{"id":125318,"date":"2026-03-02T09:59:12","date_gmt":"2026-03-02T09:59:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/125318\/"},"modified":"2026-03-02T09:59:12","modified_gmt":"2026-03-02T09:59:12","slug":"pensii-2026-decizie-iccj-privind-grupa-de-munca-anumiti-pensionari-nu-vor-beneficia-de-recalcularea-pensiei","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/125318\/","title":{"rendered":"PENSII 2026 | Decizie \u00ceCCJ privind grupa de munc\u0103: Anumi\u021bi pensionari nu vor beneficia de recalcularea pensiei"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Decizie \u00ceCCJ privind grupa de munc\u0103: Anumi\u021bi pensionari nu vor beneficia de recalcularea pensiei<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u021bie \u0219i Justi\u021bie a decis c\u0103 perioadele desf\u0103\u0219urate \u00een condi\u021bii grele pot fi asimilate condi\u021biilor speciale de munc\u0103 doar \u00een situa\u021bia \u00een care, la momentul respectiv, au fost \u00eencadrate oficial \u00een grupa I sau II de munc\u0103.<\/p>\n<p class=\"bodypostimgp\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-925272\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/pensii-taloane.webp.webp\" alt=\"\" width=\"1200\" height=\"714\"  \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Aceasta \u00eenseamn\u0103 c\u0103 rom\u00e2nii care au muncit ani de zile \u00een medii periculoase, precum mine, uzine, combinate, \u0219antiere sau alte locuri cu praf toxic, zgomot extrem, temperaturi ridicate ori substan\u021be periculoase, dar nu au fost oficial \u00eencadra\u021bi, nu vor beneficia de recalcularea pensiei ca munc\u0103 \u00een condi\u021bii speciale, conform Capital.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Problema afecteaz\u0103 mul\u021bi pensionari care au lucrat \u00een condi\u021bii dificile \u00eenainte de anul 2001, c\u00e2nd grupele I \u0219i II de munc\u0103 erau recunoscute oficial. \u00cen numeroase cazuri, angajatorii nu au f\u0103cut demersurile necesare sau nu au trecut corect condi\u021biile reale de munc\u0103 \u00een acte.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Astfel, exist\u0103 persoane care au prestat munca grea, dar \u00een documentele oficiale apar ca \u0219i cum ar fi avut munc\u0103 obi\u0219nuit\u0103. Mul\u021bi au sperat c\u0103 aceste perioade vor fi totu\u0219i recunoscute la pensie, \u00eens\u0103 decizia \u00ceCCJ confirm\u0103 c\u0103 doar \u00eencadrarea oficial\u0103 conteaz\u0103, mai noteaz\u0103 sursa citat\u0103.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia a raportat c\u0103 pe rolul instan\u021belor se afl\u0103 foarte multe dosare legate de pensii, \u00een special din jude\u021bul Hunedoara, \u00een zone cu minerit \u0219i termocentrale pe c\u0103rbune. Pensionarii solicitau recunoa\u0219terea muncii ca perioad\u0103 \u00een condi\u021bii speciale, conform legii 263\/2010, inclusiv pentru perioade \u00eenainte de 1 aprilie 2001. Analiza practicii judiciare a ar\u0103tat \u00eens\u0103 c\u0103 instan\u021bele nu aplicau regulile \u00een mod unitar, ceea ce a condus la clarificarea ICCJ.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201e\u00cen interpretarea \u015fi aplicarea unitar\u0103 a dispozi\u0163iilor art. 30 alin. (1) lit. i) \u015fi alin. (4 indice 4) din Legea nr. 263\/2010 privind sistemul unitar de pensii publice, cu modific\u0103rile \u015fi complet\u0103rile ulterioare, este asimilat\u0103 condi\u0163iilor speciale de munc\u0103 exclusiv perioada \u00een care un salariat \u015fi-a desf\u0103\u015furat activitatea \u00een grupa I \u015fi\/sau a II-a de munc\u0103\u201d, a decis \u00ceCCJ.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Conform deciziei ICCJ, pentru asimilarea muncii ca perioad\u0103 \u00een condi\u021bii speciale se iau \u00een considerare exclusiv perioadele \u00een care salaria\u021bii \u0219i-au desf\u0103\u0219urat activitatea \u00een grupa I \u0219i\/sau a II-a de munc\u0103.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Prin urmare, pensionarii care nu au fost \u00eencadra\u021bi oficial \u00een aceste grupe vor avea pensia calculat\u0103 ca pentru munc\u0103 normal\u0103, f\u0103r\u0103 avantajele aferente muncii \u00een condi\u021bii speciale. Aceast\u0103 decizie afecteaz\u0103 calculul pensiilor \u0219i marcheaz\u0103 o pierdere pentru cei care au prestat munc\u0103 grea, dar nu au avut documentele oficiale corespunz\u0103toare.<\/p>\n<p>            Sec\u021biune \u0218tiri sub articolul principal<\/p>\n<p class=\"wdg-google-news\">Urm\u0103ri\u021bi Ziarul Unirea \u0219i pe\u00a0\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/news.google.com\/publications\/CAAiEAaJUdJRjG_QA6aN1HEKAXsqFAgKIhAGiVHSUYxv0AOmjdRxCgF7?hl=ro&amp;gl=RO&amp;ceid=RO:ro\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" aria-label=\"GOOGLE \u0218TIRI\">GOOGLE \u0218TIRI<\/a><\/p>\n<p>            Ultimele \u0219tiri publicate \u00een Ziarul<br \/>\n                    Unirea<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Decizie \u00ceCCJ privind grupa de munc\u0103: Anumi\u021bi pensionari nu vor beneficia de recalcularea pensiei \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u021bie&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":125319,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[10],"tags":[32,33,31,1700,38188,36,37,27,34,35,25,1378,31377,41,40,38,39,26,28,29,30],"class_list":["post-125318","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-romania","tag-breaking-news","tag-breakingnews","tag-cele-mai-populare-subiecte","tag-decizie","tag-fara-bani","tag-featured-news","tag-featurednews","tag-headlines","tag-latest-news","tag-latestnews","tag-news","tag-pensii","tag-recalculare","tag-ro","tag-romana","tag-romania","tag-romanian","tag-stiri","tag-titluri","tag-top-stories","tag-topstories"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ro\/116158999215981613","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125318","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=125318"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125318\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/125319"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=125318"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=125318"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=125318"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}