{"id":149908,"date":"2026-04-02T00:57:11","date_gmt":"2026-04-02T00:57:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/149908\/"},"modified":"2026-04-02T00:57:11","modified_gmt":"2026-04-02T00:57:11","slug":"fcsb-sperante-spulberate-ccr-i-a-respins-ultimul-cartus-contra-stelei-urmeaza-dosarul-prejudiciului","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/149908\/","title":{"rendered":"FCSB, speran\u021be spulberate! CCR i-a respins \u201eultimul cartu\u0219\u201d contra Stelei: urmeaz\u0103 dosarul prejudiciului!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n            Articol de <a rel=\"author nofollow noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.gsp.ro\/autor\/marius-margarit-89.html\" target=\"_blank\">Marius M\u0103rg\u0103rit<\/a>, <a rel=\"author nofollow noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.gsp.ro\/autor\/daniel-grigore-3879.html\" target=\"_blank\">Daniel Grigore<\/a>            &#8211; Publicat miercuri, 01 aprilie 2026 17:31            \/ Actualizat miercuri, 01 aprilie 2026 17:35                    <\/p>\n<p>Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei a respins solicitarea <a class=\"autolink-enabled\" data-resource-id=\"576\" data-resource-type=\"team\" data-sport=\"football\" href=\"https:\/\/www.gsp.ro\/rezultate-live\/echipa-teamname-576\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">FCSB<\/a> de modificare a Legii m\u0103rcilor, ultima speran\u021b\u0103 a ro\u0219-alba\u0219trilor din prima lig\u0103 s\u0103 \u00eentoarc\u0103 soarta proceselor pierdute pe linie cu <a class=\"autolink-enabled\" data-resource-id=\"24439\" data-resource-type=\"team\" data-sport=\"football\" href=\"https:\/\/www.gsp.ro\/rezultate-live\/echipa-teamname-24439\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Steaua<\/a> Bucure\u0219ti.<\/p>\n<p class=\"do-not-hide\">\u00cen 2025, FCSB a pierdut definitiv \u0219i irevocabil dou\u0103 dosare-cheie contra CSA Steaua Bucure\u0219ti: <\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\u00cen cel privind palmaresul, instan\u021bele au decis c\u0103 CSA Steaua de\u021bine palmaresul \u00eentre 1947 \u0219i 1998, iar FCSB doar perioada 2003-prezent.<\/li>\n<li><a target=\"_blank\" class=\"editor-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.gsp.ro\/fotbal\/liga-2\/decizie-definitiva-fcsb-steaua-marca-862956.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">\u00cen cel privind m\u0103rcile<\/a>, solicitarea FCSB-ului de anulare a tuturor m\u0103rcilor Stelei a fost respins\u0103.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>\u00cen acest context, avoca\u021bii clubului patronat de Gigi Becali \u00ee\u0219i puneau ultimele speran\u021be \u00eentr-un demers la Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei, unde au \u00eencercat modificarea Legii m\u0103rcilor. <\/p>\n<p>Ei sus\u021bineau c\u0103 un eventual verdict favorabil ar fi putut duce la redeschiderea procesului din 2014, \u00een care FCSB i-a fost anulat\u0103 marca Stelei, cea folosit\u0103 de clubul lui Gigi Becali \u00eencep\u00e2nd din 2004.<\/p>\n<p>Adrian C\u0103vescu, unul dintre reprezenenta\u021bii FCSB \u00een instan\u021b\u0103, explica \u00een februarie: <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Dac\u0103 CCR modific\u0103 articolul, noi putem redeschide procesul prin care \u00een 2014 \u00cenalta Curte ne-a anulat marca. <\/p>\n<p>Atunci, noi redeschidem prin revizuire procesul de anulare a m\u0103rcii Steaua: \u00abDomnilor judec\u0103tori, \u00eentre timp s-a modificat legea, am anulat articolul \u00een baza c\u0103ruia voi a\u021bi anulat marca FCSB-ului, rejudeca\u021bi procesul!\u00bb.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>FCSB, lovitur\u0103 grea: CCR i-a respins demersul \u00een care \u00ee\u0219i punea toate speran\u021bele<\/p>\n<p>Demersul FCSB-ului a fost \u00een zadar. Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 le-a respins ast\u0103zi solicitarea, conform <a target=\"_blank\" class=\"editor-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.euronews.ro\/articole\/surse-infrangere-definitiva-pentru-gigi-becali-si-fcsb-la-ccr-nu-mai-are-cai-de-a\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">euronews.ro<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Contactat acum de GSP.ro, C\u0103vescu \u0219i-a schimbat discursul la 180 de grade: <\/p>\n<p>\u201eA fost vorba de o excep\u021bie de neconstitu\u021bionalitate a unui articol din Legea M\u0103rcilor, pe care CCR a respins-o ast\u0103zi. Noi cerusem aceast\u0103 excep\u021bie din 2017, adic\u0103 s\u0103 se revizuiasc\u0103 un articol din Legea M\u0103rcilor, care este gre\u0219it. Iar Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a judecat abia acum, dup\u0103 9 ani, de\u0219i acest proces era \u00eencheiat \u00eenc\u0103 de anul trecut, c\u00e2nd am pierdut la \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u021bie \u0219i Justi\u021bie. <\/p>\n<p>Era vorba despre articolul 3, alineatul 1, litera d, care prevede, la defini\u021bia m\u0103rcii notorii, c\u0103 r\u0103m\u00e2ne notorie f\u0103r\u0103 a fi necesar\u0103 folosirea ei. Ceea ce, \u00een opinia noastr\u0103, este complet gre\u0219it, o prostie. Este o lege gre\u0219it\u0103 fa\u021b\u0103 de toate \u021b\u0103rile din lumea asta. Iar noi am cerut \u00eenc\u0103 din 2017 s\u0103 se \u00eendrepte legea. <\/p>\n<p>V\u0103d tot felul de articole \u00een pres\u0103, c\u0103 a pierdut Gigi Becali definitiv, nu \u0219tiu ce. Nu am pierdut nimic ast\u0103zi. Procesul se \u00eencheiase \u00een noiembrie 2025, nici nu \u0219tiu de ce CCR a mai judecat acest lucru abia acum, dup\u0103 9 ani\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Urmeaz\u0103 procesul prejudiciului!<\/p>\n<p>Decizia de ast\u0103zi deschide drumul pentru judecarea ultimului proces dintre FCSB \u0219i CSA Steaua, cel \u00een care clubul din subordinea MApN solicit\u0103 desp\u0103gubiri de 37 de milioane de euro pentru folosirea ilegal\u0103 a m\u0103rcii Stelei \u00eentre 2004 \u0219i 2014. <\/p>\n<p>Primul termen \u00een acel dosar a fost fixat pe 8 aprilie. Atunci se va decide dac\u0103 procesul va fi repus pe rol. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Articol de Marius M\u0103rg\u0103rit, Daniel Grigore &#8211; Publicat miercuri, 01 aprilie 2026 17:31 \/ Actualizat miercuri, 01 aprilie&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":149909,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[341,269,44033,41,40,38,39,185,184,1053],"class_list":{"0":"post-149908","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-sport","8":"tag-ccr","9":"tag-fcsb","10":"tag-legea-marcilor","11":"tag-ro","12":"tag-romana","13":"tag-romania","14":"tag-romanian","15":"tag-sport","16":"tag-sports","17":"tag-steaua"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ro\/116332399347521630","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149908","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=149908"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149908\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/149909"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=149908"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=149908"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=149908"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}