Ekonomisko lietu tiesa (ELT) noraid\u012bjusi hokejista Sanda Ozoli\u0146a pieteikumu pret partneri golfa biznes\u0101, \u017eurn\u0101listu Armandu Pu\u010di par dal\u012bbnieka izsl\u0113g\u0161anu no uz\u0146\u0113muma SIA “Golfs & Karti”, noskaidroja a\u0123ent\u016bra LETA.<\/p>\n
T\u0101pat tiesa nol\u0113ma no “Golfs & Karti” par labu Pu\u010dem piedz\u012bt ar lietas ve\u0161anu saist\u012btos izdevumus 1425 eiro apm\u0113r\u0101.<\/p>\n
Pras\u012bba pret Pu\u010di par vi\u0146a izsl\u0113g\u0161anu no uz\u0146\u0113muma pamatota ar to, ka 90% uz\u0146\u0113muma da\u013cu pieder Ozoli\u0146am, bet tikai 10% Pu\u010dem. No 2003.gada 5.septembra l\u012bdz 2022.gada 11.maijam Pu\u010de bija valdes loceklis ar ties\u012bb\u0101m p\u0101rst\u0101v\u0113t uz\u0146\u0113mumu atsevi\u0161\u0137i un vi\u0146\u0161 vienpersoniski vad\u012bja un p\u0101rst\u0101v\u0113ja uz\u0146\u0113mumu, kam\u0113r Ozoli\u0146\u0161 nodarboj\u0101s ar hokeju.<\/p>\n
Pras\u012bb\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012bts, ka Pu\u010de nepild\u012bja savas saist\u012bbas, k\u0101 ar\u012b nodar\u012bja b\u016btisku kait\u0113jumu uz\u0146\u0113muma interes\u0113m. Sabiedr\u012bbas pamatkapit\u0101ls ir vair\u0101kk\u0101rt palielin\u0101ts, ta\u010du uz\u0146\u0113muma r\u012bc\u012bb\u0101 nav inform\u0101cijas par to, ka Pu\u010de ir veicis pamatkapit\u0101la apmaksu.<\/p>\n
T\u0101pat Pu\u010de, atst\u0101jot valdes locek\u013ca amatu, nenodeva valdei uz\u0146\u0113muma dokumentus, kas ir Pu\u010des r\u012bc\u012bb\u0101 un attiecas uz uz\u0146\u0113muma saimniecisko darb\u012bbu, k\u0101 ar\u012b nesniedza detaliz\u0113tu atskaiti par veikto darb\u012bbu valdes locek\u013ca amat\u0101 un uz\u0146emtaj\u0101m saist\u012bb\u0101m, l\u012bdz ar ko uz\u0146\u0113mums atst\u0101ts nefunkcion\u0113t\u0101 st\u0101vokl\u012b.<\/p>\n
Pieteikum\u0101 apgalvots, ka Pu\u010de k\u0101 uz\u0146\u0113muma dal\u012bbnieks viltoja Ozoli\u0146a parakstus, sast\u0101dot un komercre\u0123istr\u0101 iesniedzot viltotus dal\u012bbnieku sapul\u010du protokolus, k\u0101 ar\u012b atsevi\u0161\u0137us dokumentus.<\/p>\n
Tiesa pras\u012bbu noraid\u012bja, uzsverot, ka Ozoli\u0146\u0161 nav pier\u0101d\u012bjis, ka Pu\u010dem piedero\u0161\u0101s 10% da\u013cas no pamatkapit\u0101la neb\u016btu apmaks\u0101tas. K\u013c\u016bdains ir ar\u012b pras\u012bt\u0101ja uzskats, ka da\u013cu apmaksas faktu vajadz\u0113ja pier\u0101d\u012bt tie\u0161i ar uz\u0146\u0113muma konta izdruk\u0101m.<\/p>\n
Tiesa ar\u012b v\u0113r\u0161 uzman\u012bbu, ka pat gad\u012bjum\u0101, ja dal\u012bbnieks neb\u016btu veicis pamatkapit\u0101la apmaksu, tad tas neb\u016btu pamats vi\u0146a izsl\u0113g\u0161anai atbilsto\u0161i Komerclikuma 195.pantam.<\/p>\n
Ozoli\u0146\u0161 ties\u0101 ar\u012b nav pier\u0101d\u012bjis saist\u012bbu neizpildi, papildinot, ka no Ozoli\u0146a izvirz\u012btajiem apgalvojumiem un apst\u0101k\u013ciem nav iesp\u0113jams nodal\u012bt un konstat\u0113t, vai un k\u0101du no min\u0113taj\u0101m darb\u012bb\u0101m Pu\u010de k\u0101 valdes loceklis ir veicis apzin\u0101ti, \u013caunpr\u0101t\u012bgi vai ar nol\u016bku kait\u0113t uz\u0146\u0113muma interes\u0113m.<\/p>\n
Proti, pat gad\u012bjum\u0101, ja vair\u0101ki no pras\u012bbas pieteikum\u0101 ietvertajiem apgalvojumiem apstiprin\u0101tos ar pier\u0101d\u012bjumiem, tad tas autom\u0101tiski nenoz\u012bm\u0113tu, ka tas ir pamats atbild\u0113t\u0101ja k\u0101 dal\u012bbnieka izsl\u0113g\u0161anai. Piem\u0113ram, \u0161\u0137ietami neizdev\u012bga dar\u012bjuma nosl\u0113g\u0161ana var liecin\u0101t ar\u012b<\/p>\n
tikai par neuzman\u012bbu, nevis t\u012b\u0161u un sistem\u0101tisku darb\u012bbu uz\u0146\u0113muma intere\u0161u aizskar\u0161anai.<\/p>\n
Tiesa ar\u012b nor\u0101da, ka j\u0101\u0146em ar\u012b v\u0113r\u0101, ka gad\u012bjum\u0101, ja valdes loceklis savus pien\u0101kumus neveic k\u0101 krietns un r\u016bp\u012bgs saimnieks, tad vi\u0146u var atcelt. Ozoli\u0146am visu \u0161o laika periodu, kad Pu\u010de bija valdes loceklis, pieder\u0113ja 90% no pamatkapit\u0101la, k\u0101 ar\u012b vi\u0146\u0161 bija valdes priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101js, tom\u0113r nekad netika izvirz\u012bts jaut\u0101jums par atbild\u0113t\u0101ja k\u0101 valdes locek\u013ca atcel\u0161anu, jo tas slikti veiktu savus pien\u0101kumus.<\/p>\n
Spriedum\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012bts, ka vienlaikus, atbildot uz tiesas jaut\u0101jumiem, pras\u012bt\u0101js apstiprin\u0101ja, ka Ozoli\u0146am netika liegta pieeja uz\u0146\u0113muma dokumentiem, bet tie nekad netika piepras\u012bti. Ozoli\u0146\u0161 ar\u012b nevien\u0101 br\u012bd\u012b nav izvirz\u012bjis pretenzijas, ka k\u0101d\u0101 no gadu p\u0101rskatiem b\u016btu nor\u0101d\u012bta nekorekta inform\u0101cija.<\/p>\n
T\u0101pat Ozoli\u0146\u0161 apgalvoja, ka pat nesaprata, ka visu \u0161o laiku ir bijis valdes priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101js, lai ar\u012b pats ir parakst\u012bjis dibin\u0101\u0161anas dokumentus, t\u0101p\u0113c nav ar\u012b saprotams, k\u0101ds tie\u0161i Ozoli\u0146am vai uz\u0146\u0113muma var\u0113tu b\u016bt radies aizsk\u0101rums, ja ar\u012b 2006.gada dal\u012bbnieku sapulces protokol\u0101 par vi\u0146a iev\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu vald\u0113 vi\u0146a paraksts b\u016btu, piem\u0113ram, atveidots ar kop\u0113\u0161anu.<\/p>\n
Glu\u017ei pret\u0113ji, pats Ozoli\u0146\u0161 apgalvo, ka t\u0101 bija iepriek\u0161 sarun\u0101t\u0101 p\u0101rvald\u012bbas k\u0101rt\u012bba, ka visu veic Pu\u010de k\u0101 valdes loceklis un Ozoli\u0146\u0161 neiesaist\u0101s un visp\u0101r neinteres\u0113jas par uz\u0146\u0113muma darb\u012bbu. \u0160\u0101dos apst\u0101k\u013cos pat gad\u012bjum\u0101, ja Ozoli\u0146a paraksti attiec\u012bgajos dokumentos tiktu atz\u012bti par “iekop\u0113tiem”, nevis pa\u0161roc\u012bgi parakst\u012btiem, tad nav saprotams, k\u0101 tie\u0161i tas b\u016btu rad\u012bjis b\u016btisku aizsk\u0101rumu uz\u0146\u0113muma interes\u0113m.<\/p>\n
Attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz pras\u012bt\u0101ja apgalvojumiem par gr\u0101matved\u012bbas dokumentiem tiesa konstat\u0113, ka nav pier\u0101d\u012bts, ka Pu\u010de neb\u016btu nodevis k\u0101dus uz\u0146\u0113muma dokumentus.<\/p>\n
Jau v\u0113st\u012bts, ka \u0161is ir jau vismaz ceturtais str\u012bds starp biznesa partneriem, kur\u0161 non\u0101cis ties\u0101.<\/p>\n
Iepriek\u0161 sp\u0113k\u0101 st\u0101jies tiesas spriedums, ar kuru apmierin\u0101ta Pu\u010des pras\u012bba pret Ozoli\u0146u un “Golfs & Karti” par dal\u012bbnieku sapulces l\u0113mumu atz\u012b\u0161anu par sp\u0113k\u0101 neeso\u0161iem.<\/p>\n
T\u0101pat ties\u0101 ir v\u0113l viens l\u012bdz\u012bgs str\u012bds, kur\u0101 viens no sabiedr\u012bbas dal\u012bbniekiem v\u0113rs\u0101s ties\u0101, l\u016bdzot atz\u012bt par sp\u0113k\u0101 neeso\u0161u uz\u0146\u0113muma sapulces l\u0113mumu.<\/p>\n
P\u0113c tam, kad tika uzklaus\u012bti pu\u0161u paskaidrojumi, k\u0101 ar\u012b p\u0101rbaud\u012bti un izv\u0113rt\u0113ti lietas materi\u0101li to kopsakar\u012bb\u0101, tiesa 2025.gada 30.j\u016bnij\u0101 nosprieda noraid\u012bt sabiedr\u012bbas dal\u012bbnieka pras\u012bbu. Spriedums tika p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113ts un atrodas R\u012bgas apgabalties\u0101, kura lietu pl\u0101no izskat\u012bt 2026.gada 4.febru\u0101r\u012b plkst.13.<\/p>\n
T\u0101pat Zemgales rajona tiesa Tukum\u0101 2026.gada 16.febru\u0101r\u012b plkst.11 pl\u0101no turpin\u0101t v\u0113rt\u0113t Ozoli\u0146a pras\u012bbu pret Pu\u010di par par\u0101da piedzi\u0146u.<\/p>\n
Jau v\u0113st\u012bts, ka 2002.gad\u0101 toreiz\u0113jais Nacion\u0101l\u0101s hokeja l\u012bgas (NHL) sp\u0113l\u0113t\u0101js Ozoli\u0146\u0161 R\u012bg\u0101, \u0136\u012b\u0161ezera krast\u0101, izveidoja golfa laukumu, bet sporta \u017eurn\u0101lists Pu\u010de k\u013cuva par “Ozo golfa kluba” direktoru. Amatu Pu\u010de atst\u0101ja 2022.gad\u0101.<\/p>\n
Golfa laukumu apsaimnieko “Golfs & Karti”, kuras \u012bpa\u0161nieki ir Ozoli\u0146\u0161 (90% da\u013cu) un Pu\u010de (10% da\u013cu).<\/p>\n
Pu\u010di un Ozoli\u0146u saista ne tikai biznesa p\u0101rvald\u012b\u0161ana, bet ar\u012b gr\u0101matas, jo Pu\u010de ir vair\u0101ku biogr\u0101fisku gr\u0101matu par Ozoli\u0146u autors.<\/p>\n
Nedz Ozoli\u0146\u0161, nedz Pu\u010de a\u0123ent\u016brai LETA pla\u0161\u0101kus koment\u0101rus par tiesved\u012bbu iemesliem nesniedza.<\/p>\n
“Golfs & Karti” re\u0123istr\u0113ts 1999.gad\u0101, un t\u0101 pamatkapit\u0101ls ir 1,39 miljoni eiro. 2024.gad\u0101 uz\u0146\u0113mums str\u0101d\u0101ja ar 370 270 eiro apgroz\u012bjumu, kas bija par 12% maz\u0101k nek\u0101 2023.gad\u0101, un 12 240 eiro pe\u013c\u0146u.<\/p>\n
\u017durn\u0101ls “Priv\u0101t\u0101 Dz\u012bve” v\u0113st\u012bja, ka augusta s\u0101kum\u0101 izsol\u0113 non\u0101cis Ozoli\u0146a nekustamais \u012bpa\u0161ums “Kalns\u0113tas” \u0100da\u017eu novad\u0101, Tallinas \u0161osej\u0101 25. \u012apa\u0161ums sast\u0101v no zemes gabala ar kop\u0113jo plat\u012bbu 1,616 hekt\u0101ri, div\u0101m dz\u012bvojamaj\u0101m m\u0101j\u0101m un div\u0101m saimniec\u012bbas \u0113k\u0101m. Tiesu izpild\u012bt\u0101ja r\u012bkot\u0101s izsoles s\u0101kumcena ir 650 000 eiro.<\/p>\n
Izsole saist\u012bta ar tiesved\u012bbu, kas norit starp biju\u0161ajiem laul\u0101tajiem. Sandra Ozoli\u0146a no biju\u0161\u0101 v\u012bra prasa piedz\u012bt 1,64 miljonus eiro. Ozoli\u0146\u0161 \u017eurn\u0101lam koment\u0113ja, ka \u0161\u012b izsole “ir t\u012br\u0101kais juridiskais jaut\u0101jums”.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Ekonomisko lietu tiesa (ELT) noraid\u012bjusi hokejista Sanda Ozoli\u0146a pieteikumu pret partneri golfa biznes\u0101, \u017eurn\u0101listu Armandu Pu\u010di par dal\u012bbnieka…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":8683,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[129,363,35,39,38,36,37,34,40,364,67,365],"class_list":{"0":"post-8682","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-sports","8":"tag-__typenameadvicekeyword","9":"tag-id1351","10":"tag-latvia","11":"tag-latvian","12":"tag-latviesu","13":"tag-latviesu-valoda","14":"tag-latviesuvaloda","15":"tag-latvija","16":"tag-lv","17":"tag-slugtiesa","18":"tag-sports","19":"tag-titletiesa"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8682","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8682"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8682\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8683"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8682"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8682"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8682"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}