More than 14 million of the world’s most vulnerable people — a third of them young children — could die as a result of the Trump administration’s dismantling of US foreign aid, according to research projections.
The study in the prestigious Lancet journal was published on Tuesday as world and business leaders gather for a UN conference in Spain this week, hoping to bolster the reeling aid sector.
The US Agency for International Development (USAID) provided over 40 per cent of global humanitarian funding until Mr Trump returned to the White House in January.
Two weeks later, Mr Trump’s then-close advisor, Elon Musk, boasted of having put the agency “through the woodchipper”.
Researchers estimated that USAID funding had prevented 91 million deaths in developing countries between 2001 and 2021.
(Reuters: Annabelle Gordon)
‘Comparable to major armed conflict’
The funding cuts “risk abruptly halting, and even reversing, two decades of progress in health among vulnerable populations,” warned study co-author Davide Rasella, a researcher at the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal).
“For many low- and middle-income countries, the resulting shock would be comparable in scale to a global pandemic or a major armed conflict,” he said in a statement.
The cuts could lead to more than 14 million avoidable deaths by 2030, the projections found.
(Reuters: Kent Nishimura)
Looking back over data from 133 nations, the international team of researchers estimated that USAID funding had prevented 91 million deaths in developing countries between 2001 and 2021.
They also used modelling to project how funding being slashed by 83 per cent — the figure announced by the United States government earlier this year — could affect death rates.
Projections found the cuts could lead to more than 14 million avoidable deaths by 2030.
Before its funding was slashed, USAID represented 0.3 per cent of all US federal spending.
(Reuters)
That number included over 4.5 million children under the age of five — or about 700,000 child deaths a year.
For comparison, about 10 million soldiers are estimated to have been killed during World War I.
Research deems programmes vital
Programmes supported by USAID were linked to a 15 per cent decrease in deaths from all causes, the researchers found.
For children under five, the drop in deaths was twice as steep at 32 per cent.
USAID funding was found to be particularly effective at staving off preventable deaths from disease.
There were 65 per cent fewer deaths from HIV/AIDS in countries receiving a high level of support compared to those with little or no USAID funding, the study found. Deaths from malaria and neglected tropical diseases were similarly cut in half.
USAID funding was found to be particularly effective at staving off preventable deaths from disease.
(Reuters)
Represents 0.3 per cent of all US spending
After USAID was gutted, several other major donors, including Germany, the UK and France, followed suit in announcing plans to slash their foreign aid budgets.
These aid reductions, particularly in the European Union, could lead to “even more additional deaths in the coming years,” study co-author Caterina Monti of ISGlobal said.
What Trump’s USAID freeze means for the rest of the world
But the grim projections for deaths were based on the current amount of pledged aid.
Researchers emphasised this could rapidly come down if the situation changes.
Dozens of world leaders are meeting in the Spanish city of Seville this week for the biggest aid conference in a decade. The US, however, will not attend.
“Now is the time to scale up, not scale back,” Professor Rasella said.
Before its funding was slashed, USAID represented 0.3 per cent of all US federal spending.
“US citizens contribute about 17 cents per day to USAID, around $64 per year,” said study co-author James Macinko of the University of California, Los Angeles.
“I think most people would support continued USAID funding if they knew just how effective such a small contribution can be to saving millions of lives.”
AFP