{"id":53655,"date":"2026-05-02T07:40:19","date_gmt":"2026-05-02T07:40:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/53655\/"},"modified":"2026-05-02T07:40:19","modified_gmt":"2026-05-02T07:40:19","slug":"the-latest-supreme-court-hears-arguments-on-ending-legal-protections-for-haitian-syrian-migrants-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/53655\/","title":{"rendered":"The Latest: Supreme Court hears arguments on ending legal protections for Haitian\/Syrian migrants"},"content":{"rendered":"

WASHINGTON \u2013 The Supreme Court on Wednesday weighed the Trump administration\u2019s push to end legal protections for Haitians and Syrians<\/a> as migrants fleeing war and natural disaster.<\/p>\n

Several conservative justices appeared to be leaning in favor of the Republican administration\u2019s argument that the law limits what courts can do to the program known as temporary protected status, or TPS.<\/p>\n

Haitians and Syrians were among those from 17 countries<\/a> with TPS, which allows migrants already in the U.S. to stay with work permits in 18-month increments, so long as the Department of Homeland Security Secretary deems their country of origin unsafe for return.<\/p>\n

In President Donald Trump<\/a> \u2019s second term, Homeland Security has ended the protections for 13 countries, exposing their migrants to potential deportation<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Here’s the latest:<\/p>\n

Lawyers and TPS holders await the Court\u2019s decision<\/p>\n

The International Refugee Assistance Project, which represents Syrian TPS holders in the lawsuit heard at the Supreme Court, says stakes are high.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Court now faces a choice about whether it will uphold the checks and balances at the heart of the Constitution or whether the President can run roughshod over the laws created by Congress,\u201d said Sharif Aly, president at IRAP.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court, Aly noted, \u201cfaces a moral question of whether our country will destabilize countless families, communities, and the economy by stripping legal status from people who have it and sending them back to danger in Haiti, Syria, and beyond.\u201d<\/p>\n

A famously fast talker<\/p>\n

One thing to know about Solicitor General D. John Sauer is that he talks fast.<\/p>\n

The Solicitor General is the person tasked with arguing cases in front of the Supreme Court for the federal government. He or she is basically the federal government\u2019s lawyer at the court.<\/p>\n

If he or she isn\u2019t personally arguing a case, it can also be assigned to an Assistant or another government attorney. The solicitor general also plays a role in deciding which cases the government will appeal to the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

Sauer was also the Solicitor General of Missouri from 2017 to 2023.<\/p>\n

The speed at which Sauer talks has been a subject of debate on various legal chats on Reddit.<\/p>\n

Skeptical Alito wonders who is considered white<\/p>\n

Justice Alito was drilling down on Pipoly on the question of who is considered white and who is not.<\/p>\n

At one point he listed off various nationalities like Syrians and Greeks and questioned whether Pipoly would consider them white. Pipoly generally answered that he didn\u2019t know or hadn\u2019t considered that question.<\/p>\n

At one point Alito \u2014 who has Italian heritage \u2014 asked whether southern Italians were considered white and Pipoly answered that 120 years ago during the last wave of European immigration, they would not have been considered white.<\/p>\n

Alito said he didn\u2019t like \u201cdividing the people of the world into these groups.\u201d<\/p>\n

Gorsuch queries court role in TPS<\/p>\n

Justice Neil Gorsuch asks his first questions of the day, pressing the attorney for Haitian immigrants on whether the law lets judges step into Homeland Security\u2019s decisions on TPS.<\/p>\n

\u201cI\u2019m struggling with that,\u201d he said, seemingly unconvinced by the immigrants\u2019 process argument.<\/p>\n

Race and TPS<\/p>\n

Pipoly starts with the Haitian immigrants\u2019 argument that the administration ended TPS for Haitians because of \u201cracial animus towards nonwhite immigrants and bare dislike of Haitians.\u201d<\/p>\n

He repeats comments from President Trump, including a reference to Haiti as a \u201cshithole country.\u201d<\/p>\n

A lower-court judge found that \u201chostility to nonwhite immigrants\u201d likely played a role in the decision to end protections for Haitians.<\/p>\n

During his presidential campaign, Donald Trump amplified false rumors that Haitian immigrants were abducting and eating dogs and cats. Federal authorities have denied racial animus played any role in the TPS decisions.<\/p>\n

\u2018Bombing happening now in Syria\u2019<\/p>\n

Justice Kavanaugh asked Arulanantham about how many Syrians have returned since the end of the Assad regime and whether those figures might have any relevance to the arguments.<\/p>\n

Arulanantham said it doesn\u2019t matter because there still wasn\u2019t consultations with the State Department over country conditions in Syria.<\/p>\n

He did note that many people have gone from southern Lebanon to Syria recently, but suggested it had more to do with the armed conflict in the region driving people out than any improvements in Syria itself.<\/p>\n

Arulanantham said it\u2019s \u201cnot the same thing as saying \u2018We\u2019re going from California to Syria.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThere is still active armed conflict. There\u2019s bombing happening now in Syria,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Arguments about TPS for Haiti begin<\/p>\n

Attorney Geoffrey Pipoly begins his arguments on behalf of Haitian TPS holders, who say that their country is unsafe and does not meet the conditions to receive them back.<\/p>\n

More than 9,000 people were killed across Haiti last year, with the country now reporting a homicide rate of 76 per 100,000 inhabitants, one of the world\u2019s highest.<\/p>\n

Gang violence also has displaced more than 1.4 million people, with armed men controlling more than 70% of the capital, Port-au-Prince, and swaths of rural land north of it.<\/p>\n

Hunger also is deepening, with gangs controlling access to key routes leading in and out of Port-au-Prince.<\/p>\n

More than 5.83 million Haitians are expected to face acute levels of hunger from March to June, representing more than half the country\u2019s population, according to the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, the leading international authority on hunger crises.<\/p>\n

Skeptical questions from some conservatives<\/p>\n

Justice Samuel Alito appears skeptical, raising questions about the immigration attorneys\u2019 main argument that the administration short-circuited the process. He says the court would have to take an unusual read on the law for them to win.<\/p>\n

Thomas also seems sympathetic to the administration on process. Kavanaugh, meanwhile, seems open to their arguments about foreign policy considerations.<\/p>\n

Drilling down on consultations with State Department<\/p>\n

A little bit more on that exchange between Arulanantham and Barrett.<\/p>\n

She was drilling down into the question of how substantive the consultations have to be between the DHS secretary and State Department on whether country conditions are truly stable enough to terminate TPS.<\/p>\n

\u201cLet\u2019s imagine the consultation happens. It\u2019s a robust consultation. But everything that she hears cuts in favor of keeping TPS status and she says \u2018I\u2019m terminating it.\u2019 Is that reviewable?\u201d Barrett asked.<\/p>\n

Arulanantham says in that case it\u2019s not, but then goes on to argue that she really does have to make a substantive inquiry. And he argues that the consultation process makes for better decisions overall.<\/p>\n

Barrett raises big-picture questions<\/p>\n

Barrett comes in with a zoom-out question about the immigration attorney\u2019s argument that Homeland Security didn\u2019t follow the right process.<\/p>\n

\u201cIs this going to get you very much? If it\u2019s just a box-checking exercise, why would Congress permit review of the procedural aspect when really what everybody cares about much more is the substance?\u201d<\/p>\n

Arulanantham says that it\u2019s still important: \u201cCongress, and us too, and the millions of people who live with TPS holders have some faith in government.\u201d<\/p>\n

TPS holders have two courtroom defenders<\/p>\n

Two different lawyers are arguing for the TPS recipients.<\/p>\n

Ahilan Arulanantham, a professor at the UCLA School of Law, is up now. He\u2019s arguing the Syrian case.<\/p>\n

Attorney Geoffrey Pipoly will represent people from Haiti.<\/p>\n

Arguments turn to those defending TPS holders<\/p>\n

Sauer has now finished his arguments. The court is now hearing from Ahilan Arulanantham, a professor at the UCLA School of Law who\u2019s arguing for Syrian immigrants.<\/p>\n

Arulanantham argues that the Trump administration\u2019s is seeking an open-ended expansion of its immigration power. \u201cThe government reads this statue as a blank check,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Sauer: The T in TPS stands for \u2018temporary\u2019<\/p>\n

Before wrapping up his argument, Sauer emphasized the issue of the temporary nature of TPS.<\/p>\n

\u201cKeep in mind this is temporary protected status,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

He pointed out that a number of the TPS designations go back years, sometimes decades.<\/p>\n

That goes to a key Republican complaint about TPS: they say that while it\u2019s supposed to be temporary, it often ends up being extended repeatedly.<\/p>\n

Kavanaugh asks about legislative\/executive branch powers<\/p>\n

Justice Brett Kavanaugh is asking why Congress would have barred courts from considering claims about TPS termination.<\/p>\n

Sauer says those decisions should be left to the executive branch, arguing that the decision to grant to revoke protections can have foreign policy implications.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s an area where courts have generally given deference to the president.<\/p>\n

How much research did Kristi Noem do before terminating TPS?<\/p>\n

Some of the liberal justices have really pushed Sauer on the issue of how much the Homeland Security Secretary consulted with the State Department about country conditions.<\/p>\n

Advocates have argued that former DHS chief Kristi Noem didn\u2019t really conduct a substantive consultation with State about the conditions of the countries where they were terminating TPS and that means they\u2019re potentially sending people back to countries where they\u2019re at risk.<\/p>\n

Sauer is arguing that the secretary can\u2019t force the State Department to respond.<\/p>\n

Justices question motives for terminating TPS<\/p>\n

Liberal-leaning justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor<\/p>\n

are questioning whether racial animus played a part in the administration\u2019s decision to terminate TPS.<\/p>\n

Sauer, the government\u2019s lawyer, responded that he \u201cstrongly disagrees.\u201d<\/p>\n

Barrett asks about the racial dynamic<\/p>\n

Justice Amy Coney Barrett jumps in with a question about constitutional claims the migrants have made, which include the argument that race played a role in the decision to end the protections.<\/p>\n

She\u2019s another key member of the conservative majority, and one with a personal connection to Haiti. Two of her seven children were adopted from the country.<\/p>\n

The Trump administration has denied racial animus played a role in the decision, and Sauer argued the plaintiffs\u2019 constitutional claims are \u201cnot a close call.\u201d<\/p>\n

Judges question administration lawyer<\/p>\n

The three liberal-leaning justices, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, are grilling Sauer on his main argument.<\/p>\n

Their focus: Even if judges can\u2019t question the decision to terminate legal protections, why can\u2019t they weigh arguments about whether Homeland Security followed the steps Congress laid out in the law?<\/p>\n

Kagan losing voice & making jokes<\/p>\n

Justice Elena Kagan is struggling with some voice issues.<\/p>\n

She was questioning Sauer, stopped to cough, and then apologized.<\/p>\n

Still struggling as she questioned Sauer further, she then joked that \u201cthe likelihood of me asking a follow-up is very diminished.\u201d<\/p>\n

That sparked some laughter in the court.<\/p>\n

Sauer defends Kristi Noem\u2019s decision-making<\/p>\n

Sauer mentioned in his opening statement that when the secretary issued her TPS decisions the fact that her decisions were consistent was a \u201cvirtue and not a vice.\u201d<\/p>\n

That seemed to be in reference to criticism by immigration advocates that former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem wasn\u2019t doing a substantive consultation with the State Department when it comes to assessing country conditions and deciding whether it was safe enough for them to return home.<\/p>\n

Roberts questions link to Trump\u2019s original travel ban<\/p>\n

Chief Justice John Roberts questions whether Sauer is seeking a \u201csignificant expansion\u201d of the court\u2019s ruling in Trump v. Hawaii, the case where the court upheld Trump\u2019s travel ban for Muslim-majority countries during his first term.<\/p>\n

Roberts holds a key vote on the court as both the chief and a member of the conservative majority who has voted against the administration in some cases, like the ruling that stuck down Trump\u2019s tariffs.<\/p>\n

And they\u2019re off!<\/p>\n

Arguments have started in the TPS case.<\/p>\n

The justices first released a number of opinions before launching into oral arguments in this key case.<\/p>\n

First up is the federal government. Solicitor General D. John Sauer argues that the law doesn\u2019t allow courts to block or delay Homeland Security decisions, or question any of the steps along the way.<\/p>\n

Court voids majority Black congressional district in Louisiana<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court<\/a> struck down Louisiana\u2019s second majority Black congressional district in a decision that could open the door for Republican-led states to eliminate Black and Latino electoral districts that tend to favor Democrats and affect the balance of power in Congress.<\/p>\n

The court\u2019s conservative majority found that the district, represented by Democrat Cleo Fields<\/a>, relied too heavily on race. Chief Justice John Roberts had described the district as a \u201csnake\u201d that stretches more than 200 miles (320 kilometers) to link parts of the Shreveport, Alexandria, Lafayette and Baton Rouge areas.<\/p>\n

The decision weakens a landmark voting rights law\u2019s protections against discrimination in redistricting. It\u2019s unclear how much is left of the provision, known as Section 2, the main way to challenge racially discriminatory election practices.<\/p>\n

But first, some opinions!<\/p>\n

The court is releasing several opinions on previous cases before getting into the TPS-related arguments.<\/p>\n

In the first opinion, The court sided with a faith-based pregnancy center that raised First Amendment concerns about an investigation into whether it misled people to discourage abortions.<\/p>\n

The high court\u2019s unanimous ruling is a procedural victory for First Choice Women\u2019s Resource Centers, which is challenging a New Jersey probe of its practices.<\/p>\n

The conservative-majority court has given abortion opponents high-profile wins in recent years, most notably the watershed case that overturned the nationwide right<\/a> to abortion in 2022. First Choice, though, had also drawn support from the American Civil Liberties Union, which supports abortion rights but backed the group\u2019s First Amendment concerns.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court\u2019s decision lets First Choice sue over the subpoena in federal court.<\/p>\n

TPS holders are demonstrating outside the Supreme Court<\/p>\n

Dozens of immigrants who have been protected from deportation under a temporary status are beginning to gather in front of the Supreme Court to follow the arguments on the Trump administration\u2019s attempt to end these protections for Haitians and Syrians.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court will weigh arguments at 10 a.m. The case has wider implications for more than 1.3 million people from 17 countries who have been living and working in the U.S., protected under TPS.<\/p>\n

Immigrants and advocates outside the Supreme Court are demanding \u201cequal justice under the law.\u201d<\/p>\n

TPS holders plan to offer their testimony. There are performances by musicians from TPS countries and by Los Jornaleros del Norte, a band from Los Angeles made up of current and former day laborers.<\/p>\n

Who\u2019s at the podium<\/p>\n

Solicitor General D. John Sauer, the government\u2019s top Supreme Court attorney, will argue the case for the Trump administration.<\/p>\n

Two lawyers will argue on the other side, since the court is considering the future of legal protections for people from two countries. Ahilan Arulanantham, a professor at the UCLA School of Law, will argue the Syrian case and attorney Geoffrey Pipoly will represent people from Haiti.<\/p>\n

The new secretary gets the blame<\/p>\n

This lawsuit originally was directed at Kristi Noem, who was Trump\u2019s first Homeland Security secretary.<\/p>\n

But when she was fired, and Markwayne Mullin was sworn in as the new DHS secretary, he also got the honor of being the person named in all the lawsuits.<\/p>\n

Lawsuits tend to follow the head of the agency or department so when those people change, the new secretary or agency head takes over the role of being named in all the lawsuits, even if they happened before he or she took office.<\/p>\n

This even happens when administrations change. For example, advocates sued the first Trump administration over its efforts to terminate TPS, specifically naming his DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen.<\/p>\n

But by the time the case concluded six years later, it was Biden\u2019s DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas who was named in the suit.<\/p>\n

How temporary is temporary?<\/p>\n

One of the key complaints by conservatives about TPS is that something that is supposed to be temporary essentially becomes permanent.<\/p>\n

Republicans often point to TPS designations that are extended repeatedly, even after the reason for the original designation has long passed.<\/p>\n

The TPS designation for El Salvador, for example, was first designated in 2001 following devastating earthquakes in the country.<\/p>\n

But immigration advocates say there\u2019s no time limit on TPS use, and the administration is trying to send people back to countries still in turmoil.<\/p>\n

Conditions in Syria<\/p>\n

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, also known as the UN Refugee Agency, says that Syria\u2019s operational contexts reflect a dual dynamic of large-scale returns and persistent humanitarian needs.<\/p>\n

As of March 2026, 15.6 million Syrians required assistance, while over 1.5 million refugees and 1.8 million internally displaced persons (IDPs) have returned since December 2024, according to the agency.<\/p>\n

\u201cInternal displacement remains high (5.5 million), underscoring that returns are occurring within a still-fragile system with strained absorption capacity,\u201d said the UN agency in a report.<\/p>\n

Conditions in Haiti<\/p>\n

Haiti has not had a president since Jovenel Mo\u00efse was killed in July 2021 at his private residence.<\/p>\n

The government hopes to hold the first round of elections by year\u2019s end, but experts say that\u2019s unlikely given the surge in gang violence.<\/p>\n

A recent assessment from the International Rescue Committee (IRC) assessment reveals \u201cgrave protection risks and rapidly shrinking access to public services\u201d for civilians in Haiti, as the country faces one of the worst humanitarian crises in the world.<\/p>\n

The report notes that conditions could deteriorate further as political instability and violence and clashes between gangs and security forces continue.<\/p>\n

\u201cMillions of people in Haiti continue to face a compounding crisis of food insecurity, forced displacement, deadly disease outbreaks, and surging violence,\u201d said Alice Ribes, emergency country director for the IRC in Haiti. \u201cPublic services in many areas have collapsed under gang rule, leaving people with limited or no access to clean drinking water, food, medical care, and education.\u201d<\/p>\n

Bill to protect TPS<\/p>\n

On April 16, in a rare bipartisan moment, the House passed legislation that would extend TPS for Haitians.<\/p>\n

The bill, pushed forward by House Democrats with a group of Republicans over the objections of the GOP leadership<\/a>, would require a three-year extension of temporary protected status for Haitians by the Trump administration. That would allow hundreds of thousands of qualifying immigrants to remain in the United States without fear of deportation.<\/p>\n

But it faces uncertainty in the Senate, and President Trump would almost certainly seek to veto it.<\/p>\n

Democratic lawmakers urge the SCOTUS to support TPS<\/p>\n

Democratic Senator Edward J. Markey and Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley, both of Massachusetts, Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester, of Delaware, and Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, of Florida, asked the Supreme Court on Tuesday to reject the administrations attempts to terminate TPS.<\/p>\n

They were joined by a coalition of senior, workers and advocates from the American Business Immigration Coalition, and the National Domestic Workers Alliance, among other organizations.<\/p>\n

\u201cTPS holders serve as a backbone for families and our economy\u2014caring for our elders and loved ones through illness, strengthening our communities, and making innumerable contributions daily,\u201d Pressley. \u201cOur message to the Supreme Court today is simple: do your job, uphold the law, save lives, and protect our communities.\u201d<\/p>\n

What the administration says<\/p>\n

The administration\u2019s claims that TPS holders can safely return to their home countries, where conditions have changed since the protection was originally granted.<\/p>\n

Advocates argue that safe conditions do not exist for people to return to their countries of origin. They point out that the government is engaging in a contradiction, given that the State Department warns U.S. citizens not to travel to Haiti or Syria due to violence, instability, and limited access to basic services.<\/p>\n

\u201cThese terminations have come without credible evidence that conditions have improved,\u201d said Krish O\u2019Mara Vignarajah, president and Chief Executive Officer of Global Refuge, one of the largest faith-based nonprofit organizations serving refugees.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe administration is essentially arguing two things at once: that these countries are too dangerous for American tourists, but safe enough to deport families to. Policy makers cannot credibly hold both positions at the same time,\u201d Vignarajah said.<\/p>\n

What advocates say<\/p>\n

Immigrant advocates argue that the administration\u2019s decision to end TPS is not based on conditions in the countries of origin. They contend that, on the contrary, it is part of a broader policy aimed at deporting not only those who entered the country illegally, but also hundreds of thousands of people who have been residing in the country legally.<\/p>\n

\u201cBy trying to kill TPS, they are attacking people who are living and working here legally, paying fees and taxes, following all the rules,\u201d said Jos\u00e9 Palma, coordinator at the National TPS Alliance. \u201cThey are de-documenting people\u2026 it\u2019s cruel, arbitrary, pointless, needless, and wrong.\u201d<\/p>\n

Viles Dorsainvil, Co-Founder and Executive Director, Haitian Support Center, and a Haitian TPS holder, said \u201cTPS provides dignity, stability, and hope… TPS represents more than protection. It represents the ability of families to stay together.\u201d<\/p>\n

Public Rights Project, a non-governmental that helps local governments with litigation, filed an amicus brief outlining the economic, workforce and public service impacts cities would face if TPS is revoked.<\/p>\n

The brief was filed on April 13 on behalf of a coalition of 47 local governments, mayors and local leaders across the country urging the Court to preserve TPS.<\/p>\n

Settle in for a lengthy session<\/p>\n

The court has set aside 80 minutes for arguments, but it would be unsurprising if they last two hours or longer.<\/p>\n

Justice Clarence Thomas goes first<\/p>\n

In the post-pandemic era, the other justices allow the 77-year-old Thomas, the longest-serving member of the court, to pose a question or two before the free-for-all begins. In a second round of questioning, the justices ask questions in order of seniority. Chief Justice John Roberts, whose center chair makes him the most senior, gets the first crack.<\/p>\n

Court begins at 10 a.m., Eastern time, but the livestream won\u2019t start right away<\/p>\n

The justices have some business to take care of before arguments get going. They\u2019ll issue a decision in at least one case that was argued during the fall or winter, and the justice who wrote the majority opinion in each case will read a summary from the bench. Then, the court will ceremonially swear in lawyers to the Supreme Court bar. Once that\u2019s done, the livestream should begin.<\/p>\n

Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"WASHINGTON \u2013 The Supreme Court on Wednesday weighed the Trump administration\u2019s push to end legal protections for Haitians…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":51126,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[146],"tags":[12378,30720,24492,29588,12,30724,535,30722,30725,30726,3755,30723,8912,51,1194,52],"class_list":{"0":"post-53655","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-john-roberts","8":"tag-alejandro-mayorkas","9":"tag-alice-ribes","10":"tag-ayanna-pressley","11":"tag-debbie-wasserman-schultz","12":"tag-donald-trump","13":"tag-edward-markey","14":"tag-john-roberts","15":"tag-jose-palma","16":"tag-jovenel-moise","17":"tag-kirstjen-nielsen","18":"tag-kristi-noem","19":"tag-lisa-rochester","20":"tag-markwayne-mullin","21":"tag-politics","22":"tag-washington-news","23":"tag-world-news"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@people\/116503853376557367","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53655","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53655"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53655\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/51126"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53655"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=53655"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=53655"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}