Bratislava 16. marca (TASR) – Opozi\u010dn\u00e9 PS informovalo, \u017ee pol\u00edcia za\u010dala trestn\u00e9 st\u00edhanie v s\u00favislosti s uzavret\u00edm licen\u010dn\u00fdch zml\u00fav medzi STVR a Slovensk\u00fdm futbalov\u00fdm zv\u00e4zom (SFZ), ktor\u00e9 podp\u00edsal do\u010dasn\u00fd riadite\u013e telerozhlasu Igor Slanina e\u0161te pred odchodom z funkcie. Informovali o tom na pondelkovej tla\u010dovej konferencii \u0161\u00e9f hnutia Michal \u0160ime\u010dka a podpredsedn\u00ed\u010dka PS Zora Jaurov\u00e1.<\/p>\n
\u201eTieto licencie boli \u010dasto desa\u0165kr\u00e1t alebo 20-kr\u00e1t tak\u00e9 drah\u00e9, za ak\u00e9 peniaze sa tieto licencie v minul\u00fdch rokoch pred\u00e1vali. A aby toho nebolo m\u00e1lo, vtedaj\u0161\u00ed poveren\u00fd riadite\u013e Slanina nemal pr\u00e1vo podpisova\u0165 zmluvy vy\u0161\u0161ie ako 200.000 eur. Tak to urobil tak, \u017ee tento bal\u00edk rozdelil na 56 samostatn\u00fdch zml\u00fav, aby toto pravidlo obi\u0161iel,\u201c pribl\u00ed\u017eil \u0160ime\u010dka. Predstavitelia PS preto podali v lete minul\u00e9ho roka trestn\u00e9 ozn\u00e1menie na nezn\u00e1meho p\u00e1chate\u013ea pre podozrenie z poru\u0161ovania povinnosti pri spr\u00e1ve cudzieho majetku a zo zneu\u017e\u00edvania pr\u00e1vomoci verejn\u00e9ho \u010dinite\u013ea. \u201eVy\u0161etrovate\u013e Krajsk\u00e9ho riadite\u013estva Policajn\u00e9ho zboru (PZ) v Bratislave po ve\u013emi d\u00f4kladnom \u0161etren\u00ed v pr\u00edpravnom konan\u00ed, za\u010dal 3. marca trestn\u00e9 st\u00edhanie v oboch uveden\u00fdch skutkov\u00fdch podstat\u00e1ch. Toto je dobr\u00e1 spr\u00e1va najm\u00e4 pre ob\u010danov SR, preto\u017ee ukazuje, \u017ee slovensk\u00e9 s\u00fady a prokurat\u00fara si napriek v\u0161etk\u00e9mu robia svoju pr\u00e1cu,\u201c informovala Jaurov\u00e1.<\/p>\n
PS namietalo, \u017ee Slanina podp\u00edsal od apr\u00edla do m\u00e1ja 2025 zmluvy, ktor\u00e9 boli \u00fa\u010delovo rozdelen\u00e9. Tvrdilo, \u017ee Slanina ako poveren\u00fd riadite\u013e podp\u00edsal zmluvy v celkovej hodnote, ktor\u00e9 mu z\u00e1kon neumo\u017e\u0148oval. Jaurov\u00e1 z\u00e1rove\u0148 spochybnila aj cenu zml\u00fav, ktor\u00e1 bola pod\u013ea nej vy\u0161\u0161ia ako v minulosti. Vysvetlenia STVR ani SFZ nepova\u017eovala za uspokojiv\u00e9. Cel\u00fa sch\u00e9mu ozna\u010dilo PS ako \u201eextr\u00e9mne nev\u00fdhodn\u00fa\u201c pre STVR.<\/p>\n
V pr\u00edpade licen\u010dn\u00fdch zml\u00fav so SFZ ozna\u010dila STVR tvrdenia PS v minulosti za nepravdiv\u00e9 a zav\u00e1dzaj\u00face. Vyjadrenia o predra\u017een\u00fdch licenci\u00e1ch na futbalov\u00e9 z\u00e1pasy, ktor\u00e9 pokr\u00fdvaj\u00fa uzavret\u00e9 zmluvy s STVR na obdobie sez\u00f3n 2025 a\u017e 2029, z\u00e1sadne odmietol aj SFZ.<\/p>\n
Ved\u00faca odboru komunik\u00e1cie STVR Zuzana Vicelov\u00e1 v reakcii na vyjadrenia na pondelkovej tla\u010dovej konferencii PS deklarovala, \u017ee STVR od za\u010diatku postupuje v s\u00falade so z\u00e1konom a v plnej s\u00fa\u010dinnosti s org\u00e1nmi \u010dinn\u00fdmi v trestnom konan\u00ed. \u201eNa ich \u017eiados\u0165 poskytla v\u0161etky relevantn\u00e9 podklady a dokument\u00e1ciu vz\u0165ahuj\u00facu sa na predmetn\u00e9 zmluvy,\u201c doplnila Vicelov\u00e1.<\/p>\n
Z\u00e1rove\u0148 podotkla, \u017ee gener\u00e1lna riadite\u013eka STVR Martina Fla\u0161\u00edkov\u00e1 v auguste iniciovala stretnutie so SFZ so \u017eiados\u0165ou o op\u00e4tovn\u00e9 prerokovanie k\u013e\u00fa\u010dov\u00fdch zmluvn\u00fdch podmienok s cie\u013eom zefekt\u00edvni\u0165 ich obsah a optimalizova\u0165 vyu\u017e\u00edvanie finan\u010dn\u00fdch zdrojov. \u201eSlovensk\u00fd futbalov\u00fd zv\u00e4z tejto iniciat\u00edve vy\u0161iel v \u00fastrety, aby sa situ\u00e1ciu podarilo zvl\u00e1dnu\u0165 s \u010do najmen\u0161\u00edmi dosahmi. Vz\u0165ah STVR a SFZ je na\u010falej korektn\u00fd a profesion\u00e1lny,\u201c dodala Vicelov\u00e1.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Bratislava 16. marca (TASR) – Opozi\u010dn\u00e9 PS informovalo, \u017ee pol\u00edcia za\u010dala trestn\u00e9 st\u00edhanie v s\u00favislosti s uzavret\u00edm licen\u010dn\u00fdch…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":20665,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[136,525,7893,2489,43,40,39,42,41,6772,105],"class_list":{"0":"post-20664","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-bratislava","8":"tag-bratislava","9":"tag-policia","10":"tag-ps","11":"tag-sfz","12":"tag-sk","13":"tag-slovak","14":"tag-slovakia","15":"tag-slovencina","16":"tag-slovensko","17":"tag-stihanie","18":"tag-stvr"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@sk\/116243662540561663","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20664","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20664"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20664\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20665"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20664"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20664"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20664"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}