{"id":195508,"date":"2026-06-02T16:11:10","date_gmt":"2026-06-02T16:11:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/195508\/"},"modified":"2026-06-02T16:11:10","modified_gmt":"2026-06-02T16:11:10","slug":"avocata-aur-silvia-uscov-a-pierdut-procesul-cu-judecatorul-ccr-dacian-dragos-pe-care-a-vrut-sa-l-extraga-din-curtea-constitutionala","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/195508\/","title":{"rendered":"Avocata AUR Silvia Uscov a pierdut procesul cu judec\u0103torul CCR Dacian Drago\u0219, pe care a vrut s\u0103-l extrag\u0103 din Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"<p id=\"p-0\">Curtea de Apel Bucure\u0219ti a respins mar\u021bi cererea de anulare a decretului preziden\u021bial de numire \u00een func\u021bia de judec\u0103tor constitu\u021bional a profesorului clujean Dacian Drago\u0219, cerere formulat\u0103 la sf\u00e2r\u0219itul anului trecut de avocata AUR Silvia Uscov.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-1\">La termenul de mar\u021bi, avocata Uscov nu s-a prezentat la proces, \u00eens\u0103 au fost prezen\u021bi consilierii juridici ai pre\u0219edin\u021biei, institu\u021bia care a emis decretul de numire, \u0219i avoca\u021bii judec\u0103torului CCR Dacian Drago\u0219.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; articolul continu\u0103 mai jos &#8211;<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-2\">Decizia Cur\u021bii de Apel survine dup\u0103 ce vinerea trecut\u0103, Curta Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a solu\u021bionat o excep\u021bie de neconstitu\u021bionalitate ridicat\u0103 \u00een acest proces \u0219i clarificat sensul constitu\u021bional al sintagmei \u201e18 \u00een activitate juridic\u0103 sau \u00een \u00eenv\u0103\u021b\u0103m\u00e2ntul kiridic superior\u201d, ca reprezent\u00e2nd condi\u021bii pentru ocuparea finc\u021biei de jduec\u0103tor constitu\u021bional.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-3\">Silvia Uscov a deschis acest proces pe 30 decembrie 2025, \u00een contencios administrativ la Curtea de Apel Bucure\u0219ti, exact \u00een perioada \u00een care CCR parcurgea lungul proces de deliberare asupra legii privind pensiile magistra\u021bilor, iar voturile preliminare ar\u0103tau o majoritate fragil\u0103, de 5-4, \u00een favoarea legii.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-4\">Uscov reclama c\u0103 Dacian Drago\u0219 nu \u00eendeplinea condi\u021biile legale de numire, adic\u0103 \u201e18 ani \u00een activitate juridic\u0103 sau \u00een \u00eenv\u0103\u021b\u0103m\u00e2ntul juridic superior\u201d, dup\u0103 cum precizeaz\u0103 Constitu\u021bia \u0219i legea CCR. \u00cen opinia avocatei, \u201eactivitate juridic\u0103\u201d ar fi \u00eensemnat doar activitate de judec\u0103tor, procuror, notar sau consilier juridic, iar \u201e\u00eenv\u0103\u021b\u0103m\u00e2ntul juridic superior\u201d ar fi \u00eensemnat doar predare la o facultate de drept, nu la facult\u0103\u021bi de alt profil, a\u0219a cum era cazul lui Dacian Drago\u0219.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-5\">Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a respins interpretarea restrictiv\u0103 a avocatei, iar mar\u021bi Curtea de Apel nu a f\u0103cut dec\u00e2t s\u0103 respecte interpretarea dat\u0103 de CCR, a\u0219a c\u0103 a respins ac\u021biunea.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-6\">Iat\u0103 minuta sentin\u021bei:<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-7\">Tip solutie: Respinge cererea<br \/>Solutia pe scurt: Respinge excep\u0163ia inadmisibilit\u0103\u0163ii cererii de anulare a Decretului Pre\u015fedintelui Rom\u00e2niei nr. 774\/08.07.2025, invocat\u0103 de p\u00e2r\u00e2\u0163i prin \u00eent\u00e2mpin\u0103ri ca nefondat\u0103. Respinge excep\u0163ia tardivit\u0103\u0163ii cererii de anulare a Decretului Pre\u015fedintelui Rom\u00e2niei nr. 774\/08.07.2025, invocat\u0103 de p\u00e2r\u00e2tul Pre\u015fedintele Rom\u00e2niei, prin Administra\u0163ia Preziden\u0163ial\u0103 prin \u00eent\u00e2mpinare ca nefondat\u0103. Respinge excep\u0163ia lipsei de interes, invocat\u0103 de p\u00e2r\u00e2\u0163i prin \u00eent\u00e2mpin\u0103ri ca nefondat\u0103. Respinge excep\u0163ia lipsei calit\u0103\u0163ii procesuale active a reclamantei, invocat\u0103 de p\u00e2r\u00e2\u0163i prin \u00eent\u00e2mpin\u0103ri ca nefondat\u0103. Respinge cererea de anulare a Decretului Pre\u015fedintelui Rom\u00e2niei nr. 774\/08.07.2025 publicat \u00een Monitorul Oficial al Rom\u00e2niei nr. 643\/08.07.2025 privind numirea domnului Dacian-Cosmin Drago\u015f \u00een func\u0163ia de judec\u0103tor la Curtea Constitu\u0163ional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei pentru un mandat de 9 ani, \u00eencep\u00e2nd cu data de 13 iulie 2025, ca nefondat\u0103. Cu recurs \u00een termen de 15 zile de la comunicare, care se depune la Curtea de Apel Bucure\u015fti. Pronun\u0163at\u0103 azi, 02.06.2026, prin punerea solu\u0163iei la dispozi\u0163ia p\u0103r\u0163ilor prin mijlocirea grefei instan\u0163ei.<br \/>Document: Hotar\u00e2re\u00a0 \u00a0 02.06.2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Curtea de Apel Bucure\u0219ti a respins mar\u021bi cererea de anulare a decretului preziden\u021bial de numire \u00een func\u021bia de&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":195509,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[10],"tags":[32,33,341,31,28689,36,37,27,34,35,25,979,41,40,38,39,55438,26,28,29,30],"class_list":["post-195508","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-romania","tag-breaking-news","tag-breakingnews","tag-ccr","tag-cele-mai-populare-subiecte","tag-dacian-dragos","tag-featured-news","tag-featurednews","tag-headlines","tag-latest-news","tag-latestnews","tag-news","tag-proces","tag-ro","tag-romana","tag-romania","tag-romanian","tag-solvia-uscov","tag-stiri","tag-titluri","tag-top-stories","tag-topstories"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ro\/116681394311132409","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195508","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=195508"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195508\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/195509"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=195508"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=195508"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=195508"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}