Audio of this article is brought to you by the Air & Space Forces Association, honoring and supporting our Airmen, Guardians, and their families. Find out more at afa.org<\/p>\n
The U.S. is reducing the number of forces it is prepared to commit to NATO in a crisis, U.S. European Command said in a June 3 announcement that has stirred debate at home and abroad.\u00a0<\/p>\n
The changes, which were previewed to alliance members last month by a senior Pentagon official, appear to include a decrease in the number of combat aircraft, air-to-air refueling, and Navy vessels that would be sent to defend the alliance during a crisis or conflict under the so-called NATO Force Model<\/a>.\u00a0\t\t<\/p>\n \u201cThere has been an unhealthy codependence in the NATO Force Model on U.S. forces,\u201d EUCOM commander Air Force Gen. Alexus G. Grynkewich said in a statement<\/a>.<\/p>\n \u201cPresident Trump, Secretary Hegseth, and others have been clear that this needs to change, and it will change,\u201d Grynkewich added. \u201cThe potential reality of simultaneous conflict in multiple theaters demands it.\u201d<\/p>\n The move comes on the heels of a Pentagon decision last month to cancel the deployment of an Army armored combat brigade to Poland and a decision last year to remove a brigade from Romania. Collectively, the steps have spurred unease among U.S. lawmakers and European nations that are struggling to fill the gap.<\/p>\n Grynkewich also serves as NATO\u2019s top military officer as Supreme Allied Commander Europe, a role that will enable him to craft the alliance\u2019s plans given the reduction of U.S. forces committed in Europe.<\/p>\n According to a news release issued by EUCOM, the changes to the U.S. force model will make NATO\u2019s plans more realistic and prevent NATO from \u201cover-relying\u201d on U.S. forces, which the Defense Department says are required to \u201csustain deterrence in other regions and respond in the event of other global contingencies.\u201d\t\t<\/p>\n But the reductions come as Russia has stepped up its missile and drone attacks on Ukraine and upped its threats on NATO states<\/a>, while arms control is in abeyance.<\/p>\n After the U.S. announced it was cutting a brigade last month, the Republican heads of the Senate and House Armed Services Committees issued a joint statement expressing concern about how the reduction would affect the U.S. force posture in Europe.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cPrematurely reducing America\u2019s forward presence in Europe before those capabilities are fully realized risks undermining deterrence and sending the wrong signal to Vladimir Putin,\u201d Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) said in a May 2 statement<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n A provision in the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act stipulates<\/a> that the Pentagon may not reduce its posture in Europe below 76,000 troops. The U.S. is not expected to go below that floor this year, though American officials have signaled that further cuts should be expected. The draft House version of the 2027 NDAA also includes a provision<\/a> requiring a report from Undersecretary of Defense for Policy and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff that provides the analytical basis for force posture changes directed in Europe.<\/p>\n The Force Model reductions announced by EUCOM and previous brigade cuts in Europe are part of a broader shift by the Pentagon to reallocate more resources to the Pacific to deter China and to the Western hemisphere.\u00a0\t\t<\/p>\n