“\u0160\u012b br\u012b\u017ea tiesiskais regul\u0113jums neparedz, ka \u0161is papildu sods st\u0101jas sp\u0113k\u0101 uzreiz. T\u0101tad apstr\u012bd\u0113\u0161ana un p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113\u0161ana \u0161aj\u0101 konkr\u0113taj\u0101 situ\u0101cij\u0101 aptur l\u0113muma darb\u012bbu l\u012bdz br\u012bdim, kam\u0113r l\u0113mums st\u0101jas sp\u0113k\u0101,”\u00a0paskaidro VI Juridisk\u0101 departamenta vad\u012bt\u0101ja Laura \u0160\u0101berte. P\u0101rs\u016bdz\u012bba, kur\u0101 neirologs apstr\u012bd vi\u0146am piem\u0113roto Vesel\u012bbas inspekcijas sodu, \u0161obr\u012bd ir Zemgales apgabaltiesas tiesved\u012bb\u0101.<\/p>\n
Vi\u0161kera gad\u012bjums izsauca diskusijas VM<\/p>\n
Konkr\u0113tais Vi\u0161kera gad\u012bjums izsauca diskusijas Vesel\u012bbas ministrij\u0101 par to, vai eso\u0161ais tiesiskais regul\u0113jums ir lab\u0101kaj\u0101s pacientu interes\u0113s. Ministrij\u0101 vesel\u012bbas nozares p\u0101rst\u0101vji sprieda par to, vai administrat\u012bvi piem\u0113rots sods \u2013 liegums \u0101rst\u0113t \u2013 b\u016btu j\u0101piem\u0113ro jau laik\u0101, kad to apstr\u012bd ties\u0101.<\/p>\n
Ministrij\u0101 izl\u0113ma, ka \u0161\u0101du k\u0101rt\u012bbu ieviest nevar. T\u0101 radot p\u0101r\u0101k lielus tiesiskus riskus. K\u0101 alternat\u012bvu izdom\u0101ja noteikt, ka \u0101rstniec\u012bbas personu re\u0123istr\u0101 var\u0113tu public\u0113t piebildi, minot, ka \u0101rstam inspekcija piem\u0113rojusi sodu un ka \u0161is sods ir p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u012bbas stadij\u0101. Tas noz\u012bm\u0113 \u2013 lai pacients b\u016btu dro\u0161s, ka vi\u0146\u0161 dodas pie \u0101rsta, kuru nav sod\u012bjis medi\u0137u uzraugs, vi\u0146am pa\u0161am \u0101rstniec\u012bbas personu re\u0123istr\u0101 tas b\u016btu j\u0101p\u0101rbauda.<\/p>\n
\u0160\u0101das izmai\u0146as \u0161obr\u012bd ir iecere. Kad Vesel\u012bbas ministrija t\u0101s var\u0113tu virz\u012bt Ministru kabinet\u0101, nav zin\u0101ms.<\/p>\n
L\u0100B Aroda ties\u0101 Vi\u0161kera lieta nevirz\u0101s<\/p>\n
Situ\u0101cija non\u0101ca strupce\u013c\u0101, kad jaut\u0101jums par Vi\u0161kera \u0101rsta sertifik\u0101tu iek\u013cuva Latvijas \u0100rstu biedr\u012bbas (L\u0100B) dienask\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101. Tie\u0161i \u0161\u012b organiz\u0101cija atbild par \u0101rstu sertific\u0113\u0161anu.<\/p>\n
Vi\u0161kera gad\u012bjuma notikumu sec\u012bba ir \u0161\u0101da \u2013 inspekcija, piem\u0113rojusi neirologam sodu, v\u0113rs\u0101s L\u0100B Sertifik\u0101cijas padom\u0113 un l\u016bdza izv\u0113rt\u0113t Vi\u0161keram izsniegt\u0101 sertifik\u0101ta darb\u012bbas aptur\u0113\u0161anu vai anul\u0113\u0161anu. T\u0101 izl\u0113ma, ka nevar lemt par sertifik\u0101tu, jo to anul\u0113t var p\u0113c biedr\u012bbas \u0112tikas komisijas vai Aroda tiesas priek\u0161likuma. \u0112tikas komisij\u0101 iesniegumu par Vi\u0161keru skat\u012bja p\u0113rn un lietas materi\u0101lus aizs\u016bt\u012bja policijai. T\u0101p\u0113c \u0161\u0101 gada s\u0101kum\u0101 lieta non\u0101ca biedr\u012bbas Aroda ties\u0101. Vair\u0101k nek\u0101 pusgadu v\u0113l\u0101k lieta nav pavirz\u012bjusies uz priek\u0161u. K\u0101 nor\u0101da L\u0100B Aroda tiesas priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101ja Valent\u012bna Berga, \u201cfebru\u0101r\u012b iesnieguma izskat\u012b\u0161ana aroda ties\u0101 tika p\u0101rtraukta\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"“\u0160\u012b br\u012b\u017ea tiesiskais regul\u0113jums neparedz, ka \u0161is papildu sods st\u0101jas sp\u0113k\u0101 uzreiz. T\u0101tad apstr\u012bd\u0113\u0161ana un p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113\u0161ana \u0161aj\u0101 konkr\u0113taj\u0101…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":978,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[23,28,29,32,33,22,30,31,35,39,38,36,37,34,40,20,26,27,24,25,181,691,21],"class_list":{"0":"post-977","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-latvija","8":"tag-aktualitates","9":"tag-breaking-news","10":"tag-breakingnews","11":"tag-featured-news","12":"tag-featurednews","13":"tag-headlines","14":"tag-latest-news","15":"tag-latestnews","16":"tag-latvia","17":"tag-latvian","18":"tag-latviesu","19":"tag-latviesu-valoda","20":"tag-latviesuvaloda","21":"tag-latvija","22":"tag-lv","23":"tag-news","24":"tag-popularakas-zinas","25":"tag-popularakaszinas","26":"tag-top-stories","27":"tag-topstories","28":"tag-veseliba","29":"tag-veselibas-inspekcija","30":"tag-zinas"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/977","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=977"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/977\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/978"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=977"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=977"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=977"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}