{"id":147910,"date":"2026-03-30T17:40:10","date_gmt":"2026-03-30T17:40:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/147910\/"},"modified":"2026-03-30T17:40:10","modified_gmt":"2026-03-30T17:40:10","slug":"comparatie-samsung-galaxy-s26-utra-vs-xiaomi-17-ultra-dimensiuni-greutate-baterie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/147910\/","title":{"rendered":"Comparatie Samsung Galaxy S26 Utra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra: dimensiuni, greutate, baterie"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"TestezTestez \u00een paralel dou\u0103 flagship-uri Android: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra \u0219i Xiaomi 17 Ultra \u0219i v\u0103 ar\u0103t specific cum se compar\u0103. Azi vorbim despre dimensiune \u0219i baterie.<\/p>\n

Am ocazia s\u0103 testez \u00een paralel dou\u0103 flagship-uri reprezentative ale momentului actual: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra \u0219i Xiaomi 17 Ultra, ambele lansate la finalul lunii trecute \u0219i profit de ocazie s\u0103 fac o compara\u021bie am\u0103nun\u021bit\u0103. Dup\u0103 cum v-am obi\u0219nuit deja discut\u0103m despre dimensiuni, performan\u021b\u0103, autonomie, display \u0219i bine\u00een\u021beles, partea de fotografie de zi \u0219i de noapte.<\/p>\n

Azi vorbim despre dimensiuni, cum arat\u0103 \u0219i care este autonomia.<\/p>\n

\u00cenainte de toate s\u0103 vedem pu\u021bin cum stau la capitolul de specifica\u021bii. Avem a\u0219a:<\/p>\n\n\nSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultra<\/td>\nXiaomi 17 Ultra<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nLungime (mm)<\/td>\n163.6<\/td>\n162.9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nL\u0103\u021bime (mm)<\/td>\n78.1<\/td>\n77.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nGrosime (mm0<\/td>\n7.9<\/td>\n8.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nGreutate (g)<\/td>\n214<\/td>\n218.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nCarcasa<\/td>\n\n<\/tr>\n\nCarcasa<\/td>\naluminiu + sticl\u0103<\/td>\naliaj aluminiu + sticl\u0103 + plastic<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n\n<\/tr>\n\nDisplay (inci)<\/td>\n6.9<\/td>\n6.9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nRezolu\u021bie (pixeli)<\/td>\n1440 x 3120<\/td>\n1200 x 2608<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nTip<\/td>\nDynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X<\/td>\nLTPO AMOLED<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nRat\u0103 de afi\u0219are dinamic\u0103<\/td>\n120 Hz<\/td>\n120 Hz<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nProtec\u021bie<\/td>\nCorning Gorilla Armor 2<\/td>\nXiaomi Shield Glass 3.0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n\n<\/tr>\n\nCipset<\/td>\nSnapdragon Qualcomm SM8850-1-AD Elite Gen 5 (3nm)<\/td>\nSnapdragom SM8850-AC Elite Gen 5 (3 nm)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nCPU<\/td>\nOcta-core (2\u00d74.74 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6\u00d73.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M)<\/td>\nOcta-core (2\u00d74.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6\u00d73.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nGPU<\/td>\nAdreno 840<\/td>\nAdreno 840<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nRAM (GB)<\/td>\n12<\/td>\n16<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nStocare (GB)<\/td>\n256<\/td>\n512<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n\n<\/tr>\n\nSenzor amprent\u0103<\/td>\nda<\/td>\nda<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nAccelerometru<\/td>\nda<\/td>\nda<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nGiroscop<\/td>\nda<\/td>\nda<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nProximitate<\/td>\nda<\/td>\nda<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nCompas<\/td>\nda<\/td>\nda<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nBarometru<\/td>\nda<\/td>\nda<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n\n<\/tr>\n\nWi-Fi<\/td>\nWi-Fi 802.11 a\/b\/g\/n\/ac\/6e\/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct<\/td>\nWi-Fi 802.11 a\/b\/g\/n\/ac\/6e\/7, dual-band or tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nBluetooth<\/td>\n6.0, A2DP, LE<\/td>\n6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5, MIHC<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n\n<\/tr>\n\nCapacitate baterie (mAh)<\/td>\n5000<\/td>\n6000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\u00cenc\u0103rcare fir (W)<\/td>\n60<\/td>\n90<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\u00cenc\u0103rcare wireless (W)<\/td>\n25 (Qi 2.2)<\/td>\n50<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nReverse wireless (W)<\/td>\n4.5<\/td>\n10<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Dimensiuni, carcas\u0103<\/p>\n

Din tabelul de mai sus reies c\u00e2teva lucruri interesante \u00een ceea ce \u00eenseamn\u0103 dimensiunile: Xiaomi 17 Ultra este oleac\u0103 mai mic (insesizabil) dec\u00e2t Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, dar \u0219i cu 4 grame mai greu. Conteaz\u0103 asta? Dac\u0103 ne g\u00e2ndim c\u0103 are o construc\u021bie mai voluminoas\u0103 \u0219i o baterie cu aproape 20% mai mare, atunci e remarcabil c\u0103 se \u021bine de aceste dimensiuni.<\/p>\n

Despre ce vorbesc? Xiaomi 17 Ultra este cu aproape 0,7 mm mai scurt, cu 0,5 mm mai \u00eengust, \u00eens\u0103 e mai gros cu 0,4 mm, \u021bin\u00e2nd cont c\u0103 are un alt design pentru sistemul de camere foto.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Ambele aparate au o carcas\u0103 din aluminiu (sau mai bine zis aliaj de aluminiu) \u0219i sticl\u0103, la Xiaomi \u00eens\u0103 vedem \u0219i ni\u0219te plastic. Forma e rotunjit\u0103, aten\u021bia la detalii e impresionant\u0103.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Care arat\u0103 mai bine? Cred c\u0103 este o treab\u0103 discutabil\u0103 \u0219i de\u0219i sunt fanul formelor industriale, Xiaomi 17 Ultra mi se pare c\u0103 arat\u0103 pu\u021bin mai bine, chiar dac\u0103 nu \u00eemi place modul \u00een care sunt realizate butoanele. Nici camera imens\u0103 de pe spate nu mi se pare c\u0103 este un plus pentru design-ul Xiaomi 17 Ultra, doar c\u0103 nici Samsung nu are cu ce s\u0103 se laude.<\/p>\n

Merg\u00e2nd mai departe, ambele aparate au un display cu diagonala de 6.9 inci, Samsung are \u00eens\u0103 o rezolu\u021bie mai bun\u0103 (1440 x 3120 pixeli) fa\u021b\u0103 de 1200 x 2608 pixeli pentru Xiaomi 17 Ultra. O s\u0103 vorbesc mai \u00een detaliu despre display \u00een zilele urm\u0103toare, acum v\u0103 zic c\u0103 plusul dat de ideea de Privacy Display pe Galaxy S26 Ultra e compensat de o luminozitate mai bun\u0103 pe Xiaomi 17 Ultra \u2013 iar ambele au suport de afi\u0219are dinamic cu rate p\u00e2n\u0103 la 120 Hz.<\/p>\n

Cipset, baterie<\/p>\n

\u00cen mod interesant, de\u0219i ambele telefoane sunt construite \u00een jurul platformei Qualcomm SM8850-1 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm), exist\u0103 o diferen\u021b\u0103 semnificativ\u0103: Samsung are modelul AD, Xiaomi cel AC, teoretic cu un spor pentru Samsung. Merit\u0103 amintit c\u0103 Xiaomi 17 Ultra vine cu 16GB RAM \u0219i 5126GB de stocare pentru modelul de baz\u0103 \u00een timp ce Samsung a p\u0103strat doar 12GB RAM \u0219i 256GB pentru modelul de baz\u0103 al lui Galaxy S26 Ultra.<\/p>\n

Galaxy S26 Ultra beneficiaz\u0103 de o baterie de 5000 mAh, cu suport de \u00eenc\u0103rcare rapid\u0103 la 60W pe fir, 25W wireless \u0219i 4.5W pentru reverse wireless \u00een timp ce Xiaomi 17 Ultra are o baterie de 6000 mAh (cu aproape 20% mai mare) \u0219i \u00eenc\u0103rcare rapid\u0103 pe fir la 90W, 50w wireless \u0219i 10W pentru reverse wireless.<\/p>\n

Din p\u0103cate niciunul dintre aparate nu are \u00een cutie \u00eenc\u0103rc\u0103torul cu care s\u0103 reu\u0219easc\u0103 aceste cifre ceea ce \u00eenseamn\u0103 c\u0103 f\u0103r\u0103 o investi\u021bie suplimentar\u0103 (pe care a\u021bi f\u0103cut-o deja sau o ve\u021bi face) nu ve\u021bi ob\u021bine cifrele de mai sus.<\/p>\n

Cred c\u0103 mult mai relevant\u0103 este \u00eens\u0103 autonomia \u2013 dat fiind c\u0103 nu am terminat \u00eenc\u0103 ambele teste, v\u0103 zic m\u00e2ine cum st\u0103 treaba.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Testez \u00een paralel dou\u0103 flagship-uri Android: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra \u0219i Xiaomi 17 Ultra \u0219i v\u0103 ar\u0103t specific…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":147911,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[43581,274,3316,1829,41,40,38,39,163,340,208,141,124,808,169],"class_list":{"0":"post-147910","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-tehnologie","8":"tag-17-ultra","9":"tag-android","10":"tag-comparatie","11":"tag-flagship","12":"tag-ro","13":"tag-romana","14":"tag-romania","15":"tag-romanian","16":"tag-samsung","17":"tag-smartphone","18":"tag-specificatii","19":"tag-technology","20":"tag-tehnologie","21":"tag-test","22":"tag-xiaomi"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ro\/116319356762460767","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/147910","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=147910"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/147910\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/147911"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=147910"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=147910"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=147910"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}