EXCLUSIV Casa de Pensii recunoa\u0219te c\u0103 are 17.865 de procese cu pensionarii. Pentru ce se judec\u0103?<\/a><\/p>\nNum\u0103rul total de 51,80271 puncte a fost \u00eenmul\u021bit cu valoarea punctului de referin\u021b\u0103, de 81 de lei. \u00cen urma calculului \u0219i a rotunjirii prev\u0103zute de lege, pensia acordat\u0103 este de 4.197 de lei.<\/p>\n
![\"Pensionar\u0103](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/aHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzd2Vlay5yby9zdG9yYWdlL211bHRpbWVkaWEvMjAyNi8wOC9wNjlFblJ2cTJrcE9DQXdTSWdmN3lUWWp6NnVj.webp\")
\nPensionar\u0103 – Foto: Magnific (Imagine cu rol ilustrativ)
<\/p>\n
Prima adeverin\u021b\u0103 acoper\u0103 aproape opt ani de activitate<\/p>\n
Prima adeverin\u021b\u0103 a fost eliberat\u0103 \u00een martie 2023 de Spitalul Jude\u021bean de Urgen\u021b\u0103 T\u00e2rgu Jiu. Documentul arat\u0103 c\u0103 femeia a fost angajat\u0103 \u00een perioada 1 martie 1983\u201331 decembrie 1990.<\/p>\n
\u00cen acest interval, pensionara a lucrat ca registrator medical \u0219i, potrivit adeverin\u021bei, a fost \u00eencadrat\u0103 \u00een grupa a II-a de munc\u0103 \u00een procent de 100%. Nominalizarea ar fi fost f\u0103cut\u0103 prin Dispozi\u021bia nr. 456\/1990.<\/p>\n
Ca temei juridic, angajatorul a men\u021bionat Ordinul nr. 50\/1990 \u0219i Ordinul nr. 125\/1990, anexa a II-a, punctul 101.<\/p>\n
Adeverin\u021ba precizeaz\u0103 c\u0103 a fost eliberat\u0103 pe baza documentelor verificabile p\u0103strate \u00een arhiva unit\u0103\u021bii \u0219i c\u0103 angajatorul \u00ee\u0219i asum\u0103 r\u0103spunderea pentru corectitudinea informa\u021biilor.<\/p>\n
Perioada indicat\u0103 \u00een aceast\u0103 adeverin\u021b\u0103 este de aproximativ \u0219apte ani \u0219i zece luni.<\/p>\n
![\"Adeverin\u021b\u0103](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/aHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzd2Vlay5yby9zdG9yYWdlL211bHRpbWVkaWEvMjAyNi8wOC9qWGdZSDUwVU5KTURzSEVNYk01RlJaM0tLS2hE.webp\")
\nAdeverin\u021b\u0103 – Foto: Facebook
<\/p>\n
A doua adeverin\u021b\u0103 acoper\u0103 nou\u0103 ani \u0219i \u0219ase luni<\/p>\n
A doua adeverin\u021b\u0103 a fost eliberat\u0103 \u00een mai 2026 de Direc\u021bia de S\u0103n\u0103tate Public\u0103 Gorj. Documentul arat\u0103 c\u0103 femeia a lucrat \u00een cadrul institu\u021biei \u00eencep\u00e2nd cu 1 ianuarie 1991.<\/p>\n
\u00centre 1 ianuarie 1991 \u0219i 1 iulie 2000, aceasta a ocupat func\u021bia de statistician \u0219i, potrivit adeverin\u021bei, a fost \u00eencadrat\u0103 \u00een grupa a II-a de munc\u0103 \u00een procent de 100%.<\/p>\n
Nominalizarea ar fi fost f\u0103cut\u0103 prin aceea\u0219i Dispozi\u021bie nr. 456\/1990. Ca temei juridic, angajatorul a indicat Ordinul nr. 50\/1990, anexa a II-a, punctul 111.<\/p>\n
Aceast\u0103 perioad\u0103 \u00eensumeaz\u0103 nou\u0103 ani \u0219i \u0219ase luni. \u00cempreun\u0103, cele dou\u0103 adeverin\u021be acoper\u0103 aproximativ 17 ani \u0219i patru luni de activitate pentru care pensionara solicit\u0103 recunoa\u0219terea grupei a II-a.<\/p>\n
![\"Adeverin\u021b\u0103](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/aHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzd2Vlay5yby9zdG9yYWdlL211bHRpbWVkaWEvMjAyNi8wOC82RnVXV1RrVTdNalgzQXE1MHA0NloxR0ZOQXRr.webp\")
\nAdeverin\u021b\u0103 – Foto: Facebook
<\/p>\n
De ce Casa de Pensii a respins grupa a II-a<\/p>\n
Casa de Pensii nu a eliminat perioadele respective din stagiul de cotizare al femeii. Acestea au fost recunoscute drept vechime obi\u0219nuit\u0103, dar nu au fost valorificate ca activitate desf\u0103\u0219urat\u0103 \u00een grupa a II-a.<\/p>\n
\u00cen motivarea deciziei se arat\u0103 c\u0103 activitatea desf\u0103\u0219urat\u0103 ca registrator medical nu se reg\u0103se\u0219te la punctul 101 din anexa a II-a la Ordinul nr. 50\/1990.<\/p>\n
Institu\u021bia a oferit o explica\u021bie asem\u0103n\u0103toare \u0219i pentru a doua adeverin\u021b\u0103. Potrivit deciziei, activitatea desf\u0103\u0219urat\u0103 ca registrator statistician nu se reg\u0103se\u0219te la punctul 111 din aceea\u0219i anex\u0103.<\/p>\n
A\u0219adar, Casa de Pensii consider\u0103 c\u0103 exist\u0103 o neconcordan\u021b\u0103 \u00eentre func\u021biile ocupate efectiv de pensionar\u0103 \u0219i activit\u0103\u021bile enumerate la pozi\u021biile din Ordinul nr. 50\/1990 indicate de fo\u0219tii angajatori.<\/p>\n
Pensionara sus\u021bine c\u0103 a primit \u0219i explica\u021bia verbal\u0103 potrivit c\u0103reia registratorul sau statisticianul nu lucra direct cu pacien\u021bii, ci la calculator. Femeia contest\u0103 aceast\u0103 justificare \u0219i arat\u0103 c\u0103, \u00een perioada respectiv\u0103, activitatea nu era informatizat\u0103 \u00een forma actual\u0103.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"O pensionar\u0103 cu o pensie de 4.197 de lei reclam\u0103 c\u0103 nu i-au fost recunoscu\u021bi 17 ani de…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":276721,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[10],"tags":[36650,32,33,31,23470,76365,23469,36,37,13353,27,34,35,25,904,1378,2732,31377,41,40,38,39,26,28,29,30],"class_list":["post-276720","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-romania","tag-adevarul-a","tag-breaking-news","tag-breakingnews","tag-cele-mai-populare-subiecte","tag-digi24a","tag-dosar-de-pensie","tag-eveniment","tag-featured-news","tag-featurednews","tag-grupe","tag-headlines","tag-latest-news","tag-latestnews","tag-news","tag-pensie","tag-pensii","tag-pensionari","tag-recalculare","tag-ro","tag-romana","tag-romania","tag-romanian","tag-stiri","tag-titluri","tag-top-stories","tag-topstories"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ro\/117162420113814708","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276720","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=276720"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276720\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/276721"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=276720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=276720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=276720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"Decizie](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/aHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzd2Vlay5yby9zdG9yYWdlL211bHRpbWVkaWEvMjAyNi8wOC9DcjZOcjdMeG80YWduem5EVGVlUnBlUEs2YVpY.webp\")