{"id":1014597,"date":"2026-06-09T04:39:20","date_gmt":"2026-06-09T04:39:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/1014597\/"},"modified":"2026-06-09T04:39:20","modified_gmt":"2026-06-09T04:39:20","slug":"the-causes-and-lasting-effects-of-the-summer-of-love-1967","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/1014597\/","title":{"rendered":"The causes and lasting effects of the ‘Summer of Love’, 1967"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Haight<\/p>\n

Credit: Far Out \/ Public Domain<\/p>\n

Mon 8 June 2026 22:00, UK <\/p>\n

\u201cI went to Haight-Ashbury, expecting it to be this brilliant place,\u201d George Harrison<\/a> says at one point in The Beatles Anthology documentary, referring to his 1967 pilgrimage into the epicentre of the so-called Summer of Love in San Francisco. <\/p>\n

\u201cI thought it was gonna be all these groovy, kinda Gypsy kind of people with little shops making works of art and paintings and carvings,\u201d he added. \u201cBut instead it turned out to be just a lot of bums, many of them who were just very young kids who\u2019d come from all over America and dropped acid and gone to this Mecca of LSD. We\u2019d walk down the street, and I was being treated like the Messiah or something. I was really afraid because I could see all these spotty youths, and they were still in the undercurrent of Beatlemania, but from kind of this twisted angle\u2026 In the end, we just said, \u2018Let\u2019s get out of here\u2019.\u201d<\/p>\n

It was the single most famous occurrence of a meteorological season since the \u201cwinter of our discontent\u201d, but 60 years on from the \u2018Summer of Love\u2019, it remains exceedingly difficult to look back on this often oversimplified cultural touchstone without picking a side, so to speak.\u00a0<\/p>\n

For several decades, once the Baby Boomers became the primary curators of American history, the summer of 1967 was routinely romanticised as a fleeting moment of almost unprecedented hope, optimism, and idealism, a genuine movement for worldwide change based around the idea of listening to our better angels. <\/p>\n

Sex would be destigmatised,<\/a> equality would be celebrated, nature would be respected, and food and housing would be human rights. To showcase that cause, thousands of young people gathered in a major American city in the same numbers as a large army or a riot mob, but with no grand plan beyond peaceful, communal solidarity. And also, yeah, to do copious amounts of drugs.<\/p>\n

Suffice it to say, from the very beginning, there was also a rather vocal counter perspective on all this. Conservative America looked at the scene around San Francisco\u2019s Haight-Ashbury district<\/a> as a human blight; the \u201cdirty hippies\u201d who would further corrupt the country\u2019s already wayward children. Many people saw the \u2018dropout\u2019 population as godless and shameless heathens, and thus presumably in league with witches or devils. <\/p>\n

\"Why<\/a>Credit: Far Out \/ Public Domain<\/p>\n

But it wasn\u2019t just older, close-minded Bible Belt folks who felt threatened and anxious; the country\u2019s business and political leaders and defenders of the established capitalist norms were plenty aggravated, as well. Their response was often to key in on the hypocrisy of the hippies\u2019 mostly white, middle-class demographic, privileged youth who\u2019d selfishly turned against a system that had given them the \u2018American Dream\u2019.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe deepest truth about the hippie style of life,\u201d claimed a 1967 issue of the conservative magazine The National Review<\/a>, \u201cSeems to be that the hippies are compulsive \u2018enjoyers\u2019. They totally reject, in word and in fact, the idea of work, production, achievement; for them, the right kind of life is the life of enjoyment, bliss, even ecstasy. They wallow in life, so to speak: wallow in nature, wallow in \u2018love\u2019, wallow in wallowing. Their ideal, quite literally, is a pure and unadulterated self-indulgence, a self-indulgence on a strange primitivistic level.\u201d<\/p>\n

It\u2019s amusing that a socialism-hating scribe at The National Review would be essentially arguing that the hippies were abandoning their posts as contributors to Lyndon Johnson\u2019s \u2018Great Society\u2019, but a lot of things looked upside down at this turbulent point in American history. <\/p>\n

The children of the WWII generation had indeed grown up in the most fruitful economic period the country had ever known, but they\u2019d also lived their whole lives in fear of nuclear annihilation from Russia. In the \u201860s, they\u2019d seen a popular president assassinated, riots in the streets over racial injustices, and the deaths of thousands of their friends and family members serving in a confusing, ongoing war in Vietnam. Rock and roll had lit a rebellious fuse, drugs had changed perceptions, and the opportunity to legitimately grab the reins and rewrite the rules now seemed to be right there in front of them.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat we\u2019re thinking about is a peaceful planet,\u201d Grateful Dead frontman Jerry Garcia<\/a> explained at the time, \u201cWe\u2019re not thinking about power. We\u2019re not thinking about revolution or war or any of that. We would all like to live an uncluttered life; a simple life, a good life. And to think about moving the whole human race ahead a step.\u201d<\/p>\n

For the hippies, many of whom preferred to be called \u2018freebees\u2019, the supposed self-indulgence of their movement was actually a rejection of the self-focused capitalist structure. As one Haight-Ashbury visitor put it, \u201cThe freebies are just people trying to groove to their humanness instead of identifying their humanness with things that they have\u201d.<\/p>\n

Because its central ideas spread to many of the major cities of the world and became culturally connected to the psychedelic pop music of 1967, including The Beatles\u2019 Sgt Pepper\u2019s Lonely Hearts Club Band and the debut albums from The Doors, Jimi Hendrix, and Pink Floyd, many people think the term \u201cSummer of Love\u201d organically developed or was retro-actively tacked on to explain an on-going phenomenon. In reality, though, the name was absolutely conceived and promoted well before the summer months of \u201867, right there in San Francisco\u2019s Haight-Ashbury neighbourhood. <\/p>\n

\"The<\/a>Credit: Far Out \/ Oregon History Project<\/p>\n

In January of that year, in fact, a proof of concept had already been carried out with the \u2018Human Be-In\u2019,<\/a> a mass gathering of more than 20,000 people in the city\u2019s Golden Gate Park. While the rally was unusual for not including any of the usual enticements of a big festival or protest march, it was nonetheless motivated in part by the decision of new California governor Ronald Reagan to make LSD illegal in the state. At the event, famed LSD proponent Dr Timothy Leary spoke to the crowd, delivering one of the most famous, or infamous, pieces of advice of the era: \u201cTurn on, tune in, drop out\u201d.<\/p>\n

Turning on meant expanding one\u2019s mind, with drugs being one terrific method of doing so. Tuning in meant connecting with the world around you, and dropping out, quite literally, meant walking away from the commitments pushed upon you by society. \u201cDrop out of college, drop out of high school,\u201d Leary told thousands of people in Golden Gate Park, most of whom were in their teens or 20s.<\/p>\n

The Human Be-In took place a year before The Beatles went to India<\/a>, but was already heavily tied in with the hippies\u2019 budding embrace of Eastern philosophy, as new counterculture gurus such as Ram Dass and Alan Watts rubbed shoulders with Beat poets like Ginsberg and Ferlinghetti and various local rock bands, including the Grateful Dead, Jefferson Airplane, and Blue Cheer.<\/p>\n

Carrying on the momentum of the Human Be-In, some of the same organisers announced the formation of the \u2018Council for a Summer of Love\u2019 in April of 1967. Led by Stan McDaniel and Tsvi Strauch, the Council was basically a coming together of some of the like-minded groups that had already formed in San Francisco, including a hippie commune and concert promoter called the Family Dog, a venue known as the Straight Theatre, The Oracle newspaper, and the Diggers, who focused on providing free food and lodging for members of the community. An official poster was even commissioned for the Summer of Love happening, designed by psychedelic poster artist Bob Schnepf.<\/p>\n

Well aware that a massive pilgrimage to the Haight was already well underway before the summer months, the Council tried its best to create a framework to ease tensions they knew were likely to build as the crowds grew and resources diminished. In many ways, their preparation was immaculate. The only thing they\u2019d failed to calculate was the changing motivations of the Haight-Ashbury pilgrims. <\/p>\n

\"Why<\/a>Credit: OpenSFHistory<\/p>\n

While plenty of the young people arriving in town during the Summer of Love were certainly seeking a spiritual awakening and the promise of a new kind of lifestyle, the media frenzy over the scene had also enticed plenty of bad actors; those who were there for the dope, or the sex, or just to cynically take it all in or take up space. In an unfortunate twist, not unlike what had already happened a few years earlier to the folk music scene in New York<\/a>, an anti-materialist movement had stumbled into becoming a hot commodity, and the resulting rot began to show pretty quickly, as George Harrison witnessed during his aforementioned visit to the Haight.<\/p>\n

One teenage girl who travelled to San Francisco during the Summer of Love, identifying herself only as M, returned to her home in Connecticut later that year and described the experience to her local newspaper, the Connecticut Post. While M still believed that the \u201cAquarian Age has started\u201d and that \u201cevery person, by the mere fact of being alive, is part of the Love Flow of the Universe\u201d, she acknowledged that her fellow Aquarians in San Francisco were a bit of a mixed bag, with a few too many stereotypical \u201cdirty hippies: mostly 16 year-olds who have run away from home and who live by panhandling and who are generally sent to Huckleberry [a homeless youth shelter] and reunited with their families.\u201d<\/p>\n

William Schnabel, who was 17 and living near the Haight in the summer of 1967, later became a historian and wrote a book about the scene. Speaking to the LA Times in 2017, the SoL\u2019s 50th anniversary, Schnabel theorised that the media had ultimately killed the Haight-Ashbury by turning it into a clich\u00e9. <\/p>\n

\u201cIf you repeat something often enough,\u201d he said, \u201cIt tends to become automatic and people tend to forget what the meaning is. After the Be-In, there tended to be kind of a decline. People started getting more selfish. There were people who were drawn to the Haight-Ashbury because of all the publicity, and because they wanted to take something out rather than give something.\u201d<\/p>\n

In the end, that overcrowding and dilution of the ideals of the hippie movement created a much uglier scene than anyone had envisioned<\/a>, and it also gave conservative critics all the ammo they needed to deride the whole concept of trying to manifest a better world into existence. The hippie movement, by the dawn of the \u201970s, would be reduced to a laughing stock by the same media that had sensationalised it, presented as a silly novelty that could never threaten the status quo again.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is not innocent to pretend to an innocence impossible for man,\u201d The National Review coldly assessed, \u201cUnacknowledged sinfulness is a deadly poison, ruinous to the individual and to society both\u201d.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

ADD AS A PREFERRED SOURCE ON GOOGLE \"\"\/ <\/a> <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Credit: Far Out \/ Public Domain Mon 8 June 2026 22:00, UK \u201cI went to Haight-Ashbury, expecting it…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1014598,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[3936],"tags":[40416,257752,34220,77,26608,280891,1039,133179,269,6737,280892,16,15],"class_list":["post-1014597","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-music","tag-1960s","tag-257752","tag-counterculture","tag-entertainment","tag-george-harrison","tag-hippie","tag-homepage","tag-jerry-garcia","tag-music","tag-san-francisco","tag-summer-of-love","tag-uk","tag-united-kingdom"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/116718311195968177","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1014597","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1014597"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1014597\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1014598"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1014597"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1014597"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1014597"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}