EASA, Updated analysis of the non-CO2 climate impacts of aviation and potential policy measures pursuant to EU Emissions Trading System Directive Article 30(4), COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT, Accompanying the document Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, {COM(2020) 747 final. (eds Arrowsmith et al.) Brussels, 23 November 2020. https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/201119_report_com_ep_council_updated_analysis_non_co2_climate_impacts_aviation.pdf (2020).
Lee, D. S. et al. The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018. Atmos. Env. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834 (2021).
Schmidt, E. Die Entstehung von Eisnebel aus den Auspuffgasen von Flugmotoren. in: Schriften der deutschen Akademie der Luftfahrtforschung. Heft 44, pp 1–15 (Verlag R. Oldenbourg, München, 1941).
Appleman, H. The formation of exhaust condensation trails by jet engines. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 34, 14–20 (1953).
Voigt, C. et al. Cleaner burning aviation fuels can reduce contrail cloudiness. Commun. Earth Env. 2, 114 (2021).
Burkhardt, U., Bock, L. & Bier, A. Mitigating the contrail cirrus climate impact by reducing aircraft soot number emissions. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 1, 37 (2018).
Rosanka, S., Frömming, C. & Grewe, V. The impact of weather pattern and related transport processes on aviation’s contribution to ozone and methane concentrations from NOx emissions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 12347–12361 (2020).
Skowron, A. et al. Greater fuel efficiency is potentially preferable to reducing NOx emissions for aviation’s climate impacts. Nat. Commun. 12, 564 (2021).
Wilcox, L., Shine, K. P., Hoskins, B. J. Radiative forcing due to aviation water vapour emissions. Atmos. Env. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.08.072 (2012).
Frömming, C. et al. Influence of the weather situation on non-CO2 aviation climate effects: the REACT4C climate change functions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 9151–9172 (2021).
van Manen, J. & Grewe, V. Algorithmic climate change functions for the use in eco-efficient flight planning. Transp. Res. Part D 67, 388–405 (2019).
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Special report on aviation and the global atmosphere. (eds Penner, J. E., Lister, D. H., Griggs, D. J., Dokken, D. J. & McFarland, M.) (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1999).
Dahlmann, K., Matthes, S., Yamashita, H. & Grewe, V. Climate assessment of single flights: deduction of route specific equivalent CO2 emissions. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 17, 29–4 (2023).
Grewe, V. et al. Reduction of the air traffic’s contribution to climate change: a REACT4C case study. Atmos. Env. 94, 616–625 (2014).
Matthes, S. et al. Climate optimized air transport. (eds Schumann, U.) ISBN 978-3-642-30182-7, ISBN 978-3-642-30183-4 (eBook). (Springer, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London, 2012).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30183-4. pp 727–746.
Grewe, V. et al. Assessing the climate impact of the AHEAD multi-fuel blended wing body. Met. Z. 26, 711–725 (2017).
Köhler, M. O., Rädel, G., Shine, K. P., Rogers, H. L. & Pyle, J. A. Latitudinal variation of the effect of aviation NOx emissions on atmospheric ozone and methane and related climate metrics. Atmos. Env. 64, 1–9 (2013).
Köhler, M. O. et al. Impact of perturbations to nitrogen oxide emissions from global aviation. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D11305 (2008).
Rädel, G. & Shine, K. P. Radiative forcing by persistent contrails and its dependence on cruise altitudes. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D07105 (2008).
Frömming, C. et al. Aviation-induced radiative forcing and surface temperature change in dependency of the emission altitude. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D19 (2012).
Matthes, S. et al. Mitigation of non-CO2 aviation’s climate impact by changing cruise altitudes. Aerospace 8, 36 (2021).
Megill, L., Deck, K. & Grewe, V. Alternative climate metrics to the global warming potential are more suitable for assessing aviation non-CO2 effects. Commun. Earth Env. 5, 249 (2024).
Grewe, V. & Stenke, A. AirClim: an efficient climate impact assessment tool. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 4621–4639 (2008).
Teoh, R., Schumann, U., Majumdar, A. & Stettler, M. E. J. Mitigating the climate forcing of aircraft contrails by small-scale diversions and technology adoption. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 2941–2950 (2020).
Fuglestvedt, J. S. et al. Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Metrics. Atmos. Env. 44, 4648–4677 (2010).
Peters, G. P., Aamaas, B., Berntsen, T. & Fuglestvedt, J. S. The integrated global temperature change potential (iGTP) and relationships between emission metrics. Environ. Res. Lett. 6, 044021 (2011).
Grewe, V. & Dahlmann, K. How ambiguous are climate metrics? And are we prepared to assess and compare the climate impact of new air traffic technologies? Atmos. Env. 106, 373–374 (2015).
Azar, C. & Johansson, D. J. A. On the relationship between metrics to compare greenhouse gases – the case of IGTP, GWP and SGTP. Earth Syst. Dyn. 3, 139–147 (2012).
Borella, A. et al. The importance of an informed choice of CO2-equivalence metrics for contrail avoidance. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 24, 9401–9417 (2024).
Rogelj, J. & Schleussner, C. F. Unintentional unfairness when applying new greenhouse gas emissions metrics at country level. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 114039 (2019).
Meinshausen, M. & Nicholls, Z. GWP*is a model, not a metric. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 041002 (2022).
Dahlmann, K. et al. Climate-compatible air transport system—climate impact mitigation potential for actual and future aircraft. Aerospace 3, 38 (2016).
Dahlmann, K., Grewe, V., Frömming, C. & Burkhardt, U. Can we reliably assess climate mitigation options for air traffic scenarios despite large uncertainties in atmospheric processes? Trans. Res. Part D 46, 40–55 (2016).
Dietmüller, S. et al. A Python library for computing individual and merged non-CO2 algorithmic climate change functions: CLIMaCCF V1.0. Geosci. Model Dev. 16, 4405–4425 (2023).
Teoh, R. et al. Global aviation contrail climate effects from 2019 to 2021. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 24, 6071–6093 (2024).
Righi, M., Hendricks, J. & Sausen, R. The global impact of the transport sectors on atmospheric aerosol in 2030—Part 2: aviation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 4481–4495 (2016).
Righi, M., Hendricks, J. & Beer, C. G. Exploring the uncertainties in the aviation soot–cirrus effect. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 17267–17289 (2021).
Prather, M. J., Gettelman, A. & Penner, J. E. Trade-offs in aviation impacts on climate favour non-CO2 mitigation. Nature 643, 988–993 (2025).
Simorgh, A. et al. Robust 4D climate-optimal flight planning in structured airspace using parallelized simulation on GPUs: ROOST V1.0. Geosci. Model Dev. 16, 3723–3748 (2023).
Lee, D. S. et al. Uncertainties in mitigating aviation non-CO2 emissions for climate and air quality using hydrocarbon fuels. Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ea00091e (2023).
https://www.eex.com/de/maerkte/umweltprodukte/eu-ets-auktionen. Last accessed 9 January 2026.
Scheelhaase, J. How to regulate aviation’s full climate impact as intended by the EU Council from 2020 onwards. J. Air Transp. Manag. 75, 68–74 (2019).
Sausen, R. et al. Can we successfully avoid persistent contrails by small altitude adjustments of flights in the real world? Meteorologische Zeitschrift 33, 83–98 (2024).
Rao, P. et al. Case study for testing the validity of NOx-ozone algorithmic climate change functions for optimising flight trajectories. Aerospace https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9050231 (2022).
Yin, F. et al. Predicting the climate impact of aviation for en-route emissions: the algorithmic climate change function submodel ACCF 1.0 of EMAC 2.53. Geosci. Model Dev. 16, 3313–3334 (2023).
https://www.dwd.de/DE/fachnutzer/luftfahrt/download/produkte/luftfahrt_und_klima/d_kult_info.pdf;jsessionid=FF5F71E63FD403C0AE125545C58E52B8.live31092?__blob=publicationFile&v=1. Last accessed 9 January 2026.
https://www.haw-hamburg.de/detail/news/news/show/climate-optimized-flight-routes-the-path-from-research-to-operations/. Last accessed 9 January 2026.
https://news.aa.com/news/news-details/2023/American-Airlines-participates-in-first-of-its-kind-research-on-contrail-avoidance-CORP-OTH-08/default.aspx. Last accessed 9 January 2026.
European Commission: EU ETS Monitoring and Reporting—Quick guide for aircraft operators. Updated for EU ETS Phase 4—Version of 1 March 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/system/files/2022-03/quick_guide_ao_en.pdf. Accessed on 26 August 2023 (2022).
Eurocontrol: Emissions Trading System Support Facility. https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/emissions-trading-system-support. Accessed on 26 August 2023 (2023a).
Eurocontrol: Small emitters tool. https://www.eurocontrol.int/tool/small-emitters-tool. Accessed on 26 August 2023 (2023b).
Forster, P. M., de, F., Shine, K. P. & Stuber, N. It is premature to include non-CO2 effects of aviation in emission trading schemes. Atmos. Env. 40, 1117–1121 (2006).
Niklaß, M. et al. Integration of Non-CO2 Effects of Aviation in the EU ETS and Under CORSIA, Climate Change, 20, Umweltbundesamt. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/integration-of-non-co2-effects-of-aviation-in-the (2020).
Faber, J. et al. Lower NOx at Higher Altitudes. Policies to Reduce the Climate Impact of Aviation NOx Emission, CE-Delft 08.7536.32, Commissioned by: European Commission, DG Energy and Transport under contract TREN/07/F3/S07.78699. (Delft, 2008).
Plohr, M., Dahlmann, K., Niklaß, M. Testing of a monitoring and reporting scheme for integrating non-CO2 aviation effects into EU ETS, Climate Change, Umweltbundesamt. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/system/files/medien/11850/publikationen/25_2024_cc_testing_of_a_monitoring.pdf (2024).