Its spokesman, Grzegorz Kuli\u015b, argued that Poland<\/a> faces a particularly sharp version of the problem because it risks becoming primarily a consumer rather than a producer of advanced AI and robotics. He said that around 30 per cent of Polish jobs are indirectly exposed to AI and nearly one million jobs are directly at risk.<\/p>\n Prime Minister Donald Tusk\u2019s government is currently pushing policy in the opposite direction, with Warsaw accelerating adoption. The administration aims to turn Poland into one of Europe\u2019s leading AI ecosystems<\/a>, despite the fact that last year only 8.4 per cent of Polish companies used AI, lagging behind the EU average of 20 per cent. The draft strategy combines domestic models such as PLLuM with AI factories, expanding supercomputing capacity, regulatory sandboxes, and wider deployment in business and public administration.<\/p>\n Deputy Prime Minister and Digital Affairs Minister Krzysztof Gawkowski, who came outside to meet the demonstrators, nevertheless accepted much of their diagnosis. He warned that \u2018uncontrolled\u2019 AI could shift decision-making from people to algorithms, insisted that \u2018the human comes first\u2019, and said statutory regulation was needed when companies use machines as a basis for replacing workers.<\/p>\n The issue has also exposed a broader political divide over how far Poland should go in regulating AI. PiS has generally backed the creation of a national regulatory framework<\/a> while stressing that Polish companies, researchers, and industry must remain competitive in the technological race. On the right, however, both Konfederacja and Grzegorz Braun\u2019s Konfederacja Korony Polskiej (KKP) have warned that excessive regulation risks slowing innovation<\/a> and deepening Europe\u2019s technological disadvantage compared with the United States and China.<\/p>\n Public opinion points towards a compromise. A May CBOS poll found that 2.2 per cent of Polish adults<\/a> said AI had already cost them a job or reduced their commissions\u2014around 669,000 people. The broader EU-wide atmosphere leans more towards a positive view of robots and AI at work, with 70 per cent believing they improve productivity. 84 per cent nevertheless said AI requires careful management.<\/p>\n The economic side of the story explains Warsaw\u2019s strategic decision to significantly expand its AI capabilities. The World Bank estimates that wider AI adoption could lift Poland\u2019s real GDP by between 1.3 and 12.1 per cent<\/a> by 2035, depending partly on investment, worker adaptation, and public policy. Labour protection is therefore not necessarily an argument against AI, but a question of how its gains and disruption are distributed.<\/p>\n Related articles:<\/p>\n \n At a time when public debate is increasingly polarized and superficial, Hungarian Conservative remains committed to depth, intellectual honesty, and independent conservative thought.\n <\/p>\n \n Producing high-quality journalism requires resources. Your contribution helps us expand our coverage, reach new audiences, and keep our content accessible.\n <\/p>\n \n Please consider supporting our mission.\n <\/p>\n![\"HC](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/poland\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/1788861488_276_cropped-HC_Logo-02.png\"\/){kind=logo}
<\/p>\n