{"id":72458,"date":"2025-12-12T13:02:08","date_gmt":"2025-12-12T13:02:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/72458\/"},"modified":"2025-12-12T13:02:08","modified_gmt":"2025-12-12T13:02:08","slug":"satversmes-tiesa-atcel-4-zemes-nomas-maksas-griestus-no-2027-gada-saeimai-jarada-jauns-regulejums-lente-lv-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/72458\/","title":{"rendered":"Satversmes tiesa atce\u013c 4% zemes nomas maksas griestus no 2027. gada; Saeimai j\u0101rada jauns regul\u0113jums\u00a0\u2014\u00a0Lente.lv"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Satversmes tiesa atce\u013c 4% zemes nomas maksas griestus, Saeimai j\u0101rada jauns regul\u0113jums<\/p>\n<p>Satversmes tiesa ir pie\u0146\u0113musi noz\u012bm\u012bgu l\u0113mumu, atce\u013cot l\u012bdz\u0161in\u0113jo ierobe\u017eojumu zemes nomas maksai l\u012bdz 4% no kadastr\u0101l\u0101s v\u0113rt\u012bbas. \u0160\u012bs izmai\u0146as st\u0101sies sp\u0113k\u0101 no 2027. gada 1. janv\u0101ra, uzliekot Saeimai par pien\u0101kumu izstr\u0101d\u0101t jaunu, taisn\u012bg\u0101ku un sabalans\u0113t\u0101ku regul\u0113jumu zemes nomas jom\u0101. Tiesa uzsv\u0113rusi, ka iepriek\u0161\u0113jais regul\u0113jums nav nodro\u0161in\u0101jis taisn\u012bgu l\u012bdzsvaru starp zemes \u012bpa\u0161nieku un b\u016bvju \u012bpa\u0161nieku interes\u0113m, radot netaisn\u012bgu situ\u0101ciju atsevi\u0161\u0137\u0101m personu grup\u0101m.<\/p>\n<p>Tiesas sprieduma b\u016bt\u012bba un sekas<\/p>\n<p>Satversmes tiesa ir konstat\u0113jusi, ka sp\u0113k\u0101 eso\u0161ais regul\u0113jums, kas ierobe\u017eoja zemes likumisk\u0101s lieto\u0161anas maksu l\u012bdz 4% no zemes kadastr\u0101l\u0101s v\u0113rt\u012bbas, nav sam\u0113rojams ar Latvijas Republikas Satversmi. Tiesa secin\u0101jusi, ka \u0161\u0101ds tiesiskais regul\u0113jums, kas vienu tiesisko attiec\u012bbu dal\u012bbnieku \u2013 zemes \u012bpa\u0161niekus \u2013 nost\u0101da ac\u012bmredzami nelabv\u0113l\u012bg\u0101k\u0101 situ\u0101cijas nek\u0101 otru \u2013 b\u016bvju \u012bpa\u0161niekus, nevar nodro\u0161in\u0101t soci\u0101lo mieru un sabiedr\u012bbas labkl\u0101j\u012bbu. \u0160is tiesiskais pa\u0146\u0113miens bie\u017ei vien rad\u012bjis vil\u0161anos un neizpratni zemes \u012bpa\u0161nieku vid\u016b, kuri ir gaid\u012bju\u0161i taisn\u012bg\u0101ku risin\u0101jumu sav\u0101m ties\u012bb\u0101m. L\u012bdz ar to, norma, kas noteic zemes likumisk\u0101s lieto\u0161anas maksu 4% apm\u0113r\u0101 no zemes kadastr\u0101l\u0101s v\u0113rt\u012bbas, zaud\u0113s sp\u0113ku no 2027. gada 1. janv\u0101ra.<\/p>\n<p>Likumdev\u0113jam ir dots laiks l\u012bdz 2026. gada 1. j\u016bnijam, lai izstr\u0101d\u0101tu jaunas likuma normas, kas nodro\u0161in\u0101s gan zemes \u012bpa\u0161nieku ties\u012bbas uz adekv\u0101tu atl\u012bdz\u012bbu, gan respekt\u0113s b\u016bvju \u012bpa\u0161nieku intereses. \u0160is spriedums ir gal\u012bgs un nep\u0101rs\u016bdzams. Tas noz\u012bm\u0113, ka zemes \u012bpa\u0161niekiem, kuri no 2025. gada 1. janv\u0101ra ir sa\u0146\u0113mu\u0161i maz\u0101ku atl\u012bdz\u012bbu nek\u0101 iepriek\u0161, valstij ir pien\u0101kums atl\u012bdzin\u0101t rad\u012btos zaud\u0113jumus. Ja Saeima nesp\u0113s izstr\u0101d\u0101t jaunu un taisn\u012bgu regul\u0113jumu noteiktaj\u0101 termi\u0146\u0101, zemes \u012bpa\u0161nieki var\u0113s v\u0113rsties ties\u0101, lai piepras\u012btu atbilsto\u0161u kompens\u0101ciju. Tiesa ir noteikusi, ka l\u012bdz min\u0113tajam termi\u0146am Saeimai ir j\u0101izveido meh\u0101nisms, k\u0101 atl\u012bdzin\u0101t zaud\u0113jumus zemes \u012bpa\u0161niekiem, kuru ties\u012bbas tika aizskartas no 2025. gada 1. janv\u0101ra l\u012bdz jaun\u0101 regul\u0113juma sp\u0113k\u0101 st\u0101\u0161an\u0101s dienai.<\/p>\n<p>Ce\u013c\u0161 uz taisn\u012bg\u0101ku regul\u0113jumu<\/p>\n<p>\u0160is Satversmes tiesas l\u0113mums ir svar\u012bgs solis ce\u013c\u0101 uz taisn\u012bg\u0101ku un stabil\u0101ku tiesisko vidi Latvij\u0101, \u012bpa\u0161i nekustamo \u012bpa\u0161umu jom\u0101. T\u0101 ir mudin\u0101jums sabiedr\u012bbai un politiskajiem l\u0113mumu pie\u0146\u0113m\u0113jiem akt\u012bv\u0101k iesaist\u012bties un mekl\u0113t risin\u0101jumus, kas aizsarg\u0101 visu iesaist\u012bto pu\u0161u intereses, nevis tikai vienas grupas. Tiesas spriedums atspogu\u013co nepiecie\u0161am\u012bbu p\u0113c r\u016bp\u012bgas un sabalans\u0113tas pieejas likumdo\u0161anas izstr\u0101d\u0113, \u012bpa\u0161i jaut\u0101jumos, kas skar \u012bpa\u0161umties\u012bbas un saimniecisko darb\u012bbu.<\/p>\n<p>J\u0101atz\u012bm\u0113, ka iepriek\u0161\u0113jais regul\u0113jums, kas st\u0101j\u0101s sp\u0113k\u0101 \u0161\u012b gada s\u0101kum\u0101, da\u013cai zemes \u012bpa\u0161nieku rad\u012bja situ\u0101ciju, kur\u0101 vi\u0146i sa\u0146\u0113ma maz\u0101ku atl\u012bdz\u012bbu nek\u0101 agr\u0101k. Tas notika gad\u012bjumos, kad zemes univers\u0101l\u0101 kadastr\u0101l\u0101 v\u0113rt\u012bba bija zem\u0101ka par fisk\u0101lo kadastr\u0101lo v\u0113rt\u012bbu. Tas noz\u012bm\u0113, ka, samaks\u0101jot nekustam\u0101 \u012bpa\u0161uma nodokli, da\u013ca iedz\u012bvot\u0101ju faktiski sa\u0146\u0113ma maz\u0101ku ien\u0101kumu no zemes \u012bpa\u0161uma nek\u0101 iepriek\u0161. Tiesa ir atzinusi, ka \u0161\u0101ds st\u0101voklis nav pie\u013caujams un ir j\u0101nodro\u0161ina zemes \u012bpa\u0161niekiem pien\u0101c\u012bga atl\u012bdz\u012bba.<\/p>\n<p>V\u0113sturiskais konteksts un n\u0101kotnes perspekt\u012bvas<\/p>\n<p>\u0160\u012b lieta nav pirm\u0101, kur\u0101 Satversmes tiesa v\u0113rt\u0113 zemes nomas maksas regul\u0113jumu. Jau iepriek\u0161, 2023. gad\u0101, tiesa bija non\u0101kusi pie secin\u0101juma, ka noteiktais zemes lieto\u0161anas maksim\u0101lais apm\u0113rs 4% apm\u0113r\u0101 no zemes kadastr\u0101l\u0101s v\u0113rt\u012bbas ir neatbilsto\u0161s Satversmei, jo tas nepietiekami nodro\u0161ina zemes \u012bpa\u0161nieku ties\u012bbas uz atl\u012bdz\u012bbu. Lai gan toreiz tika ieviestas izmai\u0146as, lai nodro\u0161in\u0101tu liel\u0101ku taisn\u012bgumu, tiesa secin\u0101jusi, ka piln\u012bgs taisn\u012bgums v\u0113l nav pan\u0101kts. Turpm\u0101kajos gados Saeimai b\u016bs j\u0101mekl\u0113 rado\u0161i un juridiski pamatoti risin\u0101jumi, lai izveidotu t\u0101du zemes nomas regul\u0113jumu, kas b\u016btu ilgtsp\u0113j\u012bgs un god\u012bgs pret vis\u0101m iesaist\u012btaj\u0101m pus\u0113m, \u0146emot v\u0113r\u0101 gan zemes \u012bpa\u0161nieku pamatties\u012bbas, gan b\u016bvju \u012bpa\u0161nieku intereses. Lai gan jaunais regul\u0113jums v\u0113l nav izstr\u0101d\u0101ts, ir skaidrs, ka tas pras\u012bs r\u016bp\u012bgu sabiedr\u012bbas, juristu un politi\u0137u sadarb\u012bbu, lai rastu optim\u0101lu risin\u0101jumu.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Satversmes tiesa atce\u013c 4% zemes nomas maksas griestus, Saeimai j\u0101rada jauns regul\u0113jums Satversmes tiesa ir pie\u0146\u0113musi noz\u012bm\u012bgu l\u0113mumu,&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":72459,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[23,28,29,32,33,22,18292,30,31,35,39,38,36,37,34,40,20,18414,26,27,141,13246,24,25,18413,21],"class_list":{"0":"post-72458","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-aktualitates","8":"tag-aktualitates","9":"tag-breaking-news","10":"tag-breakingnews","11":"tag-featured-news","12":"tag-featurednews","13":"tag-headlines","14":"tag-kadastrala-vertiba","15":"tag-latest-news","16":"tag-latestnews","17":"tag-latvia","18":"tag-latvian","19":"tag-latviesu","20":"tag-latviesu-valoda","21":"tag-latviesuvaloda","22":"tag-latvija","23":"tag-lv","24":"tag-news","25":"tag-nomas-maksa","26":"tag-popularakas-zinas","27":"tag-popularakaszinas","28":"tag-saeima","29":"tag-satversmes-tiesa","30":"tag-top-stories","31":"tag-topstories","32":"tag-zemes-noma","33":"tag-zinas"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@lv\/115706733828637152","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72458","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72458"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72458\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/72459"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72458"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72458"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72458"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}