United States President Donald Trump has called on a federal court to deny a motion by the BBC to subpoena members of his immediate family, as part of a $10bn lawsuit over a documentary the broadcaster aired.<\/p>\n
On Friday, lawyers for Trump argued that the BBC had embarked on a \u201cpolitically charged discovery campaign\u201d by seeking to compel testimony from Trump\u2019s eldest son Donald Trump Jr, his first daughter Ivanka Trump and his son-in-law Jared Kushner.<\/p>\n
Recommended Stories list of 3 itemsend of list<\/p>\n
Trump\u2019s team appealed to the court to reject the BBC\u2019s motion, comparing it to a fishing expedition that goes beyond the scope of the case.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis case concerns a narrow wrong \u2014 the BBC\u2019s deliberate splicing together of two passages of President Trump\u2019s January 6, 2021, speech spoken nearly fifty-five minutes apart,\u201d Friday\u2019s court filing said.<\/p>\n
\u201cRather than litigate that narrow claim, the BBC has attempted to pursue a sweeping investigation disguised as discovery.\u201d<\/p>\n
The case began in December, when Trump announced he would sue the BBC over an episode of the documentary series Panorama, which chronicled the Republican leader\u2019s path to a second term as president.<\/p>\n
Part of the documentary focuses on the events of January 6, 2021, the day the results of the 2020 election were to be certified. Trump had lost that election but falsely claimed his defeat was the result of fraud.<\/p>\n
At a speech in front of the White House on that day, he repeated the unfounded accusation that the election had been \u201crigged\u201d to a rally of his supporters, some of whom participated in an attack on the US Capitol in the hours afterwards.<\/p>\n
The Panorama episode included snippets from Trump\u2019s speech, and critics argued that two sentences from his address had been edited together to sound like one continuous quote.<\/p>\n
The first line was: \u201cAfter this, we\u2019re going to walk down, and I\u2019ll be there with you, we\u2019re going to walk down.\u201d The second came from later in the speech: \u201cAnd we fight. We fight like hell.\u201d<\/p>\n
Though the BBC apologised for the editing and took the Panorama episode down from its platforms, Trump nevertheless filed a multibillion-dollar lawsuit accusing the broadcaster of defamation.<\/p>\n
The BBC has denied that charge and pledged to fight the lawsuit in court. The case is currently being heard before the US district court in southern Florida.<\/p>\n
As part of its defence, the BBC has sought testimony from figures close to Trump, to establish his thoughts and actions on the day of the January 6 attack.<\/p>\n
It pointed out that both Donald Trump Jr and Ivanka Trump were present at their father\u2019s speech, and that they spoke to the president and his inner circle as the violence erupted at the Capitol.<\/p>\n
Text messages released by the US Congress show Donald Trump Jr urged his father\u2019s chief of staff to \u201ccondemn this shit. Asap\u201d, a fact cited in the BBC\u2019s motion.<\/p>\n
While Kushner was not present at the White House, the BBC maintains that his role as Trump\u2019s adviser would also help establish the facts of that day.<\/p>\n
Lawyers for the broadcaster say that, after speaking with congressional leaders, Kushner drafted \u201ca proposed statement\u201d for Trump to present, \u201cwhich would have condemned the use of violence\u201d.<\/p>\n
The testimony of Trump Jr, Ivanka Trump and Kushner can help illustrate the president\u2019s \u201cburden to prove that it would be materially false to imply that he incited violence on January 6\u201d, according to the BBC\u2019s motion.<\/p>\n
But, the motion added, the BBC has been unable to serve the three family members with subpoenas due to the presence of their US Secret Service protection.<\/p>\n
The BBC reportedly attempted to deliver subpoenas to Ivanka Trump and Kushner at their residence in May, only to face Secret Service agents who said they were not authorised to accept the documents.<\/p>\n
Likewise, that same month, the BBC was unable to hand Trump Jr a subpoena at Trump Tower in New York. It has therefore asked the court for permission to use certified mail to deliver the documents instead.<\/p>\n
But in Friday\u2019s court filing, Trump\u2019s lawyers accused the BBC of carrying out a \u201ccynical\u201d campaign that involved the \u201charassment of the President\u2019s family, associates, staff, officials, and others\u201d.<\/p>\n
It also called the BBC\u2019s efforts \u201ca boundless re-investigation of the events that occurred on January 6, 2021\u201d.<\/p>\n
The filing suggests that any interactions involving Ivanka Trump and Kushner are \u201csubject to the executive privilege\u201d of the presidency, since the husband-wife duo served as adviser and senior adviser to Trump, respectively.<\/p>\n
Trump has made sweeping claims to executive privilege throughout his two terms in office.<\/p>\n
Just this month, the US Department of Justice issued a memo saying such privilege shielded communication even with private advisers who worked outside the executive branch, effectively declaring interactions with companies and private individuals off-limits for subpoenas.<\/p>\n
Critics fear the memo will be a hurdle to government transparency under Trump \u2014 and may even prevent Congress from accessing investigative materials.<\/p>\n
Senator Adam Schiff of California framed the memo as an insurance policy against congressional oversight, should the Republican Party lose its majorities in Congress during November\u2019s midterm elections.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis latest opinion should be seen as a partisan measure to insulate the president and his corrupt activities from Congressional subpoenas when the majority flips,\u201d he wrote in a statement<\/a> on August 11.<\/p>\n The federal court in southern Florida has yet to rule on the BBC\u2019s subpoena requests.<\/p>\n