Str\u012bdi par \u0161o visu biju\u0161i daudz. Iepriek\u0161 par \u0161o probl\u0113mjaut\u0101jumu jau ierosin\u0101tas vair\u0101kas Satversmes tiesas lietas, kur\u0101s regul\u0101ri uzdots eso\u0161o k\u0101rt\u012bbu uzlabot, lai nodro\u0161in\u0101tu l\u012bdzsvaru starp zemes \u012bpa\u0161nieku un, piem\u0113ram, daudz\u012bvok\u013cu namos dz\u012bvojo\u0161o interes\u0113m.<\/p>\n
P\u0113d\u0113j\u0101s izmai\u0146as notika \u0161ogad, kad tika ieviestas divas da\u017e\u0101das kadastr\u0101l\u0101s v\u0113rt\u012bbas. Likumdev\u0113js noteica, ka zemes lieto\u0161anas jeb nomas maksa paliks 4% apm\u0113r\u0101, ta\u010du to apr\u0113\u0137in\u0101s no jaun\u0101s \u2013 univers\u0101l\u0101s kadastr\u0101l\u0101s v\u0113rt\u012bbas, kurai b\u016btu j\u0101b\u016bt tuv\u0101k tirgus situ\u0101cijai. Ta\u010du izrad\u012bjies, ka t\u0101 nereti ir b\u016btiski zem\u0101ka no fisk\u0101las v\u0113rt\u012bbas, no kuras savuk\u0101rt apr\u0113\u0137ina Nekustam\u0101 \u012bpa\u0161uma nodokli, t\u0101d\u0113\u013c zemes \u012bpa\u0161niek v\u0113rs\u0101s Satversmes ties\u0101.<\/p>\n
\u201cTie\u0161i tas, ka ir tik liela at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bba starp fisk\u0101lo un univers\u0101lo kadastr\u0101lo v\u0113rt\u012bbu ir novedis pie t\u0101, k\u0101 tas ir atsevi\u0161\u0137iem pieteikuma iesniedz\u0113jiem, ka sa\u0146emt\u0101 likumisk\u0101 lieto\u0161anas maksa pat nesedz maks\u0101jam\u0101 nekustam\u0101 \u012bpa\u0161uma nodok\u013ca apm\u0113ru. Un tas noz\u012bm\u0113, ka zemes \u012bpa\u0161niekam p\u0113c b\u016bt\u012bbas ir j\u0101piemaks\u0101,\u201d nor\u0101da Satversmes tiesas priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101jas vietniece Anita Rodi\u0146a.<\/p>\n
\u201cJ\u0101saka, ka tie gad\u012bjumi ir gana daudz un kliedzo\u0161i. Jo p\u0113c savas b\u016bt\u012bbas zemes lieto\u0161anas maksa \u0161\u0101dos gad\u012bjumos ir simboliska un tuvu nullei. Tas noz\u012bm\u0113, ka t\u0101 joproj\u0101m nepilda sam\u0113r\u012bgas un atbilsto\u0161as atl\u012bdz\u012bbas funkciju,\u201d pau\u017e Satversmes tiesas priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101ja Ir\u0113na Kucina.<\/p>\n
T\u0101d\u0113\u013c Satversmes tiesa l\u0113ma, ka eso\u0161\u0101 k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101 ir neatbilsto\u0161a valsts pamatlikumam un t\u0101 zaud\u0113 sp\u0113ku no 2027. gada 1. janv\u0101ra. Tas noz\u012bm\u0113, ka gada laik\u0101 Saeimai kop\u0101 ar Ministru kabinetu, regul\u0113jums b\u016bs j\u0101p\u0101rstr\u0101d\u0101. Turkl\u0101t tiesa sprieda, ka l\u012bdz n\u0101kam\u0101 gada j\u016bnijam ir j\u0101rada ar\u012b meh\u0101nisms, k\u0101 zemes \u012bpa\u0161niekiem atl\u012bdzin\u0101t, ja\u00a0 zemes likumisk\u0101s lieto\u0161anas maksa nesedz nekustam\u0101 \u012bpa\u0161uma nodok\u013ca maks\u0101jumu.<\/p>\n
Saturs turpin\u0101s p\u0113c rekl\u0101mas<\/p>\n
Rekl\u0101ma<\/p>\n
\u201cDa\u017e\u0101du risin\u0101jumu mekl\u0113jumi ir biju\u0161i, k\u0101 neskait\u0101mu m\u0113\u0123in\u0101jumu un k\u013c\u016bdu pieeja. Un j\u0101atz\u012bm\u0113, ka ir pien\u0101cis laiks nopietnam restartam. Ir nepiecie\u0161ams, lai likumdev\u0113js un Ministru kabinets pie kop\u012bga galda \u0161o probl\u0113mu atrisina un sabiedr\u012bba, tostarp, tiesa, sagaida taisn\u012bgu risin\u0101jumu. Un \u0161ai s\u0101gai tiek pielikts punkts,\u201d v\u0113r\u0161 uzman\u012bbu Kucina.<\/p>\n
\u201cSatversmes tiesa ir da\u013c\u0113ji p\u0101rcirtusi \u0161o \u201cGordija mezglu\u201d un pateikusi, ka iedz\u012bvot\u0101ji nav vain\u012bgi, dz\u012bvok\u013cu \u012bpa\u0161nieki nav vain\u012bgi par Saeimas un Ministru kabineta k\u013c\u016bd\u0101m, vi\u0146i var turpin\u0101t maks\u0101t \u0161o nesam\u0113r\u012bgi mazo maksu, bet starp\u012bbu piemaks\u0101s Latvijas nodok\u013cu maks\u0101t\u0101ji l\u012bdz br\u012bdim kam\u0113r Saeima atrisin\u0101s \u0161o jaut\u0101jumu,\u201d saka zv\u0113rin\u0101ts advok\u0101ts un zemes \u012bpa\u0161nieku p\u0101rst\u0101vis Normunds \u0160litke.<\/p>\n
\u0160aj\u0101 proces\u0101 gan b\u016bs j\u0101iesaist\u0101s ar\u012b Tieslietu ministrijai, kura izstr\u0101d\u0101ja eso\u0161o regul\u0113jumu. Cik lieli valsts l\u012bdzek\u013ci var\u0113tu b\u016bt nepiecie\u0161ami, lai atl\u012bdzin\u0101tu zemes \u012bpa\u0161niekiem \u0161ogad radu\u0161os zaud\u0113jumus? To \u0161obr\u012bd ministrija nav gatava apl\u0113st.<\/p>\n
\u201cAr\u012b \u0161\u012bs lietas v\u0113sturisk\u0101 apjoma d\u0113\u013c un sare\u017e\u0123\u012bt\u012bbas d\u0113\u013c ir piln\u012bgi skaidrs, ka te ir noteikti vair\u0101k k\u0101 viens vai divi veidi, k\u0101 var\u0113tu \u0161\u0101du spriedumu izpild\u012bt. L\u012bdz ar to jebk\u0101di koment\u0101ri, k\u0101di var\u0113tu b\u016bt sprieduma izpildes veidi, \u0161obr\u012bd ir \u013coti p\u0101ragri,\u201d sprie\u017e Tieslietu ministrijas Valsts sekret\u0101ra vietniece ties\u012bbu politikas jaut\u0101jumos Anda Smilt\u0113na.<\/p>\n
T\u0101pat ministrij\u0101 uzsv\u0113r, t\u0101s \u0161obr\u012bd b\u016btu spekul\u0101cijas, k\u0101ds regul\u0113jums var\u0113tu b\u016bt n\u0101kotn\u0113 un vai tas noz\u012bm\u0113s, ka tiem, kura \u012bpa\u0161ums atrodas uz sve\u0161as zemes, b\u016bs spiests maks\u0101t vair\u0101k.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Str\u012bdi par \u0161o visu biju\u0161i daudz. Iepriek\u0161 par \u0161o probl\u0113mjaut\u0101jumu jau ierosin\u0101tas vair\u0101kas Satversmes tiesas lietas, kur\u0101s regul\u0101ri…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":70906,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[23,28,29,32,33,22,18130,30,31,35,39,38,36,37,34,40,20,26,27,24,25,21],"class_list":{"0":"post-70905","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-aktualitates","8":"tag-aktualitates","9":"tag-breaking-news","10":"tag-breakingnews","11":"tag-featured-news","12":"tag-featurednews","13":"tag-headlines","14":"tag-irena-kucinasatversmes-tiesatieslietu-ministrijazemes-noma","15":"tag-latest-news","16":"tag-latestnews","17":"tag-latvia","18":"tag-latvian","19":"tag-latviesu","20":"tag-latviesu-valoda","21":"tag-latviesuvaloda","22":"tag-latvija","23":"tag-lv","24":"tag-news","25":"tag-popularakas-zinas","26":"tag-popularakaszinas","27":"tag-top-stories","28":"tag-topstories","29":"tag-zinas"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@lv\/115696419664543485","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70905","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70905"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70905\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/70906"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70905"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70905"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70905"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}