O firm\u0103 de avocatur\u0103 chinez\u0103 a depus o nou\u0103 ac\u021biune \u00eempotriva Apple, viz\u00e2nd practicile companiei legate de App Store. Este a doua \u00eencercare de acest fel, dup\u0103 ce un proces anterior a fost respins.<\/p>\n
Acum, firma de avocatur\u0103 reprezint\u0103 nu mai pu\u021bin de 55 de persoane \u0219i a depus o pl\u00e2ngere antitrust \u00eempotriva Apple la State\u202fAdministration\u202ffor\u202fMarket\u202fRegulation (SAMR), autoritatea de reglementare a pie\u0163ei din China. Avocatul-\u0219ef care conduce procesul legal, Wang\u202fQiongfei, spune c\u0103 Apple abuzeaz\u0103 de pozi\u0163ia sa dominant\u0103 prin impunerea exclusiv\u0103 a sistemului s\u0103u de pl\u0103\u0163i \u00een aplica\u0163ii, prin restric\u0163ia de a desc\u0103rca aplica\u0163ii doar din App Store-ul s\u0103u \u015fi prin comisioane de p\u00e2n\u0103 la 30 % pentru achizi\u0163iile in-app.<\/p>\n
Pl\u00e2ngerea reia argumente similare cu cele aduse \u00een alte jurisdic\u021bii, unde Apple a fost acuzat\u0103 de comportament anticoncuren\u021bial. \u00cen China, \u00eens\u0103, instan\u021bele au respins p\u00e2n\u0103 acum aceste acuza\u021bii, consider\u00e2nd c\u0103 nu exist\u0103 suficiente dovezi pentru a demonstra un abuz de monopol. Un element nou \u00een pl\u00e2ngerea actual\u0103 este compara\u0163ia f\u0103cut\u0103 de avoca\u0163i \u00eentre China \u015fi alte regiuni, astfel c\u0103 firma de avocatur\u0103 sus\u0163ine c\u0103 Apple permite metode alternative de distribu\u0163ie a aplica\u0163iilor \u015fi pl\u0103\u0163i \u00een Europa \u015fi Statele Unite, dar men\u0163ine restric\u0163ii stricte \u00een China, ceea ce ar consolida pozi\u0163ia sa dominant\u0103 pe aceast\u0103 pia\u0163\u0103. Prima ac\u021biune de genul \u00eempotriva produc\u0103torului din Cupertino pe teritoriul Chinei a avut loc \u00een 2021, doar c\u0103 3 ani mai t\u00e2rziu o instan\u021b\u0103 din Shanghai a respins cazul. Acum, abordarea a fost schimbat\u0103, \u00een loc de a merge pe calea civil\u0103, pl\u00e2ngerea vizeaz\u0103 un proces administrativ la nivel de reglementare, ceea ce ar putea accelera examinarea problemei.<\/p>\n
\u00cen Uniunea European\u0103, compania a fost deja obligat\u0103 s\u0103 permit\u0103 magazine de aplica\u021bii alternative \u0219i s\u0103 relaxeze regulile privind pl\u0103\u021bile. \u00cen Statele Unite, investiga\u021biile antitrust continu\u0103, iar dezvoltatorii cer condi\u021bii mai echitabile.<\/p>\n
Apple nu a f\u0103cut \u00eenc\u0103 un comentariu public privind aceast\u0103 pl\u00e2ngere, \u00eens\u0103 primele efecte s-au sim\u021bit deja, pe pia\u021ba bursier\u0103, AAPL.O a \u00eenregistrat un recul.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"O firm\u0103 de avocatur\u0103 chinez\u0103 a depus o nou\u0103 ac\u021biune \u00eempotriva Apple, viz\u00e2nd practicile companiei legate de App…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":24003,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[11226,83,125,147,41,40,38,39,141,124],"class_list":{"0":"post-24002","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-tehnologie","8":"tag-app-store","9":"tag-apple","10":"tag-china","11":"tag-iphone","12":"tag-ro","13":"tag-romana","14":"tag-romania","15":"tag-romanian","16":"tag-technology","17":"tag-tehnologie"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24002","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24002"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24002\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24003"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24002"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24002"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24002"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}