{"id":84293,"date":"2025-12-23T14:49:12","date_gmt":"2025-12-23T14:49:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/84293\/"},"modified":"2025-12-23T14:49:12","modified_gmt":"2025-12-23T14:49:12","slug":"izmeklesanas-nepilnibu-del-buvnieku-kartela-lietu-atdod-caurskatisanai-apgabaltiesa-raksts-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/84293\/","title":{"rendered":"Izmekl\u0113\u0161anas nepiln\u012bbu d\u0113\u013c b\u016bvnieku karte\u013ca lietu atdod caurskat\u012b\u0161anai apgabalties\u0101 \/ Raksts"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Augst\u0101k\u0101 tiesa (AT) ir atc\u0113lusi Administrat\u012bv\u0101s apgabaltiesas spriedumu, ar kuru bija noraid\u012bti b\u016bvniec\u012bbas komercsabiedr\u012bbu pieteikumi par Konkurences padomes (KP) l\u0113muma atcel\u0161anu, un nodevusi lietu jaunai izskat\u012b\u0161anai Administrat\u012bvaj\u0101 apgabalties\u0101.<\/p>\n<p>Gan KP, gan Administrat\u012bv\u0101 apgabaltiesa, lai pier\u0101d\u012btu pieteic\u0113ju izdar\u012bto konkurences ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, neat\u013cauti izmantoju\u0161as Korupcijas nov\u0113r\u0161anas un apkaro\u0161anas biroja operat\u012bv\u0101s darb\u012bbas pas\u0101kum\u0101 ieg\u016bto inform\u0101ciju, proti, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lsm.lv\/raksts\/zinas\/latvija\/04.02.2024-apgabaltiesa-buvnieku-kartela-pieradisanai-driksteja-izmantot-knab-ierakstitas-sarunas.a541563\/\" class=\"lsm-link\" data-type=\"article\" data-id=\"541563\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">slepeni noklaus\u012btu sarunu ierakstus un to at\u0161ifr\u0113jumus<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Tiesa uzsv\u0113rusi, ka t\u0101da konkurences ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101puma k\u0101 karte\u013ca vieno\u0161an\u0101s atkl\u0101\u0161ana neiek\u013caujas Operat\u012bv\u0101s darb\u012bbas likum\u0101 izsme\u013co\u0161i uzskait\u012btajos m\u0113r\u0137os un uzdevumos, kuru sasnieg\u0161anai pie\u013caujams izmantot sevi\u0161\u0137\u0101 veid\u0101 veicam\u0101 operat\u012bv\u0101s darb\u012bbas pas\u0101kum\u0101 ieg\u016bto inform\u0101ciju.<\/p>\n<p>AT atzinusi, ka \u0161\u0101du inform\u0101ciju, pat ja t\u0101 ir pievienota krimin\u0101lprocesa materi\u0101liem,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>nevar br\u012bvi nodot t\u0101l\u0101k izmanto\u0161anai t\u0101diem m\u0113r\u0137iem, kas nav saist\u012bti ar operat\u012bv\u0101s darb\u012bbas uzdevumiem.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Pret\u0113j\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 tas pav\u0113rtu pla\u0161u un nekontrol\u0113tu iesp\u0113ju operat\u012bv\u0101s darb\u012bbas rezult\u0101t\u0101 ieg\u016bto inform\u0101ciju, neierobe\u017eojot datu veidu un apjomu, caur krimin\u0101lprocesu nodot nenoteiktam sa\u0146\u0113m\u0113ju lokam izmanto\u0161anai faktiski jebkur\u0101 cit\u0101 proces\u0101, kur\u0101 t\u0101 it k\u0101 b\u016btu nepiecie\u0161ama.<\/p>\n<p>Tas ac\u012bmredzami rad\u012btu b\u016btisku patva\u013c\u012bgas iejauk\u0161an\u0101s un pilnvaru \u013caunpr\u0101t\u012bgas izmanto\u0161anas risku un neatbilstu likuma kvalit\u0101tes krit\u0113rijam attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz paredzam\u012bbu, secin\u0101jusi\u00a0tiesa.<\/p>\n<p>AT uzsv\u0113rusi, ka operat\u012bv\u0101s darb\u012bbas pas\u0101kuma rezult\u0101t\u0101 ieg\u016bt\u0101 inform\u0101cija ar\u012b p\u0113c t\u0101s pievieno\u0161anas krimin\u0101lprocesa materi\u0101liem, k\u0101 tas bija noticis izskat\u0101maj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101, saglab\u0101 savu \u012bpa\u0161o tiesisko statusu un izmanto\u0161anas ierobe\u017eojumus.<\/p>\n<p>Turkl\u0101t AT Sen\u0101ta judikat\u016br\u0101<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>jau agr\u0101k atz\u012bts, ka operat\u012bv\u0101 sarunu noklaus\u012b\u0161an\u0101s ir veicama vien\u012bgi, lai atkl\u0101tu noziegumus, bet ne krimin\u0101lp\u0101rk\u0101pumus.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>T\u0101 k\u0101 likumdev\u0113js ir vair\u0101kk\u0101rt apzin\u0101ti noraid\u012bjis iesp\u0113ju kriminaliz\u0113t darb\u012bbas, kas attiecas uz aizliegtu vieno\u0161anos konkurences ties\u012bb\u0101s, to atkl\u0101\u0161anai operat\u012bv\u0101s darb\u012bbas veikt ir aizliegts.<\/p>\n<p>AT atzina, ka tiesiskaj\u0101 regul\u0113jum\u0101 nav noteikts skaidrs pamats tam, kas \u013cautu operat\u012bv\u0101s darb\u012bbas rezult\u0101t\u0101 ieg\u016bto inform\u0101ciju nodot KP izmanto\u0161anai administrat\u012bvaj\u0101 proces\u0101.<\/p>\n<p>No Operat\u012bv\u0101s darb\u012bbas likuma izriet pat skaidrs aizliegums izmantot operat\u012bv\u0101s darb\u012bbas pas\u0101kumus citu,\u00a0likum\u0101 nemin\u0113tu, uzdevumu un m\u0113r\u0137u \u012bsteno\u0161anai.<\/p>\n<p>Tas noz\u012bm\u0113, ka person\u0101m nav un nevar b\u016bt pamata paredz\u0113t, ka operat\u012bv\u0101s darb\u012bbas pas\u0101kumos ieg\u016bt\u0101 inform\u0101cija var tikt nodota un izmantota administrat\u012bvaj\u0101 proces\u0101, lai pier\u0101d\u012btu karte\u013ca vieno\u0161anos. T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di AT secin\u0101jusi, ka izskat\u0101maj\u0101 liet\u0101 operat\u012bv\u0101s darb\u012bbas rezult\u0101t\u0101 ieg\u016bt\u0101s inform\u0101cijas izmanto\u0161ana neatbilda ties\u012bbu uz priv\u0101to dz\u012bvi aizsardz\u012bbas tv\u0113rumam.<\/p>\n<p>Administrat\u012bvajai apgabaltiesai, atk\u0101rtoti izskatot lietu, b\u016bs j\u0101v\u0113rt\u0113, vai p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113t\u0101 KP l\u0113muma tiesiskumu pamato p\u0101r\u0113jie liet\u0101 eso\u0161ie pier\u0101d\u012bjumi, k\u0101 ar\u012b j\u0101apsver iesp\u0113ja v\u0113rsties Eiropas Savien\u012bbas Ties\u0101 ar prejudici\u0101lajiem jaut\u0101jumiem, uz kuriem kas\u0101cijas s\u016bdz\u012bb\u0101s bija nor\u0101d\u012bju\u0161i pieteic\u0113ji.<\/p>\n<p>KONTEKSTS:<\/p>\n<p>Administrat\u012bv\u0101 apgabaltiesa iepriek\u0161\u00a0noraid\u012bjusi 13 b\u016bvfirmu pieteikumu par KP 2021. gada 30. j\u016blija l\u0113muma atcel\u0161anu b\u016bvnieku karte\u013ca liet\u0101.<\/p>\n<p>Tiesa noraid\u012bjusi SIA &#8220;Abora&#8221; un SIA &#8220;Tehnocentrs&#8221;, SIA &#8220;Ar\u010ders&#8221;, SIA &#8220;Latvijas energoceltnieks&#8221;, AS &#8220;LNK Industries&#8221;, SIA &#8220;LNK (Latvijas Novit\u0101tes Komplekss)&#8221;, SIA &#8220;Merks&#8221; un AS &#8220;Merko Ehitus&#8221;, SIA &#8220;Re&amp;Re&#8221;, SIA &#8220;Rere b\u016bve&#8221; un AS &#8220;Rere grupa&#8221;, SIA &#8220;Skonto b\u016bve&#8221; un AS &#8220;UGN&#8221; pieteikumu.<\/p>\n<p>KP 2021. gad\u0101 atkl\u0101ja b\u016bvniec\u012bbas uz\u0146\u0113mumu karteli, kura dal\u012bbnieki biju\u0161i iesaist\u012bti vismaz 70 iepirkumos par kop\u0113jo l\u012bgumsummu 687 miljoni eiro.<\/p>\n<p>Desmit b\u016bvnieku kartel\u012b iesaist\u012btos uz\u0146\u0113mumus KP sod\u012bja ar naudas sodu kopum\u0101 16 652 927 eiro apm\u0113r\u0101. Starp 10 sod\u012btajiem uz\u0146\u0113mumiem ir SIA &#8220;Skonto b\u016bve&#8221;, SIA &#8220;Latvijas energoceltnieks&#8221;, SIA &#8220;Velve&#8221;, SIA &#8220;Ar\u010ders&#8221;, SIA &#8220;Rere b\u016bve&#8221;, SIA &#8220;Re &amp; Re&#8221;, SIA &#8220;RBSSKALS b\u016bvvad\u012bba&#8221;, SIA &#8220;Abora&#8221;, &#8220;LNK Industries&#8221; un SIA &#8220;Merks&#8221;. Tiesa &#8220;RBSSKALS b\u016bvvad\u012bba&#8221; jau bija likvid\u0113ta, t\u0101p\u0113c sods netika piespriests.<\/p>\n<p>Asto\u0146as no desmit KP sod\u012btaj\u0101m b\u016bvfirm\u0101m Administrat\u012bvaj\u0101 apgabalties\u0101 p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113ja KP l\u0113mumu, bet, t\u0101 k\u0101 vair\u0101kas p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u012bbas b\u016bvfirmas iesniedza kop\u0101 ar m\u0101tesuz\u0146\u0113mumiem, kopum\u0101 liet\u0101 k\u0101 pras\u012bt\u0101ji ir 13 uz\u0146\u0113mumi.<\/p>\n<p>Apvienot\u0101 lieta ierosin\u0101ta par &#8220;Skonto b\u016bves&#8221;, &#8220;Latvijas energoceltnieka&#8221;, &#8220;Rere b\u016bves&#8221; un t\u0101s m\u0101tesuz\u0146\u0113muma AS &#8220;Rere grupa&#8221;, &#8220;Ar\u010dera&#8221;, &#8220;LNK Industries&#8221;, &#8220;Abora&#8221; un t\u0101s m\u0101tesuz\u0146\u0113muma SIA &#8220;Tehnocentrs&#8221;, &#8220;Re &amp; Re&#8221;, &#8220;LNK Industries&#8221; m\u0101tesuz\u0146\u0113muma SIA &#8220;LNK (Latvijas novit\u0101tes komplekss)&#8221;, &#8220;Merks&#8221; un t\u0101 m\u0101tesuz\u0146\u0113muma AS &#8220;Merko Ehitus&#8221; un &#8220;Ar\u010dera&#8221; m\u0101tesuz\u0146\u0113muma AS &#8220;UGN&#8221; iesniegumiem.<\/p>\n<p>KP l\u0113mumu no desmit sod\u012btajiem uz\u0146\u0113mumiem nav p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113ju\u0161i divi \u2013 &#8220;Velve&#8221;, ar kuru KP vienoj\u0101s par izl\u012bgumu un sniedza pozit\u012bvu atzinumu par uz\u0146\u0113muma veiktajiem pas\u0101kumiem pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja &#8220;uzticam\u012bbas atjauno\u0161anai&#8221;, k\u0101 ar\u012b &#8220;RBSSKALS b\u016bvvad\u012bba&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Gad\u012bjum\u0101, ja tiesa pasludin\u0101s pieteic\u0113jiem nelabv\u0113l\u012bgu spriedumu, b\u016bs j\u0101maks\u0101 sods un \u0161ie uz\u0146\u0113mumi nedr\u012bkst\u0113s piedal\u012bties valsts iepirkumos noteiktu laiku, k\u0101 ar\u012b pret tiem var\u0113s s\u0101kt celt pras\u012bbas par jau \u012bstenotiem projektiem.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Augst\u0101k\u0101 tiesa (AT) ir atc\u0113lusi Administrat\u012bv\u0101s apgabaltiesas spriedumu, ar kuru bija noraid\u012bti b\u016bvniec\u012bbas komercsabiedr\u012bbu pieteikumi par Konkurences padomes&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":84188,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[23,28,29,32,33,22,30,31,35,39,38,36,37,34,40,20,26,27,24,25,21],"class_list":{"0":"post-84293","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-latvija","8":"tag-aktualitates","9":"tag-breaking-news","10":"tag-breakingnews","11":"tag-featured-news","12":"tag-featurednews","13":"tag-headlines","14":"tag-latest-news","15":"tag-latestnews","16":"tag-latvia","17":"tag-latvian","18":"tag-latviesu","19":"tag-latviesu-valoda","20":"tag-latviesuvaloda","21":"tag-latvija","22":"tag-lv","23":"tag-news","24":"tag-popularakas-zinas","25":"tag-popularakaszinas","26":"tag-top-stories","27":"tag-topstories","28":"tag-zinas"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@lv\/115769439864861832","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84293","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=84293"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84293\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/84188"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=84293"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=84293"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=84293"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}