{"id":10669,"date":"2026-03-28T14:54:12","date_gmt":"2026-03-28T14:54:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/news\/10669\/"},"modified":"2026-03-28T14:54:12","modified_gmt":"2026-03-28T14:54:12","slug":"blatant-disrespect-judge-contemplates-contempt-proceedings-after-va-re-terminated-union-contract","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/news\/10669\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Blatant disrespect\u2019: Judge contemplates contempt proceedings after VA re-terminated union contract"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A federal judge in Rhode Island on Friday moved to enforce her court order earlier this month requiring the Veterans Affairs Department to restore its contract with the American Federation of Government Employees and warned of possible contempt proceedings, after the department tried to terminate the agreement a second time Thursday.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier this month, U.S. District Judge Melissa DuBose issued a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.govexec.com\/workforce\/2026\/03\/judge-orders-va-restore-collective-bargaining\/412123\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">preliminary injunction<\/a> mandating the VA to reinstate its CBA with AFGE, having found that the department\u2019s August termination of the contract violated the First Amendment and the Administrative Procedures Act. But last week, the union reported that while the department had technically reinstated their collective bargaining agreement, management still <a href=\"https:\/\/www.govexec.com\/workforce\/2026\/03\/va-court-order-requires-we-reinstate-union-contract-not-honor-its-terms\/412368\/?oref=ge-author-river\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">refused to honor<\/a> any of the contract\u2019s provisions.<\/p>\n<p>On Thursday night, on the eve of a hearing on the union\u2019s request that the judge enforce her decision, the VA issued a new notice stating that it had again terminated AFGE\u2019s CBA and claimed that action made the court proceedings related to its original termination last August moot.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think, because of the VA\u2019s retermination of the CBA last night, this plaintiff\u2019s motion to enforce here is moot,\u201d said Tyler Becker, an attorney at the Justice Department. \u201c[Nothing] at this point suggests that [AFGE is] challenging the retermination or anything that would allow this court to enjoin the retermination. Given the changed factual circumstances, in addition to the clarification order Monday, this motion to enforce is moot.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Travis Silva, an attorney representing the union, argued that the move was an intentional end-run around the judge\u2019s order. He noted that the department\u2019s attorneys described at length both what compliance with an injunction would entail, including the collection of dues and participation in grievance proceedings, and virtually none of those steps had been taken by management.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe fact that there is defiance I don\u2019t think is reasonably in dispute,\u201d he said. \u201cWe\u2019ve laid out the many ways in which the Department of Veterans Affairs is not complying with the master [collective bargaining] agreement. They talked over and over in their briefings and in oral argumetns what substantive compliance looks like\u2014it was their irreparable harm argument, it was in their balance of the equities argument\u2014it was there for the court. They understand what compliance looks like and they simply aren\u2019t doing it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>DuBose agreed. In addition to issuing a new order to enforce compliance of the injunction, with a requirement that the department prove it has done so to the court by April 1, she ordered the agency to submit arguments by Tuesday spelling out why the department should not be held in contempt of court for a \u201cblatant violation\u201d of the initial injunction.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere is a process that the defendants certainly could follow to seek redress from either a higher court to stay my preliminary order or seek a rehearing because of changed circumstances\u2014none of that happened here,\u201d she said. \u201cThere was a late-night refiling of a retermination, which throws everything this court attempted to do and clarify into chaos. For yout o suggest that all the work done prior to this retermination is mooted out and we kind of disregard it is really a blatant disrespect for not just this court\u2019s order but for the rule of law.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In a statement Friday, Mary Jean Burke, president of AFGE\u2019s National VA Council, applauded the ruling.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;VA workers did not choose this fight\u2014the Trump administration brought it to them,&#8221; she said. &#8220;VA employees come to work every day focused on one thing: serving veterans. They deserve a voice in their workplace. The judge\u2019s consideration of contempt for the VA\u2019s attempt to avoid compliance and disregard the court\u2019s order further demonstrates how little this administration cares for the frontline workers serving and protecting our veterans. The NVAC will not rest until every VA facility in this country is honoring our union contract.&#8221; \u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"A federal judge in Rhode Island on Friday moved to enforce her court order earlier this month requiring&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":10670,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[1385,3831,7478,7413,7477,8,7479,9,7,245,7480,3826],"class_list":{"0":"post-10669","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-top-stories","8":"tag-civil-service","9":"tag-collective-bargaining","10":"tag-district-court","11":"tag-doug-collins","12":"tag-federal-employee-union","13":"tag-headlines","14":"tag-labor-management","15":"tag-news","16":"tag-top-stories","17":"tag-trump-administration","18":"tag-va","19":"tag-veterans-affairs-department"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@news\/116307379028483530","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10669","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10669"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10669\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10670"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10669"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10669"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10669"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}