{"id":90501,"date":"2025-12-31T02:53:11","date_gmt":"2025-12-31T02:53:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/90501\/"},"modified":"2025-12-31T02:53:11","modified_gmt":"2025-12-31T02:53:11","slug":"sasteigti-pabeidzot-pirmstiesas-procesu-un-nepareizi-kvalificejot-nodarijumu-parkaptas-cietusas-personas-tiesibas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/90501\/","title":{"rendered":"Sasteigti pabeidzot pirmstiesas procesu un nepareizi kvalific\u0113jot nodar\u012bjumu, p\u0101rk\u0101ptas cietu\u0161\u0101s personas ties\u012bbas"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sen\u0101ta Krimin\u0101llietu departaments 22. decembr\u012b atkl\u0101t\u0101 tiesas s\u0113d\u0113 izskat\u012bja pieteikuma iesniedz\u0113ja pieteikumus un Austrumzemgales prokurat\u016bras prokurora l\u0113mumu par pieteikumu par krimin\u0101lprocesa atjauno\u0161anu sakar\u0101 ar jaunatkl\u0101tiem apst\u0101k\u013ciem. Uzklaus\u012bjis prokurora, pieteikuma iesniedz\u0113ja un vi\u0146a juridisk\u0101s pal\u012bdz\u012bbas sniedz\u0113ja viedokli, Sen\u0101ts atzina, ka ir pamats atcelt Zemgales rajona tiesas spriedumu, ar kuru apstiprin\u0101ta vieno\u0161an\u0101s par vainas atz\u012b\u0161anu un sodu. Lieta ir nos\u016bt\u012bta Austrumzemgales prokurat\u016brai, lai turpin\u0101tu pirmstiesas krimin\u0101lprocesu.<\/p>\n

Krimin\u0101lproces\u0101, par kura atjauno\u0161anu bija iesniegts pieteikums, pie krimin\u0101latbild\u012bbas bija saukta persona, kurai bija inkrimin\u0113ta transportl\u012bdzek\u013ca vad\u012b\u0161ana alkohola reibum\u0101. \u0160\u012bs personas vad\u012btais transportl\u012bdzeklis bija iesaist\u012bts ce\u013cu satiksmes negad\u012bjum\u0101 ar otru transportl\u012bdzekli, kura vad\u012bt\u0101js p\u0113c notiku\u0161\u0101 bija nog\u0101d\u0101ts slimn\u012bc\u0101. V\u0113l\u0101k veiktaj\u0101 medic\u012bniskaj\u0101 ekspert\u012bz\u0113 cietu\u0161ajam vad\u012bt\u0101jam tika konstat\u0113ti viegli miesas boj\u0101jumi. T\u0101 k\u0101 s\u0101kotn\u0113jais krimin\u0101lprocess jau bija ticis pabeigts un vieno\u0161an\u0101s apstiprin\u0101ta ar sp\u0113k\u0101 st\u0101ju\u0161os tiesas spriedumu, cietu\u0161ais vad\u012bt\u0101js bija v\u0113rsies prokurat\u016br\u0101, uzskatot, ka ir pamats \u0161o krimin\u0101lprocesu atjaunot. Austrumzemgales prokurat\u016bras prokurors, veicis jaunatkl\u0101to apst\u0101k\u013cu izmekl\u0113\u0161anu, bija atzinis, ka pieteikums ir nododams izskat\u012b\u0161anai Sen\u0101tam.<\/p>\n

Sen\u0101ts konstat\u0113ja, ka pabeigtaj\u0101 krimin\u0101lproces\u0101 otra transportl\u012bdzek\u013ca vad\u012bt\u0101js nav ticis atz\u012bts par cietu\u0161o vai ieguvis k\u0101du citu krimin\u0101lprocesu\u0101lu statusu. \u0160im transportl\u012bdzek\u013ca vad\u012bt\u0101jam nodar\u012btie vieglie miesas boj\u0101jumi bija konstat\u0113ti paral\u0113li ierosin\u0101t\u0101 administrat\u012bv\u0101 p\u0101rk\u0101puma proces\u0101, kas p\u0113c eksperta atzinuma sa\u0146em\u0161anas tika izbeigts sakar\u0101 ar paz\u012bm\u0113m, ka var\u0113tu b\u016bt noticis noziedz\u012bgs nodar\u012bjums. Tom\u0113r procesa virz\u012bt\u0101js tobr\u012bd jau bija pabeidzis s\u0101kotn\u0113jo krimin\u0101lprocesu, nenoskaidrojot, vai pie krimin\u0101latbild\u012bbas saukt\u0101 persona nevar\u0113tu b\u016bt izdar\u012bjusi smag\u0101ku noziedz\u012bgu nodar\u012bjumu, un nenodro\u0161inot iesaist\u012btajai cietu\u0161ajai personai iesp\u0113ju aizst\u0101v\u0113t aizskart\u0101s intereses, lai ar\u012b faktiskie apst\u0101k\u013ci abos procesos bija nesaraujami saist\u012bti. Sen\u0101ts uzsv\u0113ra, ka v\u0113l\u0101k atkl\u0101ju\u0161\u0101s procesa virz\u012bt\u0101ja k\u013c\u016bdas parasti nav pietiekams pamats jaunatkl\u0101ta apst\u0101k\u013ca konstat\u0113\u0161anai, tom\u0113r \u0161aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 faktiski nav izmekl\u0113ta noziedz\u012bg\u0101 nodar\u012bjuma es\u012bba un cietu\u0161ajai personai liegtas ties\u012bbas piedal\u012bties krimin\u0101lproces\u0101. Sen\u0101ta ieskat\u0101 tas liecina par pietiekami b\u016btisku p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, lai atz\u012btu, ka liet\u0101 atkl\u0101jies jaunatkl\u0101ts apst\u0101klis, un atjaunotu pabeigto krimin\u0101lprocesu.<\/p>\n

Lieta SKK-J-273\/2025<\/a> (19520454024)<\/p>\n

\"\"\/<\/p>\n

\u0160\u012b inform\u0101cija ir publisks pazi\u0146ojums un neatspogu\u013co LV port\u0101la viedokli. Par t\u0101s saturu atbild ies\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js. Public\u0113\u0161anas noteikumi<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Sen\u0101ta Krimin\u0101llietu departaments 22. decembr\u012b atkl\u0101t\u0101 tiesas s\u0113d\u0113 izskat\u012bja pieteikuma iesniedz\u0113ja pieteikumus un Austrumzemgales prokurat\u016bras prokurora l\u0113mumu par…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":79472,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[23,28,29,32,33,22,30,31,35,39,38,36,37,34,40,20,26,27,24,25,21],"class_list":{"0":"post-90501","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-aktualitates","8":"tag-aktualitates","9":"tag-breaking-news","10":"tag-breakingnews","11":"tag-featured-news","12":"tag-featurednews","13":"tag-headlines","14":"tag-latest-news","15":"tag-latestnews","16":"tag-latvia","17":"tag-latvian","18":"tag-latviesu","19":"tag-latviesu-valoda","20":"tag-latviesuvaloda","21":"tag-latvija","22":"tag-lv","23":"tag-news","24":"tag-popularakas-zinas","25":"tag-popularakaszinas","26":"tag-top-stories","27":"tag-topstories","28":"tag-zinas"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@lv\/115811922893491334","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90501","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90501"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90501\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/79472"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90501"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90501"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90501"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}