• Lan, X., Thoning, K.W. & Dlugokencky, E.J. Trends in Globally-averaged CH4, N2O, and SF6 determined from NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory Measurements (2024).

  • Jackson, R. et al. Human activities now fuel two-thirds of global methane emissions. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 101002 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Masson-Delmotte, V. et al. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. 2, 2391 (IPCC, 2021).

  • Saunois, M. et al. Global methane budget 2000–2020. Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. 17, 1873–1958 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Saunois, M. et al. The global methane budget 2000–2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 1561–1623 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Saunois, M. et al. The global methane budget 2000–2012. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 8, 697–751 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, Z. et al. Development of the global dataset of Wetland Area and Dynamics for Methane Modeling (WAD2M). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 2001–2023 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bernard, J. et al. The GIEMS-MethaneCentric database: a dynamic and comprehensive global product of methane-emitting aquatic areas. Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. 2024, 1–35 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wania, R. et al. Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane modelling: methodology of a model inter-comparison project (WETCHIMP). Geosci. Model Dev. 6, 617–641 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xi, Y. et al. Gridded maps of wetlands dynamics over mid-low latitudes for 1980–2020 based on TOPMODEL. Sci. Data 9, 347 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bloom, A. A. et al. A global wetland methane emissions and uncertainty dataset for atmospheric chemical transport models (WetCHARTs version 1.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 2141–2156 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Prigent, C., Papa, F., Aires, F., Rossow, W. B. & Matthews, E. Global inundation dynamics inferred from multiple satellite observations, 1993–2000. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 112, D12 (2007).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Prigent, C., Lettenmaier, D. P., Aires, F. & Papa, F. Toward a high-resolution monitoring of continental surface water extent and dynamics, at global scale: from GIEMS (Global Inundation Extent from Multi-Satellites) to SWOT (Surface Water Ocean Topography). Remote Sens. Water Resour., 149–165 (2016).

  • Downing, J. A. et al. The global abundance and size distribution of lakes, ponds, and impoundments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51, 2388–2397 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Verpoorter, C., Kutser, T., Seekell, D. A. & Tranvik, L. J. A global inventory of lakes based on high-resolution satellite imagery. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 6396–6402 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, Z. et al. Ensemble estimates of global wetland methane emissions over 2000–2020. EGUsphere 2024, 1–27 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Z. P. et al. Methane emission from small wetlands and implications for semiarid region budgets. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 110, D13304 (2005).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Bansal, S. et al. Large increases in methane emissions expected from North America’s largest wetland complex. Sci. Adv. 9, eade1112 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Semlitsch, R. D. & Bodie, J. R. Are small, isolated wetlands expendable?. Conserv. Biol. 12, 1129–1133 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sakané, N. et al. Classification, characterisation, and use of small wetlands in East Africa. Wetlands 31, 1103–1116 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cohen, M. J. et al. Do geographically isolated wetlands influence landscape functions?. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 1978–1986 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, X. et al. GWL_FCS30: global 30 m wetland map with fine classification system using multi-sourced and time-series remote sensing imagery in 2020. Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. 2022, 1–31 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, X. et al. Global annual wetland dataset at 30 m with a fine classification system from 2000 to 2022. Sci. Data 11, 310 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yuan, K. et al. Causality guided machine learning model on wetland CH4 emissions across global wetlands. Agric. For. Meteorol. 324, 109115 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yuan, K. et al. Boreal–Arctic wetland methane emissions modulated by warming and vegetation activity. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 282–288 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yuan, K. et al. Africa dominates the long-term increase in global wetland CH4 emissions due to warmer and wetter conditions. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18856858 (2026).

  • Messager, M. L., Lehner, B., Grill, G., Nedeva, I. & Schmitt, O. Estimating the volume and age of water stored in global lakes using a geo-statistical approach. Nat. Commun. 7, 13603 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, J. et al. The Surface Water and Ocean Topography Mission (SWOT) Prior Lake Database (PLD): lake mask and operational auxiliaries. Water Resour. Res. 61, e2023WR036896 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nahlik, A. M. & Mitsch, W. J. Methane emissions from tropical freshwater wetlands located in different climatic zones of Costa Rica. Global Change Biol. 17, 1321–1334 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yvon-Durocher, G. et al. Methane fluxes show consistent temperature dependence across microbial to ecosystem scales. Nature 507, 488–491 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Knox, S. H. et al. FLUXNET-CH4 synthesis activity: objectives, observations, and future directions. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 100, 2607–2632 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Le Mer, J. & Roger, P. Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: a review. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 37, 25–50 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, B. & Rodell, M. Terrestrial water storage in 2023. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 5, 247–249 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, Z. et al. Enhanced response of global wetland methane emissions to the 2015–2016 El Niño-Southern Oscillation event. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 074009 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Peng, S. et al. Wetland emission and atmospheric sink changes explain methane growth in 2020. Nature 612, 477–482 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thornton, B. F., Wik, M. & Crill, P. M. Double-counting challenges the accuracy of high-latitude methane inventories. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 569–512,577 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kyzivat, E. D. & Smith, L. C. A closer look at the effects of lake area, aquatic vegetation, and double-counted wetlands on Pan-Arctic Lake methane emissions estimates. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2023GL104825 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Saunois, M. et al. Global methane budget 2000–2020. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 17, 1873–1958 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Eyring, V. et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 1937–1958 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Folberth, G. et al. Description and evaluation of an emission-driven and fully coupled methane cycle in UKESM1. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 14, e2021MS002982 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, J., Huo, R., Chen, H., Zhao, Y. & Zhao, T. Comparative assessment and future prediction using CMIP6 and CMIP5 for annual precipitation and extreme precipitation simulation. Front. Earth Sci. 9, 687976 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kreplin, H. N. et al. Arctic wetland system dynamics under climate warming. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Water 8, e1526 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Treat, C. C. et al. The role of wetland expansion and successional processes in methane emissions from northern wetlands during the Holocene. Quat. Sci. Rev. 257, 106864 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liljedahl, A. K. et al. Pan-Arctic ice-wedge degradation in warming permafrost and its influence on tundra hydrology. Nat. Geosci. 9, 312–318 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Webb, E. E. et al. Permafrost thaw drives surface water decline across lake-rich regions of the Arctic. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 841–846 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xiong, Y. et al. Influence of human activities and climate change on wetland landscape pattern—a review. Sci. Total Environ. 879, 163112 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Garba, S. I., Ebmeier, S. K., Bastin, J.-F., Mollicone, D. & Holden, J. Wetland fragmentation associated with large populations across Africa. Nat. Commun. 16, 5065 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kou, D. et al. Peatland heterogeneity impacts on regional carbon flux and its radiative effect within a boreal landscape. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci. 127, e2021JG006774 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hashemi, J. et al. Coarse land cover datasets bias Arctic-Boreal wetland methane budgets. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, 903 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shaw, J. T. et al. Large methane emission fluxes observed from tropical wetlands in Zambia. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 36, e2021GB007261 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, B. et al. Assessing eddy-covariance flux tower location bias across the Fluxnet-Canada Research Network based on remote sensing and footprint modelling. Agric. For. Meteorol. 151, 87–100 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Barcza, Z., Kern, A., Haszpra, L. & Kljun, N. Spatial representativeness of tall tower eddy covariance measurements using remote sensing and footprint analysis. Agric. For. Meteorol. 149, 795–807 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chu, H. et al. Representativeness of eddy-covariance flux footprints for areas surrounding AmeriFlux sites. Agric. For. Meteorol. 301, 108350 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Beck, H. E. et al. High-resolution (1 km) Köppen-Geiger maps for 1901–2099 based on constrained CMIP6 projections. Sci. Data 10, 724 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Leibowitz, S. G. Isolated wetlands and their functions: an ecological perspective. Wetlands 23, 517–531 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pott, A. & Pott, V. J. Features and conservation of the Brazilian Pantanal wetland. Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 12, 547–552 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rebelo, A. J., Scheunders, P., Esler, K. J. & Meire, P. Detecting, mapping and classifying wetland fragments at a landscape scale. Remote Sens. Appl.: Soc. Environ. 8, 212–223 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lehner, B. et al. The Global Dam Watch database of river barrier and reservoir information for large-scale applications. Sci. Data 11, 1069 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Allen, G. H. & Pavelsky, T. M. Global extent of rivers and streams. Science 361, 585–588 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Richardson, D. C. et al. A functional definition to distinguish ponds from lakes and wetlands. Sci. Rep. 12, 10472 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Culjak, I., Abram, D., Pribanic, T., Dzapo, H. & Cifrek, M. A brief introduction to OpenCV. In Proc. 35th International Convention MIPRO 1725–1730 (IEEE, 2012).

  • Culjak, I., Abram, D., Pribanic, T., Dzapo, H. & Cifrek, M. In 2012 Proc. of the 35th International Convention MIPRO 1725–1730 (IEEE).

  • Friedl, M. & Sulla-Menashe, D. MODIS/Terra+Aqua Land Cover Type Yearly L3 Global 0.05Deg CMG V061 (NASA EOSDIS Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center, 2022).

  • Bartsch, A. et al. Detection of open water dynamics with ENVISAT ASAR in support of land surface modelling at high latitudes. Biogeosciences 9, 703–714 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ramberg, L., Wolski, P. & Krah, M. Water balance and infiltration in a seasonal floodplain in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Wetlands 26, 677–690 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tsyganskaya, V., Martinis, S., Marzahn, P. & Ludwig, R. SAR-based detection of flooded vegetation–a review of characteristics and approaches. Int. J. Remote Sens. 39, 2255–2293 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oakes, G., Hardy, A. & Bunting, P. RadWet: an improved and transferable mapping of open water and inundated vegetation using Sentinel-1. Remote Sens. 15, 1705 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, J. et al. Global land cover mapping at 30 m resolution: a POK-based operational approach. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 103, 7–27 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, X. et al. GLC_FCS30: global land-cover product with fine classification system at 30 m using time-series Landsat imagery. Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. 2020, 1–31 (2020).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gong, P. et al. Finer resolution observation and monitoring of global land cover: first mapping results with Landsat TM and ETM+ data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 34, 2607–2654 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zanaga, D. et al. ESA WorldCover 10 m 2021 v200 (2022).

  • Brown, C. F. et al. Dynamic world, near real-time global 10 m land use land cover mapping. Sci. Data 9, 251 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • CCI, ESA Land Cover. Product user guide version 2.0. UCL-Geomatics: London, UK 685 (2017).

  • Stocker, B. D., Spahni, R. & Joos, F. DYPTOP: a cost-efficient TOPMODEL implementation to simulate sub-grid spatio-temporal dynamics of global wetlands and peatlands. Geosci. Model Dev. 7, 3089–3110 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Delwiche, K. B. et al. FLUXNET-CH4: a global, multi-ecosystem dataset and analysis of methane seasonality from freshwater wetlands. Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. 2021, 1–111 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Knox, S. H. et al. Identifying dominant environmental predictors of freshwater wetland methane fluxes across diurnal to seasonal time scales. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 3582–3604 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gomez-Casanovas, N. et al. Seasonal controls of CO2 and CH4 dynamics in a temporarily flooded subtropical wetland. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci. 125, e2019JG005257 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, L. & Zhang, X. Time-series global 30 m wetland maps from 2000 to 2022. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10068479 (2023).

  • Allen, G. H. & Pavelsky, T. M. Global River Widths from Landsat (GRWL) Database. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1297434 (2018).

  • Li, F. et al. SmallWetlands: v1.0.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18526323 (2026).