{"id":175633,"date":"2026-05-08T14:25:11","date_gmt":"2026-05-08T14:25:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/175633\/"},"modified":"2026-05-08T14:25:11","modified_gmt":"2026-05-08T14:25:11","slug":"taxarea-pensiilor-mai-mari-de-3-000-lei-la-cass-a-ajuns-pe-masa-ccr-retinerile-de-10-sub-semnul-intrebarii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/175633\/","title":{"rendered":"Taxarea pensiilor mai mari de 3.000 lei la CASS a ajuns pe masa CCR: re\u021binerile de 10%, sub semnul \u00eentreb\u0103rii"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Tribunalul Bucure\u0219ti a decis sesizarea Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale a Rom\u00e2niei pentru a stabili dac\u0103 introducerea contribu\u021biei de asigur\u0103ri sociale de s\u0103n\u0103tate (CASS) pe pensiile care dep\u0103\u0219esc 3.000 de lei respect\u0103 sau \u00eencalc\u0103 legea fundamental\u0103. Demersul, ini\u021biat \u00een urma unei ac\u021biuni sus\u021binute de avocatul Adrian Cuculis, suspend\u0103 practic judecarea cauzei p\u00e2n\u0103 la o decizie a CCR \u0219i deschide o disput\u0103 juridic\u0103 major\u0103 privind echitatea \u0219i constitu\u021bionalitatea tax\u0103rii pensiilor \u00een Rom\u00e2nia.<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/1759568888_395_index.jpeg\" alt=\"Un ciocan de judec\u0103tor pus peste multe bancnote de 100 \u015fi 200 de lei\" width=\"1400\" height=\"750\" loading=\"eager\" fetchpriority=\"high\" class=\"svelte-h45upf\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Tribunalul Bucure\u0219ti trimite la CCR taxarea pensiilor mai mari de 3.000 lei. Foto arhiv\u0103<\/p>\n<p>publicitate&#8221;); background-position: center center; background-repeat: no-repeat;&#8221;&gt;<\/p>\n<p>Decizia, pronun\u021bat\u0103 pe 8 mai 2026, deschide un <a href=\"https:\/\/adevarul.ro\/economie\/cea-mai-mare-pensie-s-a-micsorat-cu-2000-de-euro-2467428.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">nou front juridic major \u00een disputa privind fiscalizarea pensiilor din Rom\u00e2nia.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Sesizarea vine \u00een urma unei ac\u021biuni \u00een instan\u021b\u0103 formulate de S.C.A. Cuculis &amp; Asocia\u021bii, iar instan\u021ba a admis cererea \u0219i a dispus suspendarea procesului p\u00e2n\u0103 la pronun\u021barea CCR.<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\tCe a decis Tribunalul Bucure\u0219ti<\/p>\n<p>Sec\u021bia a VIII-a Conflicte de Munc\u0103 \u0219i Asigur\u0103ri Sociale a Tribunalului Bucure\u0219ti a admis sesizarea Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale privind dispozi\u021biile din Codul fiscal care impun plata CASS pentru partea din pensie care dep\u0103\u0219e\u0219te 3.000 de lei.<\/p>\n<p>Instan\u021ba a stabilit c\u0103 sunt contestate prevederi din art. 155 alin. (1) lit. a\u00b2 din Codul fiscal \u015fi\u00a0art. 157\u2076 din Codul fiscal.<\/p>\n<p>Judec\u0103torii au dispus sesizarea CCR prin raportare la mai multe articole din Constitu\u021bie, respectiv: art. 16 \u2013 egalitatea \u00een drepturi; art. 44 \u2013 dreptul de proprietate; art. 47 \u2013 nivelul de trai \u0219i protec\u021bia social\u0103; art. 56 \u2013 contribu\u021bii financiare \u0219i echitate fiscal\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>Totodat\u0103, instan\u021ba a suspendat judecarea cauzei p\u00e2n\u0103 la pronun\u021barea \u0219i publicarea deciziei Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale.<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\tMiza: taxarea pensiilor peste 3.000 de lei<\/p>\n<p>Conform legisla\u021biei introduse prin Legea nr. 141\/2025, \u00een vigoare din 1 august 2025, pensionarii cu venituri mai mari de 3.000 de lei datoreaz\u0103 CASS de 10% pentru suma care dep\u0103\u0219e\u0219te acest prag.<\/p>\n<p>publicitate&#8221;); background-position: center center; background-repeat: no-repeat;&#8221;&gt;<\/p>\n<p>M\u0103sura este temporar\u0103, p\u00e2n\u0103 la 31 decembrie 2026, dar afecteaz\u0103 sute de mii de pensionari din Rom\u00e2nia.<\/p>\n<p>Avocatul Adrian Cuculis sus\u021bine c\u0103 aceast\u0103 form\u0103 de taxare creeaz\u0103 un dezechilibru constitu\u021bional \u0219i transform\u0103, practic, pensia \u00eentr-un venit supus unei duble impuneri.<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\tArgumentele invocate \u00een fa\u021ba CCR<\/p>\n<p>\u00cen sesizarea trimis\u0103 Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale sunt invocate mai multe critici de neconstitu\u021bionalitate:<\/p>\n<p>1. Discriminare \u00eentre pensionari (art. 16 din Constitu\u021bie)<\/p>\n<p>Pensionarii cu pensii peste 3.000 lei sunt obliga\u021bi s\u0103 pl\u0103teasc\u0103 CASS, \u00een timp ce cei sub acest prag sunt scuti\u021bi complet. Potrivit argumentului, acest lucru creeaz\u0103 o diferen\u021biere arbitrar\u0103 \u00eentre cet\u0103\u021beni afla\u021bi \u00een situa\u021bii similare.<\/p>\n<p>2. Afectarea dreptului de proprietate (art. 44)<\/p>\n<p>Pensia este considerat\u0103 un drept patrimonial c\u00e2\u0219tigat prin contribu\u021biile de-a lungul vie\u021bii active. Re\u021binerea CASS ar reduce valoarea net\u0103 a acestui drept, f\u0103r\u0103 o justificare propor\u021bional\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>3. Impact asupra nivelului de trai (art. 47)<\/p>\n<p>Taxarea pensiilor ar diminua veniturile disponibile ale pensionarilor, afect\u00e2nd direct nivelul de trai \u0219i obliga\u021bia statului de a asigura protec\u021bie social\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>4. Posibil\u0103 inechitate fiscal\u0103 (art. 56)<\/p>\n<p>Se invoc\u0103 ideea unei duble contribu\u021bii, \u00een condi\u021biile \u00een care pensia provine deja din contribu\u021bii sociale pl\u0103tite \u00een timpul activit\u0103\u021bii. De asemenea, se pune problema a\u0219ez\u0103rii inechitabile a sarcinilor fiscale.<\/p>\n<p>publicitate&#8221;); background-position: center center; background-repeat: no-repeat;&#8221;&gt;<\/p>\n<p>Ce urmeaz\u0103 dac\u0103 CCR declar\u0103 m\u0103sura neconstitu\u021bional\u0103<\/p>\n<p>Dac\u0103 Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 va admite excep\u021bia de neconstitu\u021bionalitate, efectele ar putea fi semnificative:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>anularea aplic\u0103rii CASS pe pensii peste 3.000 lei pentru viitor;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>posibilitatea restituirii sumelor re\u021binute \u00eencep\u00e2nd cu august 2025, dar doar pentru persoanele care au deschis ac\u021biuni \u00een instan\u021b\u0103;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>efecte obligatorii pentru toate autorit\u0103\u021bile publice (efect erga omnes).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Totu\u0219i, speciali\u0219tii atrag aten\u021bia c\u0103 restituirea automat\u0103 a sumelor nu este garantat\u0103 pentru to\u021bi pensionarii, \u00een lipsa unor ac\u021biuni judiciare individuale.<\/p>\n<p>Aceasta este a doua sesizare important\u0103 privind CASS pe pensii \u00een 2026, dup\u0103 o cauz\u0103 similar\u0103 de la Tribunalul Olt. Diferen\u021ba este c\u0103 actuala excep\u021bie vizeaz\u0103 explicit noi articole din Codul fiscal \u0219i invoc\u0103 mai multe articole constitu\u021bionale considerate \u00eenc\u0103lcate.<\/p>\n<p>Decizia Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale ar putea avea impact major asupra \u00eentregului sistem de pensii \u0219i asupra modului \u00een care Rom\u00e2nia aplic\u0103 <a href=\"https:\/\/adevarul.ro\/economie\/pensii-mai-mari-din-2027-ministrul-muncii-anunta-2512034.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">politicile fiscale \u00een zona veniturilor sociale.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Tribunalul Bucure\u0219ti a decis sesizarea Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale a Rom\u00e2niei pentru a stabili dac\u0103 introducerea contribu\u021biei de asigur\u0103ri sociale&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":10845,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[32945,32,33,341,31,36,37,27,34,35,25,1378,41,40,38,39,26,2228,50337,28,29,30,18312],"class_list":{"0":"post-175633","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-titluri","8":"tag-adrian-cuculis","9":"tag-breaking-news","10":"tag-breakingnews","11":"tag-ccr","12":"tag-cele-mai-populare-subiecte","13":"tag-featured-news","14":"tag-featurednews","15":"tag-headlines","16":"tag-latest-news","17":"tag-latestnews","18":"tag-news","19":"tag-pensii","20":"tag-ro","21":"tag-romana","22":"tag-romania","23":"tag-romanian","24":"tag-stiri","25":"tag-suspendare","26":"tag-taxarea","27":"tag-titluri","28":"tag-top-stories","29":"tag-topstories","30":"tag-tribunalul-bucuresti"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ro\/116539420031502241","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175633","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=175633"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175633\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10845"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=175633"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=175633"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=175633"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}