The protesters at this year’s Vuelta a España, many thousand in number, demanded that Israel-Premier Tech (IPT) be shut down. The team, as owner Sylvan Adams put it, refused to cower, and the UCI, cycling’s governing body, rushed to their defence. Yet the unstoppable force of a protest movement that has swelled across the world has finally shifted the immovable object: Israel-Premier Tech have become NSN Cycling, owned by an international sports and entertainment company, and backed by Swiss investment bank Stoneweg.

A fragile ceasefire is now in place in Gaza, but does the pause in hostilities – and IPT’s forced rebrand – signal the end of one of cycling’s most fraught tangles with geopolitics? Or does it mark a new era in which protest and public pressure exert greater influence on cycling, blurring the line between politics and sport as never before?

Vuelta a España. Riders on rival teams pleaded for the team to suspend its racing activities, fearing for the safety of riders. In private group messages seen by Cycling Weekly, one prominent rider from a rival team said: “The fact they are racing under the name of a country committing genocide means that politics and sport are very much already intertwined… protesters have nothing to protest if Israel is not participating in sportswashing here.”

Best picks for you

At the height of the protests, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu took to social media to congratulate the team and Adams. “Great job to Sylvan and Israel’s cycling team for not giving in to hate and intimidation,” Netanyahu posted. “You make Israel proud!” Adams himself told Israeli media that if the team had withdrawn from the Vuelta, it would have spelled “not just the end of the team, but of all the other teams”. His implication was that other teams overtly linked to states would find themselves targeted. “Tomorrow they will demonstrate against the teams from Bahrain, the UAE and Astana. There is no end to the boycotts.”

Amid escalating protests against IPT, the balance of power shifted. Their headline sponsor Premier Tech and bike sponsor Factor privately informed team management that unless “Israel” was dropped from the name, they would withdraw their support. Faced with that ultimatum, the team announced it would relinquish its Israeli identity for the 2026 season, re-emerging under a new name and nationality. Both sponsors pulled out anyway. The end result was extraordinary – and made it hard to avoid the conclusion that, this time, the protesters had prevailed.

A banner at the Vuelta condemning Israeli genocide

Protests put paid to the final stage of this year’s Vuelta

(Image credit: Getty Images)

In announcing the climbdown and decision to rebrand, in early October, IPT stated that the team “is, and always has been, a sporting project,” but that recent events made the “team’s owners and management recognise the need for change”. The statement added: “In sport, progress often requires sacrifice, and this step is essential to securing the future of the team.” As for Adams, he had “chosen to step back from his day-to-day involvement and will no longer speak on behalf of the team”. Adams has remained silent on the matter, but in a recent op-ed in the Jerusalem Post, he expressed gratitude to President Trump and paid homage to Netanyahu for “leading a nation through war”.

When CW asked the team whether Adams would remain their owner and principal benefactor, a press officer replied: “Regarding Sylvan, at this point in time, there are no changes to his ownership or funding of the team.” That response raised questions: if Adams – a figure long associated with the Israeli government – continues to bankroll the team, is it really any less aligned with Netanyahu’s Israel? And if it remains an Israeli team in all but name, will the protests really fade away?

Answers were perhaps provided on 20 November, when media and entertainment group NSN (Never Say Never) announced an acquisition of the team. Though NSN is a Spanish-based company, the team will be registered in Switzerland. According to well-informed journalist Nacho Labarga of Spanish newspaper Marca, Sylvan Adams has relinquished all of his stakes in the team. The team’s general manager, Kjell Carlström, will remain in place.

Derek Gee, IPT’s highest-profile rider, revealed that he had terminated his contract with the team, owing to “certain issues [that] simply made my continuation with the team untenable”. He later expanded on his reasons, stating: “This decision was not taken lightly – it followed an irreparable relationship with the team principal, as well as serious concerns related to racing for the team, both from a safety and personal-belief standpoint that weighed heavy on my conscience.”

In an attempt to establish whether protest against the team would continue, Cycling Weekly contacted the Palestinian-led Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. Its spokesperson Stephanie Adam told us: “Regardless of the team’s name or the flag under which it races, it continues to be sponsored by Israeli government-partnered [organisations] complicit in Israel’s genocide in Gaza and its underlying 77-year apartheid regime oppressing millions of Palestinians. Until the team convincingly cuts all ties with genocidal Israel and ends its sportswashing of Israel’s regime of military occupation and apartheid, we will continue to call for peaceful protests at races to exclude it.” Israel rejects allegations of genocide and apartheid.

Where does this leave the riders being offered contracts with the team for 2026? Responding to Cycling Weekly, one agent who has brokered numerous deals between riders and IPT shrugged off the prospect of ongoing controversy: “Now the team is good for many riders,” he commented. Another agent, whose client received death threats for choosing to ride for IPT, told us he was satisfied that the team was no longer “a toxic entity” and was once again an attractive destination for riders: “The funding and ownership won’t [any longer] be perceived as blatant promotion of Israel,” he added.

The Israel-Premier Tech bus surrounded by riot police

(Image credit: Getty Images)

UCI president David Lappartient stood firm behind IPT during the protests, and criticised Spanish prime minister Pedro Sánchez and his government for expressing solidarity with demonstrators. Responding to the Vuelta protests, the UCI stated that it “strongly condemns the exploitation of sport for political purposes in general, and especially coming from a government”. Yet, as CW previously reported, the governing body faced accusations of double standards – particularly given its continued alignment with the IOC’s ban on Russian and Belarusian teams following Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

Lappartient’s predecessor, Brian Cookson, believes the time has come to consider barring teams from having nation states as title sponsors. “Cycling’s USP is that its teams are named after a sponsor, and if that sponsor causes public controversy – whether it’s a regime or a product – it’s no surprise when there are repercussions for that team,” Cookson told CW. When those nation states command armies and wage wars, those repercussions are, as we have seen, extremely impactful.

“We need to start looking more carefully [at this issue],” Cookson continued. “It’s not easy or simple; there’s no clear magic solution, and it requires a lot of talking, patience and diplomacy – but the UCI could change its regulations about who and what is acceptable as a team sponsor. Nation states could be prohibited in the same way alcohol and tobacco companies are no longer allowed.” The chances of the UCI doing this, however, given the vast sums of money at stake, appears slim.

“RACES ARE AN EFFECTIVE STAGE FOR PROTESTS”

2026 Tour de France will open with a team time trial in Barcelona, Spain, which, for protesters – given how they derailed IPT in the Vuelta’s TTT – may present a tantalising opportunity for even higher-profile disruption. As for next year’s Vuelta, a rumoured finale in the Canary Islands may face opposition, since Antonio Morales, president of the Gran Canaria Island Council, stated that the island would not host the race if IPT were permitted to compete. Cookson acknowledges that the threat to the sport has not passed. “We’re not immune to these scenarios emerging again in the future,” he said. “We have learned that we are vulnerable to public protests, and we need to be more conscious of that. The Vuelta was a warning call for all of us.”

Apple News and Readly. Subscriptions through Magazine’s Direct.