Satversmes tiesa (ST) ir pasludin\u0101jusi noz\u012bm\u012bgu spriedumu, atz\u012bstot, ka pa\u0161reiz\u0113jais regul\u0113jums, kas ierobe\u017eo zemes likumisk\u0101s lieto\u0161anas maksu l\u012bdz 4% no kadastr\u0101l\u0101s v\u0113rt\u012bbas, nav sam\u0113rojams ar Latvijas Republikas Satversmi. \u0160is l\u0113mums, kas st\u0101j\u0101s sp\u0113k\u0101 t\u0101 pasludin\u0101\u0161anas br\u012bd\u012b, rada nepiecie\u0161am\u012bbu p\u0113c jauna un taisn\u012bg\u0101ka tiesisk\u0101 regul\u0113juma zemes lieto\u0161anas maksai.<\/p>\n
Tiesas sprieduma b\u016bt\u012bba un sekas<\/p>\n
Galvenais Satversmes tiesas secin\u0101jums ir tas, ka vairs nav pie\u013caujams tiesiskais regul\u0113jums, kas vienu tiesisko attiec\u012bbu dal\u012bbnieku \u2013 zemes \u012bpa\u0161niekus \u2013 nost\u0101da ac\u012bmredzami nelabv\u0113l\u012bg\u0101k\u0101 situ\u0101cij\u0101 nek\u0101 otru \u2013 b\u016bvju \u012bpa\u0161niekus. Tiesa uzsv\u0113ra, ka \u0161\u0101ds nel\u012bdzsvarot\u012bbas st\u0101voklis nevar nodro\u0161in\u0101t soci\u0101lo mieru un sabiedr\u012bbas labkl\u0101j\u012bbu. L\u012bdz ar to, regul\u0113jums, kas noteic zemes likumisk\u0101s lieto\u0161anas maksu 4% apm\u0113r\u0101 no zemes kadastr\u0101l\u0101s v\u0113rt\u012bbas, zaud\u0113s sp\u0113ku no 2027. gada 1. janv\u0101ra. L\u012bdz \u0161im br\u012bdim Saeimai ir j\u0101izstr\u0101d\u0101 jaunas likuma normas, kas nodro\u0161in\u0101s gan zemes \u012bpa\u0161nieku ties\u012bbas uz adekv\u0101tu atl\u012bdz\u012bbu, gan respekt\u0113s b\u016bvju \u012bpa\u0161nieku intereses.<\/p>\n
\u0160is spriedums ir gal\u012bgs un nep\u0101rs\u016bdzams. Tas noz\u012bm\u0113, ka zemes \u012bpa\u0161niekiem, kuri no 2025. gada 1. janv\u0101ra ir sa\u0146\u0113mu\u0161i maz\u0101ku atl\u012bdz\u012bbu nek\u0101 iepriek\u0161, valstij ir j\u0101atl\u012bdzina rad\u012btie zaud\u0113jumi. Ja Saeima nesp\u0113s izstr\u0101d\u0101t jaunu un taisn\u012bgu regul\u0113jumu noteiktaj\u0101 termi\u0146\u0101, zemes \u012bpa\u0161nieki var\u0113s v\u0113rsties ties\u0101, lai piepras\u012btu atbilsto\u0161u kompens\u0101ciju. Tiesa ir noteikusi, ka Saeimai l\u012bdz 2026. gada 1. j\u016bnijam ir j\u0101izveido meh\u0101nisms, k\u0101 atl\u012bdzin\u0101t zaud\u0113jumus zemes \u012bpa\u0161niekiem, kuru ties\u012bbas tika aizskartas no 2025. gada 1. janv\u0101ra l\u012bdz jaun\u0101 regul\u0113juma sp\u0113k\u0101 st\u0101\u0161an\u0101s dienai.<\/p>\n
Kas noveda pie \u0161\u012b l\u0113muma?<\/p>\n
Pieteikumu liet\u0101 iesniedza 21 priv\u0101tpersona, kas ir zemes \u012bpa\u0161nieki, uz kuras atrodas cit\u0101m person\u0101m piedero\u0161as b\u016bves. Vi\u0146i apstr\u012bd\u0113ja vair\u0101kas normat\u012bvo aktu normas, kas noteic zemes likumisk\u0101s lieto\u0161anas maksas apm\u0113ru un t\u0101s apr\u0113\u0137in\u0101\u0161anas principus. Galvenais str\u012bda iemesls bija tas, ka pa\u0161reiz\u0113jais regul\u0113jums, \u012bpa\u0161i gad\u012bjumos, kad zemes univers\u0101l\u0101 kadastr\u0101l\u0101 v\u0113rt\u012bba ir zem\u0101ka par fisk\u0101lo, noved pie zemes \u012bpa\u0161nieku ien\u0101kumu samazin\u0101juma. Da\u017ek\u0101rt zemes likumisk\u0101s lieto\u0161anas maksa pat nesedz nekustam\u0101 \u012bpa\u0161uma nodokli par zemi, kas piln\u012bb\u0101 izsl\u0113dz atl\u012bdz\u012bbas funkciju.<\/p>\n
Tiesa ar\u012b nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka likumdev\u0113js, cen\u0161oties aizsarg\u0101t dz\u012bvojamo \u0113ku \u012bpa\u0161niekus, nav pien\u0101c\u012bgi izv\u0113rt\u0113jis situ\u0101ciju. Pie\u0146\u0113mums, ka visi dz\u012bvojamo \u0113ku \u012bpa\u0161nieki ir soci\u0101li maz\u0101k aizsarg\u0101ti nek\u0101 zemes \u012bpa\u0161nieki, ir visp\u0101rin\u0101ts un ne vienm\u0113r atbilst realit\u0101tei, \u012bpa\u0161i gad\u012bjumos, kad \u0113ku \u012bpa\u0161nieki ir juridiskas personas. T\u0101pat par nesam\u0113r\u012bgu tika atz\u012bts noteiktais zemes maksas pieauguma ierobe\u017eojums l\u012bdz 30% gad\u0101 dz\u012bvojamo \u0113ku \u012bpa\u0161niekiem.<\/p>\n
Divas kadastr\u0101l\u0101s v\u0113rt\u012bbas un to ietekme<\/p>\n
Lai gan likumdev\u0113js ir centies risin\u0101t situ\u0101ciju, ievie\u0161ot divas kadastr\u0101l\u0101s v\u0113rt\u012bbas \u2013 univers\u0101lo un fisk\u0101lo, tas nav piln\u012bb\u0101 izdevies. Univers\u0101l\u0101 kadastr\u0101l\u0101 v\u0113rt\u012bba tiek uzskat\u012bta par aktualiz\u0113tu un tirgus situ\u0101cijai pietuvin\u0101tu, ta\u010du t\u0101 netiek izmantota nodok\u013cu apr\u0113\u0137in\u0101. Savuk\u0101rt fisk\u0101l\u0101 kadastr\u0101l\u0101 v\u0113rt\u012bba, kas nav aktualiz\u0113ta, tiek izmantota nodok\u013cu un citu publisko maks\u0101jumu apr\u0113\u0137in\u0101\u0161anai. \u0160\u0101da sist\u0113ma daudziem zemes \u012bpa\u0161niekiem rad\u012bjusi situ\u0101ciju, ka vi\u0146u zemes likumisk\u0101s lieto\u0161anas maksa samazin\u0101s, jo univers\u0101l\u0101 kadastr\u0101l\u0101 v\u0113rt\u012bba ir zem\u0101ka par fisk\u0101lo, t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di sa\u0146emot maz\u0101ku atl\u012bdz\u012bbu nek\u0101 agr\u0101k. Tas ir rad\u012bjis vil\u0161anos un neizpratni zemes \u012bpa\u0161nieku vid\u016b, kuri gaid\u012bju\u0161i taisn\u012bg\u0101ku atrisin\u0101jumu.<\/p>\n
N\u0101kotnes perspekt\u012bvas<\/p>\n
Satversmes tiesas spriedums ir skaidrs sign\u0101ls likumdev\u0113jam, ka ir nepiecie\u0161ams radik\u0101li p\u0101rskat\u012bt zemes lieto\u0161anas maksas regul\u0113jumu. Galvenais uzdevums ir pan\u0101kt patiesu taisn\u012bgumu un l\u012bdzsvaru starp zemes \u012bpa\u0161nieku un b\u016bvju \u012bpa\u0161nieku interes\u0113m. Lai gan 2027. gada s\u0101kums v\u0113l ir t\u0101lu, tas ir ar\u012b pietiekami \u012bss laiks, lai izstr\u0101d\u0101tu jaunu, visaptvero\u0161u un ilgtsp\u0113j\u012bgu likumprojektu. \u0160is process pras\u012bs r\u016bp\u012bgu anal\u012bzi, sabiedr\u012bbas dialogu un politisko gribu, lai rad\u012btu regul\u0113jumu, kam var\u0113tu uztic\u0113ties.<\/p>\n
\u0160is Satversmes tiesas l\u0113mums ir svar\u012bgs solis ce\u013c\u0101 uz taisn\u012bg\u0101ku un stabil\u0101ku tiesisko vidi Latvij\u0101, \u012bpa\u0161i nekustamo \u012bpa\u0161umu jom\u0101. Tas mudina sabiedr\u012bbu un politiskos l\u0113mumu pie\u0146\u0113m\u0113jus akt\u012bv\u0101k iesaist\u012bties un mekl\u0113t risin\u0101jumus, kas aizsarg\u0101 visu iesaist\u012bto pu\u0161u intereses, nevis tikai vienas grupas.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Satversmes tiesa (ST) ir pasludin\u0101jusi noz\u012bm\u012bgu spriedumu, atz\u012bstot, ka pa\u0161reiz\u0113jais regul\u0113jums, kas ierobe\u017eo zemes likumisk\u0101s lieto\u0161anas maksu l\u012bdz…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":71827,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[23,28,29,32,33,22,18292,30,31,35,39,38,36,37,34,18293,40,18294,20,26,27,13246,24,25,18291,21],"class_list":{"0":"post-71826","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-aktualitates","8":"tag-aktualitates","9":"tag-breaking-news","10":"tag-breakingnews","11":"tag-featured-news","12":"tag-featurednews","13":"tag-headlines","14":"tag-kadastrala-vertiba","15":"tag-latest-news","16":"tag-latestnews","17":"tag-latvia","18":"tag-latvian","19":"tag-latviesu","20":"tag-latviesu-valoda","21":"tag-latviesuvaloda","22":"tag-latvija","23":"tag-likumiskas-lietosanas-maksa","24":"tag-lv","25":"tag-nekustama-ipasuma-nodoklis","26":"tag-news","27":"tag-popularakas-zinas","28":"tag-popularakaszinas","29":"tag-satversmes-tiesa","30":"tag-top-stories","31":"tag-topstories","32":"tag-zemes-nomas-maksa","33":"tag-zinas"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@lv\/115702565643154858","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71826","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71826"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71826\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/71827"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71826"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71826"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71826"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}