{"id":1022240,"date":"2026-06-12T16:21:14","date_gmt":"2026-06-12T16:21:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/1022240\/"},"modified":"2026-06-12T16:21:14","modified_gmt":"2026-06-12T16:21:14","slug":"physicists-just-built-the-first-ever-nuclear-clock","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/1022240\/","title":{"rendered":"Physicists Just Built the First-Ever Nuclear Clock"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The best timekeepers today\u2014<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nist.gov\/atomic-clocks\/how-do-atomic-clocks-work\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">atomic clocks<\/a>\u2014work off the quantum vibrations of an atom, specifically its electrons. But physicists have long dreamt of even better clocks that run on atomic nuclei, which are less sensitive to environmental disturbances. According to new research, that dream might soon become reality.<\/p>\n<p>Last week, two independent teams based in Europe and China reported the first set of results from experiments using an atomic nuclei clock based on crystals of calcium fluoride containing thorium-229. Both papers, which have yet to be peer reviewed, are available as a preprint on arXiv. In the European experiment, researchers <a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2606.04997v2\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">compared<\/a> how well the clock fared against leading atomic clocks involved in the search for dark matter. The Chinese team, on the other hand, <a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2606.08870\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">demonstrated<\/a> the clock\u2019s operation to compare its performance with atomic clocks.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThese results establish a solid-state platform for compact nuclear clocks, nuclear quantum sensing, and precision tests of fundamental physics,\u201d the European team wrote in its paper.<\/p>\n<p> Advanced timekeeping <\/p>\n<p>According to a <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/using-atomic-nuclei-could-allow-scientists-to-read-time-more-precisely-than-ever-what-this-research-could-mean-for-future-clocks-272017\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">column<\/a> by physicists Eric Hudson and Andrei Derevianko, ultraprecise clocks are \u201cmore than scientific curiosities,\u201d as they are vital for smooth navigation, communications, and international timekeeping. Hudson and Derevianko, from the University of California, Los Angeles, and the University of Nevada, Reno, respectively, contributed to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09776-4\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">research<\/a> from last December that demonstrated the potential of thorium-229 in atomic nucleus clocks.<\/p>\n<p>In atomic clocks, scientists zap and excite the electrons in an atom to push the electrons from one energy level to another. That absorption \u201chappens at an exquisitely precise frequency,\u201d they explained, adding that these patterns are \u201cset by the laws of physics\u201d and give the world a fairly consistent standard for keeping time.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, a nucleus is 10,000 times smaller than an atom and less prone to disturbances from temperature, electric fields, and other environmental disturbances, the pair wrote\u2014hence, physicists\u2019 long-time interest in atomic nucleus clocks.<\/p>\n<p> A concept comes to life <\/p>\n<p>The challenge, then, was to find an atom that scientists could most effectively manipulate. For instance, it should be responsive to the laser that scientists use to trigger the \u201cticks,\u201d so to speak, to tell time. In that sense, thorium-229 was an \u201cexceptionally rare case\u201d in which it has two different states, which scientists can induce using lasers to excite the nucleus from one state to another, explained Hudson and Derevianko.<\/p>\n<p>The latest pair of papers build upon their work, among many others from the past couple decades. Importantly, the recent demonstrations implement a feedback loop that stabilizes the clock\u2019s operations. This represents an improvement from the European team\u2019s own work from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-024-07839-6\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">2024<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tuwien.at\/en\/tu-wien\/news\/press-releases\/news\/wie-konstant-ist-die-feinstrukturkonstante\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">2025<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis was the final missing step before calling it an actual clock,\u201d Lars von der Wense, a physicist at Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz in Germany, told <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencenews.org\/article\/nuclear-clock-atomic-nucleus-first\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Science News<\/a>. With forthcoming improvements to laser and crystal technology, nuclear clocks should advance rapidly, added von der Wense, who wasn\u2019t involved in either work.<\/p>\n<p> At the frontier of physics <\/p>\n<p>Setting aside nuclear clocks\u2019 practical benefits, researchers believe they could test the fundamental constraints of nature and new physics, according to Hudson and Derevianko. And indeed, that\u2019s what the European team immediately set out to do with its latest iteration of a nuclear clock. The latter half of its paper describes how well the clock fared in evaluating constraints for ultralight dark matter\u2014a hypothetical form of matter that <a href=\"https:\/\/gizmodo.com\/7-weird-space-phenomena-that-only-make-sense-if-dark-matter-exists-2000720204\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">could explain a whole bunch of cosmic mysteries<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>To Science News, Thorsten Schumm, a physicist at TU Wien in Austria from the European team, reported that the nuclear clock already outperformed all atomic clocks in certain types of measurements. All that said, the technology is still at its first stages, he added. But it looks like nuclear clocks are off to a good start.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The best timekeepers today\u2014atomic clocks\u2014work off the quantum vibrations of an atom, specifically its electrons. But physicists have&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1022241,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[3845],"tags":[23390,236371,74,70,16,15],"class_list":["post-1022240","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-physics","tag-atomic-clocks","tag-nuclear-clocks","tag-physics","tag-science","tag-uk","tag-united-kingdom"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/116738057279814680","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1022240","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1022240"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1022240\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1022241"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1022240"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1022240"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1022240"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}