Home
»
EUROPE
»
France, Spain, UK, Italy Lead Europe Travel Price War as Budget Airlines Crush Trains Despite Climate Cost, New Update is Here
Published on
August 22, 2025
By: Tuhin Sarkar
France, Spain, UK, Italy lead the Europe travel price war as budget airlines crush trains despite climate cost, and this new update is here to reveal why the gap is only growing. In today’s fast-changing travel market, the Europe travel price war between rail and air has become a defining battle. France, Spain, UK, Italy are now at the centre of this struggle, as budget airlines continue to dominate routes with cheap fares that leave rail operators unable to compete. The result is a system where the climate cost is ignored, while passengers keep choosing planes over trains.
The Europe travel price war shows how budget airlines crush trains not only with low ticket prices but also with strategies that reshape passenger habits. France, Spain, UK, Italy are the biggest examples, where new data shows trains remain far more expensive than flights despite the climate cost of aviation being significantly higher. This update highlights the unfair advantage of airlines that pay no kerosene tax or VAT, while rail companies face heavy access charges and energy costs.
France, Spain, UK, Italy represent both the challenge and the opportunity in this Europe travel price war. Budget airlines crush trains today, but the climate cost makes reform urgent. This new update is here to explain how pricing, taxes, and policies shape the future of travel. The choice is clear: act now to make trains affordable, or let cheap flights keep winning the Europe travel price war at the expense of the planet.
Rail vs Air: A Growing European Price Divide
Trains remain the greener way to travel in Europe, but flying still wins on price. A new Greenpeace analysis reveals that only 39% of 109 cross-border routes are cheaper by train. The findings are even more concerning when compared to flights offered by low-cost carriers. Airlines, which avoid kerosene tax and VAT on international tickets, continue to undercut rail operators burdened by high track charges and energy taxes.
For domestic routes, however, the picture is brighter. On the 33 domestic lines studied, 70% proved cheaper by rail. This sharp contrast highlights how Europe’s fragmented pricing systems hold back train competitiveness. While rail should be the champion of sustainable mobility, unfair airline advantages and structural rail costs distort the market.
Countries Where Flying Beats the Train
The analysis shows dramatic differences between nations. France emerges as the most expensive for train travellers. On 95% of French cross-border routes, trains were pricier than flights for at least six of nine days surveyed. Spain followed at 92%, the UK at 90%, and Italy at 88%. These findings highlight deep-rooted price imbalances in major travel hubs.
Yet there are outliers. In the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, trains always outperformed planes on cost. Poland also offered strong affordability, with 89% of routes cheaper by train. Slovenia followed at 80%, showing that national rail policies and local ticketing systems make a decisive difference.
Germany, Austria, Switzerland: A Mixed Picture
German-speaking Europe presents a balanced outcome. About half of cross-border routes in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland are cheaper by rail, while the other half favour planes. The split largely depends on the destination country, highlighting how international ticketing and operator cooperation directly affect prices.
This unevenness shows how geography, bilateral agreements, and infrastructure investment shape affordability. It also underlines the lack of a truly unified European rail market. Until stronger cross-border frameworks are in place, price disparities will continue.
The Case of Barcelona–London: A Shocking Gap
Some of the most extreme differences appear on popular routes. Barcelona–London stands out as the worst offender, with a flight costing just €14.99 against a train fare of €389. That is a price difference of up to 26 times. Such imbalances discourage passengers from choosing the more climate-friendly option.
The cheapest ticket in the study was also on this route, with easyJet offering a €12.99 fare. Low-cost carriers like Ryanair, Wizz Air, Vueling, and easyJet dominate this space, drawing passengers away from rail even on routes where trains offer comfort and sustainability.
Low-Cost Airlines and the Pricing Trap
The analysis points to aggressive airline tactics. Carriers often sell tickets below airport fee costs to lock in passengers. With no kerosene tax and no VAT on international fares, they enjoy major structural advantages. Meanwhile, rail operators face VAT, track charges, and energy taxes, making their base fares higher before a ticket is even sold.
This imbalance explains why even night trains, which are cheaper to operate due to fewer transfers, remain more expensive than low-cost flights. Without regulatory reform, the air sector will keep outpricing rail on many cross-border routes.
A Slightly Positive Shift
Despite the challenges, there are signs of progress. Compared to Greenpeace’s 2023 study, the share of routes where trains were cheaper on at least six of nine days has increased from 27% to 41%. This improvement is driven by more direct rail links and fewer ultra-cheap connecting flights via hubs such as London and Dublin.
But the progress is slow. Without decisive action, rail will remain trapped in a cycle of high costs and declining competitiveness. The climate urgency demands faster change.
Climate Stakes Could Not Be Higher
Flying has a devastating climate footprint. On average, planes emit 4.85 times more greenhouse gases than trains, according to the European Environment Agency. In some cases, the climate impact of flying can be over 80 times worse than travelling by rail.
These numbers show why pricing reform is not just about fairness—it is about survival. Europe cannot meet its climate goals if flying continues to be the cheaper, easier choice for cross-border travel.
Solutions: Making Rail Competitive
The study highlights several solutions. Introducing fair taxation on aviation, starting with business and first-class tickets, could help reduce distortions. A moderate wealth tax on billionaires and centi-millionaires could also raise funds to expand rail services and lower ticket prices.
At the same time, reducing track charges, harmonising cross-border ticketing, and investing in night trains would make rail more competitive. These steps would also deliver social benefits, making sustainable travel affordable for a wider population.
Travellers’ Choice and the Market Reality
The price gap leaves travellers with difficult choices. Many would prefer trains for comfort, safety, and sustainability. Yet price remains the dominant factor for most. When airlines offer fares as low as €12.99, rail cannot compete without policy intervention.
The current pricing imbalance does not reflect true costs. Aviation’s environmental damage is not factored into ticket prices, while rail pays taxes that support sustainable energy and infrastructure. Fixing this distortion is essential to making travel fair and climate-friendly.
The Urgency for Reform
Europe faces a critical choice. If rail remains expensive, passengers will keep turning to budget flights, fuelling emissions and worsening the climate crisis. If reform succeeds, trains could become the default option, combining affordability with sustainability.
The data shows that rail already has an advantage in some regions. Expanding those gains to the whole continent requires bold political will. The coming years will determine whether Europe meets its climate goals—or lets aviation continue its unfair dominance.
A Call for Fair Pricing
The Greenpeace report is a wake-up call. While rail is greener and more sustainable, it is still too often priced out of reach. Without structural reform, Europe risks missing its climate targets and losing public trust in its transport transition.
The solution is clear: make trains cheaper than planes on all routes. By closing the price gap, Europe can align climate action with passenger choice. Travellers should not be forced to choose between saving money and saving the planet.
