{"id":71502,"date":"2026-05-14T20:48:44","date_gmt":"2026-05-14T20:48:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/71502\/"},"modified":"2026-05-14T20:48:44","modified_gmt":"2026-05-14T20:48:44","slug":"musk-vs-openai-ceo-satya-nadella-reveals-why-microsoft-backed-sam-altman-despite-internal-turmoil-firstpost","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/71502\/","title":{"rendered":"Musk vs OpenAI: CEO Satya Nadella reveals why Microsoft backed Sam Altman despite internal turmoil \u2013 Firstpost"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Microsoft chief executive Satya Nadella has explained why the tech giant stood firmly behind Sam Altman during OpenAI\u2019s dramatic 2023 leadership crisis. Testimony from Nadella and OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever has revealed internal tensions, fears over control, and the high-stakes calculations behind one of Silicon Valley\u2019s biggest AI alliances.<\/p>\n<p>When Sam Altman was abruptly removed from OpenAI in late 2023, the shockwaves spread far beyond the company\u2019s offices. Investors panicked, employees revolted and rivals watched closely as the world\u2019s most influential and fast-growing AI start-up appeared to descend into chaos overnight.<\/p>\n<p>But amid the confusion, one company moved quickly and decisively: Microsoft.<\/p>\n<p>Testifying in the<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.firstpost.com\/tech\/in-openai-trial-former-technology-chief-says-altman-sowed-chaos-distrust-among-top-executives-14008377.html\" id=\"https:\/\/www.firstpost.com\/tech\/in-openai-trial-former-technology-chief-says-altman-sowed-chaos-distrust-among-top-executives-14008377.html\" class=\"body_anchor\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">courtroom battle between Elon Musk and OpenAI<\/a>, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella offered the clearest explanation yet for why the software giant chose to continue backing<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.firstpost.com\/web-show\/between-the-lines\/why-was-sam-altman-fired-from-openai-between-the-lines-with-palki-sharma-242\/\" id=\"https:\/\/www.firstpost.com\/web-show\/between-the-lines\/why-was-sam-altman-fired-from-openai-between-the-lines-with-palki-sharma-242\/\" class=\"body_anchor\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Sam Altman despite the turmoil surrounding his leadership<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD<\/p>\n<p>According to report by the Financial Times, Nadella said Microsoft never received a convincing explanation from OpenAI\u2019s board about why Altman had been fired in the first place. That uncertainty, combined with Microsoft\u2019s belief in Altman\u2019s strategic vision, shaped the company\u2019s response during one of the most dramatic boardroom crises in recent tech history.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhenever I asked specifically why Sam was fired, [the board] never gave me a specific answer,\u201d Nadella told jurors. His frustration was unmistakable. \u201cIt was amateur city as far as I\u2019m concerned.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Why Microsoft refused to walk away<\/p>\n<p>Nadella\u2019s testimony painted a picture of a company balancing caution with conviction.<\/p>\n<p>OpenAI\u2019s board had announced Altman\u2019s removal by claiming he was \u201cnot consistently candid\u201d in communications with directors. Nadella acknowledged that dishonesty would normally be serious enough to justify dismissing a chief executive. Yet he repeatedly stressed that Microsoft was never given concrete evidence explaining the board\u2019s concerns.<\/p>\n<p>That absence of clarity appears to have strengthened Microsoft\u2019s support for Altman rather than weaken it.<\/p>\n<p>At the time, Microsoft had already committed billions of dollars to OpenAI and tied much of its future AI strategy to the company\u2019s technology. Walking away from Altman could have jeopardised both Microsoft\u2019s commercial ambitions and its position in the rapidly escalating AI race.<\/p>\n<p>The court also heard that Microsoft viewed Altman as central to OpenAI\u2019s momentum and execution. Within days of his dismissal, employee unrest and investor pressure forced OpenAI\u2019s board to reverse course and reinstate him.<\/p>\n<p>The legal case itself was brought by Musk, an early OpenAI backer who argues the company abandoned its founding non-profit mission in pursuit of profit and power. Musk has repeatedly targeted Altman personally, even mocking him publicly as \u201cSwindly Sam\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD<\/p>\n<p>A victory for Musk could complicate OpenAI\u2019s future restructuring plans and potentially disrupt ambitions for a public listing.<\/p>\n<p>Behind Microsoft\u2019s growing anxiety over OpenAI<\/p>\n<p>While Nadella defended Microsoft\u2019s support for Altman, his testimony also revealed deeper concerns inside the company about becoming too dependent on OpenAI.<\/p>\n<p>Internal emails presented in court showed Nadella privately warning Microsoft executives in 2022 about the dangers of losing strategic control. \u201cI don\u2019t want to be IBM and OpenAI to be Microsoft,\u201d he wrote, referencing the historic partnership that eventually allowed Microsoft to eclipse IBM\u2019s dominance in computing.<\/p>\n<p>Explaining the remark in court, Nadella said he wanted to avoid a situation where Microsoft lacked \u201cself-sufficiency\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Another email to Microsoft finance chief Amy Hood revealed even sharper concerns. Nadella warned that Microsoft risked becoming merely \u201ca very thin layer on top of Nvidia and all the IP is with OpenAI\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Those fears help explain why Microsoft has spent recent years strengthening its independent AI capabilities even while expanding its partnership with OpenAI.<\/p>\n<p>Still, the alliance has proved immensely valuable. Microsoft invested $1bn into OpenAI in 2019, followed by $2 billion in 2021 and another $10 billion in 2023. The company now reportedly owns roughly 27 per cent of OpenAI, whose valuation has climbed above $200 billion.<\/p>\n<p>STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD<\/p>\n<p>Later in the hearing, Ilya Sutskever also reflected on the chaos surrounding Altman\u2019s removal. Sutskever, who initially supported the decision before later helping restore Altman, admitted the process had been mishandled.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe process seemed rushed,\u201d he said, adding that the board lacked experience and had received poor legal advice.<\/p>\n<p>Sutskever also recalled Musk predicting OpenAI had \u201cless than 1 per cent\u201d chance of succeeding without him after leaving the organisation in 2018. Asked how much AI had advanced since then, he answered: \u201cIt\u2019s the difference between an ant and a cat.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>For Microsoft, however, the testimony made one thing clear: despite the uncertainty, Nadella believed backing Altman remained the safer bet than risking OpenAI\u2019s collapse.<\/p>\n<p class=\"first-published\">First Published:<br \/>\nMay 12, 2026, 08:13 IST<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.firstpost.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Home<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.firstpost.com\/tech\/\" title=\"Tech\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Tech<\/a>Musk vs OpenAI: CEO Satya Nadella reveals why Microsoft backed Sam Altman despite internal turmoilEnd of Article<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Microsoft chief executive Satya Nadella has explained why the tech giant stood firmly behind Sam Altman during OpenAI\u2019s&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":71503,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[151],"tags":[41107,26809,11146,25842,39339,38733,40798,585,39409],"class_list":{"0":"post-71502","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-satya-nadella","8":"tag-ai-startup-turmoil","9":"tag-elon-musk-lawsuit","10":"tag-microsoft-ai-strategy","11":"tag-microsoft-openai-partnership","12":"tag-openai-board-crisis","13":"tag-openai-valuation","14":"tag-sam-altman-firing","15":"tag-satya-nadella","16":"tag-satya-nadella-testimony"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@people\/116574899657580834","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71502","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71502"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71502\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/71503"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71502"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71502"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/people\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71502"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}