{"id":231650,"date":"2026-07-15T11:45:08","date_gmt":"2026-07-15T11:45:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/231650\/"},"modified":"2026-07-15T11:45:08","modified_gmt":"2026-07-15T11:45:08","slug":"ccr-a-invalidat-o-initiativa-a-parlamentului-de-a-scurta-procesele-in-timpul-procedurii-de-camera-preliminara","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/231650\/","title":{"rendered":"CCR a invalidat o ini\u021biativ\u0103 a Parlamentului de a scurta procesele \u00een timpul procedurii de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>                        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"30\" height=\"30\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/1784115072_53_google-g.png\" alt=\"Google Split\"\/>    <\/p>\n<p id=\"p-0\">Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a declarat drept neconstitu\u021bional\u0103 o ini\u021biativ\u0103 legislativ\u0103 ini\u021biat\u0103 de 43 de senatori \u0219i deputa\u021bi, din toate grupurile parlamentare, \u0219i menit\u0103 s\u0103 scurteze procedurile \u00een timpul fazei de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 a proceselor. Sesizarea CCR a fost formulat\u0103 de Sec\u021biile Unite al \u00cenaltei Cur\u021bi de Casa\u021bie \u0219i Justi\u021bie.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; articolul continu\u0103 mai jos &#8211;<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-1\">Decizia CCR, luat\u0103 cu unanimitate, a constatat c\u0103 adoptarea acestei ini\u021biative ar fi afectat coeren\u021ba procedurii penale, drepturile procesuale ale p\u0103r\u021bilor \u0219i regulile privind judecata \u00een camera preliminar\u0103.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-2\">Cu privire la criticile de neconstitu\u021bionalitate formulate, Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a constatat urm\u0103toarele:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Reglementarea, prin dispozi\u021biile art.I pct.2 \u0219i pct.3 din lege, a\u00a0competen\u021bei judec\u0103torului de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 de a dispune reunirea \u0219i, respectiv, disjungerea cauzelor este \u00een dezacord cu natura procedurii camerei preliminare \u0219i a func\u021biei judiciare exercitate de judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103, cre\u00e2nd o incoeren\u021b\u0103 legislativ\u0103 incompatibil\u0103 cu standardele de calitate a legii\u00a0ce rezult\u0103 din prevederile art.1 alin.(5) din Constitu\u021bie.<\/li>\n<li>Dispozi\u021biile art.I pct.45 din lege [cu referire la art.343 alin.(3) \u0219i (4) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103]\u00a0transfer\u0103 \u00een sarcina participan\u021bilor la procesul penal obliga\u021bia organelor judiciare penale de a aduce la cuno\u0219tin\u021ba participan\u021bilor la procesul penal (prin procedura de citare) termenele de judecat\u0103, obliga\u021bie ce constituie singura form\u0103 de garantare de c\u0103tre stat, prin intermediul acestor organe, a drepturilor fundamentale prev\u0103zute la art.21 alin.(1) \u0219i (3) \u0219i art.24 din Constitu\u021bie.<\/li>\n<li>De asemenea, dispozi\u021biile art.I pct.45, care\u00a0prev\u0103d acordarea termenului \u00een continuare f\u0103r\u0103 a preciza procedura concret\u0103 potrivit c\u0103reia participan\u021bii la procesul penal \u00ee\u0219i pot \u00eendeplini obliga\u021bia procesual\u0103 de a urm\u0103ri parcursul dosarului, contravin principiului legalit\u0103\u021bii\u00a0procesului penal \u0219i, totodat\u0103, standardelor de calitate a legii ce rezult\u0103 din prevederile constitu\u021bionale ale art.1 alin.(5) din Constitu\u021bie.<\/li>\n<li>Solu\u021bia legislativ\u0103\u00a0prev\u0103zut\u0103 la art.I pct.50 din lege,\u00a0prin care \u00eencheierile judec\u0103torului de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 sunt asociate cu principiul autorit\u0103\u021bii de lucru judecat, \u015fi, respectiv, cu principiul\u00a0ne bis in idem, \u00eencalc\u0103 standardele de calitate a legii procesual penale\u00a0ce rezult\u0103 din prevederile art.1 alin.(5) din Legea fundamental\u0103, \u00eentruc\u00e2t aceste \u00eencheieri nu solu\u021bioneaz\u0103 fondul cauzei penale, nepresupun\u00e2nd o analiz\u0103 a raportului juridic penal de conflict, care s\u0103 se finalizeze cu stabilirea vinov\u0103\u021biei sau nevinov\u0103\u021biei inculpatului, \u00een timp ce principiul anterior men\u021bionat are \u00een vedere hot\u0103r\u00e2rile penale definitive, prin care se solu\u021bioneaz\u0103 fondul cauzelor penale.<\/li>\n<li>Mai mult, reglementarea \u00een privin\u021ba \u00eencheierilor judec\u0103torului de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 a efectelor specifice autorit\u0103\u021bii de lucru judecat ar avea ca efect imposibilitatea invoc\u0103rii, ulterior momentului finaliz\u0103rii fazei camerei preliminare, a acelor cauze de nulitate absolut\u0103 care, \u00een prezent, conform dispozi\u021biilor art.281 alin.(3) \u0219i alin.(4) lit.c) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103,\u00a0pot fi invocate \u00een orice stare a procesului, cu consecin\u021ba imposibilit\u0103\u021bii excluderii, potrivit dispozi\u021biilor art.101-102 din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103,\u00a0a probelor corespunz\u0103toare ob\u021binute sau administrate \u00een mod nelegal, \u00een cursul urm\u0103ririi penale, din dosarul cauzei, aspecte ce \u00eencalc\u0103 drepturile fundamentale\u00a0prev\u0103zute la art.21 alin.(3) \u0219i ale art.24 din Constitu\u021bie.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a declarat drept neconstitu\u021bional\u0103 o ini\u021biativ\u0103 legislativ\u0103 ini\u021biat\u0103 de 43 de senatori \u0219i deputa\u021bi, din toate&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":185296,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[10],"tags":[32,33,64619,341,31,36,37,27,34,35,25,41,40,38,39,26,28,29,30],"class_list":["post-231650","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-romania","tag-breaking-news","tag-breakingnews","tag-camera-preliminara","tag-ccr","tag-cele-mai-populare-subiecte","tag-featured-news","tag-featurednews","tag-headlines","tag-latest-news","tag-latestnews","tag-news","tag-ro","tag-romana","tag-romania","tag-romanian","tag-stiri","tag-titluri","tag-top-stories","tag-topstories"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ro\/116923828287084935","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231650","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=231650"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231650\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/185296"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=231650"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=231650"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=231650"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}