• Mack, E. A. & Wrase, S. A burgeoning crisis? A nationwide assessment of the geography of water affordability in the United States. PLoS ONE 12, e0169488 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jones, P. A. & Moulton, A. The invisible crisis: water unaffordability in the United States. SCRIBD https://www.scribd.com/document/315199865/The-Invisible-Crisis-Water-Unaffordability-In-The-United-States (2016).

  • Teodoro, M. P. Measuring household affordability for water and sewer utilities. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 110, 13–24 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Teodoro, M. P. & Thiele, R. Water and sewer price and affordability trends in the United States, 2017–2023. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 116, 14–24 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Patterson, L. A., Bryson, S. A. & Doyle, M. W. Affordability of household water services across the United States. PLoS Water 2, e0000123 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Raucher, R., Clements, J., Rothstein, E., Mastracchio, J. & Green, Z. Developing a New Framework for Household Affordability and Financial Capability in the Water Sector (AWWA, 2019).

  • Cardoso, D. S. & Wichman, C. J. Water affordability in the United States. Water Resour. Res. 58, e2022WR032206 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Doyle, M. W., Patterson, L., Smull, E. & Warren, S. Growing options for shrinking cities. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 112, 56–66 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hanak, E. et al. Paying for Water in California (Public Policy Institute of California, 2014).

  • Sarango, M., Senier, L. & Harlan, S. L. The high health risks of unaffordable water: an in-depth exploration of pathways from water bill burden to health-related impacts in the United States. PLoS Water 2, e0000077 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rosinger, A. Y. Biobehavioral variation in human water needs: how adaptations, early life environments, and the life course affect body water homeostasis. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 32, e23338 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gleick, P. H. Water: the Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change for the Water Resources of the United States (Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security, 2000).

  • Gleick, P. H. & Cooley, H. Freshwater scarcity. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 46, 319–348 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) 4-1–4-21 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).

  • Wang, X. et al. Adaptation to climate change impacts on water demand. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 21, 81–99 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Blount, K., Wolfand, J. M., Bell, C. D., Ajami, N. K. & Hogue, T. S. Satellites to sprinklers: assessing the role of climate and land cover change on patterns of urban outdoor water use. Water Resour. Res. 57, e2020WR027587 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, J. H. & Kim, C. J. A multimodel assessment of the climate change effect on the drought severity–duration–frequency relationship. Hydrol. Process. 27, 2800–2813 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Spinoni, J., Naumann, G., Carrao, H., Barbosa, P. & Vogt, J. World drought frequency, duration, and severity for 1951–2010. Int. J. Climatol. 34, 2792–2804 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Diffenbaugh, N. S., Swain, D. L. & Touma, D. Anthropogenic warming has increased drought risk in California. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3931–3936 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cooley, H., Shimabuku, M. & DeMyers, C. Advancing Affordability through Water Efficiency (Pacific Institute, 2022).

  • Luthy, R. G., Wolfand, J. M. & Bradshaw, J. L. Urban water revolution: sustainable water futures for California cities. J. Environ. Eng. 146, 04020065 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rachunok, B. & Fletcher, S. Socio-hydrological drought impacts on urban water affordability. Nat. Water 1, 83–94 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goddard, J. J., Ray, I. & Balazs, C. How should water affordability be measured in the United States? A critical review. WIREs Water 9, e1573 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Patterson, L. A. & Doyle, M. How sensitive is household affordability to changes in water bills?. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 115, 14–26 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goddard, J. J., Ray, I. & Balazs, C. Water affordability and human right to water implications in California. PLoS ONE 16, e0245237 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • House-Peters, L., Pratt, B. & Chang, H. Effects of urban spatial structure, sociodemographics, and climate on residential water consumption in Hillsboro, Oregon. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 46, 461–472 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lempert, R. J. & Groves, D. G. Identifying and evaluating robust adaptive policy responses to climate change for water management agencies in the American west. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 77, 960–974 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Herman, J. D., Zeff, H. B., Reed, P. M. & Characklis, G. W. Beyond optimality: multistakeholder robustness tradeoffs for regional water portfolio planning under deep uncertainty. Water Resour. Res. 50, 7692–7713 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jeuland, M. & Whittington, D. Water resources planning under climate change: assessing the robustness of real options for the Blue Nile. Water Resour. Res. 50, 2086–2107 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fletcher, S., Lickley, M. & Strzepek, K. Learning about climate change uncertainty enables flexible water infrastructure planning. Nat. Commun. 10, 1782 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zeff, H., Herman, J. D., Reed, P. M. & Characklis, G. W. Cooperative drought adaptation: integrating infrastructure development, conservation, and water transfers into adaptive policy pathways. Water Resour. Res. 52, 7327–7346 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zeff, H., Kasprzyk, J. R., Herman, J. D., Reed, P. M. & Characklis, G. W. Navigating financial and supply reliability tradeoffs in regional drought management portfolios. Water Resour. Res. 50, 4906–4923 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Heyman, J. M., Mayer, A. & Alger, J. Predictions of household water affordability under conditions of climate change, demographic growth, and fresh groundwater depletion in a southwest US city indicate increasing burdens on the poor. PLoS ONE 17, e0277268 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nayak, A., Rachunok, B., Thompson, B. & Fletcher, S. Socio-hydrological impacts of rate design on water affordability during drought. Environ. Res. Lett. 18, 124027 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Water conservation portal. State Water Resources Control Board. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues//programs/conservation_portal/conservation_reporting.html (2025).

  • Perez, S. E. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (City of Santa Cruz Water Department, 2021); https://www.santacruzca.gov/files/assets/city/v/1/wt/documents/water-mgmt/final-adopted-2020-urban-water-management-plan-including-water-shortage-contingency-plan-without-appendices.pdf

  • Water Affordability Needs Assessment: Report to Congress (United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2024).

  • House-Peters, L. & Chang, H. Urban water demand modeling: review of concepts, methods, and organizing principles. Water Resour. Res. 47, W05401 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Raucher, R., Wagner, C. & Donovan, C. The Economic Impacts of Water Supply Curtailments as May Need to Be Implemented by the Santa Cruz Water Department (City of Santa Cruz Water Department, 2022).

  • Giang, A. Equity and modeling in sustainability science: examples and opportunities throughout the process. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, Water Resour. Res. (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pierce, G., Chow, N. & DeShazo, J. R. The case for state-level drinking water affordability programs: conceptual and empirical evidence from California. Util. Policy 63, 101006 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Howe, C. W. & Goemans, C. The simple analytics of demand hardening. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 99, 24–25 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Medwid, L. & Mack, E. A. A scenario-based approach for understanding changes in consumer spending behavior in response to rising water bills. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 44, 487–514 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Understanding Proposition 218. California Legislative Analyst’s Office https://lao.ca.gov/1996/120196_prop_218/understanding_prop218_1296.html (1996).

  • Moser, S. C. & Ekstrom, J. A. A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 22026–22031 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Helmrich, A., Chester, M., Miller, T. R. & Allenby, B. Lock-in: origination and significance within infrastructure systems. Environ. Res. Infrastruct. Sustain. 3, 032001 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Palmer, R. N. & Characklis, G. W. Reducing the costs of meeting regional water demand through risk-based transfer agreements. J. Environ. Manage. 90, 1703–1714 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hansen, K. & Mullin, M. Barriers to water infrastructure investment: findings from a survey of US local elected officials. PLoS Water 1, e0000039 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wichman, C. J. The economics of equity and affordability in residential water pricing. Water Econ. Policy 11, 2530002 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bardeen, S. Prop 218’s ongoing impacts on California water. Public Policy Institute of California https://www.ppic.org/blog/prop-218s-ongoing-impacts-on-california-water/ (2025).

  • Clements, J. et al. Customer Assistance Programs for Multi-Family Residential and Other Hard-to-Reach Customers (Water Research Foundation, 2017).

  • Guzman, G. & Kollar, M. Income in the United States: 2023 (2024).

  • Shrider, E. A. Poverty in the United States: 2023. (United States Census Bureau, 2023). https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2024/demo/p60-283

  • 2019 American Community Survey Five-Year Estimates. American Community Survey (United States Census Bureau, 2019).

  • Menard, R. Long Range Financial Plan (WT). City of Santa Cruz Water Department (2016).

  • Menard, R. 2021 Water Department Long-Range Financial Plan and Water Rate Schedule for FY 2023 to FY 2027 (WT). City of Santa Cruz Water Department (2021).

  • Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Planning for Santa Cruz Water Department (Hydrosystems Research Group, 2023).

  • Tomlinson, J. E., Arnott, J. H. & Harou, J. J. A water resource simulator in Python. Environ. Modell. Softw. 126, 104635 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Loucks, D. P. & van Beek, E. Water Resource Systems Planning and Management: an Introduction to Methods, Models, and Applications (Springer, 2017).

  • Eyring, V. et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 1937–1958 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Steinschneider, S. & Brown, C. A semiparametric multivariate, multisite weather generator with low-frequency variability for use in climate risk assessments. Water Resour. Res. 49, 7205–7220 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Portfolio Schedules and Costs (Kennedy Jenks, 2024).

  • Trindade, B., Reed, P. M., Herman, J., Zeff, H. B. & Characklis, G. W. Reducing regional drought vulnerabilities and multi-city robustness conflicts using many-objective optimization under deep uncertainty. Adv. Water Res. 104, 195–209 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hadka, D. & Reed, P. Borg: an auto-adaptive many-objective evolutionary computing framework. Evol. Comput. 21, 231–259 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Olmstead, S. M., Michael Hanemann, W. & Stavins, R. N. Water demand under alternative price structures. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 54, 181–198 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Klassert, C., Sigel, K., Klauer, B. & Gawel, E. Increasing block tariffs in an arid developing country: a discrete/continuous choice model of residential water demand in Jordan. Water 10, 248 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Worthington, A. C. & Hoffman, M. An empirical survey of residential water demand modelling. J. Econ. Surv. 22, 842–871 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bohn, S., Danielson, C., Kimberlin, S., Malagon, P. & Wimer, C. Poverty in California. PPIC https://www.ppic.org/wp-content/uploads/JTF_PovertyJTF.pdf (2023).

  • M1 Principles of Water Rates, Fees and Charges. 7th ed. (AWWA, 2017).

  • Reed, P. M. et al. Addressing Uncertainty in MultiSector Dynamics Research—Addressing Uncertainty in MultiSector Dynamics Research Documentation (2022).

  • Saltelli, A. et al. Global Sensitivity Analysis: the Primer (Wiley, 2008).

  • County of Santa Cruz Assessor’s Office Database (County of Santa Cruz, 2023).

  • American Community Survey (ACS), Five-Year Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), 2015–2019 (United States Census Bureau, 2020).

  • Maurer, E. P., Wood, A. W., Adam, J. C., Lettenmaier, D. P. & Nijssen, B. A long-term hydrologically based dataset of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States. AMS https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/15/22/1520-0442_2002_015_3237_althbd_2.0.co_2.xml (2002).

  • San Lorenzo R a Big Trees CA (United States Geological Survey, 2024).

  • Exploring Next-Gen Climate Data. Cal-Adapt https://cal-adapt.org/ (2022).

  • Mitchell, K. E. et al. The multi-institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 109, D07S90 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rodell, M. et al. The Global Land Data Assimilation System. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 85, 381–394 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Skerker, J. et al. Stochastic flow and weather data. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18752509 (2026).

  • Skerker, J. jskerker/SantaCruz_Integrated_Model: updated code for paper revisions—Skerker et al. 2026. Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/18752481 (2026).

  • Pascale, S., Kapnick, S. B., Delworth, T. L. & Cooke, W. F. Increasing risk of another Cape Town ‘day zero’ drought in the 21st century. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 29495–29503 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fletcher, S. et al. Water supply infrastructure planning: decision-making framework to classify multiple uncertainties and evaluate flexible design. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 143, 04017061 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kramer, I., Tsairi, Y., Roth, M. B., Tal, A. & Mau, Y. Effects of population growth on Israel’s demand for desalinated water. npj Clean Water 5, 67 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Naseri, M. Y., Bernosky, G., Mayer, P. W. & Marston, L. T. Patterns and predictors of residential indoor water use across major US cities. Earths Future 13, e2024EF005467 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fagundes, T. S., Marques, R. C., Ferreira, D. F., da, C. & Malheiros, T. F. Exploring water affordability through subsidy policies. Water Res. 286, 124251 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar