Zedler, J. B. & Kercher, S. Wetland resources: status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annu. Rev. Environ. Res. 30, 39–74 (2005).
Brander, L. M., Florax, R. J. & Vermaat, J. E. The empirics of wetland valuation: a comprehensive summary and a meta-analysis of the literature. Environ. Res. Econ. 33, 223–250 (2006).
Acreman, M. & Holden, J. How wetlands affect floods. Wetlands 33, 773–786 (2013).
Kadykalo, A. N. & Findlay, C. S. The flow regulation services of wetlands. Ecosyst. Serv. 20, 91–103 (2016).
Fluet-Chouinard, E. et al. Extensive global wetland loss over the past three centuries. Nature 614, 281–286 (2023).
Clean Water Act. 33 (US Congress, 1972).
Greenhill, S. et al. Machine learning predicts which rivers, streams, and wetlands the Clean Water Act regulates. Science 383, 406–412 (2024).
Walsh, R. & Ward, A. S. An overview of the evolving jurisdictional scope of the US Clean Water Act for hydrologists. WIREs Water 9, e1603 (2022).
Sackett v. EPA Vol. 598, 651 (US Supreme Court, 2023).
Kihslinger, R., McElfish, J. M., Luedke, H. & Ray, G. Strategies for States/Tribes for Protection of Non-WOTUS Waters (Environmental Law Institute, 2023).
Gold, A. C. How wet must a wetland be to have federal protections in post-Sackett US? Science 385, 1450–1453 (2024).
Lane, C., D’Amico, E., Christensen, J., Fritz, K. & Golden, H. Linking wetlands to relatively permanent flowing waters: a conterminous United States geospatial analysis. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 33, 1–19 (2025).
Greenhill, S., Walker, B. J. & Shapiro, J. S. Deep Learning Projects Jurisdiction of New and Proposed Clean Water Act Regulation (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2026).
Boyle, K. J., Kotchen, M. J. & Smith, V. K. Deciphering dueling analyses of clean water regulations. Science 358, 49–50 (2017).
Keiser, D. A. et al. The evolution of the “Waters of the United States” and the role of economics. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 16, 146–152 (2022).
Economic Analysis for the Navigable Waters Protection Rule: Definition of “Waters of the United States” (US Environmental Protection Agency & Department of the Army, 2020).
Moeltner, K., Balukas, J. A., Besedin, E. & Holland, B. Waters of the United States: upgrading wetland valuation via benefit transfer. Ecol. Econ. 164, 106336 (2019).
Keiser, D. et al. Report on the Repeal of the Clean Water Rule and Its Replacement with the Navigable Waters Protection Rule to Define Waters of the United States (WOTUS) (External Environmental Economics Advisory Committee, 2020).
Advancing the Frontiers of Benefit-Cost Analysis: Federal Priorities and Directions for Future Research (National Science and Technology Council, 2023).
Javaheri, A. & Babbar-Sebens, M. On comparison of peak flow reductions, flood inundation maps, and velocity maps in evaluating effects of restored wetlands on channel flooding. Ecol. Eng. 73, 132–145 (2014).
Tang, Y., Leon, A. S. & Kavvas, M. Impact of size and location of wetlands on watershed-scale flood control. Water Resour. Manag. 34, 1693–1707 (2020).
Holden, J. et al. Overland flow velocity and roughness properties in peatlands. Water Resour. Res. 44, W06415 (2008).
Kadlec, R. H. Overland flow in wetlands: vegetation resistance. J. Hydraul. Eng. 116, 691–706 (1990).
Moser, K., Ahn, C. & Noe, G. Characterization of microtopography and its influence on vegetation patterns in created wetlands. Wetlands 27, 1081–1097 (2007).
Wamsley, T. V., Cialone, M. A., Smith, J. M., Atkinson, J. H. & Rosati, J. D. The potential of wetlands in reducing storm surge. Ocean Eng. 37, 59–68 (2010).
Gourevitch, J. D. et al. Spatial targeting of floodplain restoration to equitably mitigate flood risk. Glob. Environ. Change 61, 102050 (2020).
Worley, L. C. et al. Balancing multiple stakeholder objectives for floodplain reconnection and wetland restoration. J. Environ. Manage. 326, 116648 (2023).
Al-Attabi, Z., Xu, Y., Tso, G. & Narayan, S. The impacts of tidal wetland loss and coastal development on storm surge damages to people and property: a Hurricane Ike case-study. Sci. Rep. 13, 4620 (2023).
Narayan, S. et al. The value of coastal wetlands for flood damage reduction in the northeastern USA. Sci. Rep. 7, 9463 (2017).
Brauman, K. A. et al. Producing valuable information from hydrologic models of nature-based solutions for water. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 18, 135–147 (2022).
Bunya, S. et al. A high-resolution coupled riverine flow, tide, wind, wind wave, and storm surge model for southern Louisiana and Mississippi. Part I: model development and validation. Mon. Weather Rev. 138, 345–377 (2010).
Bates, P. D. Flood inundation prediction. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 54, 287–315 (2022).
Medeiros, S. C., Hagen, S. C. & Weishampel, J. F. Comparison of floodplain surface roughness parameters derived from land cover data and field measurements. J. Hydrol. 452, 139–149 (2012).
Pollack, A., Wing, I. S., Pinter, N. & Nolte, C. New empirical models for flood loss prediction and implications for the coterminous United States. Preprint at Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2062647/v1 (2022).
Wing, O. E., Pinter, N., Bates, P. D. & Kousky, C. New insights into US flood vulnerability revealed from flood insurance big data. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–10 (2020).
Brody, S. D., Highfield, W. E. & Blessing, R. An analysis of the effects of land use and land cover on flood losses along the Gulf of Mexico coast from 1999 to 2009. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc.51, 1556–1567 (2015).
Costanza, R. et al. The value of coastal wetlands for hurricane protection. Ambio 37, 241–248 (2008).
Highfield, W. E. & Brody, S. D. Price of permits: measuring the economic impacts of wetland development on flood damages in Florida. Nat. Hazards Rev. 7, 123–130 (2006).
Sun, F. & Carson, R. T. Coastal wetlands reduce property damage during tropical cyclones. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 5719–5725 (2020).
Taylor, C. A. & Druckenmiller, H. Wetlands, flooding, and the clean water act. Am. Econ. Rev. 112, 1334–1363 (2022).
Aronoff, D. & Rafey, W. Conservation priorities and environmental offsets: markets for Florida wetlands. Am. Econ. Rev. 116, 1723–1764 (2026).
Amornsiripanitch, N., Biswas, S., Orellana, J. & Zink, D. Measuring flood underinsurance in the USA. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02396-w (2025).
Bradt, J., Kousky, C. & Wing, O. Voluntary purchases and adverse selection in the market for flood insurance. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 110, 102515 (2021).
Flores, A. et al. Federally-overlooked flood risk inequities in the conterminous United States. Sci. Rep. 15, 10678 (2025).
Smiley, K. Social inequalities in flooding inside and outside of floodplains during Hurricane Harvey. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 0940b0943 (2020).
Weill, J. Flood risk mapping and the distributional impacts of climate information. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy (in the press).
Wing, O. et al. Inequitable patterns of US flood risk in the Anthropocene. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 156–162 (2022).
Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) 4.1. (US Geological Survey, 2024).
Gold, M., Binder, S. & Nolte, C. Expanding the coverage and accuracy of parcel-level land value estimates. PLoS ONE 18, e0291182 (2023).
Nolte, C. High-resolution land value maps reveal underestimation of conservation costs in the United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 29577–29583 (2020).
Liscow, Z. & Sunstein, C. R. Efficiency vs. welfare in benefit–cost analysis: the case of government funding. J. Benefit-Cost Anal. 15, 224–251 (2024).
Lockwood, J. W., Oppenheimer, M., Lin, N. & Gourevitch, J. Socioeconomic distributional impacts of evaluating flood mitigation activities using equity-weighted benefit-cost analysis. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 074024 (2024).
Gourevitch, J. D. et al. Projected losses of ecosystem services in the US disproportionately affect non-white and lower-income populations. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–9 (2021).
Haque, M. N. & Sharifi, A. Who are marginalized in accessing urban ecosystem services? A systematic literature review. Land Use Policy 144, 107266 (2024).
Villamagna, A. M., Mogollón, B. & Angermeier, P. L. Inequity in ecosystem service delivery: socioeconomic gaps in the public–private conservation network. Ecol. Soc. 22, 36 (2017).
Sanders, B. et al. Large and inequitable flood risks in Los Angeles, California. Nat. Sustain. 6, 47–57 (2023).
Kim, Y. Payments for ecosystem services programs and climate change adaptation in agriculture. SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4746066 (2023).
Karwowski, N. & Skidmore, M. Nature’s kidneys: the role of wetland reserve easements in restoring water quality. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 13, 495–531 (2026).
Moreno-Mateos, D., Power, M. E., Comín, F. A. & Yockteng, R. Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001247 (2012).
Roychowdhury, I. & Moore, F. C. Spatial selection undermines flood protection in US wetland markets. SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5926242 (2026).
Guidance for Assessing Changes in Environmental and Ecosystem Services in Benefit–Cost Analysis (Office of Management and Budget, 2024).
Mitsch, W. J. et al. Wetlands, carbon, and climate change. Landscape Ecol. 28, 583–597 (2013).
Ghermandi, A. Integrating social media analysis and revealed preference methods to value the recreation services of ecologically engineered wetlands. Ecosyst. Serv. 31, 351–357 (2018).
Johnson, K. A. et al. A benefit–cost analysis of floodplain land acquisition for US flood damage reduction. Nat. Sustain. 3, 56–62 (2020).
Kousky, C., Kunreuther, H., Lingle, B. & Shabman, L. The Emerging Private Residential Flood Insurance Market in the United States (Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center, 2018).
Horn, D. National Flood Insurance Program: The Current Rating Structure and Risk Rating 2.0 (Congressional Research Service, 2021).
Lang, A. & Poschlod, B. Updating catastrophe models to today’s climate—an application of a large ensemble approach to extreme rainfall. Clim. Risk Manag. 44, 100594 (2024).
Davenport, F. V., Burke, M. & Diffenbaugh, N. S. Contribution of historical precipitation change to US flood damages. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2017524118 (2021).
Ortega, F. & Petkov, I. To improve is to change? The effects of risk rating 2.0 on flood insurance demand. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 134, 103228 (2025).
Mulder, P. & Kousky, C. Risk rating without information provision. AEA Papers Proc. 113, 299–303 (2023).
Alix-Garcia, J. & Millimet, D. L. Remotely incorrect? Accounting for nonclassical measurement error in satellite data on deforestation. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 10, 1335–1367 (2023).
Blum, A. G., Ferraro, P. J., Archfield, S. A. & Ryberg, K. R. Causal effect of impervious cover on annual flood magnitude for the United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL086480 (2020).
Jeong, H.-G., Ahn, J.-B., Lee, J., Shim, K.-M. & Jung, M.-P. Improvement of daily precipitation estimations using PRISM with inverse-distance weighting. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 139, 923–934 (2020).
USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD). United States Geological Survey https://www.usgs.gov/national-hydrography/access-national-hydrography-products (2025).
Meissel, K. & Yao, E. S. Using Cliff’s delta as a non-parametric effect size measure: an accessible web app and R tutorial. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 29, 2 (2024).
Ogawa, H. & Male, J. W. Simulating the flood mitigation role of wetlands. J. Water Res. Plan. Manag. 112, 114–128 (1986).
O’Brien, R. M. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual. Quant. 41, 673–690 (2007).
Salmerón, R., García, C. B. & García, J. Variance inflation factor and condition number in multiple linear regression. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 88, 2365–2384 (2018).
Salas, J., Saha, A. & Ravela, S. Learning inter-annual flood loss risk models from historical flood insurance claims. J. Environ. Manage. 347, 118862 (2023).
Bates, P. D. et al. Combined modelling of US fluvial, pluvial and coastal flood hazard under current and future climates. Water Resour. Res. 57, e2020WR028673 (2020).
Wing, O. E. et al. Validation of a 30 m resolution flood hazard model of the conterminous United States. Water Resour. Res. 53, 7968–7986 (2017).
Wing, O. E. et al. A flood inundation forecast of Hurricane Harvey using a continental-scale 2D hydrodynamic model. J. Hydrol. X 4, 100039 (2019).
Wing, O. E. et al. Simulating historical flood events at the continental scale: observational validation of a large-scale hydrodynamic model. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 21, 559–575 (2021).
Pizer, W. A. & Prest, B. C. Circular A-4: practical advances in discounting for policy decisions. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 19, 229–237 (2025).
Isgin, T. & Forster, D. L. A hedonic price analysis of farmland option premiums under urban influences. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 54, 327–340 (2006).
Plantinga, A. J., Lubowski, R. N. & Stavins, R. N. The effects of potential land development on agricultural land prices. J. Urban Econ. 52, 561–581 (2002).
Liscow, Z. Is efficiency biased? Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 85, 1649 (2018).
Adler, M. D. Benefit–cost analysis and distributional weights: an overview. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 10, 264–285 (2016).
Banzhaf, H. S. Distribution and disputation: net benefits, equity, and public decision-making. J. Benefit Cost Anal. 14, 205–229 (2023).
Buzbee, W. W. The lawlessness of Sackett v. EPA. Case Western Reserve Law Rev. 74, 317–351 (2023).
Gardner, R. C. Waters of the United States: POTUS, SCOTUS, WOTUS, and the Politics of a National Resource (Island Press, 2024).
Jaffe, C. Sackett and the unraveling of Federal Environmental Law. Environ. Law Rep. 53, 10801 (2023).
Lazarus, R. J. Judicial destruction of the Clean Water Act: Sackett v. EPA. The University of Chicago Law Review https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/judicial-destruction-clean-water-act-sackett-v-epa (2023).
Gourevitch, J., Gold, A. & Garcia, H. The economic value of wetlands in reducing riverine flood losses in the US. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19699730 (2026).