The Yorkshire Party has been vocal about devolved planning powers for years, and frankly, they’ve never had a better example than what’s happening now in Handsworth. Sean Bean, the Yorkshire actor, was born in Handsworth and has thrown his weight behind the residents fighting plans for nearly 1,800 new homes on green belt land. And before anyone rolls their eyes about another celebrity cause, this isn’t some middle-class NIMBY nonsense. This is about something much bigger.

The council wants to concrete over green spaces that families have used for generations.

Green spaces will always be important in Sheffield

We’re talking about land around Handsworth Grange and areas bordering Woodhouse, places where kids play football, walk their dogs, and where you can breathe. These aren’t just ‘fields’ as the planners like to dismiss them. They’re informal parks, wildlife corridors, the green lungs of a working-class community that’s already been squeezed enough.

And let’s be honest about what we’re losing here. This isn’t just about pretty views. These spaces are home to wildlife already struggling in our increasingly concrete world. They’re where people go to escape the stress of modern life, where children learn about nature, and where families have picnics on sunny weekends. The mental health benefits alone should make any sensible planner think twice.

The infrastructure is already creaking. Anyone who lives in Handsworth will tell you the same: school places are like gold dust, getting a GP appointment feels like winning the lottery, and the roads are a nightmare during rush hour. Imagine adding thousands more residents to this mix. It’s madness.

Who’s responsible for the decision on Sheffield’s green spaces?

Yes, it’s Sheffield councillors making the final decision, but they’re dancing to Whitehall’s tune. The government sets these brutal housing targets, then local councils get the blame when they’re forced to build on green belt land to meet them. Westminster creates the pressure, Sheffield Council takes the flak, and residents in places like S13 get ignored or accused of being nimbies.

When Bean protests about protecting green spaces, it resonates. He is not some outsider parachuting in. He has become a voice for people who feel like they’re shouting into the void. His celebrity status has at least forced attention onto what is, at its heart, a David and Goliath battle.

When and how will this change be implemented?

The pressure to build is real. Sheffield needs nearly 38,000 new homes by 2039: that’s not a small number. The council insists they’ve run out of brownfield sites, and they’ve got a planning inspector backing their claim about ‘exceptional circumstances’ for green belt release, but have they really exhausted all the alternatives?

Walk through Sheffield and you’ll still find derelict industrial land in places like Neepsend and Attercliffe, empty office blocks such as Commercial House, and countless abandoned commercial units. Yes, regenerating brownfield land costs more and takes longer than plonking houses on green fields, but isn’t that exactly where public investment should go? Instead of taking the easy option that disrupts communities?

Then there’s the density question. We don’t need to turn Sheffield into Manhattan, but there’s scope for building more homes within existing urban areas. Convert some of those big Victorian houses that are already subdivided. Look at all those retail parks that are half empty thanks to online shopping. Get creative with town centre spaces that could be used for residential purposes.

Perhaps the biggest grievance in Handsworth is the perceived injustice of bearing a disproportionate share of the burden. Why are working-class areas consistently earmarked for massive developments, while Sheffield’s leafier, more affluent suburbs, often with superior existing infrastructure, remain largely untouched and shielded from similar pressures?

How does London compare?

Look at London to see what’s possible when there’s political will. Despite facing more intense development pressure than Sheffield, London has protected around 3,000 parks and green spaces. Ninety percent of Londoners rate their access to green space as good or excellent. If they can resist building on green space in one of the world’s most expensive property markets, surely Sheffield can protect community spaces like those around Handsworth Grange.

The key difference? London’s boroughs have proper devolved planning powers that let them make decisions based on local knowledge rather than just hitting targets set by distant bureaucrats. They can be creative about densification, priorities’ brownfield regeneration, and crucially, they have the power to say no when something doesn’t make sense for their communities. That’s exactly what the Yorkshire Party has been arguing for, giving local areas real control over their development.

Solutions and how we can fight against this

The solutions for Handsworth aren’t rocket science. Start with genuine consultation where residents’ views matter, not just token exercises where the decisions have already been made. Speed up brownfield development with proper public investment in site preparation and infrastructure. Make sure any new housing comes with new schools, GP practices, and transport, not as an afterthought, but as part of the original plan.

This fight in Handsworth is about more than saving some green spaces, though that’s important enough. It’s about whether we believe in democracy at the local level, whether communities should have a real say in their future, and whether we can build the homes we need without destroying what makes places worth living in.

The green belt exists to stop urban sprawl and protect the environment. If we start treating it as another development opportunity, we’ve lost something fundamental about how we plan our towns and cities. Handsworth deserves better, Yorkshire deserves better, and it’s about time our planning system reflected that. It is time for this wonderful region of Yorkshire to look after its affairs.