Budskapet i st\u00e4mningsans\u00f6kan \u00e4r ungef\u00e4r detsamma om \u00e4n i torrare juridisk spr\u00e5kdr\u00e4kt. F\u00f6rbundet p\u00e5pekar att polisens agerande har pr\u00f6vats av en \u00e5klagare som beslutade att inte inleda f\u00f6runders\u00f6kning om tj\u00e4nstefel, eftersom det saknades anledning att anta att brott beg\u00e5tts. \u00c5klagaren bed\u00f6mde allts\u00e5 att det v\u00e5ld som polisen anv\u00e4nt var f\u00f6rsvarligt sett till situationen som r\u00e5dde p\u00e5 platsen, skriver f\u00f6rbundet.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Men n\u00e4r Pan<\/strong> sedan pr\u00f6vade fallet arbetsr\u00e4ttsligt blev det fel, anser f\u00f6rbundet. Det kan bero p\u00e5 att processen i n\u00e4mnden inte \u00e4r lika grundlig som en straffr\u00e4ttslig process i domstol, resonerar man i st\u00e4mningsans\u00f6kan. Det blir en sv\u00e5r uppgift f\u00f6r n\u00e4mndens ledam\u00f6ter att \u201d\u2026enbart p\u00e5 ett skriftligt underlag bed\u00f6ma situationer d\u00e4r polistaktiska bed\u00f6mningar av enskilda polism\u00e4n \u00e4r helt avg\u00f6rande f\u00f6r handlandet som pr\u00f6vas\u201d.<\/p>\n F\u00f6rbundet po\u00e4ngterar<\/strong> att polisen i den aktuella situationen uppfattade att personen var bev\u00e4pnad med ett skjutvapen. Han bed\u00f6mde allts\u00e5 att det f\u00f6rel\u00e5g en p\u00e5taglig risk f\u00f6r att personen skulle ut\u00f6va allvarligt v\u00e5ld mot honom eller allm\u00e4nheten. D\u00e4rmed fanns det grund f\u00f6r att anv\u00e4nda ECV, enligt f\u00f6rbundet.\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Budskapet i st\u00e4mningsans\u00f6kan \u00e4r ungef\u00e4r detsamma om \u00e4n i torrare juridisk spr\u00e5kdr\u00e4kt. F\u00f6rbundet p\u00e5pekar att polisens agerande har…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":171341,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[3060,22,23,15269,15270,26,27,15271,17,21,24,25,15272,28,29,15,16,15273,15274,18,34,31,33,32,30,19,20],"class_list":{"0":"post-171340","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-sverige","8":"tag-arbetsdomstolen","9":"tag-breaking-news","10":"tag-breakingnews","11":"tag-disciplinpafoljd","12":"tag-ecv","13":"tag-featured-news","14":"tag-featurednews","15":"tag-forsvarlighet","16":"tag-headlines","17":"tag-huvudnyheter","18":"tag-latest-news","19":"tag-latestnews","20":"tag-loneavdrag","21":"tag-main-news","22":"tag-mainnews","23":"tag-news","24":"tag-nyheter","25":"tag-pan","26":"tag-proportionalitet","27":"tag-rubriker","28":"tag-se","29":"tag-svenska","30":"tag-sverige","31":"tag-sweden","32":"tag-swedish","33":"tag-top-stories","34":"tag-topstories"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@se\/116107027639483564","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/se\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171340","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/se\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/se\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/se\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/se\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=171340"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/se\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171340\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/se\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/171341"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/se\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=171340"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/se\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=171340"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/se\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=171340"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}