Hungarian Prime Minister-elect Péter Magyar’s pick for Minister of Justice, Márton Melléthei-Barna, has rejected the nomination following the backlash generated by the announcement of his candidacy last Thursday. Melléthei-Barna, who has served as the leading legal expert of the Tisza Party since 2024, came under scrutiny due to being Magyar’s brother-in-law, sparking accusations of nepotism within the incoming government.
In a lengthy Facebook post published one week after his nomination, on Thursday evening, Melléthei-Barna defended both his professional qualifications and his role in the emergence of Tisza, while ultimately announcing that he would step aside in order to avoid harming what he described as the broad social consensus and cohesion behind the incoming government.
Addressing the nepotism accusations directly, Melléthei-Barna confirmed that he married Magyar’s younger sister in September 2025 after the two reconnected in August 2024 following more than two decades without contact. He stressed that his nomination had ‘absolutely nothing to do’ with either the family relationship or his longstanding friendship with Magyar. The two were classmates at the Faculty of Law at Pázmány Péter Catholic University.
‘My nomination for the position of Minister of Justice was a tremendous honour,’ he wrote, adding that both he and the prime minister-elect had ‘thought long and hard’ about whether he should accept the role. He argued that his appointment would have been ‘beyond reproach from legal, political, moral, and human perspectives alike,’ but acknowledged that the controversy risked weakening the broad public support behind the incoming government’s stated commitment to restoring the rule of law.
He added that he had decided to withdraw in order to ensure that ‘not even the slightest shadow is cast over the regime change.’
As one of the core members of Tisza’s inner circle, with considerable professional experience behind him, Melléthei-Barna could have been an ideal choice for such a sensitive position. However, his nomination proved controversial from the outset, as reflected in criticism coming not only from Fidesz but also from circles broadly aligned with Tisza.
Magyar and the Tisza Party have consistently portrayed nepotism as one of the defining problems of the Orbán system, repeatedly criticizing Fidesz for placing politically and personally loyal relatives, friends, and business circles in key state positions. One of Tisza’s core campaign messages was the promise of a more meritocratic, transparent, and professionally based state administration. With the nomination of Melléthei-Barna, despite his qualifications, that narrative was undermined from the beginning.
Reacting to Melléthei-Barna’s announcement, Péter Magyar thanked him for what he described as his ‘commitment to his homeland, the regime change, and the Tisza community’, while promising to announce a new nominee for Minister of Justice on Friday, 8 May.
It is not the first time in recent weeks that Tisza has retreated from a planned government appointment. In mid-April, Hungarian outlet Telex reported that Magyar was preparing to nominate Rita Rubovszky as Minister of Education. During her career, Rubovszky—currently Director of the Cistercian School Authority—established herself within Hungary’s educational and ecclesiastical system and became consistently associated with conservative values.
Tisza’s voter base is highly heterogeneous, comprising a significant number of liberal-progressive voters, as the party emerged as an electoral umbrella uniting various ideological backgrounds around the common goal of defeating Viktor Orbán on 12 April. Many of these liberal-progressive Tisza supporters and public figures who backed Magyar during the campaign reacted with outrage to the possible nomination of Rubovszky, attacking her ties to conservative and religious circles and triggering what Magyar described as a ‘verbal lynching’.
‘Tisza increasingly measures public opinion on controversial decisions through online reactions’
Magyar eventually picked Judit Lannert instead—essentially the opposite of Rubovszky in terms of background and positioning—coming from liberal-progressive academic and research circles.
A similar strategic calculus may also lie behind Melléthei-Barna’s withdrawal. After witnessing the scale of the backlash, Tisza may have concluded that retreating from the nomination and selecting a less controversial candidate would be politically wiser. Critics have even described the party’s strategy as ‘comment-section politics’, arguing that because its core voter base is highly active on social media, Tisza increasingly measures public opinion on controversial decisions through online reactions.
From a communication and PR perspective, this is a double-edged sword: while both reversals signal that Tisza appears willing to conduct politics in a more consultative and socially responsive manner than Fidesz, they also risk portraying the incoming government as uncertain and reactive—the opposite of the image Péter Magyar and Tisza are trying to project.
Related articles: