{"id":183893,"date":"2026-05-19T19:11:13","date_gmt":"2026-05-19T19:11:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/183893\/"},"modified":"2026-05-19T19:11:13","modified_gmt":"2026-05-19T19:11:13","slug":"o-avocata-din-iasi-a-cerut-10-000-de-euro-despagubire-pentru-o-recenzie-negativa-pe-google-data-de-un-client-ce-au-decis-magistratii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/183893\/","title":{"rendered":"O avocat\u0103 din Ia\u0219i a cerut 10.000 de euro desp\u0103gubire pentru o recenzie negativ\u0103 pe Google dat\u0103 de un client. Ce au decis magistra\u021bii"},"content":{"rendered":"

O avocat\u0103 din Ia\u0219i a cerut \u00een instan\u021b\u0103 10.000 de euro desp\u0103gubiri \u0219i \u0219tergerea unei recenzii negative de o stea postate pe Google de fiul unei foste cliente, sus\u021bin\u00e2nd c\u0103 i-a afectat imaginea \u0219i activitatea profesional\u0103.<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\"Magistra\u021bii<\/p>\n

Magistra\u021bii spun c\u0103 b\u0103rbatul \u0219i-a exprimat o opinie bazat\u0103 pe experien\u021ba sa\/FOTO: Shutterstock<\/p>\n

publicitate”); background-position: center center; background-repeat: no-repeat;”><\/p>\n

\u00cen ac\u021biunea \u00eenaintat\u0103 Tribunalului, avocata L.L. a ar\u0103tat c\u0103 \u00eencheiase cu F.B.A. un contract de asisten\u021b\u0103 juridic\u0103 \u00eentr-un dosar \u00een care mama acestuia figura ca p\u00e2r\u00e2t\u0103, scrie\u00a0Ziarul de Ia\u0219i<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Invocase \u00een \u00eent\u00e2mpinare prescrip\u021bia dreptului la ac\u021biune, dar excep\u021bia fusese respins\u0103 de instan\u021b\u0103, iar femeia pierduse procesul. Ulterior, dup\u0103 ce \u00eencepuse executarea silit\u0103, femeia apelase la alt avocat pentru a o reprezenta. Dup\u0103 ce F.B.A. primise hot\u0103r\u00e2rea judec\u0103toreasc\u0103, \u00eei scrisese avocatei, acuz\u00e2nd-o c\u0103 nu adusese nicio prob\u0103 \u00een ap\u0103rarea mamei sale.<\/p>\n

Dup\u0103 o discu\u021bie telefonic\u0103 \u00eentre avocat\u0103 \u0219i F.B.A., acesta postase o recenzie pe pagina ei de Google. \u00cei acordase o singur\u0103 stea, din cinci posibile, \u0219i ad\u0103ugase un comentariu pe care L.L. \u00eel considera denigrator. Fiind public\u0103, recenzia \u00eei aducea prejudicii de imagine, f\u0103c\u00e2ndu-i pe poten\u021bialii clien\u021bi s\u0103 apeleze la alt avocat. <\/p>\n

L.L. a ar\u0103tat c\u0103 pe pagina sa fuseser\u0103 postate 84 de recenzii. Cele mai multe erau favorabile, nota paginii pe ansamblu fiind de 4,8.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Avocata i-a cerut b\u0103rbatului s\u0103 \u0219tearg\u0103 recenzia negativ\u0103 \u0219i s\u0103 pl\u0103teasc\u0103 desp\u0103gubiri, \u00eens\u0103 acesta a refuzat, sus\u021bin\u00e2nd c\u0103 \u0219i-a exprimat doar nemul\u021bumirea fa\u021b\u0103 de serviciile primite. \u00cen comentariul postat online, el a acuzat-o c\u0103 nu i-a r\u0103spuns la mesaje.<\/p>\n

\u201e\u00cei trimiteam screenshoturi, nu r\u0103spundea niciodat\u0103, p\u00e2n\u0103 c\u00e2nd a venit raspunsul c\u0103 trebuie s\u0103 pl\u0103tesc crean\u021ba, cum c\u0103 nu s a adus nici o dovad\u0103 la solicitarea noastr\u0103. O contactez pe dna avocat, iar aceasta \u00eencerc\u00e2nd s\u0103 m\u0103 expedieze \u00eemi spune c\u0103 nu sunt clientul cabinetului, ci mama mea este (era pe numele mamei crean\u021ba). <\/p>\n

\u00cei spun respectuos c\u0103 eu sunt cel care a angajat-o \u0219i care a pl\u0103tit-o. \u0218i de aici urmeaz\u0103 o \u00eentreag\u0103 \u00eencercare a doamnei de a ar\u0103ta ce func\u021bie are d\u00e2nsa \u0219i c\u00e2t de Dumnezeu pe p\u0103m\u00e2nt este \u0219i c\u0103 trebuie s\u0103 \u00eei vorbesc cu s\u0103ru\u2019 m\u00e2na \u0219i c\u0103 sunt prost crescut \u0219i c\u0103 nu \u0219tiu s\u0103 vorbesc \u0219i c\u0103 s\u0103-mi caut alt avocat. <\/p>\n

publicitate”); background-position: center center; background-repeat: no-repeat;”><\/p>\n

Concluzie: Ia banii \u0219i dup\u0103 te \u00eentreab\u0103 cine e\u0219ti \u0219i \u00ee\u021bi d\u0103 un \u0219ut \u00een fund. Din cauza acestui avocat, \u00een loc de 6500 lei c\u00e2t aveam de plat\u0103, ajung s\u0103 pl\u0103tesc TRIPLU, \u00een cel mai bun caz\u201d, a scris F.B.A.<\/p>\n

\u00centre timp, pe pagina avocatei au fost \u00eenregistrate 94\u00a0de recenzii,<\/a>\u00a0\u00een majoritate favorabile, serviciile sale fiind apreciate de cei mai mul\u021bi dintre clien\u021bi cu cinci stele.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Tribunalul din Ia\u0219i a considerat c\u0103 b\u0103rbatul \u0219i-a exprimat o opinie personal\u0103 bazat\u0103 pe experien\u021ba sa \u0219i c\u0103 nu a dep\u0103\u0219it limitele libert\u0103\u021bii de exprimare.<\/p>\n

\u201e\u00cen momentul \u00een care decid s\u0103 \u00ee\u0219i deschid\u0103 conturi \u00een mediul virtual, exist\u00e2nd posibilitatea de a fi evalua\u0163i pentru activitatea desf\u0103\u015furat\u0103, [avoca\u021bii] trebuie s\u0103 \u00ee\u015fi asume orice opinie a celor cu care au avut o rela\u0163ie contractual\u0103, at\u00e2ta vreme c\u00e2t aceasta este exprimat\u0103 politicos \u0219i folosind un limbaj decent\u201d, au ar\u0103tat judec\u0103torii.<\/p>\n

Magistra\u021bii au mai ar\u0103tat c\u0103 avocata nu a demonstrat c\u0103 recenzia i-a produs un prejudiciu real, astfel c\u0103 ac\u021biunea prin care cerea desp\u0103gubiri \u0219i \u0219tergerea comentariului a fost respins\u0103.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"O avocat\u0103 din Ia\u0219i a cerut \u00een instan\u021b\u0103 10.000 de euro desp\u0103gubiri \u0219i \u0219tergerea unei recenzii negative de…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":183894,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[5],"tags":[22422,32,33,31,1839,36,37,27,2400,34,35,25,52441,41,40,38,39,26,28,29,30],"class_list":["post-183893","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-titluri","tag-avocata","tag-breaking-news","tag-breakingnews","tag-cele-mai-populare-subiecte","tag-despagubiri","tag-featured-news","tag-featurednews","tag-headlines","tag-iasi","tag-latest-news","tag-latestnews","tag-news","tag-recenzie-google","tag-ro","tag-romana","tag-romania","tag-romanian","tag-stiri","tag-titluri","tag-top-stories","tag-topstories"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ro\/116602830000300129","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183893","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=183893"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183893\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/183894"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=183893"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=183893"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=183893"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}