{"id":97117,"date":"2026-01-07T11:27:23","date_gmt":"2026-01-07T11:27:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/97117\/"},"modified":"2026-01-07T11:27:23","modified_gmt":"2026-01-07T11:27:23","slug":"raimonda-paula-varda-izmantosana-bez-atlaujas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/97117\/","title":{"rendered":"Raimonda Paula v\u0101rda izmanto\u0161ana bez at\u013caujas"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bez Raimonda Paula piekri\u0161anas tiek r\u012bkots vi\u0146a v\u0101rd\u0101 nosaukts lielkoncerts un tirgotas bi\u013cetes uz \u201cRaimonda Paula dziesmu sv\u0113tkiem\u201d. V\u0113l trak\u0101k \u2013 \u0161o dziesmu sv\u0113tku organiz\u0113t\u0101jam J\u0101nim \u0136irsim piedero\u0161a SIA \u201cAUSS Media\u201d re\u0123istr\u0113jusi k\u0101 savu pre\u010du z\u012bmi \u201cRAIMONDA PAULA DZIESMU SV\u0112TKI Manai Dzimtenei\u201d. Kam lai s\u016bdz\u0113 b\u0113du Maestro, kam?*<\/p>\n

Pag\u0101ju\u0161\u0101 gada nogal\u0113 Maestro publiski nep\u0101rprotami pauda savu nost\u0101ju, ka nepiekr\u012bt sava v\u0101rda izmanto\u0161anai priv\u0101ta lielkoncerta r\u012bko\u0161anai. Visticam\u0101k, tobr\u012bd Maestro v\u0113l pat nenojauta, ka vi\u0146am pa\u0161am teik\u0161ana par sava v\u0101rda izmanto\u0161anu ir stipri jau \u201capcirpta\u201d.<\/p>\n

Publiski nav dzird\u0113ts, ka Maestro b\u016btu nov\u0113l\u0113jis sava v\u0101rda un uzv\u0101rda izmanto\u0161anu tik pla\u0161\u0101 koncertbiznesa spektr\u0101. 28.12.2025. organizatori publiski atbild\u0113ja tikai par ska\u0146darbu izmanto\u0161anas autorties\u012bbu aspektiem, cit\u0113jot: \u201cAttiec\u012bb\u0101 uz Maestro Raimonda Paula ska\u0146darbu izmanto\u0161anu – sv\u0113tku organiz\u0113\u0161ana notiek saska\u0146\u0101 ar sp\u0113k\u0101 eso\u0161o tiesisko regul\u0113jumu, iev\u0113rojot autoru ties\u012bbu aizsardz\u012bbas principus.\u201d<\/p>\n

Bet, kas attiecas uz Maestro personv\u0101rda izmanto\u0161anu, organizatori klus\u0113 k\u0101 \u016bdeni mut\u0113 ie\u0146\u0113mu\u0161i – varb\u016bt t\u0101p\u0113c, ka viss ir ticis sak\u0101rtots daudz smalk\u0101k, nek\u0101 s\u0101kotn\u0113ji var\u0113ja \u0161\u0137ist.<\/p>\n

Apst\u0101k\u013cos, kad daudzmaz b\u016bsim tiku\u0161i skaidr\u012bb\u0101, cik organizatoru komp\u0101niju ir pie vad\u012bbas gro\u017eiem, seko n\u0101kamais satricino\u0161ais pav\u0113rsiens.<\/p>\n

Juridiski izsmalcin\u0101t\u0101 \u201c\u0123\u0113rbtuve\u201d<\/p>\n

Patentu valdes vestaj\u0101 Pre\u010du z\u012bmju re\u0123istr\u0101 melns uz balta las\u0101ms, ka J. \u0136irsim piedero\u0161\u0101 SIA \u201cAUSS Media<\/a>\u201d 2025. gada 20. mart\u0101 re\u0123istr\u0113jusi pre\u010du z\u012bmi \u201cRAIMONDA PAULA DZIESMU SV\u0112TKI Manai Dzimtenei\u201d.<\/p>\n

Uzreiz j\u0101atz\u012bm\u0113, ka Patentu valde veic pieteikuma iepriek\u0161\u0113jo izskat\u012b\u0161anu (form\u0101lo pras\u012bbu p\u0101rbaudi) un ekspert\u012bzi. Pre\u010du z\u012bmju likum\u0101 ir noteikti gad\u012bjumi, k\u0101dos Patentu valde var atteikt pre\u010du z\u012bmes re\u0123istr\u0101ciju. Visus atteikuma pamatojumus var skat\u012bt Pre\u010du z\u012bmju likuma 6. un 8. pant\u0101. Konkr\u0113tais gad\u012bjums ar Raimonda Paula v\u0101rda izmanto\u0161anu nav tas gad\u012bjums, kuru Pre\u010du z\u012bmju likums burtiski aizliegtu, l\u012bdz ar to, visticam\u0101k, Patentu valdei nebija tiesiska pamata atteikt re\u0123istr\u0113t \u0161\u0101du SIA \u201cAUSS Media\u201d pre\u010du z\u012bmes pieteikumu.<\/p>\n

Juridiski smalki nostr\u0101d\u0101ts. Gr\u016bti notic\u0113t, ka autorties\u012bbu jom\u0101 Maestro tiek \u201ciz\u0123\u0113rbts\u201d pamaz\u0101m, pa kluso. Publisk\u0101 re\u0123istra ieraksti run\u0101 pietiekami skaidri.<\/p>\n

\"\"\/ <\/p>\n

Mulsa situ\u0101cija<\/p>\n

Ar milzu sparu turpin\u0101s bi\u013ce\u0161u p\u0101rdo\u0161ana uz 2026. gada 11. j\u016blij\u0101 Me\u017eaparka Lielaj\u0101 estr\u0101d\u0113 pl\u0101noto lielkoncertu “Raimonda Paula dziesmu sv\u0113tki \u201cManai dzimtenei'”, pret kuru kategoriskus iebildumus paudis pats Maestro Raimonds Pauls.<\/p>\n

Situ\u0101cija ir mulsa. K\u0101 t\u0101 var? K\u0101 tas iesp\u0113jams? Raimonds Pauls ir paudis nepatiku pret lielkoncerta organiz\u0113t\u0101jiem, nesaucot gan vi\u0146us konkr\u0113tos v\u0101rdos.<\/p>\n

P\u0113c \u201cNeatkar\u012bg\u0101s\u201d publik\u0101cij\u0101m<\/a> lielkoncerta organiz\u0113t\u0101ji ar\u012b pa\u0161i beidzot tika skaidr\u012bb\u0101, k\u0101das juridiska formas veidojums tie ir.<\/p>\n

P\u0113c publisk\u0101 nesmukuma \u201cManai Dzimtenei\u201d p\u0101rtrauca d\u0113v\u0113t sevi par fondu un m\u0101jaslap\u0101 kori\u0123\u0113ja juridisko statusu atbilsto\u0161i Uz\u0146\u0113mumu re\u0123istr\u0101 fiks\u0113tajam – \u201cbiedr\u012bba\u201d. Bet tie tikai ir t\u0101di s\u012bkumi, jo sav\u0101 veid\u0101 Maestro v\u0101rds jau ir \u201cprihvatiz\u0113ts\u201d.<\/p>\n

Protams, tikai pats Maestro zin\u0101s lab\u0101k, ko dar\u012bt – protest\u0113t, ties\u0101ties, s\u016bdz\u0113ties, m\u0113\u0123in\u0101t aizliegt pas\u0101kumu vai nelikties ne zinis.<\/p>\n

Nezinot prec\u012bzi visus lietas apst\u0101k\u013cus, bet izv\u0113rt\u0113jot pieejamo inform\u0101ciju, savu redz\u0113jumu jau p\u0113rn\u0101 gada nogal\u0113 pauda zv\u0113rin\u0101ts advok\u0101ts Lauris Klagi\u0161s, kur\u0161 sava biroja \u201cFacebook\u201d lap\u0101 ir ievietojis rakstu \u201cKur beidzas godin\u0101\u0161ana un s\u0101kas ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101pums?\u201d. Taj\u0101 sniegta \u0161\u0101 gad\u012bjuma juridisk\u0101 anal\u012bze.<\/p>\n

\u201cRaimonds Pauls<\/a> ir nor\u0101d\u012bjis: “Es ta\u010du nepiekritu, lai vi\u0146i r\u012bko to! Vi\u0146i ta\u010du uz savu galvu!”<\/p>\n

Lai gan pas\u0101kuma r\u012bkot\u0101ji apgalvo, ka v\u0113las “godin\u0101t Maestro dai\u013cradi” un ka visas at\u013caujas ir ieg\u016btas, no juridisk\u0101 viedok\u013ca \u0161\u012b situ\u0101cija izgaismo b\u016btiskas probl\u0113mas Latvijas pas\u0101kumu r\u012bko\u0161anas kult\u016br\u0101,\u201d sac\u012bts zv\u0113rin\u0101ta advok\u0101ta Laura Klagi\u0161a \u201cFacebook\u201d ierakst\u0101.<\/p>\n

V\u0101rda izmanto\u0161ana pe\u013c\u0146as g\u016b\u0161anai<\/p>\n

\u201cViens no rupj\u0101kajiem p\u0101rk\u0101pumiem \u0161aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 ir Maestro v\u0101rda un uzv\u0101rda izmanto\u0161ana pas\u0101kuma nosaukum\u0101 un rekl\u0101m\u0101 bez vi\u0146a piekri\u0161anas. Latvijas Republikas Rekl\u0101mas likums nosaka striktu aizliegumu: rekl\u0101m\u0101 aizliegts izmantot citas personas v\u0101rdu, uzv\u0101rdu vai cit\u0101du identific\u0113jo\u0161u apz\u012bm\u0113jumu bez \u0161\u012bs personas piekri\u0161anas. \u0160is aizliegums ir imperat\u012bvs. Fakts, ka persona ir sabiedr\u012bb\u0101 paz\u012bstama, nedod ties\u012bbas citiem komersantiem izmantot t\u0101s v\u0101rdu, lai veicin\u0101tu bi\u013ce\u0161u p\u0101rdo\u0161anu un g\u016btu pe\u013c\u0146u. Raimonda Paula v\u0101rds ir \u201cz\u012bmols\u201d ar milz\u012bgu pievienoto v\u0113rt\u012bbu, un tikai vi\u0146am pa\u0161am ir ties\u012bbas lemt, kur un k\u0101 tas tiek izmantots,\u201d nor\u0101da L. Klagi\u0161s. <\/a><\/p>\n

Koncerta nosaukums “Raimonda Paula dziesmu sv\u0113tki” <\/p>\n

\u201cVidusm\u0113ra pat\u0113r\u0113t\u0101jam tas rada nep\u0101rprotamu iespaidu, ka pas\u0101kumu r\u012bko, atbalsta vai taj\u0101 vismaz piedal\u0101s pats komponists. Situ\u0101ciju v\u0113l kliedzo\u0161\u0101ku padara fakts, ka bi\u013ce\u0161u cenas uz \u0161o pas\u0101kumu sasniedz pat 150 eiro, tom\u0113r publiskaj\u0101 telp\u0101 nav pieejama nek\u0101da inform\u0101cija, kas liecin\u0101tu, ka kaut da\u013ca no \u0161\u012bs iespaid\u012bg\u0101s summas b\u016btu paredz\u0113ta pa\u0161am Maestro k\u0101 atl\u012bdz\u012bba. P\u0101rdot d\u0101rgas bi\u013cetes, izmantojot person\u012bbas uzticam\u012bbas kapit\u0101lu pret\u0113ji \u0161\u012bs personas gribai un bez finansi\u0101la labuma pa\u0161am autoram, ir ne tikai ne\u0113tiski, bet ar\u012b uzskat\u0101ma par maldino\u0161u komercpraksi, ko aizliedz Pat\u0113r\u0113t\u0101ju ties\u012bbu aizsardz\u012bbas likums,\u201d pau\u017e zv\u0113rin\u0101ts advok\u0101ts.<\/p>\n

At\u013caujas esot \u201cnok\u0101rtotas\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cR\u012bkot\u0101ji publiski aizbildin\u0101s, ka “aran\u017e\u0113jumi un at\u013caujas ir nok\u0101rtotas”. \u0160eit bie\u017ei tiek jauktas divas da\u017e\u0101das lietas: publisk\u0101 izpild\u012bjuma licence un autora personisk\u0101s ties\u012bbas. Saska\u0146\u0101 ar Autorties\u012bbu likumu autoram ir neatsavin\u0101mas personisk\u0101s ties\u012bbas izlemt, vai un kad darbs tiks publiskots, aizliegt darba p\u0101rveido\u0161anu un jebk\u0101du krop\u013co\u0161anu (aran\u017e\u0113\u0161anu bez saska\u0146o\u0161anas), k\u0101 ar\u012b pretoties t\u0101dai darba izmanto\u0161anai, kas var kait\u0113t autora godam vai cie\u0146ai,\u201d pie\u013cauj Lauris Klagi\u0161s.<\/p>\n

Tas esot \u201cvelt\u012bjums\u201d<\/p>\n

Lietojot sal\u012bdzin\u0101jumus ar l\u012bdz\u012bg\u0101m situ\u0101cij\u0101m, jurists raksta: \u201cR\u012bkot\u0101ju arguments, ka pas\u0101kums ir \u201cvelt\u012bjums\u201d, neiztur nek\u0101du kritisku v\u0113rt\u0113jumu un rada b\u012bstamu precedentu. Iedom\u0101jieties situ\u0101ciju: k\u0101ds uz\u0146\u0113mums bez saska\u0146o\u0161anas atver r\u016bpn\u012bcu, s\u0101k ra\u017eot elektroauto, uzl\u012bm\u0113 t\u0101m \u201cTesla\u201d logo un p\u0101rdod par tirgus cenu. Kad \u012alons Masks vai \u201cTesla\u201d juristi iesniedz pras\u012bbu ties\u0101 par pre\u010du z\u012bmes z\u0101dz\u012bbu un pat\u0113r\u0113t\u0101ju maldin\u0101\u0161anu, uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113js publiski sa\u0161utis pazi\u0146o: \u201cJ\u016bs p\u0101rprat\u0101t! M\u0113s negras\u0101mies maks\u0101t Maskam vai pras\u012bt vi\u0146a at\u013cauju – \u0161\u012b r\u016bpn\u012bca ir m\u016bsu godin\u0101jums vi\u0146a in\u017eeniera \u0123\u0113nijam! M\u0113s ta\u010du populariz\u0113jam elektroauto ideju!\u201d Tas ir t\u0101pat k\u0101 uzrakst\u012bt un izdot jaunu gr\u0101matu \u201cHarijs Poters un Raimonda nosl\u0113pumi\u201d, p\u0101rdot to veikalos un D\u017e. K. Roulingai pazi\u0146ot: \u201cJums nekas nepien\u0101kas, jo m\u0113s ta\u010du tikai godin\u0101m j\u016bsu rad\u012bto burvju pasauli!\u201d<\/p>\n

Tas b\u016btu identiski situ\u0101cijai, ja k\u0101ds uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113js sar\u012bkotu Kristapa Porzi\u0146\u0123a basketbola nometni ar 500 eiro dal\u012bbas maksu, bet bez pa\u0161a Kristapa zi\u0146as. Kad sportists iebilstu, r\u012bkot\u0101js atbild\u0113tu: \u201cBet m\u0113s ta\u010du tikai cildin\u0101m tavu ieguld\u012bjumu Latvijas basketbol\u0101!\u201d Nevien\u0101 tiesisk\u0101 valst\u012b \u0161\u0101ds arguments nepasarg\u0101tu no soda. Sve\u0161a v\u0101rda un rad\u012bt\u0101 produkta (\u0161aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 – m\u016bzikas un v\u0101rda \u201cRaimonds Pauls\u201d) izmanto\u0161ana savas pe\u013c\u0146as g\u016b\u0161anai bez \u012bpa\u0161nieka piekri\u0161anas ir nevis cie\u0146as izr\u0101d\u012b\u0161ana, bet gan ciniska parazit\u0113\u0161ana uz sve\u0161iem pan\u0101kumiem.<\/p>\n

Ja koncert\u0101 pl\u0101nots atska\u0146ot \u201c\u012bpa\u0161i \u0161im koncertam rad\u012btus jaunus Maestro ska\u0146darbu aran\u017e\u0113jumus\u201d, tam nepiecie\u0161ama tie\u0161a autora piekri\u0161ana. Standarta licences nenosedz ties\u012bbas br\u012bvi p\u0101rveidot ska\u0146darbus vai iek\u013caut tos kontekst\u0101, kas autoram ir nepie\u0146emams. Maestro ba\u017eas par izpild\u012bjuma kvalit\u0101ti un finan\u0161u caursp\u012bd\u012bgumu ir pietiekams pamats, lai uzskat\u012btu, ka \u0161\u0101ds pas\u0101kums var kait\u0113t vi\u0146a reput\u0101cijai.\u201d<\/p>\n

M\u0113r\u0137is \u201cgodin\u0101t\u201d neatbr\u012bvo no pien\u0101kuma iev\u0113rot likumu <\/p>\n

\u0145emot v\u0113r\u0101 situ\u0101cijas nopietn\u012bbu un iesp\u0113jamo kait\u0113jumu reput\u0101cijai, advok\u0101ts iesaka Maestro izv\u0113rt\u0113t iesp\u0113ju v\u0113rsties:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Pat\u0113r\u0113t\u0101ju ties\u012bbu aizsardz\u012bbas centr\u0101 (PTAC), zi\u0146ojot par negod\u012bgu un maldino\u0161u komercpraksi;<\/li>\n
  2. Ties\u0101, lai civiltiesisk\u0101 k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101 aizst\u0101v\u0113tu savas ties\u012bbas uz v\u0101rdu un godu, k\u0101 ar\u012b piepras\u012btu pas\u0101kuma atcel\u0161anu vai nosaukuma mai\u0146u;<\/li>\n
  3. Valsts policij\u0101, lai l\u016bgtu izv\u0113rt\u0113t, vai r\u012bkot\u0101ju darb\u012bb\u0101s, iekas\u0113jot iev\u0113rojamas naudas summas uz autora v\u0101rda r\u0113\u0137ina bez vi\u0146a zi\u0146as, nav saskat\u0101mas noziedz\u012bga nodar\u012bjuma paz\u012bmes.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    \u201c\u0160is gad\u012bjums ir spilgts atg\u0101din\u0101jums visiem pas\u0101kumu r\u012bkot\u0101jiem: intelektu\u0101lais \u012bpa\u0161ums un personisk\u0101s ties\u012bbas nav formalit\u0101te. Bez autora piekri\u0161anas r\u012bkots \u201cvelt\u012bjuma koncerts\u201d ar autora v\u0101rdu virsrakst\u0101 ir taisn\u0101kais ce\u013c\u0161 uz tiesved\u012bbu un administrat\u012bvajiem sodiem,\u201d rezum\u0113 eksperts.<\/p>\n

    Lauris Klagi\u0161s piebilst, ka vi\u0146a rakst\u0101 paustais viedoklis un juridisk\u0101 situ\u0101cijas anal\u012bze ir balst\u012bta tikai un vien\u012bgi uz publik\u0101cijas br\u012bd\u012b publiski pieejamo inform\u0101ciju un iesaist\u012bto pu\u0161u sniegtajiem pazi\u0146ojumiem pla\u0161sazi\u0146as l\u012bdzek\u013cos. Autora r\u012bc\u012bb\u0101 nav inform\u0101cijas par to, vai starp pus\u0113m past\u0101v k\u0101das nepublic\u0113tas vieno\u0161an\u0101s, konfidenci\u0101li l\u012bgumi vai atsevi\u0161\u0137as saska\u0146o\u0161anas sarakstes, kas nav non\u0101ku\u0161as atkl\u0101t\u012bb\u0101 un kas var\u0113tu main\u012bt situ\u0101cijas tiesisko v\u0113rt\u0113jumu. Raksts atspogu\u013co visp\u0101r\u0113ju ties\u012bbu normu piem\u0113ro\u0161anu konkr\u0113tajai situ\u0101cijai, pie\u0146emot, ka publiskaj\u0101 telp\u0101 izskan\u0113ju\u0161ie fakti atbilst paties\u012bbai.<\/p>\n

    Raksts ir izrais\u012bjis lielu \u201cFacebook\u201d lietot\u0101ju interesi un ir izpeln\u012bjies vair\u0101k nek\u0101 1000 reakciju.<\/p>\n

    Ja Raimonds Pauls grib s\u016bdz\u0113ties, tad vi\u0146am j\u0101pasteidzas<\/p>\n

    Intervij\u0101 \u201cnra.lv\u201d Lauris Klagi\u0161s uzsv\u0113ra domu, ka Raimonds Pauls var\u0113tu v\u0113rsties Pat\u0113r\u0113t\u0101ju aizsardz\u012bbas centr\u0101 un tas b\u016btu j\u0101dara p\u0113c iesp\u0113jas \u0101tr\u0101k.<\/p>\n

    Vi\u0146\u0161 var v\u0113rsties ar\u012b ties\u0101 un, v\u0113l negaidot spriedumu, pras\u012bt pagaidu noregul\u0113jumu – lai tiesa aizliedz pas\u0101kum\u0101 izmantot vi\u0146a v\u0101rdu un uzv\u0101rdu. Tiesa var\u0113tu \u0161o pras\u012bbu apmierin\u0101t, un PTAC<\/a> ar\u012b var\u0113tu \u0161o pas\u0101kumu aizliegt un, iesp\u0113jams, piem\u0113rot naudas sodu.<\/p>\n

    \u201cKaut ko dar\u012bt jau p\u0113c pas\u0101kuma diezin vai b\u016bs liela j\u0113ga,\u201d dom\u0101 zv\u0113rin\u0101ts advok\u0101ts.<\/p>\n

    Mistisk\u0101 biedr\u012bba ar \u201ccaur\u0101m kabat\u0101m\u201d<\/p>\n

    \u201c\u201dBi\u013ce\u0161u parad\u012bze\u201d jau tirgo bi\u013cetes, un koncertu organiz\u0113jo\u0161\u0101 biedr\u012bba \u201cLatvijas Festiv\u0101lu Asoci\u0101cija\u201d sa\u0146em naudu. Kad nauda b\u016bs izt\u0113r\u0113ta, diezin vai kaut ko var\u0113s piedz\u012bt. Biedr\u012bbas rodas un paz\u016bd, biedri jau neatbild par biedr\u012bbas saist\u012bb\u0101m. Biedr\u012bba, kurai nek\u0101 nav – ne pamatl\u012bdzek\u013cu, ne naudas uzkr\u0101jumu – var sar\u012bkot \u0161\u0101du pas\u0101kumu un p\u0113c tam pazust,\u201d saka Lauris Klagi\u0161s.<\/p>\n

    \u201cNeatkar\u012bg\u0101s\u201d iepriek\u0161\u0113j\u0101 publik\u0101cij\u0101 (https:\/\/nra.lv\/neatkariga\/komentari\/maris-krautmanis-3\/510587-skandals-ap-paula-vardu.htm ) jau tika aprakst\u012bts, ka biedr\u012bba \u201cLatvijas Festiv\u0101lu Asoci\u0101cija\u201d nav iesniegusi Valsts ie\u0146\u0113mumu dienest\u0101 gada p\u0101rskatus kop\u0161 2022. gada, kas jau pats par sevi ir LR normat\u012bvo aktu p\u0101rk\u0101pums un sod\u0101ma darb\u012bba, un kop\u0161 2025. gada maija biedr\u012bbu vada divdesmit gadus vecs jaunietis vienpersoniski.<\/p>\n

    Uz \u201cnra.lv\u201d jaut\u0101jumu, vai Raimondu Paulu \u201cneuzmet\u012bs\u201d ar\u012b finansi\u0101li, nenor\u0113\u0137inoties par autorties\u012bb\u0101m, Lauris Klagi\u0161s atbild\u0113ja: \u201cJ\u0101, t\u0101ds risks past\u0101v. Ja pas\u0101kuma organizators ir nezin\u0101ma biedr\u012bba, kura var pazust, tad ir risks, ka vi\u0146\u0161 var nesa\u0146emt ar\u012b naudu par autorties\u012bb\u0101m. Ja b\u016btu vieno\u0161an\u0101s starp organizatoriem un Maestro, kur b\u016btu lo\u0123iski, ja k\u0101da da\u013ca naudas vi\u0146am jau tiktu samaks\u0101ta avans\u0101. Bet, k\u0101 var noprast, \u0161\u0101das vieno\u0161an\u0101s nav.<\/p>\n

    Esmu savulaik p\u0101rst\u0101v\u0113jis citus m\u0101ksliniekus l\u012bdz\u012bg\u0101 liet\u0101, un tiesa notika gadiem ilgi, kam\u0113r vi\u0146i var\u0113ja s\u0101kt sa\u0146emt sev pien\u0101ko\u0161os atl\u012bdz\u012bbu par to, ka tika izmantota vi\u0146u m\u016bzika.\u201d<\/p>\n

    * Teikums darin\u0101ts no Raimonda Paula dziesmas \u201cT\u0101ls Par\u012bzes radio\u201d ar dzejnieka J\u0101\u0146a Petera v\u0101rdiem:<\/p>\n

    … K\u0101p\u0113c rudmatain\u0101 \u017danna<\/p>\n

    Sav\u0101 kara\u013cvalst\u012b, kara\u013cvalst\u012b raud?<\/p>\n

    Kam lai \u017danna s\u016bdz\u0113 b\u0113du<\/p>\n

    T\u0101l\u0101 kara\u013cvalst\u012b?<\/p>\n

    Vai maestro jums?<\/p>\n

    Troni, filigr\u0101nais troni,<\/p>\n

    Tev m\u016bsu b\u0113du nesadzird\u0113t…<\/p>\n

    \t\t\t\t\t\tinfo<\/p>\n

    Uzzini pirmais
    kas interesants noticis Latvij\u0101 un pasaul\u0113,
    pievienojoties mums     Telegram<\/a> vai Whatsapp<\/a> kan\u0101l\u0101<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Bez Raimonda Paula piekri\u0161anas tiek r\u012bkots vi\u0146a v\u0101rd\u0101 nosaukts lielkoncerts un tirgotas bi\u013cetes uz \u201cRaimonda Paula dziesmu sv\u0113tkiem\u201d.…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":97118,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[23,28,29,32,33,22,30,31,35,39,38,36,37,34,40,20,26,27,24,25,21],"class_list":{"0":"post-97117","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-latvija","8":"tag-aktualitates","9":"tag-breaking-news","10":"tag-breakingnews","11":"tag-featured-news","12":"tag-featurednews","13":"tag-headlines","14":"tag-latest-news","15":"tag-latestnews","16":"tag-latvia","17":"tag-latvian","18":"tag-latviesu","19":"tag-latviesu-valoda","20":"tag-latviesuvaloda","21":"tag-latvija","22":"tag-lv","23":"tag-news","24":"tag-popularakas-zinas","25":"tag-popularakaszinas","26":"tag-top-stories","27":"tag-topstories","28":"tag-zinas"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@lv\/115853580340210455","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97117","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=97117"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97117\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/97118"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=97117"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=97117"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=97117"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}