• Zutic, I., Fabian, J. & Das Sarma, S. Spintronics: fundamentals and applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323–410 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dieny, B. et al. Opportunities and challenges for spintronics in the microelectronics industry. Nat. Electron. 3, 446–459 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sinova, J., Valenzuela, S. O., Wunderlich, J., Back, C. & Jungwirth, T. Spin Hall effects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213–1260 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Qi, X.-L. & Zhang, S.-C. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057–1110 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Narang, P., Garcia, C. A. C. & Felser, C. The topology of electronic band structures. Nat. Mater. 20, 293–300 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xiao, J. & Yan, B. First-principles calculations for topological quantum materials. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 283–297 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, K. L., Wu, Y., Eckberg, C., Yin, G. & Pan, Q. Topological quantum materials. MRS Bull. 45, 373–379 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schaibley, J. R. et al. Valleytronics in 2D materials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16055 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, L. et al. Room-temperature valleytronic transistor. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 743–749 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jiang, S., Li, L., Wang, Z., Shan, J. & Mak, K. F. Spin tunnel field-effect transistors based on two-dimensional van der waals heterostructures. Nat. Electron. 2, 159–163 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chuang, P. et al. All-electric all-semiconductor spin field-effect transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 35–39 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hegde, G. & Bowen, R. C. Machine-learned approximations to density functional theory Hamiltonians. Sci. Rep. 7, 42669 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schutt, K. T., Gastegger, M., Tkatchenko, A., Muller, K. R. & Maurer, R. J. Unifying machine learning and quantum chemistry with a deep neural network for molecular wavefunctions. Nat. Commun. 10, 5024 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Unke, O. T. et al. SE(3)-equivariant prediction of molecular wavefunctions and electronic densities. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 34, 14434–14447 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, L. et al. Equivariant analytical mapping of first principles Hamiltonians to accurate and transferable materials models. NPJ Comput. Mater. 8, 158 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gong, X. et al. General framework for e(3)-equivariant neural network representation of density functional theory Hamiltonian. Nat. Commun. 14, 2848 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhong, Y., Yu, H., Su, M., Gong, X. & Xiang, H. Transferable equivariant graph neural networks for the hamiltonians of molecules and solids. NPJ Comput. Mater. 9, 182 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gu, Q. et al. Deep learning tight-binding approach for large-scale electronic simulations at finite temperatures with ab initio accuracy. Nat. Commun. 15, 6772 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Qiao, Z. et al. Informing geometric deep learning with electronic interactions to accelerate quantum chemistry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2205221119 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhong, Y. et al. Universal machine learning Kohn–Sham Hamiltonian for materials. Chin. Phys. Lett. 41, 077103 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grisafi, A., Wilkins, D. M., Csanyi, G. & Ceriotti, M. Symmetry-adapted machine learning for tensorial properties of atomistic systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 036002 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Morrison, M. A. & Parker, G. A. A guide to rotations in quantum-mechanics. Aust. J. Phys. 40, 465–497 (1987).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jones, M. D. & Albers, R. C. Spin–orbit coupling in an f-electron tight-binding model: electronic properties of Th, U, and Pu. Phys. Rev. B 79, 045107 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, M., Liu, G.-B., Guo, H. & Yao, Y. An efficient method for hybrid density functional calculation with spin–orbit coupling. Comput. Phys. Commun. 224, 90–97 (2018).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fernández-Seivane, L., Oliveira, M. A., Sanvito, S. & Ferrer, J. On-site approximation for spin–orbit coupling in linear combination of atomic orbitals density functional methods. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 18, 7999 (2006); erratum 19, 489001 (2007).

  • Kurita, K. & Koretsune, T. Systematic first-principles study of the on-site spin–orbit coupling in crystals. Phys. Rev. B 102, 045109 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cuadrado, R. et al. Validity of the on-site spin–orbit coupling approximation. Phys. Rev. B 104, 195104 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Batatia, I. et al. MACE: higher order equivariant message passing neural networks for fast and accurate force fields. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 11423–11436 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Jain, A. et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045–3067 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fukui, T., Hatsugai, Y. & Suzuki, H. Chern numbers in discretized brillouin zone: efficient method of computing (spin) Hall conductances. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 74, 1674–1677 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, Q. S., Zhang, S. N., Song, H. F., Troyer, M. & Soluyanov, A. A. Wanniertools: an open-source software package for novel topological materials. Comput. Phys. Commun. 224, 405–416 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marzari, N., Mostofi, A. A., Yates, J. R., Souza, I. & Vanderbilt, D. Maximally localized wannier functions: theory and applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1419–1475 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Merchant, A. et al. Scaling deep learning for materials discovery. Nature 624, 80–85 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Haastrup, S. et al. The computational 2D materials database: high-throughput modeling and discovery of atomically thin crystals. 2D Mater. 5, 042002 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gjerding, M. N. et al. Recent progress of the Computational 2D Materials Database (C2DB). 2D Mater. 8, 044002 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Unke, O. T. & Meuwly, M. Physnet: a neural network for predicting energies, forces, dipole moments, and partial charges. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 3678–3693 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thomas, N. et al. Tensor field networks: rotation- and translation-equivariant neural networks for 3D point clouds. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.08219v3 (2018).

  • Batzner, S. et al. E(3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials. Nat. Commun. 13, 2453 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Y. et al. Universal materials model of deep-learning density functional theory hamiltonian. Sci. Bull. 69, 2514–2521 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Loshchilov, I. & Hutter, F. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In 7th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2019).

  • Reddi, S. J., Kale, S. & Kumar, S. On the convergence of Adam and beyond. In 6th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2018).

  • Ozaki, T. Variationally optimized atomic orbitals for large-scale electronic structures. Phys. Rev. B 67, 155108 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhong, Y. The code and network weights of the universal SOC Hamiltonian model (Uni-HamGNN). Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17239078 (2025).