{"id":4526,"date":"2026-04-21T09:55:02","date_gmt":"2026-04-21T09:55:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/netherlands\/4526\/"},"modified":"2026-04-21T09:55:02","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T09:55:02","slug":"netherlands-dutch-republic-revolution-enlightenment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/netherlands\/4526\/","title":{"rendered":"Netherlands – Dutch Republic, Revolution, Enlightenment"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Fate thus intervened to give Holland<\/a>\u2019s leaders, now intensely distrustful of Orangist influence, a chance to take over the country<\/a> from the leaderless party of their antagonists<\/a>. They governed the country for a little more than two decades, during what is known as the \u201cfirst stadtholderless period\u201d (1650\u201372) because the five leading provinces did not appoint a successor to William II<\/a>. (It should be noted, however, that William II\u2019s cousin, William Frederick, of the junior branch of Orange-Nassau, continued to govern Friesland<\/a> as well as Groningen<\/a>, which also elected him stadtholder.) During the early months of 1651, a Great Assembly of the States General<\/a>, with expanded delegations from all the provinces, met at The Hague to consider the new situation. Holland was satisfied to consolidate the leadership it had so unexpectedly regained and conciliated the lesser provinces by leaving undisturbed the religious settlement of 1619 and by granting amnesty to those who had supported William II in 1650. But Holland\u2019s fears of the increased powers of the central government had been so stiffened that it depended upon its own preponderance, rather than upon constitutional<\/a> reforms, to achieve effective government.<\/p>\n

Yet efficiency<\/a> of rule, so difficult to obtain when the powers to make and apply policy were so widely scattered, became all the more necessary when the republic became embroiled in war with the English<\/a> Commonwealth in 1652. Nonetheless, the system was surprisingly efficient. The conflict with England<\/a> arose out of a medley of causes: first, the English<\/a> republicans, after their successes against the royalists, took up the cause of defending English commercial interests against the Dutch and passed the Navigation Act<\/a> of 1651, forbidding Dutch shippers from acting as middlemen in English trade both in Europe<\/a> and overseas; second, the English sought to bring the Dutch into a political union directed primarily against the Stuarts and their cousins of the house of Orange. But the Dutch, whatever resentment the Hollanders bore against the Orange dynasty<\/a>, were unwilling either to court civil war or to abandon their dearly won independence in a union that would make them junior partners to the English. An accidental clash between the Dutch and English fleets led to full-scale war in which a greatly improved English navy won the upper hand. By 1654 the Dutch were compelled to accept peace on English terms, including a secret promise by Holland (\u201cAct of Seclusion<\/a>\u201d) to exclude forever the prince of Orange from the stadtholderate and the supreme command.<\/p>\n

Johan De Witt<\/a>Johan De Witt, detail of a painting by Jacobus de Baen; in the Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam.(more)<\/p>\n

The decision to accept a humiliating peace as the only way to terminate a disastrous war had been taken at the insistence of the young Johan de Witt<\/a>, who had taken office in 1653 as councillor pensionary of Holland (the same office once held by Oldenbarnevelt). With the return of peace, became the brilliant leader of the republic\u2019s foreign and domestic policy. He rebuilt the Dutch navy, reduced indebtedness, improved the financial condition of both the States General and the States of Holland, and restored the republic\u2019s prestige<\/a> in Europe. Carefully averting any renewal of strife with England, he was able not only to compel France<\/a> to back down in a naval dispute but also to send a powerful Dutch fleet to save Denmark<\/a> from Swedish conquest in the First Northern War<\/a> (1657\u201360).<\/p>\n

William III<\/a>William III, painting after W. Wissing; in the National Portrait Gallery, London.(more)<\/p>\n

When the exiled English king, Charles II<\/a>, was restored to his throne in 1660, de Witt continued his policy of staying on good terms with England no matter who ruled there; this policy, however, foundered on the same two issues\u2014commercial rivalry and the status of the house of Orange\u2014that had brought about the war of 1652\u201354. Charles not only accepted the renewal of the Navigation Act of 1651 but intensified the rivalry with the Dutch by demanding forcefully that they acknowledge his sovereignty<\/a> over the adjacent<\/a> seas, pay tribute for the right to fish in the North Sea<\/a>, and open the Dutch East Indies<\/a> to English traders. When naval warfare<\/a> resumed in 1664 off Africa, followed by war in Europe the next year, Charles took up the cause of the young prince of Orange. By persuading the Orangists that his price for peace was restoration of William III to the offices of his forefathers, the English monarch built up a friendly party in the United Provinces<\/a> that urged acceptance of his terms and even fostered a conspiracy<\/a> to overthrow the government of de Witt and his friends. But de Witt managed to meet the new threat. An Orangist plot in Holland was uncovered and put down in 1666.<\/p>\n

When Charles had demanded too high a price for Dutch friendship in 1660\u201362, de Witt had negotiated an alliance with the French<\/a>, who feared that the restoration of the prince of Orange would create a hostile Anglo-Dutch coalition. Furthermore, success in the fighting at sea increasingly went to the newly rebuilt Dutch navy. In 1667 the Dutch fleet sailed up the Thames and the Medway to Chatham, destroying the English shipyards and burning the fleet at its moorings. In that same year, however, the French, under Louis XIV<\/a>, who had only belatedly sent naval and land forces to aid the Dutch, began an invasion of the Spanish<\/a> (southern) Netherlands (present-day Belgium) in the War of Devolution<\/a>. As French conquest of the southern Low Countries<\/a> constituted<\/a> a threat to both the Dutch Republic and Britain<\/a>, those states came to terms in the standoff Peace of Breda<\/a> (July 31, 1667), followed in January by an Anglo-Dutch alliance compelling France to make peace with Spain.<\/p>\n

This Triple Alliance<\/a> (so called because Sweden<\/a> became a third partner) proved to be de Witt\u2019s undoing, although he had no effective diplomatic strategy to put in its place. Louis XIV, balked in his aim of conquest, considered that the Dutch had betrayed their alliance and turned to Charles II with proposals for a joint war against the United Provinces. Charles, bitterly resentful over his humiliating<\/a> defeat at Chatham, accepted the French offer of a richly subsidized alliance. Even as the threat from France emerged more clearly, the Orangists imagined that the Dutch could still win over Charles by the restoration of William III, but they were able to obtain only the prince\u2019s appointment as commander in chief early in 1672. Charles joined the French in open war<\/a> in the spring of 1672, counting upon William to accept rule of a rump Dutch<\/a> Republic after France and Britain had taken away important territories for themselves. But William, who was given full power, including the stadtholdership, during a storm of riots and near rebellion that swept the country in June and July after the French invasion penetrated to its heart, took over the leadership of the Dutch defense from de Witt, who was lynched by a mob in The Hague in August. With William\u2019s support, the States General rejected the Anglo-French terms.<\/p>\n

The tide of war now turned against the aggressors. The Dutch navy under Adm. Michiel Adriaanszoon de Ruyter<\/a> repeatedly defeated the allied fleets off the coast of the republic, while the Dutch armies held on behind the flooded polders of the \u201cwater line.\u201d When other powers\u2014Spain, at first as an auxiliary<\/a> and then as a full participant, the German emperor, and Brandenburg\u2014joined the Dutch side, the French armies withdrew from the republic. During six years of bitter war, William III<\/a> was able to bring about the withdrawal of England (1674) and the defeat of all French war aims against the Dutch; yet his Grand Alliance<\/a> was unable to bring Louis XIV to his knees, although Spain paid the price of a peace negotiated at Nijmegen<\/a> in 1678. But during these years in which his political control of the republic, while strong, was not absolute, William was no more interested in constitutional reform than de Witt, his predecessor in the leadership of the country, had been. He was satisfied to expel adversaries from office and dominate the decisions taken by men who represented the same groups and the same social principles as those whom they replaced; but Holland, whose wealth ultimately was the basis for all Dutch power, political and military, slipped from under his thumb and asserted its autonomy<\/a> of judgment and decision. The transformation of the republic, which had been from its origins an aristocracy<\/a> dominated by mercantile wealth, into an oligarchy<\/a> of inherited power, continued unimpeded by William; he had used the violence of the urban citizenry during the crisis of 1672 to unseat his opponents, including de Witt, but he was no more sympathetic than they had been to the vague democratic aspirations<\/a> that were expressed here and there.<\/p>\n

During the decade after the conclusion of the Peace of Nijmegen, the tension between William and Holland (particularly Amsterdam) worsened, because the prince was fixed upon a policy of renewed resistance to Louis XIV, while the Hollanders preferred peace at any reasonable price. But the upsurge of the threat from France in the late 1680s\u2014the French incursions into western Germany<\/a> and the threat of French domination of England under James II<\/a>, a stalwart<\/a> Roman Catholic and a pensioner of Louis XIV\u2014brought William and Holland into agreement upon the need to support the prince\u2019s expedition to England in 1688, which resulted in his acceptance of the English throne, jointly with his wife, Mary Stuart<\/a>, early the next year. William, as king-stadtholder, had to give primacy to English interests because England was the more powerful partner in the alliance. He therefore approved the arrangement whereby England concentrated its efforts against France on the sea, while the Dutch did so on land; the result was neglect of the Dutch navy. Ironically, the final triumph of the English over the Dutch in their commercial rivalry was a consequence of their alliance, not their enmity<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The war begun in 1689 ended with a stalemate peace in 1697, followed by two treaties between the maritime powers and France for partition of the Spanish monarchy<\/a>. In 1700, however, Louis XIV accepted the bequest<\/a> of the Spanish throne for his grandson, Philippe d\u2019Anjou (Philip V<\/a> of Spain<\/a>), and war was resumed the next year.<\/p>\n

William died, childless, in 1702. When Holland<\/a> again took the initiative<\/a> for government without a stadtholder<\/a>, it was followed by the other provinces with much greater alacrity<\/a> than had been the case in 1650\u201351. Resentment had built up against William, who had been preoccupied with foreign affairs<\/a> and did little to improve domestic politics, and the absence of an adult heir meant that there was no effective opposition to the new course. Leadership of the Dutch state for the next 45 years came from the councillor pensionaries of Holland, who were often able men but either unwilling or unable to do more than conduct current business without attempting the delicate and explosive task of restructuring the government. On the contrary, constitutional rigidity became the credo not only of Dutch republicans but also of the Orangist party, with the only point in contention<\/a> between them being whether the prince of Orange-Nassau, who was stadtholder of Friesland, should be elected to the same office in the other provinces. William IV<\/a>, who followed his father in Friesland in 1711, was chosen stadtholder in Groningen in 1718 and in Gelderland<\/a> (and the district of Drenthe) in 1722. Even without a stadtholder in the principal provinces, Dutch subordination to English interests remained intact during the War of the Spanish Succession<\/a> (1701\u201313) and the succeeding years of peace.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Fate thus intervened to give Holland\u2019s leaders, now intensely distrustful of Orangist influence, a chance to take over…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3971,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[707,706,705,704,6],"class_list":{"0":"post-4526","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-netherlands","8":"tag-article","9":"tag-britannica","10":"tag-encyclopeadia","11":"tag-encyclopedia","12":"tag-netherlands"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/netherlands\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4526","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/netherlands\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/netherlands\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/netherlands\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/netherlands\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4526"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/netherlands\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4526\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/netherlands\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3971"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/netherlands\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4526"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/netherlands\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4526"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/netherlands\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4526"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}