{"id":73808,"date":"2025-12-13T23:16:29","date_gmt":"2025-12-13T23:16:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/73808\/"},"modified":"2025-12-13T23:16:29","modified_gmt":"2025-12-13T23:16:29","slug":"domes-atteikums-izdot-telekomunikaciju-sakaru-torna-buvatlauju-bijis-prettiesisks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/73808\/","title":{"rendered":"Domes atteikums izdot telekomunik\u0101ciju sakaru tor\u0146a b\u016bvat\u013cauju bijis prettiesisks"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sen\u0101ta Administrat\u012bvo lietu departaments atteicies ierosin\u0101t kas\u0101cijas tiesved\u012bbu liet\u0101, kur\u0101 Administrat\u012bv\u0101 apgabaltiesa atzinusi Ogres novada pa\u0161vald\u012bbas domes l\u0113mumu, ar kuru atteikts izdot b\u016bvat\u013cauju telekomunik\u0101ciju sakaru tor\u0146a b\u016bvniec\u012bbai, par prettiesisku. Sen\u0101ts nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka Ogres novada pa\u0161vald\u012bbas domes kas\u0101cijas s\u016bdz\u012bb\u0101 nav argumentu, kas var\u0113tu rad\u012bt \u0161aubas par Administrat\u012bv\u0101s apgabaltiesas sprieduma tiesiskumu, k\u0101 ar\u012b lietai nav noz\u012bmes judikat\u016bras veido\u0161an\u0101.<\/p>\n

Pieteikumu liet\u0101 bija iesniegusi SIA \u201cTeleTower\u201d, kas bija v\u0113rsusies Ogres novada b\u016bvvald\u0113 ar b\u016bvniec\u012bbas ieceri 60 metrus augsta telekomunik\u0101ciju sakaru tor\u0146a b\u016bvniec\u012bbai, bet b\u016bvvalde bija atteikusi izsniegt b\u016bvat\u013cauju, galvenok\u0101rt atsaucoties uz ieceres publiskaj\u0101 apsprie\u0161an\u0101 paustajiem iedz\u012bvot\u0101ju iebildumiem. Administrat\u012bv\u0101 rajona tiesa bija apmierin\u0101jusi pieteikumu, konstat\u0113jot, ka p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113tais l\u0113mums nav tiesisks, jo taj\u0101 nav min\u0113ts neviens pamatots apst\u0101klis, kas liegtu \u012bstenot b\u016bvniec\u012bbas ieceri, k\u0101 ar\u012b ticis sa\u0161aurin\u0101ts apstiprin\u0101tais teritorijas pl\u0101nojums, liedzot zemesgabal\u0101 izvietot \u0161im pl\u0101nojumam atbilsto\u0161u infrastrukt\u016bras objektu. Administrat\u012bv\u0101 apgabaltiesa pievienoj\u0101s \u0161\u012b sprieduma motiv\u0101cijai un atzina, ka nav saskat\u0101mi \u0161\u0137\u0113r\u0161\u013ci b\u016bvat\u013caujas izdo\u0161anai, papildus nor\u0101dot, ka \u0161\u0101das sakaru b\u016bves ir rakstur\u012bgas un nepiecie\u0161amas pils\u0113tvid\u0113 un ka b\u016bvvalde subjekt\u012bvas iedz\u012bvot\u0101ju ba\u017eas par sakaru tor\u0146a ietekmi uz vesel\u012bbu un visp\u0101r\u0113jo nepatiku pret projektu nost\u0101d\u012bjusi augst\u0101k par pieteic\u0113jas interes\u0113m, neizv\u0113rt\u0113jot t\u0101s p\u0113c b\u016bt\u012bbas. T\u0101 k\u0101 b\u016bvvalde pieteic\u0113jai jau bija izdevusi b\u016bvat\u013cauju, izpildot Sen\u0101ta l\u0113mumu par pagaidu noregul\u0113juma piem\u0113ro\u0161anu liet\u0101 (SKA-439\/2025<\/a>), Administrat\u012bv\u0101 apgabaltiesa atk\u0101rtoti nel\u0113ma par pieteikuma apmierin\u0101\u0161anu \u0161aj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101.<\/p>\n

Lieta Nr. SKA-915\/2025 (A420110424)<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"\/<\/p>\n

\u0160\u012b inform\u0101cija ir publisks pazi\u0146ojums un neatspogu\u013co LV port\u0101la viedokli. Par t\u0101s saturu atbild ies\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js. Public\u0113\u0161anas noteikumi<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Sen\u0101ta Administrat\u012bvo lietu departaments atteicies ierosin\u0101t kas\u0101cijas tiesved\u012bbu liet\u0101, kur\u0101 Administrat\u012bv\u0101 apgabaltiesa atzinusi Ogres novada pa\u0161vald\u012bbas domes l\u0113mumu,…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":73809,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[23,28,29,32,33,22,30,31,35,39,38,36,37,34,40,20,26,27,24,25,21],"class_list":{"0":"post-73808","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-latvija","8":"tag-aktualitates","9":"tag-breaking-news","10":"tag-breakingnews","11":"tag-featured-news","12":"tag-featurednews","13":"tag-headlines","14":"tag-latest-news","15":"tag-latestnews","16":"tag-latvia","17":"tag-latvian","18":"tag-latviesu","19":"tag-latviesu-valoda","20":"tag-latviesuvaloda","21":"tag-latvija","22":"tag-lv","23":"tag-news","24":"tag-popularakas-zinas","25":"tag-popularakaszinas","26":"tag-top-stories","27":"tag-topstories","28":"tag-zinas"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@lv\/115714810589289383","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73808","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73808"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73808\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/73809"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73808"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73808"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73808"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}