Public discontent has accumulated for a whole host of reasons over the past few weeks. Tax hikes for businesses have led to a sharp rise in prices. Moscow has experienced first-hand what it means to live without mobile internet, something people in less central regions have already had to endure for months. In Siberia, the authorities have been seizing cows from farmers en masse and slaughtering them under the pretext of a foot-and-mouth disease outbreak.<\/p>\n
But the main catalyst was the unexpected blocking of Telegram.<\/p>\n
Since the start of April, the messaging app has stopped working without a VPN, which the authorities are restricting access to and reportedly considering banning. Meanwhile, the Federal Antimonopoly Service has warned that advertising on Telegram will soon be banned.<\/p>\n
With this heavy-handed ban, the Kremlin has angered even its long-standing supporters. It is difficult to overstate just how deeply Telegram is woven into the daily routine of the average Russian.<\/p>\n
According to a study by MTS AdTech, the number of unique Telegram users in Russia stood at 105 million in November 2025. That is almost 72% of the country\u2019s population.<\/p>\n
Telegram hosted neighborhood\u2019 chat groups. People used it to rent flats, sell items, advertise their services, coordinate business and run blogs. Emigrants used it to keep in touch with their families, among many other things.<\/p>\n
\t\tnews \t\t\t\tEverything You Need to Know About Max, Russia\u2019s State-Backed Answer to WhatsApp An acquaintance of mine, a Russian army officer fighting in Ukraine, told me that military information security specialists had advised them against using the Russian messaging app MAX which, ironically, the authorities are actively pushing as a replacement for Telegram. So the Russian military continues to use Telegram on the front line to communicate with one another.<\/p>\n Most officials of any significance \u2014 from federal to regional \u2014 communicate with the public via Telegram channels. Governors of border regions use these channels to warn people about Ukrainian drone strikes and missile threats.<\/p>\n After the authorities blocked YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, X, Discord, WhatsApp and all independent media, Telegram remained the only uncensored platform. It hosts the full spectrum of views and opinions, from exiled Russian media to pro-war bloggers.<\/p>\n Moreover, it is precisely thanks to Telegram that pro-war bloggers have become so popular in Russia. Their entire audience, as well as their advertising revenue, depends on this messaging app. On Telegram, they raise money to support the Russian army.<\/p>\n With Telegram blocked, they stand to lose everything. It is no surprise that even these ultra-patriots have been thrown into a rage.<\/p>\n For example, the propagandist Anastasia Kashevarova writes<\/a> about the blocking of Telegram: \u201cNeural connections in the minds of some officials are dying, trust in those in power is dying, the aid to people that was built through horizontal connections on Telegram is dying, and communication at the front is dying.\u201d<\/p>\n Conservative publicist Dmitry Olshansky, who supported the invasion of Ukraine, also published a post<\/a> full of disappointment in the authorities: \u201cThey devour social media and messaging apps, books and films, journalists and musicians; they devour everything they can get their hands on.\u201d<\/p>\n The blocking of Telegram was also criticised by the pro-war channels Rybar<\/a> and Astra Militarum<\/a>, as well as Russia Today war correspondent Alexander Kharchenko<\/a> and many others.<\/p>\n Officials are also unhappy with the blocking of Telegram. Even Sergei Mironov, leader of the Fair Russia party \u2014 which presents itself as social-democratic but supports the government \u2014\u00a0called<\/a> those blocking the messaging app \u201cscoundrels\u201d and advised them to go to the front line.<\/p>\n \u201cPeople are raising money for a special operation. For those [at the front], Telegram is the only way to communicate with their families and loved ones,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n The far-right LDPR party has expelled State Duma deputy Andrei Svintsov from its ranks. He actively supported the blocking of Telegram, commenting on the situation in the media.<\/p>\n But the main absurdity is that even Roskomnadzor, the very agency that is blocking Telegram, continues to use it. Just yesterday, Roskomnadzor congratulated<\/a> Russians on Telegram on the anniversary of the creation of the Russian-language internet.<\/p>\n Parliamentary Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin and former Prime Minister and well-known hawk Dmitry Medvedev<\/a> continue to run their own Telegram channels. It is obvious that they all use a VPN.<\/p>\n \t\tnews \t\t\t\tRussian Lawmakers Still Prefer Telegram Despite Kremlin Push for State-Backed Max Messenger People can see that the officials who are banning them from using the free internet and social media are themselves using VPNs. In other words, they are exposing their own hypocrisy.\u00a0<\/p>\n Even my grandmother, who, like most pensioners, has always supported Putin, is not thrilled about the blocking of Telegram. She simply doesn\u2019t understand why it was necessary. Why can\u2019t she just write to or call her grandchildren, as she is used to doing? And my mum, who has always been apolitical, has asked me to set up a VPN for her.<\/p>\n Against this backdrop, even VTsIOM, the government-controlled public opinion service, is recording<\/a> Putin\u2019s lowest approval rating since the start of the invasion. The ruling United Russia party\u2019s rating has also fallen.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, the spoiler<\/a> New People party, which opposes the blocking of Telegram, has unexpectedly risen to second<\/a> place in the opinion polls.<\/p>\n It is naive to hope that this mass discontent will lead to protests. Given the current risks and repression, this is simply impossible.<\/p>\n However, another important process is underway. The blocking of Telegram is a self-inflicted blow to the Kremlin\u2019s legitimacy. When a ban is so absurd that not even the regime\u2019s functionaries are complying with it, even loyalists view the authorities\u2019 actions as ridiculous.<\/p>\n In the words<\/a> of political scientist Yekaterina Schulmann, the authorities\u2019 campaign against the free internet is reminiscent of the anti-alcohol campaign during the Perestroika era. Back then, the authorities encroached upon a sacred cow \u2014 something that had long been woven into the social fabric: alcohol consumption. This led to a sharp rise in the illicit production of alcohol.<\/p>\n The same applies now. Blocking Telegram will lead to a rise in cynicism towards the Kremlin\u2019s narratives and will prompt more and more people to download a VPN. This includes officials themselves, as well as those who previously had no interest in blocked information. All of this will lead to the erosion of the Russian political system.\u00a0<\/p>\n Nevertheless, I expect the worst. It is likely that in the future we will see the use of VPNs criminalized and attempts to create a closed internet in Russia, modelled on Iran\u2019s system.\u00a0<\/p>\n But I\u2019d like to believe that the more absurd things get, the closer we are to this nightmare being over.\u00a0 <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tThe views expressed in opinion pieces do not necessarily reflect the position of The Moscow Times.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n A Message from The Moscow Times:<\/p>\n Dear readers,<\/p>\n We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia’s Prosecutor General’s Office has designated The Moscow Times as an “undesirable” organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a “foreign agent.”<\/p>\n These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work “discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership.” We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.<\/p>\n We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help<\/a>.<\/p>\n Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It’s quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.<\/p>\n By supporting The Moscow Times, you’re defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\tContinue\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n \t\t\t\t Not ready to support today? \u00d7<\/p>\n \t\tRemind me next month<\/p>\n \n\t\t\tThank you! Your reminder is set.\n\t\t<\/p>\n \t\t\tWe will send you one reminder email a month from now. For details on the personal data we collect and how it is used, please see our Privacy Policy<\/a>.<\/p>\n
\n\t\t<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\tRead more
\n\t\t<\/a><\/p>\n
\n\t\t<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\tRead more
\n\t\t<\/a><\/p>\n![\"paiment](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/russia\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/payment_icons.png\"){kind=icon}
<\/p>\n
Remind me later.<\/p>\n