{"id":61648,"date":"2026-05-07T23:38:09","date_gmt":"2026-05-07T23:38:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/61648\/"},"modified":"2026-05-07T23:38:09","modified_gmt":"2026-05-07T23:38:09","slug":"are-readers-meant-to-take-this-seriously-economist-refutes-latest-attack-on-wealth-tax-by-bezos-washington-post","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/61648\/","title":{"rendered":"‘Are Readers Meant to Take This Seriously?’: Economist Refutes Latest Attack on Wealth Tax by Bezos’ Washington Post"},"content":{"rendered":"

The architect of California’s wealth tax proposal called out The Washington Post<\/a> and its multibillionaire owner, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos<\/a>, on Thursday for peddling what he said is “misinformation” to readers.<\/p>\n

Emmanuel Saez, a French economist and professor at the University of California, Berkeley, who was tapped by California’s largest union to design the tax proposal, singled out an opinion piece<\/a> by the Washington<\/a> Post editorial board from earlier this week that argues the proposal would backfire and cost California billions of dollars in tax revenue each year.<\/p>\n

Saez said the article contains glaring falsehoods and omits key information about the proposal<\/a>, which aims to create a one-time tax of 5% on the total assets of California’s roughly 200 billionaire residents in order to recoup about $100 billion in revenue for healthcare<\/a>, food assistance, and education stripped from the state by last year’s Republican federal budget<\/a> legislation, which will hand $1 trillion<\/a> in tax breaks to the wealthiest 1% of Americans over the next 10 years.<\/p>\n

The piece<\/a>, published on Monday with the headline “California already losing with billionaire tax referendum,” argues that even if California voters don’t ultimately approve the measure, “the specter of such a wealth tax has already cost the state more in lost future revenue from income taxes than it would raise” due to an exodus of wealthy people from the state\u2014an oft-used but weakly substantiated<\/a> talking point by opponents of the measure.<\/p>\n

The Post cited a paper<\/a> by Jared Walczak, a visiting fellow at the California Tax Foundation, which it said demonstrates that billionaire flight “will cost California\u2019s state government somewhere between $3.5 billion and $4.5 billion every year in other tax collections, and up to $19 billion in lost [gross domestic product].”<\/p>\n

But Saez argued that his study makes a “basic mistake” by “modeling a mobility response of billionaires to a permanent annual and recurrent 5% wealth tax.” In reality, though, the tax would be imposed only once and would apply to any billionaires who resided in the state after January 1, 2026, which has already passed, so it no longer creates an incentive to move.<\/p>\n

Saez argued that in any case, “Walczak\u2019s estimation of the California income tax paid by billionaires who have threatened to leave is also wildly exaggerated.”<\/p>\n

Walczak’s figure for lost tax revenue, he said, hinges on the idea that the three richest men who’ve threatened to leave the state, Google co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page, and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg<\/a>, pay $1.7 billion in California income taxes each year.<\/p>\n

“If only they paid so much!” Saez quipped.<\/p>\n

“In reality, using Securities and Exchange Commission data on stock sales, stock donations, dividends, and executive compensation, we can directly estimate that they paid only [$269 million] in California income tax in 2025, 6.3 times less than Walczak\u2019s assumption,” he said, citing a paper<\/a> he co-wrote in March responding to a similar argument by a conservative think tank<\/a>.<\/p>\n

He cited tax data showing that the tech tycoons\u2014who own a combined $810 billion according to Forbes<\/a>\u2014only collectively paid about [$22 million] per year on average between 2019-25, with Brin and Page paying no taxes on their wealth from stock in Google’s parent company Alphabet during three of those years because they didn’t sell stock, get dividends, or receive executive compensation. This is despite 90% of their wealth coming from those holdings.<\/p>\n

“The one-time wealth tax finally makes them contribute in proportion to their enormous wealth gains,” Saez said.<\/p>\n

The Post also claimed that the Service Employees International Union (SEIU<\/a>) United Healthcare Workers<\/a> West, the union leading the charge in support of the referendum, is “pretend[ing] that the tax is needed to save California\u2019s health system from ‘collapse'” and is instead dishonestly using that framing to covertly pursue the “redistribution of wealth.”<\/p>\n

But Saez said that the federal cuts of roughly $20 billion annually are already having devastating effects on Californians that could be alleviated with more tax revenue.<\/p>\n

As a result of the cuts, “more than 400 California hospitals have already laid off<\/a> more than 3,400 healthcare workers as of mid-March, with a second wave of layoffs expected as funding cuts tied to recent federal policy changes are phased in over the next several years,” he said. “Statewide, projections show the cuts could result in the loss of up to 145,000 healthcare jobs, impacting hospitals, clinics, and home care providers alike.”<\/p>\n

Eighty-three more hospitals in California may be at risk of closing due to the federal funding cuts, according to a recent nationwide analysis<\/a> by Public Citizen<\/a>. But Saez said the billionaire’s tax would go a long way toward closing the gap.<\/p>\n

“Right now, California\u2019s billionaires pay much lower tax rates than what working families pay out of every paycheck,” Saez said.<\/p>\n

Despite claims otherwise by the Post editorial board\u2014which last month ran another piece<\/a> arguing that due to progressive taxation<\/a>, “the rich already pay more than their fair share”\u2014according to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, at all levels of government from 2018-20, billionaires paid just 24% of their total income in taxes, while the US-wide average was 30%. This disparity arises largely due to loopholes<\/a> that allow the rich to avoid taxes on business and investment gains that are not sold.<\/p>\n

“Local hospitals and emergency rooms could shut their doors forever because billionaires insist on paying less than the rest of us,” Saez said.<\/p>\n

Debru Carthan, the executive vice president of SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West, said it was not surprising that the Post “completely ignores that the billionaire tax would keep hospitals from closing and healthcare costs from skyrocketing for millions of Californians” because it is “a crisis that comes as a direct result of the tax breaks handed out to Jeff Bezos and his buddies.”<\/p>\n

Since the return of Donald Trump<\/a> to the presidency, the Amazon founder has taken a much heavier hand over the content of his flagship paper, including its opinion section, which he last year mandated<\/a> to exclusively publish pieces on economics that promote \u201cpersonal liberties and free markets,” leading to the resignation of opinion editor David Shipley.<\/p>\n

But Saez marveled at how blatant Bezos’ thumb on the scale has appeared in his paper’s coverage of California’s billionaire wealth tax and similar proposals, which it has denounced on several<\/a> other<\/a> occasions.<\/a><\/p>\n

\u201cAre readers meant to take this seriously?” Saez asked. “\u2018Board of billionaire-owned paper comes out against tax on billionaires\u2019? Everyone knows this board makes political decisions at the behest of Jeff Bezos, but this one is the most transparent of them all.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The architect of California’s wealth tax proposal called out The Washington Post and its multibillionaire owner, Amazon founder…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":61649,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[161],"tags":[544,36540,5189,734,6652,2584,3973],"class_list":{"0":"post-61648","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-jeff-bezos","8":"tag-california","9":"tag-california-billionaires-tax","10":"tag-inequality","11":"tag-jeff-bezos","12":"tag-taxation","13":"tag-washington-post","14":"tag-wealth-tax"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@people\/116535931836439455","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61648","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61648"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61648\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/61649"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61648"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61648"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61648"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}