• Ruckelshaus, M. H. et al. The IPBES Global Assessment: pathways to action. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 407–414 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dasgupta, S. P. The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review Abridged Version (HM Treasury, 2021).

  • Bruno, E. M. & Jessoe, K. Designing water markets for climate change adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 331–339 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ponce-Campos, G. E. et al. Ecosystem resilience despite large-scale altered hydroclimatic conditions. Nature 494, 349–352 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Greve, P. et al. Global assessment of water challenges under uncertainty in water scarcity projections. Nat. Sustain. 1, 486–494 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pastor, A. et al. The global nexus of food-trade-water sustaining environmental flows by 2050. Nat. Sustain. 2, 499–507 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lerat, J., Chiew, F., Robertson, D., Andréassian, V. & Zheng, H. Data Assimilation Informed model Structure Improvement (DAISI) for robust prediction under climate change: application to 201 catchments in southeastern Australia. Water Resour. Res. 60, e2023WR036595 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rodell, M. et al. Emerging trends in global freshwater availability. Nature 557, 651–659 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • High and Dry: Climate Change, Water, and the Economy (World Bank, 2016).

  • Connor, R. The United Nations World Water Development Report 2015: Water for a Sustainable World Vol. 1 (UNESCO, 2015).

  • Reed, J., Van Vianen, J., Deakin, E. L., Barlow, J. & Sunderland, T. Integrated landscape approaches to managing social and environmental issues in the tropics: learning from the past to guide the future. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 2540–2554 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Holley, C. & Sinclair, D. Governing water markets: achievements, limitations and the need for regulatory reform. Environ. Plan. Law J. 33, 301–324 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Rosegrant, M. W. & Gazmuri S., R. Reforming water allocation policy through markets in tradable water rights: lessons from Chile, Mexico, and California. Cuad. Econ. 291–315 (1995).

  • Bennett, E. M. Changing the agriculture and environment conversation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0018 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, M. et al. Uneven consequences of global climate mitigation pathways on regional water quality in the 21st century. Nat. Commun. 15, 5464 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hart, B., Byron, N., Bond, N., Pollino, C. & Stewardson, M. Murray–Darling Basin, Australia: Its Future Management (Elsevier, 2020).

  • Yonge, D. & Hesse, P. P. Geomorphic environments, drainage breakdown, and channel and floodplain evolution on the lower Macquarie River, central-western New South Wales. Aust. J. Earth Sci. 56, S35–S53 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jalilov, S.-M., Watto, M. A., Robertson, D., Wahid, S. & Shokri, A. Sensitivity of agricultural outcomes to water allocation scenarios under changing climate in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Agric. Water Manag. 317, 109609 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Inquiry into Water Use Efficiency in Australian Agriculture (Inquiry) (Parliament of Australia, 2017).

  • Gleick, P. H. Global freshwater resources: soft-path solutions for the 21st century. Science 302, 1524–1528 (2003).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cosgrove, W. J. & Loucks, D. P. Water management: current and future challenges and research directions. Water Resour. Res. 51, 4823–4839 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Horne, A. C. et al. Environmental water efficiency: maximizing benefits and minimizing costs of environmental water use and management. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Water 5, e1285 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Poff, N. L. & Matthews, J. H. Environmental flows in the Anthropocence: past progress and future prospects. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain 5, 667–675 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • The past is key for the future of our freshwater systems. Nat. Commun. 14, 3971 (2023).

  • Higgins, A. et al. Integrated modelling of cost-effective siting and operation of flow-control infrastructure for river ecosystem conservation. Water Resour. Res. 47, (2011).

  • Leslie, D. J. Effect of river management on colonially-nesting waterbirds in the Barmah-Millewa forest, south-eastern Australia. Regulated Rivers-Res. Manag. 17, 21–36 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Arthington, A. H., Kennen, J. G., Stein, E. D. & Webb, J. A. Recent advances in environmental flows science and water management-Innovation in the Anthropocene. Freshw. Biol. 63, 1022–1034 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Arthington, A. H. et al. The Brisbane declaration and global action agenda on environmental flows (2018). Front. Environ. Sci. 6, 45 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xing, J. et al. Integrated crop–livestock–bioenergy system brings co-benefits and trade-offs in mitigating the environmental impacts of Chinese agriculture. Nat. Food 3, 1052–1064 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Roesch-McNally, G. E., Gordon Arbuckle, J. & Tyndall, J. C. What would farmers do? Adaptation intentions under a Corn Belt climate change scenario. Agric. Hum. Values 34, 333–346 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Leff, B., Ramankutty, N. & Foley, J. A. Geographic distribution of major crops across the world. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 18, (2004).

  • Smakhtin, V., Revenga, C. & Döll, P. A pilot global assessment of environmental water requirements and scarcity. Water Int. 29, 307–317 (2004).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chiew, F. H. Estimation of rainfall elasticity of streamflow in Australia. Hydrological Sci. J. 51, 613–625 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chiew, F. H. & McMahon, T. A. Global ENSO-streamflow teleconnection, streamflow forecasting and interannual variability. Hydrological Sci. J. 47, 505–522 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jeffrey, P., Yang, Z. & Judd, S. The status of potable water reuse implementation. Water Res. 214, (2022).

  • Holt, G. et al. Data and code for Synergies in environmental and agricultural water availability under climate change. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29345789.v1 (2025).

  • Eyring, V. et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 1937–1958 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Neill, B. C. et al. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 3461–3482 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chiew, F. H. S. et al. Estimating climate change impact on runoff across southeast Australia: method, results, and implications of the modeling method. Water Resourc. Res. 45, (2009).

  • Simons, M., Podger, G. & Cooke, R. IQQM—a hydrologic modelling tool for water resource and salinity management. Environ. Softw. 11, 185–192 (1996).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Van Rossum, G. & Drake, F. L., Jr. The Python Language Reference Manual (Python Software Foundation, 2014).

  • General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) (GAMS Development Corporation, 2024).

  • Holt, G., Dwyer, G. K., Robertson, D. E., Job, M. & Lester, R. E. HydroBOT: an integrated toolkit for assessment of hydrology-dependent outcomes (preprint). Environ. Model. Softw. 192, 106579 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing https://www.R-project.org/ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2024) https://www.R-project.org/

  • Sumner, M. ozmaps: Australia Maps, R package version 0.4.5. GitHub https://github.com/mdsumner/ozmaps (2021).