{"id":82302,"date":"2025-12-21T21:14:22","date_gmt":"2025-12-21T21:14:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/82302\/"},"modified":"2025-12-21T21:14:22","modified_gmt":"2025-12-21T21:14:22","slug":"brandavs-atzinies-kukula-apsolisana-usakovam","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/82302\/","title":{"rendered":"Brandavs atzinies kuku\u013ca apsol\u012b\u0161an\u0101 U\u0161akovam"},"content":{"rendered":"

Biju\u0161ais pasa\u017eieru p\u0101rvad\u0101t\u0101ja “R\u012bgas mikroautobusu satiksme<\/a>” (RMS) pastarpin\u0101tais \u012bpa\u0161nieks Aleksandrs Brandavs \u0161oruden samaks\u0101ja 73 t\u016bksto\u0161u eiro naudas sodu, jo ties\u0101 atzin\u0101s regul\u0101ru kuku\u013cu apsol\u012b\u0161an\u0101 k\u0101dai vado\u0161ai R\u012bgas domes (RD) amatpersonai, sv\u0113tdien v\u0113sta Latvijas Telev\u012bzijas (LTV<\/a>) raid\u012bjums “de facto”.<\/p>\n

Process, kas izaudzis no Brandava sarun\u0101m b\u0113d\u012bgi slavenaj\u0101 “Taure\u0146u” pirt\u012b, nu ir sadal\u012bts vair\u0101k\u0101s liet\u0101s. Kam\u0113r biju\u0161ais R\u012bgas m\u0113rs Nils U\u0161akovs<\/a> (“Saska\u0146a<\/a>“) vismaz pagaid\u0101m bauda Eiropas Parlamenta (EP) deput\u0101ta imunit\u0101ti, dr\u012bzum\u0101 uz aps\u016bdz\u0113to sola “mikri\u0146u” korupcijas<\/a> liet\u0101 non\u0101ks ar\u012b biju\u0161ais R\u012bgas vicem\u0113rs Andris Ameriks<\/a>, nor\u0101da “de facto”.<\/p>\n

“R\u012bgas satiksmes” (RS) Elektronisko nor\u0113\u0137inu projektu da\u013cas vad\u012bt\u0101js, uz\u0146\u0113muma “R\u012bgas karte<\/a>” valdes loceklis, partijas “Gods kalpot R\u012bgai<\/a>” valdes loceklis, kordiri\u0123ents. Aleksandram Brandavam 2017. gada septembr\u012b bija vair\u0101kas lomas, ta\u010du korupcijas apkarot\u0101ju uzman\u012bbu piesaist\u012bja vi\u0146a tik\u0161an\u0101s ar uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ju M\u0101ri Martinsonu Pier\u012bgas pirt\u012b “Taure\u0146i” un taj\u0101s run\u0101tais, zin\u0101ms “de facto”.<\/p>\n

“Tas izriet no sarunu ierakstiem, kur\u0101 viens no iesaist\u012btajiem st\u0101st\u012bja citai personai par tik\u0161anos ar amatperson\u0101m un notiku\u0161o vieno\u0161anos,” par spriedum\u0101 aprakst\u012btajiem notikumiem “de facto” saka prokurors Ando Skalbe. Vaic\u0101ts, vai sarunas ierakst\u012btas pirt\u012b, vi\u0146\u0161 atz\u012bst: “Nu j\u0101, iesp\u0113jams.”<\/p>\n

Prokurors Skalbe \u0161oruden vieno\u0161an\u0101s proces\u0101 pan\u0101ca Brandavam noties\u0101jo\u0161u spriedumu, kas jau oktobra beig\u0101s ir st\u0101jies sp\u0113k\u0101. Brandavs atzina savu vainu. Tiesa, p\u0101rbaudot iesniegto vieno\u0161anos un krimin\u0101llietas materi\u0101lus, konstat\u0113ja: kop\u012bgas tik\u0161an\u0101s laik\u0101 2017. gada septembr\u012b Brandavam k\u0101du priek\u0161likumu izteica RD amatpersona, kas ie\u0146em atbild\u012bgu st\u0101vokli. Saska\u0146\u0101 ar Krimin\u0101llikumu, \u0161\u0101ds statuss R\u012bg\u0101 ir tikai m\u0113ram, vicem\u0113ram un izpilddirektoram.<\/p>\n

K\u0101 zin\u0101ms, pag\u0101ju\u0161aj\u0101 EP sasaukum\u0101 prokurat\u016bra neveiksm\u012bgi bija l\u016bgusi atcelt deput\u0101ta imunit\u0101ti biju\u0161ajam R\u012bgas m\u0113ram U\u0161akovam un k\u0101dreiz\u0113jam vicem\u0113ram Amerikam. K\u0101p\u0113c Brandava spriedum\u0101 piemin\u0113ta vairs tikai viena amatpersona? Prokurors skaidro: Brandava nozieguma smagumu un sodu tas neietekm\u0113ja. “Tas ir zin\u0101ms kompromiss, jo persona bija gatava atz\u012bt tikai to, ka ir apsol\u012bjusi kukuli vienai amatpersonai, nevis div\u0101m. Lai pan\u0101ktu \u0101tr\u0101ku krimin\u0101ltiesisko attiec\u012bbu noregul\u0113jumu, es l\u0113mu, ka inkrimin\u0113\u0161u tikai, ka viena amatpersona ir \u0161eit figur\u0113jusi,” st\u0101sta Skalbe.<\/p>\n

RD amatpersonas priek\u0161likums Brandavam bija \u0161\u0101ds: t\u0101 var\u0113tu pan\u0101kt groz\u012bjumus normat\u012bvos, lai atlaides vair\u0101k\u0101m pasa\u017eieru kategorij\u0101m R\u012bg\u0101 var\u0113tu izmantot ar\u012b Brandavam pastarpin\u0101ti piedero\u0161\u0101s “R\u012bgas mikroautobusu satiksmes” (RMS) transportl\u012bdzek\u013cos. \u0160\u0101di groz\u012bjumi Brandava firmai nodro\u0161in\u0101tu liel\u0101ku pasa\u017eieru skaitu un t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di palielin\u0101tu apgroz\u012bjumu un pe\u013c\u0146u.<\/p>\n

To apzinoties, amatpersona piepras\u012bja Brandavam dot tai kukuli 50 % apm\u0113r\u0101 no R\u012bgas domes finans\u0113juma, kas tiks pie\u0161\u0137irts atkar\u012bb\u0101 no p\u0101rvad\u0101to, atlaides izmantoju\u0161o pasa\u017eieru skaita. Kad Brandavs bija izv\u0113rt\u0113jis kuku\u013ca do\u0161anas ekonomisko izdev\u012bgumu, vi\u0146\u0161 amatpersonai apliecin\u0101ja gatav\u012bbu dot kukuli un pied\u0101v\u0101ja variantus: ar p\u0101rskait\u012bjumiem vi\u0146\u0161 maks\u0101tu 45 %, bet skaidr\u0101 naud\u0101 \u2013 30 % no sa\u0146emt\u0101 R\u012bgas domes finans\u0113juma.<\/p>\n

Rezult\u0101t\u0101 abi vienoj\u0101s, ka kuku\u013ca apm\u0113rs b\u016bs 30 % skaidr\u0101 naud\u0101. Spriedum\u0101 ar\u012b nor\u0101d\u012bts, ka Brandavs un amatpersona, b\u016bdami inform\u0113ti par pasa\u017eieru skaitu, kuri l\u012bdz \u0161im vid\u0113ji m\u0113nes\u012b izmanto brauk\u0161anas maksas atvieglojumus, var\u0113ja paredz\u0113t: kukulis b\u016btu vismaz 19 t\u016bksto\u0161i eiro m\u0113nes\u012b.<\/p>\n

Vai \u0161is sol\u012bjums tika \u012bstenots ar\u012b dz\u012bv\u0113? “Tika m\u0113\u0123in\u0101ts ieg\u016bt pier\u0101d\u012bjumus, bet diem\u017e\u0113l neveiksm\u012bgi. T\u0101 k\u0101 m\u0113s \u0161aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 varam run\u0101t tikai par kuku\u013ca piepras\u012b\u0161anu un kuku\u013ca apsol\u012bjumu,” st\u0101sta prokurors Skalbe.<\/p>\n

Brandavs ar sava advok\u0101ta Normunda Du\u013cevska starpniec\u012bbu “de facto” spriedumu koment\u0113t atteic\u0101s. Tom\u0113r “de facto” zin\u0101ms, ka vi\u0146a liec\u012bbas attiecas uz Nilu U\u0161akovu.<\/p>\n

Tas gan nenoz\u012bm\u0113, ka izbeigta b\u016btu lieta pret Ameriku: prokurors prognoz\u0113, ka t\u0101 tiesai tiks nos\u016bt\u012bta tuv\u0101kaj\u0101 laik\u0101, jo aps\u016bdz\u012bba vi\u0146am jau ir celta. Ameriks, kur\u0161 p\u0113c EP deput\u0101ta karjeras beig\u0101m p\u0113rn s\u0101ka darbu R\u012bgas br\u012bvostas p\u0101rvald\u0113 eksperta status\u0101, uz “de facto” zvaniem un \u012bszi\u0146\u0101m neatbild\u0113ja. Nel\u012bdz\u0113ja ar\u012b br\u012bvostas preses dienesta iesaist\u012b\u0161ana.<\/p>\n

U\u0161akovs par Brandava spriedum\u0101 atz\u012bto un pret vi\u0146u v\u0113rstaj\u0101m aizdom\u0101m par kuku\u013ca piepras\u012b\u0161anu v\u0113l\u0113j\u0101s atbild\u0113t rakstiski. Konkr\u0113tos “de facto” jaut\u0101jumus vi\u0146\u0161 gan liel\u0101koties ignor\u0113ja.<\/p>\n

“Pildot amata pien\u0101kumus, esmu r\u012bkojies stingr\u0101 saska\u0146\u0101 ar visiem sp\u0113k\u0101 eso\u0161ajiem likumiem un normat\u012bvajiem aktiem. Atturos koment\u0113t procesus, kuru deta\u013cas un apst\u0101k\u013ci man nav zin\u0101mi, ta\u010du kategoriski noliedzu jebk\u0101du saist\u012bbu ar jebk\u0101diem iesp\u0113jamiem pretlikum\u012bgiem nodar\u012bjumiem,” raksta biju\u0161ais R\u012bgas m\u0113rs U\u0161akovs.<\/p>\n

U\u0161akovs ar\u012b neatbild\u0113ja, k\u0101 r\u012bkotos tagad, ja prokurat\u016bra atkal l\u016bgs EP vi\u0146am atcelt imunit\u0101ti. \u0160obr\u012bd ir gan cits EP sasaukums, gan cits procesa virz\u012bt\u0101js un \u0123ener\u0101lprokurors, turkl\u0101t nu ir ar\u012b Latvijas tiesas spriedum\u0101 fiks\u0113ts kuku\u013ca pied\u0101v\u0101juma fakts.<\/p>\n

\u0122ener\u0101lprokurors Arm\u012bns Meisters sarun\u0101 ar “de facto” \u0161\u0101du iesp\u0113ju \u2013 atk\u0101rtotu v\u0113r\u0161anos pie EP \u2013 neizsl\u0113dz: “Paldies, ka j\u016bs man v\u0113rs\u0101t uzman\u012bbu! Es noteikti p\u0101rrun\u0101\u0161u ar prokuroru, k\u0101da ir t\u0101 situ\u0101cija un ko m\u0113s dar\u0101m t\u0101l\u0101k. Protams, tikai vienk\u0101r\u0161i s\u0113d\u0113t un gaid\u012bt, kad [U\u0161akova EP deput\u0101ta pilnvaru] termi\u0146\u0161 beigsies, ar\u012b nav pareizi. Ja ir iesp\u0113jas, tad ir j\u0101izmanto.”<\/p>\n

No pamatlietas izdal\u012btais process pret U\u0161akovu \u0161obr\u012bd ir aptur\u0113ts. Pret vi\u0146u aizdomas izvirz\u012btas ne vien par kuku\u013ca pras\u012b\u0161anu, bet ar\u012b par dienesta st\u0101vok\u013ca \u013caunpr\u0101t\u012bgu izmanto\u0161anu. P\u0113c \u0161\u012b panta liet\u0101 aps\u016bdz\u0113ti v\u0113l divi cilv\u0113ki. Tie ir biju\u0161ais RS valdes priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101js Leons Bemhens un k\u0101dreiz\u0113jais RD Satiksmes departamenta direktora pien\u0101kumu pild\u012bt\u0101js Em\u012bls Jakrins<\/a>. Lieta \u0161oned\u0113\u013c nos\u016bt\u012bta uz tiesu. RS un R\u012bgas pa\u0161vald\u012bba tur piedal\u012bsies k\u0101 cietu\u0161ie, jo \u0161o iest\u0101\u017eu skat\u012bjum\u0101 t\u0101m ir nodar\u012bts 10 miljonu eiro liels kait\u0113jums.<\/p>\n

Krimin\u0101lproces\u0101, kura ietvaros 2023. gada vasar\u0101 notika krat\u012b\u0161anas pie “R\u012bgas kartes” pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jiem, bija aizdomas par pa\u0161vald\u012bbas uz\u0146\u0113muma slepenu sadarb\u012bbu ar priv\u0101tiem uz\u0146\u0113mumiem, lai m\u0101ksl\u012bgi palielin\u0101tu pieg\u0101d\u0101to pre\u010du un pakalpojumu cenas. Brandavam \u0161ai proces\u0101 ir ties\u012bbas uz aizst\u0101v\u012bbu.<\/p>\n

Lasiet ar\u012b<\/p>\n

\"Aptauja:<\/a><\/p>\n

Seko “Delfi” ar\u012b Instagram<\/a> un YouTube<\/a> profil\u0101 \u2013 pievienojies, lai uzzin\u0101tu svar\u012bg\u0101ko un interesant\u0101ko pirmais!<\/p>\n

Publik\u0101cijas saturs vai t\u0101s jebk\u0101da apjoma da\u013ca ir aizsarg\u0101ts autorties\u012bbu objekts Autorties\u012bbu likuma izpratn\u0113, un t\u0101 izmanto\u0161ana bez izdev\u0113ja at\u013caujas ir aizliegta. Vair\u0101k lasi \u0161eit<\/a>