113tu liecin\u0101t, ka darba dev\u0113js nem\u0113\u0123ina izvair\u012bties no \u0161\u0101da atlai\u0161anas pabalsta izmaksas. Turpretim vieno\u0161an\u0101s dokument\u0101 uzreiz ir ietverts nosac\u012bjums\/br\u012bdin\u0101jums, ka darbiniekam var b\u016bt neizmaks\u0101ta ar\u012b kompens\u0101cija par neizmantoto ikgad\u0113jo apmaks\u0101to atva\u013cin\u0101jumu, ja darba dev\u0113jam tiks uzs\u0101kts maks\u0101tnesp\u0113jas process,&#8221; vi\u0146a koment\u0113 port\u0101lam &#8220;Delfi&#8221; s\u016bt\u012bt\u0101s v\u0113stules pielikum\u0101 eso\u0161os dokumentus.<\/p>\n<p>Par savstarp\u0113jo vieno\u0161anos \u2013 nianses, kuras ir b\u016btiski zin\u0101t<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Saska\u0146\u0101 ar Darba likuma 114. pantu, darbinieks un darba dev\u0113js var izbeigt darba tiesisk\u0101s attiec\u012bbas savstarp\u0113ji vienojoties, inform\u0113 VDI. Inici\u0113t darba tiesisko attiec\u012bbu p\u0101rtrauk\u0161anu saska\u0146\u0101 ar Darba likuma 114. pantu var gan darbinieks, gan darba dev\u0113js, iesniedzot otrai pusei iesniegumu vai sagatavotu vieno\u0161an\u0101s projektu. Turkl\u0101t t\u0101 sl\u0113g\u0161anai nav j\u0101b\u016bt pamatojumam, k\u0101d\u0113\u013c viena vai otra puse v\u0113las p\u0101rtraukt darba tiesisk\u0101s attiec\u012bbas. Ja otra puse piekr\u012bt izteiktajam pied\u0101v\u0101jumam, vieno\u0161an\u0101s ir sl\u0113dzama rakstveid\u0101.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Inspekcij\u0101 skaidro, ka ar\u012b gad\u012bjum\u0101, ja darba dev\u0113jam past\u0101v k\u0101ds no Darba likuma 101. panta pirm\u0101s da\u013cas apst\u0101k\u013ciem darba tiesisko attiec\u012bbu p\u0101rtrauk\u0161anai, darba dev\u0113js nav ierobe\u017eots darbiniekam pied\u0101v\u0101t nosl\u0113gt savstarp\u0113jo vieno\u0161anos par darba tiesisko attiec\u012bbu p\u0101rtrauk\u0161anu. Ta\u010du tas, vai darbinieks piekr\u012bt vai nepiekr\u012bt vieno\u0161an\u0101s nosl\u0113g\u0161anai, ir darbinieka br\u012bva izv\u0113le. Proti, Darba likum\u0101 noteikt\u0101s pu\u0161u ties\u012bbas izpild\u0101mas p\u0113c labas tic\u012bbas un atbilsto\u0161i br\u012bvas gribas izpausmei, t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di, ja k\u0101da no pus\u0113m nepiekr\u012bt izteiktajam pied\u0101v\u0101jumam izbeigt darba tiesisk\u0101s attiec\u012bbas atbilsto\u0161i Darba likuma 114. pantam, nevienai no pus\u0113m nav pien\u0101kuma \u0161\u0101du vieno\u0161anos sl\u0113gt piespiedu k\u0101rt\u0101. Attiec\u012bgi, ja darbinieks nev\u0113las p\u0101rtraukt darba tiesisk\u0101s attiec\u012bbas, savstarp\u0113ji vienojoties, darbiniekam ir ties\u012bbas atteikties no \u0161\u0101das vieno\u0161an\u0101s sl\u0113g\u0161anas.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Darba likums neregul\u0113 Darba likuma 114. panta k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101 nosl\u0113gt\u0101s savstarp\u0113j\u0101s vieno\u0161an\u0101s par darba tiesisko attiec\u012bbu p\u0101rtrauk\u0161anu saturu. L\u012bdz ar to, ja vieno\u0161an\u0101s par darba tiesisko attiec\u012bbu p\u0101rtrauk\u0161anu ietver papildu noteikumus, tie pus\u0113m ir saisto\u0161i. Ta\u010du VDI v\u0113r\u0161 uzman\u012bbu, ka p\u0113c visp\u0101r\u0113j\u0101 principa nav pie\u013caujams darba dev\u0113jam ar darbinieku sl\u0113gt t\u0101das vieno\u0161an\u0101s, kas pret\u0113ji normat\u012bvajiem aktiem pasliktina darbinieka tiesisko st\u0101vokli (Darba likuma 6. pants). L\u012bdz ar to, ja vieno\u0161an\u0101s satur darbinieka tiesisko st\u0101vokli pasliktino\u0161us nosac\u012bjumus, \u0161\u0101das vieno\u0161an\u0101s pasliktino\u0161ie nosac\u012bjumi b\u016btu atz\u012bstami par sp\u0113k\u0101 neeso\u0161iem. T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di vieno\u0161an\u0101s saturs nevar ierobe\u017eot darbinieka ties\u012bbas v\u0113rsties pie darba dev\u0113ja vai ties\u0101, ja tiek konstat\u0113ti darba tiesisko attiec\u012bbu nosac\u012bjumu iesp\u0113jami p\u0101rk\u0101pumi, piem\u0113ram, pien\u0101ko\u0161\u0101s naudas summas neizmaks\u0101.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">VDI ar\u012b inform\u0113, ka vieno\u0161an\u0101s par darba tiesisko attiec\u012bbu p\u0101rtrauk\u0161anu nav pamats darba dev\u0113jam neizmaks\u0101t darbiniekam pien\u0101ko\u0161\u0101s naudas summas darba tiesisko attiec\u012bbu p\u0101rtrauk\u0161anas gad\u012bjum\u0101, proti, ar\u012b izbeidzot darba tiesisk\u0101s attiec\u012bbas, savstarp\u0113ji vienojoties, darba dev\u0113jam ir pien\u0101kums izmaks\u0101t darbiniekam nopeln\u012bto darba samaksu l\u012bdz darba tiesisko attiec\u012bbu p\u0101rtrauk\u0161anas dienai, atl\u012bdz\u012bbu par neizmantoto ikgad\u0113jo apmaks\u0101to atva\u013cin\u0101jumu (Darba likuma 149. panta piekt\u0101 da\u013ca) un\/vai papildatva\u013cin\u0101jumu (Darba likuma 151. panta piekt\u0101 da\u013ca), ja darbiniekam tie paliku\u0161i neizmantoti. Turkl\u0101t izmaksa veicama, iev\u0113rojot Darba likuma 128. pant\u0101 noteikto k\u0101rt\u012bbu, proti, izmaks\u0101jot visas pien\u0101ko\u0161\u0101s naudas summas atbr\u012bvo\u0161anas dien\u0101, vai, ja darbinieks p\u0113d\u0113j\u0101 darba dien\u0101 nestr\u0101d\u0101 \u2013 ne v\u0113l\u0101k k\u0101 n\u0101ko\u0161aj\u0101 dien\u0101 p\u0113c tam, kad darbinieks piepras\u012bjis apr\u0113\u0137inu.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\u0145emot v\u0113r\u0101 iepriek\u0161 min\u0113to, ja darbinieku k\u0101ds no vieno\u0161an\u0101s tekst\u0101 ietvertajiem nosac\u012bjumiem neapmierina, darbiniekam ir ties\u012bbas v\u0113rsties pie darba dev\u0113ja, lai vienotos par groz\u012bjumiem vieno\u0161an\u0101s tekst\u0101, ja darbinieks piekr\u012bt darba tiesisko attiec\u012bbu p\u0101rtrauk\u0161anai vieno\u0161an\u0101s ce\u013c\u0101. Ja groz\u012bjumi netiek veikti vai darbinieku neapmierina darba dev\u0113ja pied\u0101v\u0101t\u0101 vieno\u0161an\u0101s, darbiniekam ir ties\u012bbas atteikties to parakst\u012bt un attiec\u012bgi darba tiesisk\u0101s attiec\u012bbas nav p\u0101rtraucamas.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Ja ar darbinieku nav iesp\u0113jams pan\u0101kt savstarp\u0113j\u0101s vieno\u0161an\u0101s nosl\u0113g\u0161anu par darba attiec\u012bbu p\u0101rtrauk\u0161anu saska\u0146\u0101 ar Darba likuma 114. pantu, un darba dev\u0113js ir darba tiesisko attiec\u012bbu izbeig\u0161anas iniciators, tad VDI skaidro, ka, lai ar\u012b, no ties\u012bbu viedok\u013ca raugoties, darba l\u012bguma uzteikums ir darbinieka vai darba dev\u0113ja izdar\u012bts gribas izteikums (vienpus\u0113js tiesisks dar\u012bjums), ar ko tiek izbeigtas darba tiesisk\u0101s attiec\u012bbas, darba dev\u0113ja uzteikuma gad\u012bjum\u0101 darba dev\u0113ja r\u012bc\u012bb\u0101 ir j\u0101b\u016bt tiesiski pamatotiem un pier\u0101d\u0101miem iemesliem, k\u0101p\u0113c ir nolemts ar darbinieku turpm\u0101k darba attiec\u012bbas neturpin\u0101t.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Proti, darba dev\u0113jam ir ties\u012bbas rakstveid\u0101 uzteikt darba l\u012bgumu, vien\u012bgi pamatojoties uz apst\u0101k\u013ciem, kas saist\u012bti ar darbinieka uzved\u012bbu, vi\u0146a sp\u0113j\u0101m vai ar saimniecisku, organizatorisku, tehnolo\u0123isku vai l\u012bdz\u012bga rakstura pas\u0101kumu veik\u0161anu uz\u0146\u0113mum\u0101 Darba likuma 101. panta pirmaj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 noteiktajos gad\u012bjumos. L\u012bdz ar to, ja darba dev\u0113jam radies k\u0101ds no iepriek\u0161 min\u0113tajiem apst\u0101k\u013ciem, darba tiesisk\u0101s attiec\u012bbas ar darbinieku uzsak\u0101mas atbilsto\u0161i Darba likuma 101. panta pirmajai da\u013cai, iev\u0113rojot Darba likum\u0101 noteikto uzteik\u0161anas k\u0101rt\u012bbu un termi\u0146us. Savuk\u0101rt, ja nepast\u0101v k\u0101ds no Darba likuma 101. panta pirmaj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 min\u0113tajiem apst\u0101k\u013ciem, darba dev\u0113ja uzteikumam nav tiesiska pamata.<\/p>\n<p>Lasiet ar\u012b<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.delfi.lv\/bizness\/37264250\/biznesa_vide\/120097601\/airbaltic-met-acis-uz-smartlynx-airlines-darbiniekiem\" class=\"headline__image-link\" itemprop=\"url\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" itemprop=\"image\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/ca768254-5409-4284-a50c-f769f97e041c.jpg\" alt=\"&quot;airBaltic&quot; met acis uz &quot;SmartLynx Airlines&quot; darbiniekiem\" title=\"&quot;airBaltic&quot; met acis uz &quot;SmartLynx Airlines&quot; darbiniekiem\" class=\"headline__image img-fluid w-100\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"m-0\">Seko &#8220;Delfi&#8221; ar\u012b  <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/delfi.lv\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Instagram<\/a>  un <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCw5foWtcJvAbUm64rv7jwUQ\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">YouTube<\/a>  profil\u0101 \u2013 pievienojies, lai uzzin\u0101tu svar\u012bg\u0101ko un interesant\u0101ko pirmais!<\/p>\n<p>Publik\u0101cijas saturs vai t\u0101s jebk\u0101da apjoma da\u013ca ir aizsarg\u0101ts autorties\u012bbu objekts Autorties\u012bbu likuma izpratn\u0113, un t\u0101 izmanto\u0161ana bez izdev\u0113ja at\u013caujas ir aizliegta. Vair\u0101k lasi  <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.delfi.lv\/noteikumi#autortiesibas\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">\u0161eit<\/a><script async src=\"\/\/www.instagram.com\/embed.js\"><\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Aviokomp\u0101nija &#8220;SmartLynx Airlines&#8221; ar 24. novembri p\u0101rtraukusi uz\u0146\u0113muma saimniecisko darb\u012bbu. Port\u0101ls &#8220;Delfi&#8221; sa\u0146\u0113mis anon\u012bmu uz\u0146\u0113muma darbinieka v\u0113stuli, kur\u0101&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":66430,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[77,76,35,39,38,36,37,34,40,10380],"class_list":{"0":"post-66429","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-bizness","8":"tag-bizness","9":"tag-business","10":"tag-latvia","11":"tag-latvian","12":"tag-latviesu","13":"tag-latviesu-valoda","14":"tag-latviesuvaloda","15":"tag-latvija","16":"tag-lv","17":"tag-smartlynx-airlines"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@lv\/115667117434951569","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66429","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66429"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66429\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/66430"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66429"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66429"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66429"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}