{"id":25109,"date":"2026-03-22T10:55:09","date_gmt":"2026-03-22T10:55:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/25109\/"},"modified":"2026-03-22T10:55:09","modified_gmt":"2026-03-22T10:55:09","slug":"vysetrovanie-kauzy-simeckovej-mamy-pokrocilo-o-nicom-nevedela","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/25109\/","title":{"rendered":"Vy\u0161etrovanie kauzy \u0160ime\u010dkovej mamy pokro\u010dilo! O ni\u010dom nevedela"},"content":{"rendered":"

BRATISLAVA – V pr\u00edpade vy\u0161etrovania nar\u00e1bania s dot\u00e1ciami firmy matky Michala \u0160ime\u010dku – Marty \u0160ime\u010dkovej nastali nov\u00e9 skuto\u010dnosti. Vy\u0161etrovanie pokro\u010dilo a pol\u00edcia roz\u0161\u00edrila trestn\u00e9 st\u00edhanie o nov\u00e9 pr\u00edpady. \u0160ime\u010dkov\u00e1 tak bude musie\u0165 vysvet\u013eova\u0165 nar\u00e1banie s dot\u00e1ciami za \u0161ir\u0161ie obdobie, ako sa p\u00f4vodne zdalo. \u0160ime\u010dkov\u00fa v\u0161ak pod\u013ea vlastn\u00fdch slov doteraz vo veci nevypo\u010duli. <\/p>\n

Marta \u0160ime\u010dkov\u00e1 stoj\u00ed na \u010dele zdru\u017eenia Projekt F\u00f3rum. Na probl\u00e9my nieko\u013ekon\u00e1sobn\u00e9ho prepl\u00e1cania dot\u00e1ci\u00ed a ich \u00fa\u010dtovania do \u00fa\u010dtovn\u00edctva pouk\u00e1zal Robert Fico, pri\u010dom hovoril o roku 2021. Probl\u00e9my Fico prezentoval ako subven\u010dn\u00fd podvod. Tento t\u00fd\u017ede\u0148 v\u0161ak pol\u00edcia za\u010dala nov\u00e9 trestn\u00e9 st\u00edhanie, a to pr\u00e1ve vo veci subven\u010dn\u00e9ho podvodu zdru\u017eenia, a to za dota\u010dn\u00e9 obdobie 2018, 2019, 2020 a 2022.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Prvotn\u00e9 nezrovnalosti v \u00fa\u010dtovn\u00edctve, ktor\u00e9 premi\u00e9r Robert Fico vopred prezentoval ako \u201esubven\u010dn\u00fd podvod ako hrom\u201c, sa t\u00fdkali dot\u00e1ci\u00ed v roku 2021. Vy\u0161etrovanie pritom vedie\u00a0protikorup\u010dn\u00e1 jednotka \u00daBOK, expozit\u00fara V\u00fdchod, pri\u010dom v pr\u00edpade zatia\u013e nie je obvinen\u00e1 \u017eiadna konkr\u00e9tna osoba. Informoval o tom port\u00e1l sme.sk<\/a>. To, \u017ee pol\u00edcia roz\u0161\u00edrila st\u00edhanie o \u010fal\u0161ie roky, m\u00f4\u017ee nazna\u010dova\u0165 systematick\u00e9 nespr\u00e1vne \u00fa\u010dtovanie, ne\u0161lo tak zrejme o jednorazov\u00fa chybu. V pr\u00edpade sa hovor\u00ed o duplicitnom \u010di dokonca triplicitnom prepl\u00e1can\u00ed fakt\u00far.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Pol\u00edcia sa bli\u017e\u0161ie nevyjadruje<\/p>\n

Vy\u0161etrovanie pol\u00edcie pritom vych\u00e1dza z auditu ministerstva financi\u00ed, ktor\u00fd si objednala vl\u00e1da e\u0161te na jese\u0148 minul\u00e9ho roku. Audit pritom poukazoval na chyby v dota\u010dn\u00fdch rokoch 2020 a\u017e 2022. Zdru\u017eenie si malo viacn\u00e1sobne prepl\u00e1ca\u0165 desiatky fakt\u00far z r\u00f4znych dot\u00e1ci\u00ed. P\u00f4vodne sa hovorilo o fakt\u00farach a zmluv\u00e1ch vo v\u00fd\u0161ke necel\u00fdch 70-tis\u00edc eur. Nateraz nie je zn\u00e1me, na ak\u00fa sumu sa vy\u0161plhali spochybnen\u00e9 fakt\u00fary za \u010fal\u0161ie roky, o ktor\u00e9 bolo roz\u0161\u00edren\u00e9 st\u00edhanie. V rokoch 2018-2020, o ktor\u00e9 bolo vy\u0161etrovanie roz\u0161\u00edren\u00e9, bola na \u010dele \u0161t\u00e1tu koal\u00edcia Smer-SNS a Most-H\u00edd.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Pol\u00edcia port\u00e1lu potvrdila, \u017ee nov\u00e9 st\u00edhanie za\u010dala, a to konkr\u00e9tne v pondelok 16. marca. Bli\u017e\u0161ie sa ale k pr\u00edpadu nevyjadrovali.\u00a0„Ke\u010f\u017ee ide o prebiehaj\u00face vy\u0161etrovanie, ktor\u00e9 je zo z\u00e1kona neverejn\u00e9, bli\u017e\u0161ie inform\u00e1cie zatia\u013e nie je mo\u017en\u00e9 poskytn\u00fa\u0165,“ uviedol policajn\u00fd hovorca Roman H\u00e1jek.<\/p>\n

\u0160ime\u010dkov\u00e1 o novom st\u00edhan\u00ed dosia\u013e nevedela. \u201eNeviem, \u010do by som na to mala poveda\u0165. St\u00e1le plat\u00ed, \u017ee som k dispoz\u00edcii vy\u0161etrovate\u013eovi a rada mu poskytnem v\u0161etky doklady, preto\u017ee z toho bude vidie\u0165, \u017ee som sa nijako neobohatila,\u201c reagovala \u0160ime\u010dkov\u00e1. Ako dodala, do dne\u0161n\u00e9ho d\u0148a ju k pr\u00edpadu nik nevypo\u010dul, rovnako nebola vyzvan\u00e1 ani k tomu, aby predlo\u017eila \u00fa\u010dtovn\u00e9 podklady \u010di dokument\u00e1cie.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Pochybnosti z prostredia vlastn\u00fdch<\/p>\n

To, \u017ee Fico o tomto probl\u00e9me informoval a na\u010falej ho spom\u00edna na tla\u010dovk\u00e1ch, negat\u00edvne ovplyvnilo aj stranu Progres\u00edvne Slovensko, ktor\u00e9ho predsedom je \u0160ime\u010dkovej syn Michal \u0160ime\u010dka. Uk\u00e1zal to prieskum agent\u00fary NMS Market Research. Pod\u013ea neho zachytilo kauzu a\u017e 60,4 percenta voli\u010dov strany a dve tretiny op\u00fdtan\u00fdch voli\u010dov kon\u0161tatuje, \u017ee kauza m\u00e1 sk\u00f4r negat\u00edvny alebo ve\u013emi negat\u00edvny vplyv na vn\u00edmanie strany. \u0160tyri percent\u00e1 voli\u010dov uviedlo, \u017ee kauza m\u00e1 ve\u013emi negat\u00edvny dopad na stranu. Negat\u00edvne kauzu vn\u00edmaj\u00fa aj voli\u010di \u010fal\u0161\u00edch opozi\u010dn\u00fdch str\u00e1n, ako SaS, Demokratov \u010di KDH. Vzh\u013eadom na to, \u017ee kauza u\u017e zneistila \u010das\u0165 voli\u010dov strany, \u0160ime\u010dkov\u00e1 predpoklad\u00e1, \u017ee Smer e\u0161te viac „pritvrd\u00ed“.\u00a0\u201e\u010c\u00edm je poz\u00edcia Smeru \u0165a\u017e\u0161ia, t\u00fdm viac bude tla\u010di\u0165 t\u00fato t\u00e9mu. To je zjavn\u00e9,\u201c povedala \u0160ime\u010dkov\u00e1.<\/p>\n

Napriek tomu, \u017ee premi\u00e9r mesiace hovor\u00ed o subven\u010dnom podvode, doteraz nepodal nik z predstavite\u013eov \u0161t\u00e1tu trestn\u00e9 ozn\u00e1menie. Urobila tak a\u017e predsedn\u00ed\u010dka mimoparlamentnej strany Pir\u00e1ti Zuzana \u0160ubov\u00e1, ktor\u00e1 t\u00fdmto krokom pod\u013ea vlastn\u00fdch slov supluje \u00falohu \u0161t\u00e1tu. Okrem toho v\u0161ak podala trestn\u00e9 ozn\u00e1menie aj na premi\u00e9ra Roberta Fica a ministra spravodlivosti Borisa Suska za to, \u017ee ke\u010f vedeli o subven\u010dnom podvode a neozn\u00e1mili to, nesplnili si svoju povinnos\u0165 a t\u00fdm tak sami sp\u00e1chali trestn\u00fd \u010din.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Audit sa pritom zameral predov\u0161etk\u00fdm na fakt\u00fary, ktor\u00e9 mali by\u0165 viackr\u00e1t predlo\u017een\u00e9 pri vy\u00fa\u010dtovan\u00ed dot\u00e1ci\u00ed, a to na ministerstvo spravodlivosti, ministerstvo kult\u00fary \u010di Fond na podporu umenia. Samotn\u00e1 \u0160ime\u010dkov\u00e1 pritom pochybenia v administrat\u00edvnej rovine prip\u00fa\u0161\u0165ala, odmieta v\u0161ak, \u017ee by i\u0161lo o \u00famyseln\u00e9 obohacovanie.\u00a0 \u201eMy nem\u00e1me na administrat\u00edvu projektov \u017eiadny t\u00edm, mohlo pr\u00eds\u0165 k zl\u00e9mu za\u00fa\u010dtovaniu. Ale ur\u010dite nie k tak\u00fdm chyb\u00e1m, ktor\u00e9 by mali za cie\u013e nejako z\u00edska\u0165, \u010do n\u00e1m nepatr\u00ed, a sp\u00f4sobi\u0165 \u0161t\u00e1tu finan\u010dn\u00fa ujmu.\u201c Ako n\u00e1sledne pripustila, do vy\u00fa\u010dtovania r\u00f4znych \u0161t\u00e1tnych dot\u00e1ci\u00ed mohli by\u0165 zahrnut\u00e9 tie ist\u00e9 fakt\u00fary, no pod\u013ea jej slov nebolo ni\u010d vyplaten\u00e9 duplicitne.\u00a0Rovnako uviedla, \u017ee verejn\u00e9 peniaze zdru\u017eenie pou\u017eilo na organizovanie Stredoeur\u00f3pskeho f\u00f3ra, pri\u010dom n\u00e1klady na podujatie mali by\u0165 v\u017edy vy\u0161\u0161ie ako z\u00edskan\u00e9 dot\u00e1cie.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"BRATISLAVA – V pr\u00edpade vy\u0161etrovania nar\u00e1bania s dot\u00e1ciami firmy matky Michala \u0160ime\u010dku – Marty \u0160ime\u010dkovej nastali nov\u00e9 skuto\u010dnosti.…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":25110,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[11870,34,37,11868,33,11869,1614,43,40,39,42,41,36,11867,38,35],"class_list":{"0":"post-25109","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-spravy","8":"tag-duplicitne-preplacanie-faktur","9":"tag-headlines","10":"tag-hlavne-spravy","11":"tag-marta-simeckova","12":"tag-news","13":"tag-projekt-forum","14":"tag-robert-fico","15":"tag-sk","16":"tag-slovak","17":"tag-slovakia","18":"tag-slovencina","19":"tag-slovensko","20":"tag-spravy","21":"tag-subvencny-podvod","22":"tag-titulky","23":"tag-top-stories"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@sk\/116272465444890134","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25109","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25109"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25109\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/25110"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25109"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25109"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25109"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}