{"id":17571,"date":"2026-05-06T00:35:50","date_gmt":"2026-05-06T00:35:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/spain\/17571\/"},"modified":"2026-05-06T00:35:50","modified_gmt":"2026-05-06T00:35:50","slug":"spain-dictatorship-franco-autarky","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/spain\/17571\/","title":{"rendered":"Spain – Dictatorship, Franco, Autarky"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Throughout Franco\u2019s rule, his authoritarian<\/a> regime was based on the emergency war powers granted him as head of state and of the government by his fellow generals in 1936. The first decade of his government saw harsh repression by military tribunals, political purges, and economic hardship. Economic recovery was made difficult by the destruction during the Civil War (especially of railway rolling stock and communications in general), a loss of skilled labor, a series of bad droughts, and a shortage of foreign exchange and the restriction on imports of capital goods imposed by World War II<\/a> and its aftermath. These difficulties were increased by Franco\u2019s misguided policies of autarky<\/a>, which aimed at economic self-sufficiency through the state control of prices and industrial development within a protected national economy cut off from the international market. The national income fell back to the levels of 1900, as industrial production and agricultural output stagnated and real wages dramatically fell. The near-famine years of the 1940s witnessed the rise of the black market<\/a> and misery in rural areas that caused migration to the shantytowns of the cities. Given brutal repression and a controlled and censored press, sullen discontent could take no organized form. The regime maintained a division between the victors and the vanquished of the Civil War, with the vanquished excluded from public life.<\/p>\n

Franco\u2019s sympathies in World War II<\/a> lay with Germany<\/a> and Italy<\/a>, to whom he gave moral<\/a> and material support. Nevertheless, Franco demanded France\u2019s<\/a> North African colonies in compensation for military cooperation against the Western Allies, on whom Spain was dependent for food and oil imports. Hitler refused. When in 1943 it appeared that the Allies would win the war, Franco reaffirmed Spain\u2019s nominal<\/a> neutrality without gaining their benevolence<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The declared hostility of the great powers after 1945 and the diplomatic sanctions imposed by the United Nations<\/a> (UN), from which Spain was excluded, gave Franco\u2019s opposition in Spain and in exile new life. Juan Carlos Teresa Silverio Alfonso de Borb\u00f3n y Battenberg, conde de Barcelona<\/a> (popularly known as Don Juan), heir of Alfonso XIII<\/a>, presented the monarchy<\/a> as something acceptable to the democratic powers and offered himself as king of all Spaniards, victors and vanquished alike. Because many of Franco\u2019s fellow generals were monarchists hostile to the Falange<\/a>, demands for a restoration were parried only with difficulty. Valiant but futile<\/a> guerrilla activities, inspired largely by the Communist Party<\/a> (1944\u201348), were brutally suppressed.<\/p>\n

Franco met these serious difficulties with success, shifting the balance of power<\/a> among his supporters from the Falange to Catholics. The Fuero de los Espa\u00f1oles (1945), guaranteeing personal freedoms (provided no attack was made on the regime), was a cosmetic device that failed to establish Franco\u2019s democratic credentials with the Allies. More important for Franco was the support of the church, which was given control over education. The diplomatic<\/a> ostracism imposed by the UN was skillfully turned into a means of rallying support for the regime in the name of national unity.<\/p>\n

Franco\u2019s confidence came from his sense that, with the onset of the Cold War<\/a>, the United States<\/a> would come to consider Spain a valuable ally against the Soviet Union<\/a> and that France and Britain<\/a>, though declaring support for the democratic opposition, would not intervene directly to overthrow him at the cost of renewed civil war. Hence, the hopes of the opposition came to nothing. In 1953 an agreement with the United States gave Franco considerable financial aid in return for the establishment of four U.S. military bases in Spain; in the same year a concordat<\/a> with the Vatican gave Spain added diplomatic respectability.<\/p>\n

By 1955, when Spain was admitted to the UN, Franco\u2019s regime appeared secure. Internal political command remained in Franco\u2019s hands, ensured by his control of the armed forces and by his ability to play off the groups that supported him, in particular the Falange, the monarchists, and the church. Ultimately, the Falange lost power in the National Movement<\/a>, the sole legal political organization; its attempts to create a Falangist one-party state<\/a> were defeated in 1956, though tensions between the Falange and the conservative<\/a> elements persisted.<\/p>\n

Opposition to the regime took the form of student unrest, strikes, and the unsuccessful efforts of the Communist Party<\/a> to forge a united front and challenge the regime (1958, 1959). The moderate opposition\u2019s attempt in 1962 to force a democratic opening in order to enter the European Economic Community<\/a> (EEC) was dismissed by the regime as treason. More serious was the bankruptcy of autarky, evident in inflation, a growing deficit in the balance of payments<\/a>, and strikes. This crisis was remedied by the technocrats of Opus Dei<\/a> (a conservative Roman Catholic lay organization), a number of whose members were appointed to the cabinet in February 1957. The devaluation of the European currencies forced Franco to implement<\/a> a stabilization plan in 1959, which provided a fierce dose of orthodox finance. Economic nationalism<\/a>, protectionism, and the state intervention characteristic of autarky were abandoned in favour of a market economy and the opening of Spain to international trade<\/a> and much-needed foreign investment. The stabilization plan was followed by a development plan in 1963, which was based on French indicative planning\u2014i.e., the setting of targets for the public sector<\/a> and encouragement of the private sector.<\/p>\n

The new policies produced growth rates of more than 7 percent between 1962 and 1966, aided by a rapid increase in tourism, foreign investment, and the remittances of emigrants who, hard-hit by the immediate results of the 1959 stabilization policies, had sought employment in other European countries. There was a rural exodus<\/a> from the impoverished countryside and a dramatic fall of the active population engaged in agriculture, from about two-fifths in 1960 to about one-fifth by 1976. Spain was rapidly becoming a modern industrialized country<\/a>. However, the government\u2019s policies were fiercely resisted by the Falange, who claimed that the policies were a surrender to neocapitalism. All hopes of a limited liberalization of the regime by its reformist wing were blocked by conservative elements, with the exception of Manuel Fraga\u2019s Press Law of 1966, which gave the press greater freedom and influence.<\/p>\n

Although the new prosperity brought a novel degree of social mobility<\/a> and satisfied the enlarged middle class, the workers\u2019 movement revived. Workers, disillusioned with the \u201cofficial\u201d syndicates run by the Falange, set up Workers\u2019 Commissions<\/a> (Confederaci\u00f3n Sindical de Comisiones Obreras; CC.OO.) to negotiate wage claims outside the official framework and called serious strikes. Sections of the church were sympathetic to claims for greater social justice<\/a> and responsive to the recommendations of the Second Vatican Council<\/a>. Indeed, many younger priests were sympathetic to the Workers\u2019 Commissions. Although the bishops generally felt that the church should support the regime, they were increasingly aware of the long-term dangers of such an alliance.<\/p>\n

Peripheral<\/a> nationalism<\/a> constituted<\/a> an intractable problem. In the Basque<\/a> provinces the nationalists could count on the support of the clergy, and Basque nationalism developed a terrorist<\/a> wing, ETA<\/a> (Euskadi Ta Askatasuna; Basque: \u201cBasque Homeland and Liberty\u201d). The Burgos<\/a> trials of Basque terrorists in 1970 discredited the regime abroad, and the following year the Assembly of Catalonia<\/a> united the opposition with a demand for democratic institutions and the restoration of the Autonomy<\/a> Statute of 1932.<\/p>\n

In the 1960s elements in the regime were increasingly troubled by its lack of \u201cinstitutionalization\u201d and the problem of the succession, as Franco was in failing health and there was no designated successor. The Organic Law of 1969 gave the regime a cosmetic constitution, and in 1969 Franco finally recognized Juan Carlos<\/a>, grandson of Alfonso XIII, as his successor as king and head of state; Juan Carlos\u2019s designation<\/a> was rejected by the democratic opposition as a continuation of the regime. To secure continuity<\/a>, in June 1973 Franco abandoned the premiership to Admiral Luis Carrero Blanco. However, in December Carrero Blanco was assassinated by ETA.<\/p>\n

Carlos Arias Navarro<\/a>, the former minister of the interior, was selected as the new premier. His government saw a fierce struggle between reformists, led by Manuel Fraga and the new foreign minister, Jos\u00e9 Maria de Areilza, who wished to \u201copen\u201d the regime by limited democratization from above, and the \u201cbunker\u201d mentality of nostalgic Francoists. Although Arias Navarro promised liberalization in a February 1974 speech, he eventually sided with the hard-line Francoists, and his Law of Associations proved to be completely unacceptable to the opposition and a defeat for the reformists. The government severely repressed ETA\u2019s terrorist activity in the Basque provinces, executing five terrorists in September 1975 despite international protests.<\/p>\n

Spain since 1975 Transition to democracy <\/p>\n

After Franco\u2019s death on November 20, 1975, the accession of Juan Carlos as king opened a new era, which culminated<\/a> in the peaceful transition to democracy<\/a> by means of the legal instruments of Francoism. This strategy made it possible to avoid the perils of the \u201cdemocratic rupture\u201d advocated by the opposition, which had united, uneasily, on a common platform in July 1974. Arias Navarro, incapable of making the democratic transition supported by the king, was replaced in July 1976 by Adolfo Su\u00e1rez Gonz\u00e1lez<\/a>, a former Francoist minister. Su\u00e1rez persuaded the Francoist right in the Cortes to pass the Law for Political Reform (November 1976), which paved the way for democratic elections. Su\u00e1rez then convinced the opposition of his willingness to negotiate and his democratic intentions; in April 1977 he legalized the PCE against the wishes of the armed forces. In the elections of June 1977, Su\u00e1rez\u2019s party, a coalition of centrist groups called the Union of the Democratic Centre<\/a> (UCD), emerged as the strongest party, winning 165 seats in the Cortes, closely followed by the Spanish Socialist Workers\u2019 Party<\/a> (PSOE), who captured 118 seats. It was a triumph for political moderation and the consensus<\/a> politics of Su\u00e1rez. The PCE gained 20 seats and the right-wing Popular Alliance<\/a> 16.<\/p>\n

Su\u00e1rez formed a minority government, and the political consensus held to pass the constitution of 1978. The new constitution, overwhelmingly ratified in a public referendum in December 1978, established Spain as a constitutional monarchy<\/a>. Church and state were separated, and provisions were made for the creation of 17 autonomous<\/a> communities<\/a> throughout Spain, which extended regional autonomy beyond Euskadi (the Basque Country<\/a>, encompassing<\/a> the provinces of Viscaya, Guip\u00fazcoa<\/a>, and \u00c1lava) and Catalonia, both of which had already been given limited autonomy. Confronted by terrorism and economic recession, the UCD disintegrated into the factions of its \u201cbarons.\u201d After heavy defeats in local elections and fearing a possible military coup, Su\u00e1rez resigned in January 1981.<\/p>\n

The inauguration of Leopoldo Calvo Sotelo, also a member of the UCD, as prime minister<\/a> was interrupted by the attempted military coup of Lieutenant Colonel Antonio Tejero, who occupied the Cortes (February 23, 1981) and held the government and the deputies captive for 18 hours. The coup attempt failed, however, because of King Juan Carlos\u2019s resolute support of the democratic constitution. Calvo Sotelo, who was left with the task of restoring confidence in democracy<\/a>, successfully engineered Spain\u2019s entry into the North Atlantic Treaty Organization<\/a> (NATO) in 1982.<\/p>\n

The administration of Felipe Gonz\u00e1lez<\/a>, 1982\u201396 <\/p>\n

The election of October 1982 marked the final break with the Francoist legacy<\/a>, returning the PSOE under its leader, Felipe Gonz\u00e1lez<\/a>, whose government was the first in which none of the members had served under Francoism. The PSOE won a solid majority (202 seats), while the UCD was annihilated<\/a>, winning only 12 seats. The conservative Democratic Coalition led by Manuel Fraga gained 106 seats and formed the official opposition.<\/p>\n

A radical party in 1975 committed to the replacement of capitalism<\/a>, the PSOE subsequently abandoned Marxism and accepted a market economy. The new government made its main concern the battle against inflation and the modernization of industry. Gonz\u00e1lez\u2019s policies were resisted by the unions (the socialist UGT and the CC.OO. controlled by the PCE), which staged violent strikes against the closing of uneconomic steel plants and shipyards. The left was further alienated by the government\u2019s decision to continue NATO membership, despite the party\u2019s official opposition to membership during the 1982 election. To justify this radical departure from the PSOE\u2019s traditional neutralism, membership in NATO was submitted to a referendum and made dependent on a partial withdrawal of U.S. forces stationed in Spain under the 1953 agreements. Spain also was to make its contribution to collective<\/a> defense outside the integrated<\/a> military command of NATO. The government won the referendum of March 12, 1986\u2014a triumph for Gonz\u00e1lez rather than evidence of understanding of or enthusiasm for NATO. Gonz\u00e1lez also secured Spain\u2019s entry into the EEC in January 1986 after prolonged and difficult negotiations.<\/p>\n

The government lost some support on the left with the creation of the United Left<\/a> (Izquierda Unida; IU), the core of which was remnants of the PCE, and the right capitalized on law-and-order issues, focusing on the fight against terrorism, disorder on the streets, the rise in crime, and the development of a serious drug problem. The government was accused of using its large majority to force through a major reform of university and secondary education<\/a> and of abandoning socialist policies in the battle against inflation and in its support of a capitalist market economy. However, the government\u2019s control of the PSOE was ensured by its manipulation of political patronage<\/a>. It was furthermore troubled by frictions created by the demands of Euskadi and Catalonia for greater autonomy. But the success of the government\u2019s economic policies (inflation fell and growth was resumed) and the popularity of Gonz\u00e1lez enabled the socialists in the election of June 1986 to retain their majority (184 seats), whereas Fraga\u2019s conservative Popular Coalition (105 seats) failed to make any gains and fell apart.<\/p>\n

In its second term, the government\u2019s economic policies continued to provoke the hostility of the trade unions\u2014unemployment ran at nearly 20 percent\u2014and on December 14, 1988, the CC.OO. and the socialist UGT staged a general strike<\/a>. In foreign policy<\/a>, all the major parties, with the exception of the United Left, supported the government\u2019s decision to offer logistical support to the United States and its allies in 1991 in the Persian Gulf War<\/a>; however, massive demonstrations against the war revealed widespread neutralist sentiments<\/a>. Tensions between the central government and the autonomous governments of Euskadi and Catalonia continued. Although ETA terrorists lost political support, the rise of nationalism in the disintegrating Soviet Union sparked outbursts of separatism in Spain. The Spanish government favored greater political union with the EEC, the country\u2019s major trading partner. Following Spain\u2019s success in hosting football\u2019s<\/a> (soccer\u2019s) World Cup<\/a> a decade earlier, the country again achieved international prominence in 1992, when it hosted the Expo \u201992 world\u2019s fair<\/a> in Sevilla<\/a> and the Olympic Games<\/a> in Barcelona<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Even before the glamour of those international events had faded, Spain entered a difficult period. The economy experienced a downturn, the government was rocked by a series of corruption scandals, and infighting within the PSOE reached intolerable levels. In these highly unfavourable circumstances, Felipe Gonz\u00e1lez called new elections for 1993. Surprisingly, the Socialists remained the largest party in the Cortes, though without an absolute majority; they were forced to rely upon the support of Catalan<\/a> and Basque nationalists.<\/p>\n

Gonz\u00e1lez\u2019s fourth term got off to a rocky start. Investigations led by judge Baltasar Garz\u00f3n<\/a> into the \u201cdirty war\u201d against ETA during the mid-1980s led to accusations that senior government officials had lent support to the Antiterrorist Liberation Groups (Grupos Antiteroristas de Liberaci\u00f3n), whose activities included the kidnapping and murder of suspected ETA militants. Another scandal, involving missing security documents, led to the resignation of two ministers, including the deputy prime minister, Narc\u00eds Serra. When Catalan leader Jordi Pujol withdrew<\/a> his party\u2019s support for the government, Gonz\u00e1lez called new elections for March 1996, which were won by the conservative Popular Party<\/a> (Partido Popular; PP), although by a much narrower margin than had been expected and without a parliamentary majority. Overall, the PP captured 156 of the Cortes\u2019 350 seats, while the PSOE was reduced to 141 seats.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Throughout Franco\u2019s rule, his authoritarian regime was based on the emergency war powers granted him as head of…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":17572,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2417,1017,5291,1020,17],"class_list":{"0":"post-17571","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-spain","8":"tag-article","9":"tag-britannica","10":"tag-encyclopeadia","11":"tag-encyclopedia","12":"tag-spain"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/spain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17571","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/spain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/spain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/spain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/spain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17571"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/spain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17571\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/spain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17572"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/spain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17571"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/spain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17571"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/spain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17571"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}